Accuracy of Critical Care Pain Observation Tool and Behavioral Pain Scale to assess pain in critically ill conscious and unconscious patients: prospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) may suffer from different painful stimuli, but the assessment of pain is difficult because most of them are almost sedated and unable to self-report. Thus, it is important to optimize evaluation of pain in these patients. The main aim of this study was to compare two commonly used scales for pain evaluation: Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) and Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS), in both conscious and unconscious patients. Secondary aims were (1) to identifying the most relevant parameters to determine pain scales changes during nursing procedures, (2) to compare both pain scales with visual analog scale (VAS), and (3) to identify the best combination of scales for evaluation of pain in patients unable to communicate. METHODS: In this observational study, 101 patients were evaluated for a total of 303 consecutive observations during 3 days after ICU admission. Measurements with both scales were obtained 1 min before, during, and 20 min after nursing procedures in both conscious (n.41) and unconscious (n.60) patients; furthermore, VAS was recorded when possible in conscious patients only. We calculated criterion and discriminant validity to both scales (Wilcoxon, Spearman rank correlation coefficients). The accuracy of individual scales was evaluated. The sensitivity and the specificity of CPOT and BPS scores were assessed. Kappa coefficients with the quadratic weight were used to reflect agreement between the two scales, and we calculated the effect size to identify the strength of a phenomenon. RESULTS: CPOT and BPS showed a good criterion and discriminant validity (p < 0.0001). BPS was found to be more specific (91.7 %) than CPOT (70.8 %), but less sensitive (BPS 62.7 %, CPOT 76.5 %). COPT and BPS scores were significantly correlated with VAS (p < 0.0001). The combination of BPS and CPOT resulted in better sensitivity 80.4 %. Facial expression was the main parameter to determine pain scales changes effect size = 1.4. CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill mechanically ventilated patients, both CPOT and BPS can be used for assessment of pain intensity with different sensitivity and specificity. The combination of both BPS and CPOT might result in improved accuracy to detect pain compared to scales alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01669486.

Protective mechanical ventilation during general anesthesia for open abdominal surgery improves postoperative pulmonary function.

BACKGROUND: The impact of intraoperative ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications is not defined. The authors aimed at determining the effectiveness of protective mechanical ventilation during open abdominal surgery on a modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score as primary outcome and postoperative pulmonary function. METHODS: Prospective randomized, open-label, clinical trial performed in 56 patients scheduled to undergo elective open abdominal surgery lasting more than 2 h. Patients were assigned by envelopes to mechanical ventilation with tidal volume of 9 ml/kg ideal body weight and zero-positive end-expiratory pressure (standard ventilation strategy) or tidal volumes of 7 ml/kg ideal body weight, 10 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure, and recruitment maneuvers (protective ventilation strategy). Modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score, gas exchange, and pulmonary functional tests were measured preoperatively, as well as at days 1, 3, and 5 after surgery. RESULTS: Patients ventilated protectively showed better pulmonary functional tests up to day 5, fewer alterations on chest x-ray up to day 3 and higher arterial oxygenation in air at days 1, 3, and 5 (mmHg; mean ± SD): 77.1 ± 13.0 versus 64.9 ± 11.3 (P = 0.0006), 80.5 ± 10.1 versus 69.7 ± 9.3 (P = 0.0002), and 82.1 ± 10.7 versus 78.5 ± 21.7 (P = 0.44) respectively. The modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score was lower in the protective ventilation strategy at days 1 and 3. The percentage of patients in hospital at day 28 after surgery was not different between groups (7 vs. 15% respectively, P = 0.42). CONCLUSION: A protective ventilation strategy during abdominal surgery lasting more than 2 h improved respiratory function and reduced the modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score without affecting length of hospital stay.

In vitro evaluation of an active heat-and-moisture exchanger: the Hygrovent Gold.

BACKGROUND: To improve the heat and humidification that can be achieved with a heat-and-moisture exchanger (HME), a hybrid active (ie, adds heat and water) HME, the Hygrovent Gold, was developed. We evaluated in vitro the performance of the Hygrovent Gold. METHODS: We tested the Hygrovent Gold (with and without its supplemental heat and moisture options activated), the Hygrobac, and the Hygrovent S. We measured the absolute humidity, using a test lung ventilated at minute volumes of 5, 10, and 15 L/min, in normothermic (expired temperature 34 degrees C) and hypothermic (expired temperature 28 degrees C) conditions. We also measured the HMEs' flow resistance and weight after 24 h and 48 h. RESULTS: In its active mode the Hygrovent Gold provided the highest absolute humidity, independent of minute volume, in both normothermia and hypothermia. The respective normothermia and hypothermia absolute humidity values at 10 L/min were 36.3 + 1.3 mg/L and 27.1 + 1.0 mg/L with the active Hygrovent Gold, 33.9 + 0.5 mg/L and 24.2 + 0.8 mg/L with the passive Hygrovent Gold, 33.8 + 0.56 mg/L and 24.4 + 0.4 mg/L with the Hygrobac, and 33.9 + 0.8 mg/L and 24.6 + 0.6 mg/L with the Hygrovent S. The efficiency of the tested HMEs did not change over time. At 24 h and 48 h the increase in weight and flow resistance was highest in the active Hygrovent Gold. CONCLUSIONS: The passive Hygrovent Gold provided adequate heat and moisture in normothermia, but the active Hygrovent Gold provided the highest humidity, in both normothermia and hypothermia.

Prognostic role of clinical and laboratory criteria to identify early ventilator-associated pneumonia in brain injury.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the role of the clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS), serum levels of procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and serum amyloid A (SAA) in the detection of patients with early ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). METHODS: Observational study in a university hospital. In 58 patients with severe brain injury receiving mechanical ventilation, CPIS, PCT, CRP and SAA were evaluated at ICU entry and at days 3 to 4 of hospital stay for VAP diagnosis (confirmed by endotracheal aspirate or BAL cultures). RESULTS: We found the following: (1) PCT at entry was increased in patients who later had early VAP develop (25 patients) compared to no VAP (median, 1.4 ng/mL; 25-75 percentiles, 0.14-0.78; vs median, 0.2 ng/mL; 25-75 percentiles, 0.76-2.4, p<0.001; sensitivity, 76%; and specificity, 75%); (2) CPIS increased at the day of VAP diagnosis, compared to entry (median, 6.6+/-1.1 vs 1.5+/-1.1, p<0.001; sensitivity, 97%; specificity, 100%), while other serum inflammatory markers did not change; and (3) deterioration in oxygenation and changes in tracheal secretions were the main determinants of CPIS changes. CONCLUSIONS: PCT may be a useful marker to predict which patients subsequently have early VAP. The CPIS could help as an early way to detect the patients with early VAP and who need further diagnostic testing.

Performance of heated wire humidifiers: an in vitro study.

PURPOSE: We assessed the performance of heated wire humidifiers (HWHs), which should avoid water condensation in the circuit. METHODS: We evaluated the efficiency of 3 HWHs, MR850 (Fisher & Paykel, Auckland, New Zealand), CONCHATHERM IV (Hudson RCI, Temecula, Calif), and DAR HC 2000 (Mallinckrodt DAR, Mirandola, Italy), in comparison with that of the MR730 heated humidifier (HH), which has a standard circuit. We measured gas temperature and absolute humidity (AH) at the Y piece of the ventilatory circuit using a test lung ventilated at 2 minute ventilation volumes (5 and 15 L/min). Temperature levels at the Y piece of the ventilatory circuit of the HHs were set at 35 degrees C, 37 degrees C, and 39 degrees C with different gradients (-2 degrees C, 0 degrees C, and +2 degrees C) between the outlet chamber and the Y piece of the ventilatory circuit. RESULTS: At the set temperature levels of 35 degrees C, 37 degrees C, and 39 degrees C with a gradient of 0 degrees C, the MR850 and CONCHATHERM IV had lower gas temperature and AH levels as compared with the DAR HC 2000 and MR730 HH. With increasing temperature gradient, gas temperature increased only with the CONCHATHERM IV but AH increased with all the HWHs. The MR850 showed lower gas temperature and AH levels as compared with CONCHATHERM IV. The condensate was abolished inside the inspiratory circuit with the HWHs. CONCLUSIONS: Heated wire humidifiers eliminate water condensation but present significant differences in gas temperature and AH levels that are lower than the expected settings.

An integrated approach to prevent and treat respiratory failure in brain-injured patients.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Brain-injured patients are at increased risk of extracerebral organ dysfunction, in particular ventilator-associated pneumonia. The purpose of this review is to discuss functional abnormalities, clinical treatment, and possible prevention of respiratory function abnormalities in brain-injured patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Ventilator-associated pneumonia worsens the neurologic outcome and increases the intensive care unit and hospital stay, costs, and risk of death. The respiratory dysfunction can be due to several causes, but atelectasis and/or consolidation of the lower lobes predominates in the most severe cases. Strategies should be implemented to prevent lung infections and accelerate weaning from mechanical ventilation to reduce the incidence of respiratory dysfunction and ventilator-associated pneumonia. SUMMARY: An integrated approach including appropriate ventilatory, antibiotic, and fluid management could be extremely useful, not only to prevent and more rapidly treat respiratory failure but also to improve neurologic outcome and reduce hospital stay. Further studies are warranted to better elucidate the pathophysiology and clinical treatment of respiratory dysfunction in brain-injured patients.

Circulating levels of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with the systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is a key regulator cytokine that modulates the proliferation and maturation of polymorphonuclear and mononuclear progenitors. This study was designed to investigate and clarify the role of GM-CSF in 52 critically ill patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). METHODS: Serum levels of GM-CSF were detected by an immunoenzyme assay. RESULTS: Our results clearly show that the serum concentrations of GM-CSF were significantly elevated in patients with infectious and noninfectious SIRS (33.2+/-45.7pg/ml, controls: 17.2+/-9.8pg/ml; p=0.0303). In addition, GM-CSF levels significantly decreased in patients with SIRS, particularly in patients with infectious SIRS, 5 and 7 days later. There was a clear tendency toward higher levels of GM-CSF in patients with poor, as compared with those having a good outcome of the disease. CONCLUSION: These results show that GM-CSF may play an important role in patients with infectious and noninfectious SIRS, and that GM-CSF levels progressively and significantly decrease in patients with infectious SIRS.

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation delivered by helmet vs. standard face mask.

OBJECTIVE: This bench and human study compared large and small helmets with face mask (FM) for delivery of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation. DESIGN: A lung simulator was employed, and the human study involved six healthy subjects. We evaluated a continuous high-flow (CPAPHF), low flow (CPAPLF), ventilator (CPAPVENT) CPAP, and pressure support ventilation (PSV 10 and 20 cmH2O). In the human study we used CPAPHF, CPAPVENT, and PSV 5 cmH2O. PEEP was 5 cmH2O. MEASUREMENTS: In the bench study during CPAP we measured the negative airway pressure time product (areaCPAP), i.e., the area of airway pressure (Paw) under PEEP and during PSV the pressure airway time product (areaPSV), i.e., the area of Paw from onset to end of inspiratory flow. In the human study we measured the breathing pattern and work of breathing (WOB). RESULTS: In the bench study during CPAPLF the helmets had a lower areaCPAP than the FM, while during CPAPHF the three interfaces had similar areaCPAP. Using CPAPVENT and PSV the FM reduced areaCPAP and increased areaPSV compared to helmets. At 20 cmH2O of PSV using helmets areaPSV was similar to that obtained at 10 cmH2O of PSV using the FM. In human study using CPAPHF and CPAPVENT the tree interfaces had similar effects on breathing pattern and WOB, while using PSV the FM reduced WOB more than helmets. CONCLUSIONS: During CPAPLF helmets were more efficient than FM, while during CPAPHF the three interfaces were comparable. Using CPAPVENT and PSV, FM was more efficient than helmets

Non-invasive ventilation delivered by conventional interfaces and helmet in the emergency department.

Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation is increasingly used as a first-line treatment for respiratory failure. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation can reduce the complications of endotracheal intubation such as barotrauma, nosocomial infections and the need for sedation. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation has been shown to reduce the rate of endotracheal intubation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema (27%), in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (21%), and in acute respiratory failure (17%). Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation can be successfully delivered in the emergency department or in the general ward. However, the criteria for interrupting non-invasive positive pressure ventilation must be stricter (i.e. failure to improve gas exchange within 30 min) than in the general ward. One of the main reasons for the failure of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation lies in the technical problems caused by the face mask. We recently developed a new interface, the 'helmet', to deliver non-invasive positive pressure ventilation. When using the helmet instead of a face mask an increase of 10 cm H(2)O of pressure support and a fast pressurization rate are recommended. In a lung model and in healthy individuals the helmet reduced inspiratory effort. In hypoxemic patients the helmet reduced the intubation rate and the incidence of face mask-related complications. We believe that the helmet can extend the application of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in different categories of patients with respiratory failure.

New treatment of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: noninvasive pressure support ventilation delivered by helmet--a pilot controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of noninvasive pressure support ventilation (NPSV) using a new special helmet as first-line intervention to treat patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (ARF), in comparison to NPSV using standard facial mask. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective clinical pilot investigation with matched control group in three intensive care units of university hospitals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three consecutive patients without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and with hypoxemic ARF (defined as severe dyspnea at rest, respiratory rate >30 breaths/min, PaO2:FiO2 < 200, and active contraction of the accessory muscles of respiration) were enrolled. Each patient treated with NPSV by helmet was matched with two controls with ARF treated with NPSV via a facial mask, selected by simplified acute physiologic score II, age, PaO2/FiO2, and arterial pH at admission. Primary end points were the improvement of gas exchanges, the need for endotracheal intubation, and the complications related to NPSV. RESULTS: The 33 patients and the 66 controls had similar characteristics at baseline. Both groups improved oxygenation after NPSV. Eight patients (24%) in the helmet group and 21 patients (32%) in the facial mask group (p = .3) failed NPSV and were intubated. No patients failed NPSV because of intolerance of the technique in the helmet group in comparison with 8 patients (38%) in the mask group (p = .047). Complications related to the technique (skin necrosis, gastric distension, and eye irritation) were fewer in the helmet group compared with the mask group (no patients vs. 14 patients (21%), p = .002). The helmet allowed the continuous application of NPSV for a longer period of time (p = .05). Length of stay in the intensive care unit, intensive care, and hospital mortality were not different. CONCLUSIONS: NPSV by helmet successfully treated hypoxemic ARF, with better tolerance and fewer complications than facial mask NPSV.