Hyperbaric spinal ropivacaine for cesarean delivery: a comparison to hyperbaric bupivacaine.

UNLABELLED: We evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of spinal anesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric ropivacaine compared with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for elective cesarean delivery. Sixty healthy, full-term parturients were randomly assigned to receive either 12 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine or 18 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric ropivacaine intrathecally. There were no significant differences in demographic or surgical variables or neonatal outcomes between groups. Onset time of sensory block to T10 or to peak level was later in the Ropivacaine group (P < 0.05). The median (range) peak level of analgesia was T3 (T1-5) in the Bupivacaine group and T3 (T1-4) in the Ropivacaine group. Time for sensory block to recede to T10 did not differ between groups. Duration of sensory block was shorter in the Ropivacaine group (188.5 +/- 28.2 min vs 162.5 +/- 20.2 min; P < 0.05). Complete motor block of the lower extremities was obtained in all patients. Ropivacaine also produced a shorter duration of motor blockade than bupivacaine (113.7 +/- 18.6 min vs 158.7 +/- 31.2 min; P < 0.000). The intraoperative quality of anesthesia was excellent and similar in both groups. Side effects did not differ between groups. Eighteen milligrams of 0.5% hyperbaric ropivacaine provided effective spinal anesthesia with shorter duration of sensory and motor block, compared with 12 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine when administered for cesarean delivery IMPLICATIONS: Eighteen milligrams of 0.5% hyperbaric ropivacaine provided effective spinal anesthesia with shorter duration of sensory and motor block, compared with 12mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine when administered for cesarean delivery.

Lymph node involvement rate in low-grade gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma--too high to be neglected.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Anti-Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) treatment for low-grade gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma has been the subject of attention. The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of such cases which could be suitable candidates for H. pylori eradication for the purpose of cure; we focused on gross morphology and lymph node metastasis. METHODOLOGY: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 53 patients diagnosed and treated for gastric MALT lymphoma at Seoul National University Hospital between 1992 and 1996. RESULTS: According to Isaacson's classification, 60% of cases were low-grade, and H. pylori was detected in 88% of them. In low-grade disease, gastroscopy revealed superficial lesions in 56% of cases, ulcerofungating lesions were found in as much as 19%, and ulceroinfiltrating in 25%. Even in low-grade disease, invasion of proper muscle, or deeper, was seen in 28% of patients, and lymph node involvement in 36%; even in low-grade disease confined to mucosa and submucosa, the rate of lymph node involvement was 40%. All cases which, on gastroscopy, appeared to be gastritis or benign ulcer-like lesions were free of lymph node metastasis, but in low-grade disease, this proportion was only 16%. In 33% of cases, pre-operative clinical stage I--as shown by abdominal CT--was found post-operatively to be stage II. The negative predictive value of lymph node detection by CT was 68%. CONCLUSIONS: In low-grade gastric MALT lymphoma, the lymph node involvement rate was too high to be neglected. In detecting lymph node metastasis, the diagnostic accuracy of CT was too low. The proportion of suitable candidates for anti-H. pylori treatment for low-grade gastric MALT lymphoma was not high, and in clinical practice, anti-H. pylori treatment in such cases should at present be very carefully applied.

The efficacy of intrathecal neostigmine, intrathecal morphine, and their combination for post-cesarean section analgesia.

UNLABELLED: We designed this study to evaluate the postoperative analgesic efficacy and safety of intrathecal (i.t.) neostigmine, i.t. morphine, and their combination in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Seventy-nine term parturients were randomly divided into four groups to receive isotonic sodium chloride solution 0.2 mL, neostigmine 25 microg, morphine 100 microg, or the combination of i.t. neostigmine 12.5 microg and morphine 50 microg with i.t. 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 12 mg. There were no significant differences among the four groups with regard to spinal anesthesia, maternal blood pressure and heart rate, or fetal status. Postoperative analgesia was provided by i.v. patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) using fentanyl and ketorolac. Compared with the saline group, the time to first PCA use was significantly longer in the neostigmine group (P < 0.001), with lower 24-h analgesic consumption (P < 0.001). Nausea and vomiting were the most common side effects of i.t. neostigmine (73.7%). Analgesic effectiveness was similar between the neostigmine and morphine groups. Compared with the neostigmine group, the combination group had significantly prolonged analgesic effect and reduced 24-h PCA consumption (P < 0.05) with less severity of nausea and vomiting (P = 0.058). Compared with the morphine group, the combination group tended to have prolonged times to first PCA use (P = 0.054) with a lower incidence of pruritus (P < 0.03). IMPLICATIONS: Intrathecal (i.t.) neostigmine 25 microg produced postoperative analgesia for cesarean section similar to that of i.t. morphine 100 microg, but with a high incidence of nausea and vomiting. The combination of i.t. neostigmine 12.5 microg and i.t. morphine 50 microg may produce better postoperative analgesia with fewer side effects than i.t. neostigmine 25 microg or i.t. morphine 100 microg alone.

Spinal anaesthesia with 0.25% hyperbaric bupivacaine for Caesarean section: effects of volume.

To investigate the safety and efficacy of 0.25% hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in Caesarean section, we studied 60 parturients allocated randomly to one of three groups. According to the patient's height, groups 1, 2 and 3 received 3.2-3.6 ml (8-9 mg), 3.6-4.0 ml (9-10 mg) and 4.0-4.4 ml (10-11 mg) of 0.25% bupivacaine in 5% glucose, respectively. Subarachnoid injection was performed in the right lateral decubitus position, and parturients were then turned immediately supine with left uterine displacement. Mean spread of sensory analgesia was significantly higher in group 3 (T2-3) than in groups 1 and 2 (T4-5 in each group). Duration of sensory analgesia was significantly longer in groups 2 and 3 than in group 1. Complete motor block of the lower extremities occurred in all patients but in only one in group 1. Onset time and duration of motor block were not significantly different between the three groups. The incidence of hypotension was significantly higher in group 3 (75%) than in groups 1 and 2 (40% in each group). The efficacy of intraoperative analgesia was significantly greater in groups 2 and 3 than in group 1. The incidence of patients requiring analgesics during operation was significantly lower in groups 2 (25%) and 3 (10%) than in group 1 (70%). There was no difference in neonatal condition between the three groups. Spinal anaesthesia with 3.6-4.0 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine in 5% glucose was satisfactory for Caesarean section.