Occupational exposure and risk of oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review and 25-year retrospective cohort study of patients.

Social habits such as smoking and drinking alcohol are well-known causative agents for oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC/OPSCC). Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a known causative agent for OPSCC. However, we often encounter patients with no identifiable risk factors. There is growing evidence of the role of occupational carcinogens in the pathogenesis of oral cancer. The aim of this study therefore was to identify any occupational carcinogens linked to oral cancer. We carried out a systematic review of the literature using PubMed, EMBASE, and Medline, along with a retrospective review of patients treated in a regional unit over 25 years. Occupations were classified based on the UK Standard of Classification 2020. Data analysis was completed using the chi-squared test. A total of 17 papers met the inclusion criteria for review. In our retrospective study a total of 874 patients were identified of whom 31% were blue-collar workers, 32.8% were white-collar workers, 20.2% were unemployed/housewives, and 16% workers in other occupations. The majority of blue-collar workers were in the construction industry and had maximum exposure to hydrocarbons and exhaust fumes. The aetiology of oral and oropharyngeal SCC is multifactorial and there is no consensus on the role of occupational carcinogens. We showcase our patient cohort and discuss the occupational exposures that appear to make them susceptible to OSCC and OPSCC. Further multicentre studies are required to enable us to understand fully the pathogenesis of oral cancer and help us to inform relevant organisations, the aim being to reduce the incidence of occupation-related cancer.

Health related quality of life and patient concerns in patients with osteoradionecrosis.

The number of patients presenting with osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is likely to increase in future and health related quality of life (HRQOL) is a key outcome. This study aimed to report patient concerns and HRQOL in an osteoradionecrosis cohort over 12 years. Patients attended routine follow-up clinics between 2008 to 2020, where patient reported outcome (PRO) assessment was used before consultations as standard practice. The two PROs were the Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI) and the University of Washington quality of life questionnaire (UW-QOL v4). The study sample comprised 109 patients with ORN seen in 445 clinics when PCI and UW-QOL were used. At clinic, patients were in one of six ORN states: before ORN (26 with data), at diagnosis (12), and following treatment either improved (27), progressed (46), stable (63) or resolved (37). Worst HRQOL outcomes were reported in the progressive group with 50% reporting overall QOL as less than good. Pain was a major dysfunction (63%) as was physical and social-emotional functioning and this group reported many PCI issues, median (IQR) 7 (4-11). Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival with 95% CI after diagnosis with ORN were 96% (90-99%) at 12 months, 89% (81-94%) at 24 months and 73% (61-82%) at 60 months. This study indicates that ORN is a chronic condition with long-term survivorship consequences. More data through cohort studies and trials are needed to assist in decision making for individual patients.

Clinical characteristics, treatment intent, and outcome in a consecutive 10-year cohort of oral cancer patients aged 75 years and older.

The prevalence of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in the elderly is expected to increase by nearly a third in the next decade. Its management in older patients is potentially more challenging due to their pre-existing medical comorbidities, frailty, reduced life expectancy, and social issues. The aim of this retrospective review was to report on treatment given to patients aged 75 years and over, case mix, and survival. All patients aged 75 years and over who were diagnosed with OSCC in Merseyside between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2016, and treated with either curative or palliative intent, were included. Their hospital notes were reviewed. Fisher's exact test and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used for data analysis. There were 236 patients (median (IQR) age 81 (78-86) years); 67% were treated curatively and 33% palliatively. Factors associated with palliation included older age, advanced tumour stage, cognitive impairment, and residence in a nursing or residential home. Of the 165 patients who were offered curative treatment, six (4%) declined due to personal or family reasons. Overall survival for palliative patients was 12% at one year and 7% at two years, whereas for patients treated curatively it was 74% at one year, 56% at two years, and 34% at five years. Patients over 85 years of age were less likely to have composite free flaps and postoperative radiotherapy. Perioperative mortality was 2.6%. Improvements in surgical techniques and perioperative management have enabled clinicians to offer treatment with curative intent to older frail patients, and with careful case selection outcomes can be very good.

Oral and maxillofacial dental care professionals in critical care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

At the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic there was a 'call to arms' across the oral and maxillofacial staff. This article reports on the extended role of the department's dental care professionals (DCPs) and the tremendous opportunity and value that temporary redeployment presented.

Management of carious primary molars within the community dental setting in Wales: a retrospective observational study.

Background Tertiary prevention is still an integral part of a child's healthcare. In community dental service (CDS), we aim to try to restore carious primary teeth in young children as a means of caries control.Aim To assess the survival rates of individual carious primary molars within CDS, based on the type of dental interventions.Design Retrospective observational study.Methods Fifty patients' notes were reviewed, and patients were selected using a defined protocol. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival curves.Results Out of 251 teeth, the estimated survival rates of teeth restored with stainless steel crowns (SSC) was the highest at 46.7 months, GIC-restored teeth at 45.8 months and unrestored teeth at 18.2 months. There was no correlation seen between the survival rates and the number of further interventions required. The difference between the survival rates of teeth restored with GIC, SSC and unrestored was statistically significant (p <0.05). There was minimal use of SSCs within this sample.Conclusion Our present findings indicate that restored teeth have higher survival rates than unrestored teeth. However, it must be emphasised that restorative treatment may not always be feasible and other factors should be considered in the treatment planning.

Assessment of the level of knowledge of colorectal cancer among public at outpatient clinics in Serdang Hospital: a survey based study.

OBJECTIVES: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common gastrointestinal cancers in the world. In the Asia- Pacific region, it is the fastest emerging gastrointestinal cancer. Level of awareness on CRC warning signs and risk factors in the rural population of Malaysia is reported of very low. The aim of this study was to assess the level of knowledge of CRC among the public at medical outpatient clinics in Serdang Hospital. The association between sociodemographic factors with level of knowledge among the respondents was further studied. STUDY DESIGN: A study was conducted among the non-CRC patients' relatives accompanying their relatives to the medical outpatient clinics in Serdang Hospital from 1st April to 31st August 2016. The study was carried out with cluster sampling method. METHODS: The respondents were assessed using validated and modified Cancer Awareness Measures (CAM) questionnaire consists of three parts which are knowledge on warning signs, knowledge on risk factors and sociodemographic factors. All data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics 21.0. RESULTS: Altogether 308 subjects completed the questionnaires. It was shown high percentage of good knowledge for warning signs and risk factors of CRC among the respondents. A significant association between age groups and level of income with level of knowledge on warning signs was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The level of knowledge of CRC among the general public in Serdang Hospital was sufficient. The respondents with higher income or younger age had higher level of knowledge regarding CRC.