Consistency between two subjective assessments of activities of daily living: Patient- and occupational therapist-reported judgments.

Purpose: To examine the consistency between patient- and occupational therapist-reported judgments of patients' ability and change in ADL abilities. Materials: Patient- and therapist-reported ADL abilities were assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale, whilst the changes in patients' ADL abilities were reported by patients and therapists using a 15-point Likert-type scale. Methods: Repeated assessments at a 3-week interval were used. 88 inpatients with stroke and 16 occupational therapists were recruited from rehabilitation wards in a medical center. Results: Moderate correlations (rs = .53-.56) were found between the patient- and therapist-reported ADL abilities. The patient-reported scores were significantly lower (ds = .45; ps < .001 at follow-up) than the therapist-reported scores. Only low correlation (r = .33) was found for the change scores. Conclusions: Our findings indicated that there was only a moderate to low correlation between the patients' reports and the therapists' judgments regarding the patients' ADL ability and its change. Because both patients' reports and therapists' judgments affect decisions on rehabilitation, frequent communication may be beneficial for reaching consensus and helpful in managing the interventions.

Test-Retest Reliability and Random Measurement Error of the Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire in Older Adults With Subjective Memory Complaints.

To examine the psychometric properties of the Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire (MMQ) in older adults with subjective memory complaints. The three MMQ subscale (Satisfaction, Ability, and Strategy) was administered twice, with a 3-month interval. The test-retest reliability was examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The random measurement error was examined by calculating the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC95). The test-retest reliabilities of the three MMQ subscales were generally acceptable. The SEM of the three MMQ subscales was higher than the acceptable criterion of 10%. Despite the influence of random measurement error, the change scores of the three MMQ subscales may represent true changes if they are larger than the MDC95 of 13.2 (Satisfaction), 18.4 (Ability), and 16.9 (Strategy). The MMQ appears to be a reliable measure for use in research settings, but may not yet be suitable for clinical use.

Test-Retest Reliability and Responsiveness of the Computerized Adaptive Test of Social Functioning in Persons With Stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the test-retest reliability, minimal detectable change (MDC), responsiveness, and efficiency of the Computerized Adaptive Test of Social Functioning (Social-CAT) in patients with stroke. DESIGN: Repeated-assessments design. SETTING: A department of rehabilitation of a medical center. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 31 patients with chronic stroke and 65 patients with subacute stroke were recruited. INTERVENTION: Not available. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Social-CAT. RESULTS: The Social-CAT showed acceptable test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.80) and small random measurement error (MDC%: 18.0%). However, heteroscedasticity was found (r between the means and the absolute change scores: 0.32), so the MDC% adjusted cut-off score is recommended for determining real improvement. Regarding responsiveness, the Social-CAT showed large differences (Kazis' effect size and standardized mean response: 1.15 and 1.09, respectively) in subacute patients. Regarding efficiency, the Social-CAT required an average of 5 items and less than 2 minutes for completion. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the Social-CAT is a reliable and efficient measure with good test-retest reliability, small random measurement error, and good responsiveness. Thus, the Social-CAT is a useful outcome measure for routine monitoring of the changes in social function of patients with stroke.

Test-retest reliabilities and minimal detectable changes of 5 versions of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale in people with dementia.

PURPOSE: To compare the test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) of the commonly used versions of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) (the ADAS-Cog-11 (11 items), ADAS-Cog-3 (three items), ADAS-Cog-5-Subset (five items), ADAS-Cog-6-Subset (six items), and ADAS-Rasch (11 items)) in people with dementia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A repeated-assessments design (2 weeks apart) was used to examine the ADAS-Cog-11, ADAS-Cog-3, ADAS-Cog-5-Subset, ADAS-Cog-6-Subset, and ADAS-Rasch. Participants with dementia were recruited from one hospital, one elder care center, and two day-care centers using convenience sampling. RESULTS: Fifty-two participants finished the assessments twice in two weeks. All versions showed high intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) (0.82-0.96), minimal standardized response means (-0.07 to 0.08) and low to acceptable MDC% (9.2-28.6%). The ADAS-Rasch had the highest ICC (0.96) and the lowest MDC%. The ADAS-Cog-3 had an ICC lower than 0.90 (0.82) and the highest MDC% (28.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The ADAS-Rasch seems to be the most reliable version of the ADAS-Cog for group- and individual-level comparisons. The ADAS-Cog-3 may be a better choice for researchers for group-level comparisons because it requires fewer items to achieve acceptable reliability. The ADAS-Cog-11, ADAS-Cog-5-Subset, ADAS-Cog-6-Subset, and ADAS-Rasch could be considered for clinical usage for individual-level comparisons.Implications for rehabilitationThe ADAS-Rasch is the most reliable version of the ADAS-Cog for group- and individual-level comparisons due to its excellent test-retest reliability, lowest random measurement error and absence of a practice effect.The ADAS-Cog-5-Subset and ADAS-Cog-6-Subset might be good substitutes for the ADAS-Rasch in clinical settings because of their comparable reliability features and superior administration efficiency.

Development of a Rasch-calibrated emotion recognition video test for patients with schizophrenia.

Patients with schizophrenia tend to have deficits in emotion recognition (ER) that affect their social function. However, the commonly-used ER measures appear incomprehensive, unreliable and invalid, making it difficult to comprehensively evaluate ER. The purposes of this study were to develop the Computerized Emotion Recognition Video Test (CERVT) evaluating ER ability in patients with schizophrenia. This study was divided into two phases. First, we selected candidate CERVT items/videos of 8 basic emotion domains from a published database. Second, we validated the selected CERVT items using Rasch analysis. Finally, the 269 patients and 177 healthy adults were recruited to ensure the participants had diverse abilities. After the removal of 21 misfit (infit or outfit mean square > 1.4) items and adjustment of the item difficulties of the 26 items with severe differential item functioning, the remaining 217 items were finalized as the CERVT items. All the CERVT items showed good model fits with small eigenvalues (≤ 2) based on the residual-based principal components analysis for each domain, supporting the unidimensionality of these items. The 8 domains of the CERVT had good to excellent reliabilities (average Rasch reliabilities = 0.84-0.93). The CERVT contains items of the 8 basic emotions with individualized scores. Moreover, the CERVT showed acceptable reliability and validity, and the scores were not affected by examinees' gender. Thus, the CERVT has the potential to provide a comprehensive, reliable, valid, and gender-unbiased assessment of ER for patients with schizophrenia.

A Label-Free Electrochemical Impedimetric Immunosensor with Biotinylated-Antibody for SARS-CoV-2 Nucleoprotein Detection in Saliva.

The timely detecting of SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus antigens for infection validation is an urgent request for COVID-19 pandemic control. This study constructed label-free electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)-based immunosensors based on gold nanostructured screen-printed carbon electrodes (AuNS/SPCEs) to detect the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (N-protein) in saliva. Using short-chain 3-mercaptopropionic acid (MPA) as a linker to covalently bond streptavidin (SA) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) for controlling the oriented immobilization of the biotinylated anti-N-protein antibody (BioAb) can offer a greater sensitivity, a lower limit of detection (LOD), and better reproducibility of immunosensors (defined as BioAb/SA-BSA/MPA/AuNS/SPCEs) than the antibody randomly immobilized immunosensors and the long-chain 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid (MUA)-modified immunosensors (BioAb/SA-BSA/MUA/AuNS/SPCEs). The BioAb/SA-BSA/MPA/AuNS/SPCE-based immunosensors presented good linearity from 0.01 ng/mL to 100 ng/mL and a low LOD of 6 pg/mL in a phosphate buffer solution (PBS) and PBS-diluted saliva. Moreover, the immunosensor exhibited little cross-activity with other viral antigens such as MERS-CoV N-protein, influenza A N-protein, influenza B N-protein, and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, indicating the high specificity of the immunosensors. The disposable label-free EIS-based immunosensors have promising potential in facilitating the rapid and sensitive tests of saliva-based COVID-19 diagnostics.

Efficacy and safety of belimumab therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Belimumab is the first biological agent approved for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The efficacy and safety of belimumab for SLE patients are not clear. Therefore, this meta-analysis is integrating the efficacy and safety of belimumab for patients with SLE. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that studied the efficacy and safety of belimumab plus standard therapy before November 1, 2021. Data were pooled using the random-effects model and are expressed as risk ratios (RRs) or mean difference (MD) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed and quantified using I2. RESULTS: Seven RCTs with 3,009 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Belimumab showed significantly decreased at least a 4-point improvement in Safety of Estrogen in Lupus National Assessment (SELENA)-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score than placebo (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.21-1.44; p < 0.001). However, belimumab significantly reduced the prednisone dose by 50% or more than placebo (RR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.17-2.15; p = 0.003) and belimumab significantly increased the 36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) score (MD, 1.60; 95% CI, 0.30-2.90; p = 0.02). Regarding adverse events, there was no significant difference between the belimumab group and the control group. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that belimumab plus standard therapy is more effective than placebo plus standard therapy in SLE patients.

Assessment of Low Back Pain: Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change of the Brief Pain Inventory.

IMPORTANCE: The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) is one of the most widely used measures to assess pain and related impacts among patients with low back pain (LBP). However, its test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) have rarely been examined in patients with LBP, interfering with its utility. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the test-retest reliability and MDC of the BPI among patients with LBP. DESIGN: Repeated assessments design with a 1-wk interval. SETTING: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation in a hospital in Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-four patients with stable LBP conditions. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The BPI has two subscales-Intensity and Interference-that assess pain intensity and pain interference, respectively. Their test-retest reliability was examined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and MDCs were calculated. RESULTS: The ICCs of the Intensity and Interference subscales were .62 and .76, respectively. The MDC values for the two subscales were 2.57 and 2.34, respectively. For the four Intensity items, the average-pain score had a higher ICC (.60) than scores on the other items (worst, least, and current pain, which had ICCs of about .40). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results suggest that although the BPI is a commonly used measure of pain intensity and pain interference among patients with LBP, caution should be exercised in interpreting the Intensity subscale score and its item scores. What This Article Adds: The BPI is widely used to assess pain and related impacts on daily occupation and functioning among patients with LBP. This study provides information regarding its test-retest reliability. Moreover, the MDC values provide clinicians and researchers with the thresholds for determining real improvement (beyond random measurement error).

Cross-Validation of the Factorial Validity of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 in Patients With Stroke.

IMPORTANCE: The Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 appears to be a promising outcome measure of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for clients with stroke. However, because the factorial validity of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 remains unclear, its validity is limited. OBJECTIVE: To examine the underlying structure of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 by comparing the currently available eight- and four-domain structures simultaneously. DESIGN: Secondary data analysis of responses to the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 from a previous psychometric validation study. SETTING: Five general hospitals in northern and southern Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred sixty-three patients with stroke from rehabilitation wards (inpatients) and neurology and rehabilitation clinics (outpatients). OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the eight- and four-domain structures of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0. Four fit indices were considered simultaneously to examine the model fits of both structures. RESULTS: The eight- and four-domain structures of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 were not supported by all four indices (χ²/df = 2.7 and 5.0, comparative fit index = .79 and .86, root mean square error of approximation = .08 and .12, standardized root mean square residual = .08 and .08, respectively). The unidimensionality of each domain in the two structures was not supported. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Neither the eight- nor the four-domain structure of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 was supported, suggesting that scores may not provide valid assessments of HRQOL in clients with stroke. Further modification and validation of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 are warranted. WHAT THIS ARTICLE ADDS: Our findings suggest that the eight- and four-domain scores of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 may not be valid. Therefore, until more supporting evidence is developed, these scores should be interpreted cautiously in regard to clients' HRQOL; alternatively, other measures could be used.

Development of a Computerized Adaptive Testing System for Assessing Social Knowledge in People With Schizophrenia.

IMPORTANCE: A psychometrically sound measure of social knowledge (SK) is necessary to assess people with schizophrenia because they tend to have moderate to severe deficits in SK. OBJECTIVE: To develop a computerized adaptive test (CAT) for assessing SK in people with schizophrenia. DESIGN: Two phases, consisting of (1) development and validation of an SK item bank and (2) determination of the best stopping rules for the CAT. SETTING: Two psychiatric hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred thirty-six people diagnosed with schizophrenia through convenience sampling. MEASURE: Computerized Adaptive Test-Social Knowledge (CAT-SK). RESULTS: The SK items were examined using Rasch analysis. A CAT simulation was performed to determine the best set of stopping rules for achieving high reliability and efficiency. After unsuitable items were removed, 71 items remained with acceptable model fit (infit and outfit mean square <1.4) and no gender bias. Two suboptimal alternative sets of rules were identified. The most efficient set used 21 items to achieve acceptable Rasch reliability (.81). The most reliable set used 40 items to achieve satisfactory Rasch reliability (.88). High correlations (r > .93) between CAT-SK scores and scores on the SK item bank support the concurrent validity of the CAT-SK. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The CAT-SK appears to be a valid assessment that can provide reliable or efficient measures of SK. If high reliability is needed, examiners can adopt the most reliable set of 40 items. If efficiency is the primary concern, they can adopt the most efficient set of 21 items. WHAT THIS ARTICLE ADDS: The CAT-SK is a valid measure of SK with flexibility to meet examiners' needs.

Investigating the optimal handle diameters and thumb orthoses for individuals with chronic de Quervain's tenosynovitis - a pilot study.

Aims: The aims of this study were to compare the differences in forearm muscle activities between two types of thumb orthoses and the optimal handle diameter when the orthosis is worn during a power grasp for individuals with chronic de Quervain's Tenosynovitis.Methods: A 2 × 3 (Group × orthosis) and a 2 × 2 × 3 (Group × orthosis × diameter) repeated factorial design were used. Grip strength and muscle load were measured. A 2 × 3 mixed repeated measures ANOVA was conducted, and the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test was used for post hoc analysis. Cohen's d was used to calculate the effect size between groups and handle diameters.Results: Grip strength was significantly lower (in long/short/no-orthosis conditions) and muscle load was higher in 12 participants with chronic de Quervain's Tenosynovitis than in 16 healthy participants (p < 0.001). No differences in muscle activities were found when the two different orthoses were worn. The muscle activities were higher during grasping of the 33 mm handle diameter.Conclusion: Individuals with chronic de Quervain's Tenosynovitis require greater muscle loads than healthy controls to produce the same power grasp, and when one of the two orthoses is worn, the optimal handle diameters for performing a power grasp are relatively larger (45 and 55 mm).Implications for RehabilitationBoth the long and short thumb orthoses can be worn by individuals with de Quervain's Tenosynovitis during daily activities because wearing both orthoses requires the same exertion of muscle load.When performing a power grasp, individuals with de Quervain's Tenosynovitis tend to exert greater muscle loads than healthy controls to produce the same power grasp.We suggest that patients with de Quervain's Tenosynovitis use utensils with larger handle diameters, such as 45 mm and 55 mm.

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke.

The computerized adaptive testing system of the functional assessment of stroke (CAT-FAS) can simultaneously assess four functions (motor functions of the upper and lower extremities, postural control, and basic activities of daily living) with sufficient reliability and administrative efficiency. CAT, a modern measurement method, aims to provide a reliable estimate of the examinee's level of function rapidly. CAT administers only a few items whose item difficulties match an examinee's level of function and, thus, the administered items of CAT can provide sufficient information to reliably estimate the examinee's level of function in a short time. The CAT-FAS was developed through four steps: (1) determining the item bank, (2) determining the stopping rules, (3) validating the CAT-FAS, and (4) establishing a platform of online administration. The results of this study indicate that the CAT-FAS has sufficient administrative efficiency (average number of items = 8.5) and reliability (group-level Rasch reliability: 0.88 - 0.93; individual-level Rasch reliability: ≥70% of patients had Rasch reliability score ≥0.90) to simultaneously assess four functions in patients with stroke. In addition, because the CAT-FAS is a computer-based test, the CAT-FAS has three additional advantages: the automatic calculation of scores, the immediate storage of data, and the easy exporting of data. These advantages of the CAT-FAS will be beneficial to data management for clinicians and researchers.

Self-assembly and ring-opening metathesis polymerization of cyclic conjugated molecules on highly ordered pyrolytic graphite.

Cyclic conjugated monomers comprising cyclopentadithiophene-vinylene trimers and their polymers on HOPG are observed using STM and AFM. ROMP of the monomers is performed using a Grubbs catalyst. Their STM images exhibit single chains of planar polymers, whereas their AFM images show elongation of the polymer chains on HOPG.

Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the Balance Computerized Adaptive Test in Patients With Stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the interrater and intrarater reliability of the Balance Computerized Adaptive Test (Balance CAT) in patients with chronic stroke having a wide range of balance functions. DESIGN: Repeated assessments design (1wk apart). SETTING: Seven teaching hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: A pooled sample (N=102) including 2 independent groups of outpatients (n=50 for the interrater reliability study; n=52 for the intrarater reliability study) with chronic stroke. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Balance CAT. RESULTS: For the interrater reliability study, the values of intraclass correlation coefficient, minimal detectable change (MDC), and percentage of MDC (MDC%) for the Balance CAT were .84, 1.90, and 31.0%, respectively. For the intrarater reliability study, the values of intraclass correlation coefficient, MDC, and MDC% ranged from .89 to .91, from 1.14 to 1.26, and from 17.1% to 18.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Balance CAT showed sufficient intrarater reliability in patients with chronic stroke having balance functions ranging from sitting with support to independent walking. Although the Balance CAT may have good interrater reliability, we found substantial random measurement error between different raters. Accordingly, if the Balance CAT is used as an outcome measure in clinical or research settings, same raters are suggested over different time points to ensure reliable assessments.

A comparison between the original and Tablet-based Symbol Digit Modalities Test in patients with schizophrenia: Test-retest agreement, random measurement error, practice effect, and ecological validity.

We aimed to compare the test-retest agreement, random measurement error, practice effect, and ecological validity of the original and Tablet-based Symbol Digit Modalities Test (T-SDMT) over five serial assessments, and to examine the concurrent validity of the T-SDMT in patients with schizophrenia. Sixty patients with chronic schizophrenia completed five serial assessments (one week apart) of the SDMT and T-SDMT and one assessment of the Activities of Daily Living Rating Scale III at the first time point. Both measures showed high test-retest agreement, similar levels of random measurement error over five serial assessments. Moreover, the practice effects of the two measures did not reach a plateau phase after five serial assessments in young and middle-aged participants. Nevertheless, only the practice effect of the T-SDMT became trivial after the first assessment. Like the SDMT, the T-SDMT had good ecological validity. The T-SDMT also had good concurrent validity with the SDMT. In addition, only the T-SDMT had discriminative validity to discriminate processing speed in young and middle-aged participants. Compared to the SDMT, the T-SDMT had overall slightly better psychometric properties, so it can be an alternative measure to the SDMT for assessing processing speed in patients with schizophrenia.

Psychometric properties of three measures assessing advanced theory of mind: Evidence from people with schizophrenia.

Patients with schizophrenia tend to have deficits in advanced Theory of Mind (ToM). The "Reading the mind in the eyes" test (RMET), the Faux Pas Task, and the Strange Stories are commonly used for assessing advanced ToM. However, most of the psychometric properties of these 3 measures in patients with schizophrenia are unknown. The aims of this study were to validate the psychometric properties of the 3 advanced ToM measures in patients with schizophrenia, including: (1) test-retest reliability; (2) random measurement error; (3) practice effect; (4) concurrent validity; and (5) ecological validity. We recruited 53 patients with schizophrenia, who completed the 3 measures twice, 4 weeks apart. The Revised Social Functioning Scale-Taiwan short version (R-SFST) was completed within 3 days of first session of assessments. We found that the intraclass correlation coefficients of the RMET, Strange Stories, and Faux Pas Task were 0.24, 0.5, and 0.76. All 3 advanced ToM measures had large random measurement error, trivial to small practice effects, poor concurrent validity, and low ecological validity. We recommend that the scores of the 3 advanced ToM measures be interpreted with caution because these measures may not provide reliable and valid results on patients' advanced ToM abilities.

Exploration of the associations of touch-screen tablet computer usage and musculoskeletal discomfort.

BACKGROUND: Tablet users may be at high risk of developing physical discomfort because of their usage behaviors and tablet design. OBJECTIVE: Investigate the usage of tablets, variations in head and neck posture associated with different tablet tilt angles, and the association of tablet use with users' musculoskeletal discomfort. METHODS: A survey of users' subjective perceptions conducted by questionnaire and measurements of users' postures by a 3D Motion analysis system was used to explore the effects of tablet use. RESULTS: The questionnaire results indicated that over half of the participants reported physical discomfort after using tablets, with the most prevalent discomfort in the neck and shoulders, and more intensity of discomfort for the back although only few participants experienced it. Chi-squared tests indicated that significantly more participants who tended to use tablet computers to play games reported having musculoskeletal discomfort after using a tablet. In addition, preferences for tablet tilt angles varied across tasks (reading and game playing). The results from the 3D motion analysis revealed that head and neck flexion angles were significantly reduced when the tablets were positioned at relatively steep tilt angles. Neck flexion angle was significantly higher in game playing. CONCLUSIONS: These data add information regarding to the usage of tablet and its associations with physical discomfort (significantly more participants who tended to use tablet computers to play games reported having musculoskeletal discomfort after using a tablet). Steep tilt angles (such as 60°) may cause tablet users to decrease their head and neck flexion angles, which could lead to a more neutral, effortless, and ergonomically correct posture. Maintaining proper neck posture during active activities such as game playing is recommended to avoid neck discomfort.

Body mass index and cholesterol level predict surgical outcome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in Taiwan - a cohort study.

Curative surgical resection (CSR) remains the most effective therapeutic intervention for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, frequent post-surgical recurrence leads to high cancer related mortality. This study aimed to clarify the role of body mass index (BMI) and serum cholesterol level in predicting post-surgical outcomes in HCC patients after CSR. A total of 484 HCC patients including 213 BMIhigh and 271 BMIlow patients were included. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were examined in patients with differential BMI and serum cholesterol level. The analysis showed that significant different 1-, 3- and 5-year cumulative OS rates (P-value=0.015) and RFS rate (P-value=0.010) between BMIlow and BMIhigh patients. Further analysis in groups with differential serum cholesterol levels among BMIlow and BMIhigh patients indicated that the BMIlow/Chollow patients exhibited the significant lower cumulative OS and RFS rates in comparison with the remaining subjects (P-value=0.007 and 0.039 for OS and RFS rates, respectively). In conclusion, the coexistence of low BMI and low serum cholesterol level could serve as prognostic factors to predict post-operative outcomes in HCC patients undergoing surgical hepatectomy.

Influence of background music on work attention in clients with chronic schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Work attention in persons with chronic schizophrenia is an important issue in vocational rehabilitation. Some of the research literature indicates that background music may influence visual attention performance. OBJECTIVES: Based on the theory of occupational therapy, environmental sounds, colors and decorations may affect individual performance, this study thus examined the influence of music on work attention in persons with schizophrenia. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were recruited from a halfway house in Taipei. Forty-nine (49) patients with chronic schizophrenia volunteered. They had been accepted into vocational rehabilitation and a work-seeking program. The sample included 20 females and 29 males. The participant ages ranged between 29 and 63 years old, and their average age was 47 years old. METHODS: Using a randomized controlled trial (RCT) study, the participants were assigned to one of three conditions: quiet environment as the control group (n= 16), classical light music as background music (n= 16), and popular music as background music (n= 17). RESULTS: For Group 1 (control group/quiet environment), there was no significant variance (sig = 0.172). For Group 2 (Classical light music), the intervention revealed significant variance (sig = 0.071*). For Group 3 (popular music), the intervention had significant variance (sig = 0.048**). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of background music tended to increase attention test scores of persons with schizophrenia. Moreover, the increase in test attention scores was statistically significant when popular music was played in the background. This result suggested that background music may improve attention performance of persons with chronic schizophrenia. Future research is required with a larger sample size to support the study results.

The compensatory motion of wrist immobilization on thumb and index finger performance--kinematic analysis and clinical implications.

BACKGROUND: Based on the high prevalence of people with problems in the wrist and hand simultaneously, it is of its importance to clarify whether hand joints exert extra motion to compensate for wrist motion while immobilized. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to measure the compensatory movement of the thumb and index finger when people perform daily activities with an immobilized wrist. METHODS: Thirty healthy volunteers were recruited in this study. A wrist splint, the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test, and the OptoTrak Certus motion tracking system were used. Seven inter-digit mean joint angles of the index finger and thumb were calculated. Paired sample t-test was used. RESULTS: (1) The compensatory motions were noted in the Metacarpophalangeal and Carpometacarpal joints of the thumb, and the proximal interphalangeal joints of the index finger; (2) The manifestation of compensatory motion was related to type of activity performed except when picking up light and heavy cans. CONCLUSIONS: The compensatory motions appeared while the wrist was immobilized and were found to be disadvantageous to the progression of disease. In the future, studies need to be done to understand how to select products with correct ergonomic design to enable people to reap greater benefits from wearing wrist splints.