The 'brick diet' and postprandial insulin: a practical method to balance carbohydrates ingested and prandial insulin to prevent hypoglycaemia in hospitalized persons with diabetes.

AIM: Insulin is the preferred treatment for the control of diabetes in hospital, but it raises the risk of hypoglycaemia, often because oral intake of carbohydrates in hospitalized persons is lower than planned. Our aim was to assess the effect on the incidence of hypoglycaemia of giving prandial insulin immediately after a meal depending on the amount of carbohydrate ingested. METHODS: A prospective pre-post intervention study in hospitalized persons with diabetes eating meals with stable doses of carbohydrates present in a few fixed foods. Foods were easily identifiable on the tray and contained fixed doses of carbohydrates that were easily quantifiable by nurses as multiples of 10 g (a 'brick'). Prandial insulin was given immediately after meals in proportion to the amount of carbohydrates eaten. RESULTS: In 83 of the first 100 people treated with the 'brick diet', the oral carbohydrate intake was lower than planned on at least one occasion (median: 3 times; Q1-Q3: 2-6 times) over a median of 5 days. Compared with the last 100 people treated with standard procedures, postprandial insulin given on the basis of ingested carbohydrate significantly reduced the incidence of hypoglycaemic events per day, from 0.11 ± 0.03 to 0.04 ± 0.02 (P < 0.001) with an adjusted incidence rate ratio of 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.54-0.92; P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: In hospitalized persons with diabetes treated with subcutaneous insulin, the 'brick diet' offers a practical method to count the amount of carbohydrates ingested, which is often less than planned. Prandial insulin given immediately after a meal, in doses balanced with actual carbohydrate intake reduces the risk of hypoglycaemia.

Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of a low radiation exposure protocol for prospective ECG-triggering coronary MDCT angiography.

AIM: To compare the feasibility, accuracy, and effective radiation dose (ED) of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in the detection of coronary artery disease using a combined ED-saving strategy including prospective electrocardiogram (ECG) triggering with a short x-ray window and a body mass index (BMI)-adapted imaging protocol using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR; group 1), in comparison with a prospective ECG triggering strategy alone (group 2). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and seventy patients scheduled for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) were evaluated. Fourteen patients were not eligible for MDCT. The remaining 156 patients were randomized to group 1 (78 patients) and group 2 (78 patients). Eight and 11 patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively, were excluded after randomization because the patients' heart rates were >65 beats/min. MDCT images were assessed for feasibility, signal-to-noise ration (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), accuracy in detection of coronary stenoses >50% versus ICA and for ED. RESULTS: The feasibility, SNR, CNR, accuracy in a segment-based and patient-based model were similar in both groups (97 versus 95%, 14.5 ± 3.9 versus 14.2 ± 4.1, 16 ± 4.6 versus 16.5 ± 4.4, 95 versus 94% and 97 versus 99%, respectively). The ED in group 1 was 72% lower than in group 2 (2.1 ± 1.2 versus 7.5 ± 1.8 mSv, respectively; p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a multi-parametric ED saving protocol results in a significant reduction in ED without a negative impact on accuracy.

Intralaboratory reproducibility of interpretation of Pap smears: results of an experiment.

One hundred and twenty Pap-smears were examined by 3 cytotechnologists on two occasions in the Legnano Hospital Cytologic Center. A 10-category classification system was used. Chance-adjusted overall and category-specific agreement was estimated (Cohen's unweighted kappa-statistics) within and between cytotechnologists. Mean K for the Center, weighted for precision, was 0.432, S.E. 0.029 (between cytotechnologists). The most reproducible categories (between cytotechnologists) were "9: malignant cells" (K = 0.683) and "1: normal" (K = 0.533); the least reproducible categories were "4: endocervical metaplastic cells" (K = 0.024) and "8: severe squamous dysplasia CIN III" (K = 0.227).

Discovering asymptomatic non-precancerous lesions with cervical cytologic mass-screening campaigns: is it a benefit or a cost?

A total of 3357 women (88.1% married, 82.0% parous) were examined at least once in the mass-screening program carried out by the Legnano Hospital Screening Center in Nerviano (a small town near Milan with 15,600 inhabitants) in 1974, 1977 and 1980. Married women with visible portio and adequate smear were 2758: a visibly healthy cervix was found only in 1143 subjects (41.4%). A total of 1516 married women were examined at least in 2 consecutive campaigns: 1279 (84.4%) reported "no gynecologic treatment in the previous 5 years" at the first campaign, and 899 (59.3%) reported "no gynecologic treatment in the previous 3 years" at their second one. Of 350 women with "medical lesions" and 525 with "surgical lesions" recorded at the first visit, 111 (31.7%) and 232 (44.2%) reported, respectively, a "medical treatment" or a "surgical treatment" at the second visit. In women with "medical lesions" at the first visit, at the second visit a healthy cervix was found in 66.2% of the treated women and in 72.6% of the untreated patients. In those with "surgical lesions" a healthy cervix was successively found in 91.6% of treated and in 40.7% of the untreated patients.

Study of women who did not respond to screening for cervical cancer.

Demographic and social factors influencing the population response to cervical screening programs have been studied. Age, marital status and, to a lesser extent, place of birth and socio-economic status were the most relevant factors. On the other hand, the reasons for nonparticipation were mainly the lack of information and motivation. Personal invitations, the recall of women who did not present on the first call, and the setting up of decentralized smear collection clinics proved to be useful tools to increase attendance.