RESUMO
Health profession educators readily identify with the goal of fostering healthcare providers who are critical thinkers focused on quality patient care. In the following paper, we aim to delve into critical thinking at the team level and help educators begin the process of creating a shared mental model focusing on cognition to identify gaps and opportunities for growth in their trainees. We will distinguish between microcognition (an individual's own critical thinking process in a controlled environment), macrocognition (critical thinking process in a real-world environment), and team cognition (the interaction and relationship among team members to augment macrocognition). A common case example will be used to guide the discussion as well as provide a model framework to be used for clinician educators in the future.
RESUMO
Background: Producing scholarship in education is essential to the career development of a clinician-educator. Challenges to scholarly production include a lack of resources, time, expertise, and collaborators. Objective: To develop communities of practice for education scholarship through an international society to increase community and academic productivity. Methods: We developed multi-institutional scholarship pods within the American Thoracic Society through the creation of a working group (2017-2019). Pods met virtually, and meetings were goal focused to advance education scholarship within their area of interest. To understand the impact of these scholarship pods, we surveyed pod leaders and members in 2021 and analyzed the academic productivity of each pod via a survey of pod leaders and a review of the PubMed index. Results: Nine pods were created, each with an assigned educational topic. The survey had a response rate of 76.6%. The perceived benefits were the opportunity to meet colleagues with similar interests at other institutions, production of scholarly work, and engagement in new experiences. The main challenges were difficulty finding times to meet because of competing clinical demands and aligning times among pod members. Regarding academic productivity, eight publications, four conference presentations, and one webinar/podcast were produced by six of the nine pods. Conclusion: The development of communities of practice resulted in increased multi-site collaboration, with boosted academic productivity as well as an enhanced sense of belonging. Multiple challenges remain but can likely be overcome with accountability, early discussion of roles and expectations, and clear delegation of tasks and authorship.
RESUMO
Background: Communication skills is a core competency for critical care fellowship training. The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has made it increasingly difficult to teach these skills in graduate medical education. We developed and implemented a novel, hybrid version of the Critical Care Communication (C3) skills with virtual and in-person components for pulmonary and critical care fellows. Objective: To develop and implement a new hybrid virtual/in-person version of the traditional C3 serious illness communication skills course and to compare learner outcomes to prior courses. Methods: We modified the C3 course in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic by adapting large-group didactic content to an online format that included both virtual asynchronous and virtual live content. Small-group skills training remained in person with trained actors and facilitators. We administered self-assessments to the participants and compared with historical data from the traditional in-person courses beginning in 2012. After the 2020 course, we collected informal feedback from a portion of the learners. Results: Like the traditional in-person version, participants rated the hybrid version highly. Learners reported feeling well prepared or very well prepared over 90% of the time in most communication skills after both versions of the course. Over 90% of participants in both versions of the course rated the specific course components as effective or very effective. Feedback from the learners indicates that they prefer the virtual didactics over traditional in-person didactics. Conclusions: Pulmonary and critical care fellows rated a hybrid version of a communication skills training similarly to the traditional in-person version of the course. We have provided a scaffolding on how to implement such a course. We anticipate some of the virtual components of this training will outlive the current pandemic based on learner feedback.
Assuntos
Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina , Lesão Pulmonar/fisiopatologia , Vaping/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Feminino , Febre/etiologia , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Leucocitose/etiologia , Lesão Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Lesão Pulmonar/etiologia , Lesão Pulmonar/terapia , Masculino , Oxigenoterapia , Readmissão do Paciente , Pennsylvania , Respiração Artificial , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Capacidade Vital , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Background: Interpersonal and communication skills are essential for physicians practicing in critical care settings. Accordingly, demonstration of these skills has been a core competency of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education since 2014. However, current practices regarding communication skills training in adult and pediatric critical care fellowships are not well described. Objective: To describe the current state of communication curricula and training methods in adult and pediatric critical care training programs as demonstrated by the published literature. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the published literature using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. Three authors reviewed a comprehensive set of databases and independently selected articles on the basis of a predefined set of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were independently extracted from the selected articles. Results: The 23 publications meeting inclusion criteria fell into the following study classifications: intervention (n = 15), cross-sectional survey (n = 5), and instrument validation (n = 3). Most interventional studies assessed short-term and self-reported outcomes (e.g., learner attitudes and perspectives) only. Fifteen of 22 publications represented pediatric subspecialty programs. Conclusion: Opportunities exist to evaluate the influence of communication training programs on important outcomes, including measured learner behavior and patient and family outcomes, and the durability of skill retention.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lung Cancer is occasionally observed in patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF). We sought to describe the epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of lung cancer for patients with IPF and other interstitial lung disease (ILD) using institutional and statewide data registries. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of IPF and non-IPF ILD patients from the ILD center registry, to compare with lung cancer registries at the University of Pittsburgh as well as with population data of lung cancer obtained from Pennsylvania Department of Health between 2000 and 2015. RESULTS: Among 1108 IPF patients, 31 patients were identified with IPF and lung cancer. The age-adjusted standard incidence ratio of lung cancer was 3.34 (with IPF) and 2.3 (with non-IPF ILD) (between-group Hazard ratio = 1.4, p = 0.3). Lung cancer worsened the mortality of IPF (p < 0.001). Lung cancer with IPF had higher mortality compared to lung cancer in non-IPF ILD (Hazard ratio = 6.2, p = 0.001). Lung cancer among IPF was characterized by a predilection for lower lobes (63% vs. 26% in non-IPF lung cancer, p < 0.001) and by squamous cell histology (41% vs. 29%, p = 0.07). Increased incidence of lung cancer was observed among single lung transplant (SLT) recipients for IPF (13 out of 97, 13.4%), with increased mortality compared to SLT for IPF without lung cancer (p = 0.028) during observational period. CONCLUSIONS: Lung cancer is approximately 3.34 times more frequently diagnosed in IPF patients compared to general population, and associated with worse prognosis compared with IPF without lung cancer, with squamous cell carcinoma and lower lobe predilection. The causality between non-smoking IPF patients and lung cancer is to be determined.
Assuntos
Análise de Dados , Bases de Dados Factuais/tendências , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/epidemiologia , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/diagnóstico , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Estudos RetrospectivosAssuntos
Diretivas Antecipadas , Comunicação , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Preferência do Paciente , Padrões de Prática Médica , Relações Profissional-Família , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/terapia , Adulto , Planejamento Antecipado de Cuidados , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Estado Terminal , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Relações Médico-Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados UnidosRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Sarcoidosis is a chronic granulomatous disease typically affecting the lung, lymph nodes, and other organ systems. Evidence suggests that the morbidity and mortality rates for sarcoidosis in the USA are rising, despite widespread use of anti-inflammatory therapies. In this review, we survey new therapies that target specific inflammatory pathways in other diseases (such as rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, and psoriasis) that are similar to pathways relevant to sarcoidosis immunopathogenesis, and therefore, represent potentially new sarcoidosis therapies. RECENT FINDINGS: Immunopathogenesis of sarcoidosis has been well elucidated over the past few years. There is abundant evidence for T-cell activation in sarcoidosis leading to activation of both Th1 and Th17 inflammatory cascades. Therapies targeting T-cell activation, Th1 pathways (such as the interleukin-6 inhibitors), Th17 pathway mediators, and others have been Food and Drug Administration approved or under investigation to treat a variety of autoimmune inflammatory diseases, but have not been studied in sarcoidosis. Targeting the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases and the ubiquitine proteasome system with new agents may also represent a novel therapeutic option for patients with sarcoidosis. SUMMARY: Rising morbidity and mortality rates for patients with sarcoidosis strongly support the need to develop more effective anti-inflammatory therapies to treat chronic disease.
Assuntos
Sarcoidose/imunologia , Humanos , Sarcoidose/tratamento farmacológico , Sarcoidose/metabolismoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Although barriers to shared decision making in intensive care units are well documented, there are currently no easily scaled interventions to overcome these problems. We sought to assess stakeholders' perceptions of the acceptability, usefulness, and design suggestions for a tablet-based tool to support communication and shared decision making in ICUs. METHODS: We conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with 58 key stakeholders (30 surrogates and 28 ICU care providers). Interviews explored stakeholders' perceptions about the acceptability of a tablet-based tool to support communication and shared decision making, including the usefulness of modules focused on orienting families to the ICU, educating them about the surrogate's role, completing a question prompt list, eliciting patient values, educating about treatment options, eliciting perceptions about prognosis, and providing psychosocial support resources. The interviewer also elicited stakeholders' design suggestions for such a tool. We used constant comparative methods to identify key themes that arose during the interviews. RESULTS: Overall, 95% (55/58) of participants perceived the proposed tool to be acceptable, with 98% (57/58) of interviewees finding six or more of the seven content domains acceptable. Stakeholders identified several potential benefits of the tool including that it would help families prepare for the surrogate role and for family meetings as well as give surrogates time and a framework to think about the patient's values and treatment options. Key design suggestions included: conceptualize the tool as a supplement to rather than a substitute for surrogate-clinician communication; make the tool flexible with respect to how, where, and when surrogates can access the tool; incorporate interactive exercises; use video and narration to minimize the cognitive load of the intervention; and build an extremely simple user interface to maximize usefulness for individuals with low computer literacy. CONCLUSION: There is broad support among stakeholders for the use of a tablet-based tool to improve communication and shared decision making in ICUs. Eliciting the perspectives of key stakeholders early in the design process yielded important insights to create a tool tailored to the needs of surrogates and care providers in ICUs.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Tomada de Decisões , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Relações Profissional-Família , Adulto , Comunicação , Computadores de Mão , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Narração , Percepção , Prognóstico , Pesquisa QualitativaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Conflict is common between physicians and surrogate decision makers around end-of-life care in ICU. Involving experts in conflict management improve outcomes, but little is known about what differences in conflict management styles may explain the benefit. We used simulation to examine potential differences in how palliative care specialists manage conflict with surrogates about end-of-life treatment decisions in ICUs compared with intensivists. DESIGN: Subjects participated in a high-fidelity simulation of conflict with a surrogate in an ICU. In this simulation, a medical actor portrayed a surrogate decision maker during an ICU family meeting who refuses to follow an advance directive that clearly declines advanced life-sustaining therapies. We audiorecorded the simulation encounters and applied a coding framework to quantify conflict management behaviors, which was organized into two categories: task-focused communication and relationship building. We used negative binomial modeling to determine whether there were differences between palliative care specialists' and intensivists' use of task-focused communication and relationship building. SETTING: Single academic medical center ICU. SUBJECTS: Palliative care specialists and intensivists. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We enrolled 11 palliative care specialists and 25 intensivists. The palliative care specialists were all attending physicians. The intensivist group consisted of 11 attending physicians, 9 pulmonary and critical care fellows, and 5 internal medicine residents rotating in the ICU. We excluded five residents from the primary analysis in order to reduce confounding due to training level. Physicians' mean age was 37 years with a mean of 8 years in practice. Palliative care specialists used 55% fewer task-focused communication statements (incidence rate ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.36-0.83; p = 0.005) and 48% more relationship-building statements (incidence rate ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.89-2.46; p = 0.13) compared with intensivists. CONCLUSIONS: We found that palliative care specialists engage in less task-focused communication when managing conflict with surrogates compared with intensivists. These differences may help explain the benefit of palliative care involvement in conflict and could be the focus of interventions to improve clinicians' conflict resolution skills.
Assuntos
Comunicação , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar , Negociação/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos , Assistência Terminal/organização & administração , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Adulto , Adesão a Diretivas Antecipadas , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , EspecializaçãoRESUMO
PURPOSE: There is a paucity of scalable advance care planning strategies that achieve the diverse goals of patients, families, and clinicians. We convened key stakeholders to gain their perspectives on developing a Web-based advance care planning tool for lung disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews with 50 stakeholders: 21 patients with lung disease, 18 surrogates, and 11 clinicians. Interviews explored stakeholders' desired content and design features of a Web-based advance care planning tool. Participants also rated the tool's acceptability and potential usefulness. We analyzed the interviews with modified grounded theory and validated themes through member checking. RESULTS: Stakeholders highly rated the acceptability (median, 5; interquartile range, 5-5) and potential usefulness (median, 5; interquartile range, 4-5) of a Web-based tool. Interviewees offered several suggestions: (1) use videos of medical scenarios and patient narratives rather than text, (2) include interactive content, and (3) allow the user control over how much they complete in 1 sitting. Participants identified challenges and potential solutions, such as how to manage the emotional difficulty of thinking about death and accommodate low computer literacy users. CONCLUSIONS: There is strong stakeholder support for the development of a Web-based advance care planning tool for lung disease.
Assuntos
Planejamento Antecipado de Cuidados , Tomada de Decisões , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Pneumopatias/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cuidadores , Comunicação , Feminino , Humanos , Internet , Pneumopatias/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Saúde PúblicaRESUMO
RATIONALE: Although numerous studies have documented that family members in intensive care units struggle with end-of-life decisions for incapacitated patients, there is little information about whether prior advance care planning lessens the burden of decision making. OBJECTIVES: We sought to measure decisional conflict in surrogates of critically ill patients and to examine whether prior advance care planning is associated with less decisional conflict. METHODS: We performed a secondary data analysis of a multicenter, prospective cohort study done at five U.S. academic medical centers that included 471 surrogates of 257 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. The main outcome was surrogates' burden of decision making as measured using the Decisional Conflict Scale. Surrogates completed a questionnaire item addressing whether they had had any prior advance care planning conversations with their loved ones. We used multilevel linear regression modeling to measure the association between decisional conflict and advance care planning. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Moderate or high levels of decisional conflict (Decisional Conflict Scale score≥25) were present in 48% of surrogates. After adjusting for potential confounders, surrogates who had engaged in prior advance care planning conversations had significantly lower levels of decisional conflict than those who had not (mean score 3.3 points lower on the Decisional Conflict Scale; 95% confidence interval, -6.4 to -0.2; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of surrogates for critically ill patients have moderate or high levels of decisional conflict. Prior advance care planning was associated with less decisional conflict. These results suggest that the scope of the benefit of advance care planning may extend beyond respecting patients' wishes to also ameliorating the burden on patients' loved ones who act as surrogates.
Assuntos
Planejamento Antecipado de Cuidados/normas , Conflito Psicológico , Tomada de Decisões , Procurador/psicologia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Comunicação , Estado Terminal , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Although misperceptions about prognosis by surrogates in ICUs are common and influence treatment decisions, there is no validated, practical way to measure the effectiveness of prognostic communication. Surrogates' subjective ratings of quality of communication have been used in other domains as markers of effectiveness of communication. We sought to determine whether surrogates' subjective ratings of the quality of prognostic communication predict accurate expectation about prognosis by surrogates. DESIGN: We performed a cross-sectional cohort study. Surrogates rated the quality of prognostic communication by survey. Physicians and surrogates gave their percentage estimate of patient survival on ICU day 3 on a 0-100 probability scale. We defined discordance about prognosis as a difference in the physician's and surrogate's estimates of greater than or equal to ±20%. We used multilevel logistic regression modeling to account for clustering under physicians and patients and adjust for confounders. SETTING: Medical-surgical, trauma, cardiac, and neurologic ICUs of five U.S. academic medical centers located in California, Pennsylvania, Washington, North Carolina, and Massachusetts. PATIENTS: Two hundred seventy-five patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome at high risk of death or severe functional impairment, their 546 surrogate decision makers, and their 150 physicians. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There was no predictive utility of surrogates' ratings of the quality of communication about prognosis to identify inaccurate expectations about prognosis (odds ratio, 1.04 ± 0.07; p = 0.54). Surrogates' subjective ratings of the quality of communication about prognosis were high, as assessed with a variety of questions. Discordant prognostic estimates were present in 63.5% (95% CI, 59.0-67.9) of physician-surrogate pairs. CONCLUSIONS: Although most surrogates rate the quality of prognostic communication high, inaccurate expectations about prognosis are common among surrogates. Surrogates' ratings of the quality of prognostic communication do not reliably predict an accurate expectation about prognosis.
Assuntos
Comunicação , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Médicos , Relações Profissional-Família , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/diagnóstico , APACHE , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Humanos , Competência em Informação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Papel do Médico , Prognóstico , Respiração Artificial , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
RATIONALE: Although medical simulation is increasingly being used in healthcare education, there are few examples of how to rigorously design a simulation to evaluate and study important communication skills of intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians. OBJECTIVES: To use existing best practice recommendations to develop a medical simulation to study conflict management in ICUs, then assess the feasibility, acceptability, and realism of the simulation among ICU clinicians. METHODS: The setting was a medical ICU of a tertiary care, university hospital. Participants were 36 physicians who treat critically ill patients: intensivists, palliative medicine specialists, and trainees. Using best-practice guidelines and an iterative, multidisciplinary approach, we developed and refined a simulation involving a critically ill patient, in which the patient had a clear advance directive specifying no use of life support, and a surrogate who was unwilling to follow the patient's preferences. ICU clinicians participated in the simulation and completed surveys and semistructured interviews to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and realism of the simulation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All participants successfully completed the simulation, and all perceived conflict with the surrogate (mean conflict score, 4.2 on a 0-10 scale [SD, 2.5; range, 1-10]). Participants reported high realism of the simulation across a range of criteria, with mean ratings of greater than 8 on a 0 to 10 scale for all domains assessed. During semistructured interviews, participants confirmed a high degree of realism and offered several suggestions for improvements. CONCLUSIONS: We used existing best practice recommendations to develop a simulation model to study physician-family conflict in ICUs that is feasible, acceptable, and realistic.
Assuntos
Estado Terminal/terapia , Dissidências e Disputas , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Simulação de Paciente , Relações Profissional-Família , Assistência Terminal , Adulto , Cuidados Críticos , Tomada de Decisões , Bolsas de Estudo , Feminino , Humanos , Medicina Interna , Internato e Residência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medicina Paliativa , Procurador , PneumologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To describe the association of intensive care with trajectories of functional, emotional, social, and physical well-being in patients with 3 common advanced illnesses. METHODS: Cross-sectional cohort study of 42 patients admitted to the intensive care unit selected from 210 patients with stage IV breast, prostate, or colon cancer or stage IIIb or IV lung cancer; New York Heart Association class III or IV congestive heart failure; and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with hypercapnea (Pco2 > 46 mm Hg). Scores on subscales of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General survey were measured monthly for 6 months before and after admission to the intensive care unit and were analyzed by using the unit admission date as a point of discontinuous change to illustrate trajectories before and after the admission. RESULTS: Overall, trajectories of well-being declined sharply after admission to the intensive care unit. Declines in physical, functional, and emotional well-being were statistically significant. During the 6 months after admission, physical, functional, and emotional well-being scores trended back up to baseline while social well-being scores continued to decline. CONCLUSIONS: Well-being trajectories declined sharply after admission to the intensive care unit, with recovery in the subsequent 6 months, and may be characterized by common patterns. These results help to better describe intensive care as a marker for advancing illness in patients with advanced chronic illness.