Efficacy and Safety of the Association of Nimodipine and Choline Alphoscerate in the Treatment of Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Cerebral Small Vessel Disease. The CONIVaD Trial.

BACKGROUND: No approved treatment is available for patients with vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) due to cerebral small vessel disease (SVD). OBJECTIVE: The CONIVaD (Choline Alphoscerate and Nimodipine in Vascular Dementia) study aimed to investigate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of a combined treatment with choline alphoscerate and nimodipine in patients with SVD and mild-to-moderate cognitive impairment. METHODS: Within this pilot, single-center (university hospital), double-blinded, randomized clinical trial, patients were randomized to two arms: 1-year treatment with nimodipine 30 mg three times a day (TID) plus choline alphoscerate 600 mg twice a day (BID) (arm 1) or nimodipine 30 mg TID plus placebo BID (arm 2). Patients underwent an evaluation at baseline and after 12 months. Cognitive decline, defined as a ≥ 2-point loss on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, was the primary endpoint. Functional, quality of life, other cognitive measures, and safety were secondary endpoints. Treatment adherence was measured by the count of medicine bottles returned by patients. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were randomized (31 each arm). Fourteen patients (22%) dropped out for reasons including consent withdrawal (n = 9), adverse reactions (n = 4), and stroke (n = 1). Forty-eight patients (mean ± SD age 75.1 ± 6.8 years), well balanced between arms, completed the study. Regarding adherence, of the prescribed total drug dose, > 75% was taken by 96% of patients for choline alphoscerate, 87.5% for placebo, and 15% for nimodipine. No statistically significant differences were found between the treatment groups for the primary cognitive outcome, nor for the secondary outcomes. Eight patients had non-serious adverse reactions; five presented adverse events. CONCLUSION: Patients' adherence to treatment was low. With this limitation, the combined choline alphoscerate-nimodipine treatment showed no significant effect in our cohort of VCI patients with SVD. The safety profile was good overall. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial NCT03228498. Registered 25 July 2017.

Association of nimodipine and choline alphoscerate in the treatment of cognitive impairment in patients with cerebral small vessel disease: study protocol for a randomized placebo-controlled trial-the CONIVaD trial.

BACKGROUND: Vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) is an extremely disabling condition that includes post-stroke dementia and VCI caused by cerebral small vessel disease (SVD). Currently, there is no approved treatment for this condition. Drugs active on the cholinergic pathway have been tested in VCI patients showing positive but limited efficacy. The calcium-antagonist nimodipine also showed some moderate positive effects in VCI patients. AIMS: CONIVaD (choline alphoscerate and nimodipine in vascular dementia) is a pilot, single-center, double-blinded, randomized trial aimed to assess whether the association of choline alphoscerate and nimodipine is more effective than nimodipine alone in reducing cognitive decline in patients with SVD and mild-to-moderate cognitive impairment. METHODS: All patients are evaluated at baseline and after 12 months with: (1) clinical, daily functions, quality of life, and mood assessment and (2) extensive neuropsychological evaluation. After the baseline evaluation, patients are randomly assigned to one of the two arms of treatment: (1) nimodipine 90 mg/die t.i.d plus placebo b.i.d and (2) nimodipine 90 mg t.i.d plus choline alphoscerate 1200 mg/die b.i.d. for a total of 12 months. The primary endpoint is cognitive decline, expressed as the loss of at least two points on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment at 12 months. Secondary endpoints include safety and tolerability, functional, quality of life, and neuropsychological measures. DISCUSSION: CONIVaD study is the first randomized controlled trial to examine the cognitive efficacy of combined choline alphoscerate-nimodipine treatment in VCI patients. Results of this pilot study will serve as a methodological basis for other clinical controlled, multicentric, double-blinded, and randomized trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial NCT03228498. Registered 25 July 2017.

The Florence VAS-COG clinic: a model for the care of patients with cognitive and behavioral disturbances consequent to cerebrovascular diseases.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Services dedicated to patients with cognitive and behavioral consequences of cerebrovascular diseases are not well established. In this paper, we report on the general organization of such a service (the Florence VAS-COG Clinic) after 9 years of activity, updating a previous work related to the first 5 years. METHODS: The Florence VAS-COG clinic, started in 2006, is an outpatient service dedicated to the assessment and follow-up of patients with cerebrovascular diseases and related cognitive, psychiatric, and behavioral disturbances. The staff involved in the clinic is composed of certified neurologists, one neuropsychologist, and neurology residents. The diagnostic protocol includes detailed personal and family history, general and neurologic examinations, and functional, neuropsychological, and neuroimaging assessment. After this work-up, comprehensive diagnoses are made. RESULTS: From January 2006 to March 2014, 600 patients (mean age 67.3 years ± 13.9; 52% females) have been evaluated in the clinic. Cognitive impairment, including mild cognitive impairment and dementia, mainly of vascular origin, was the most common (36.4%) diagnostic category, followed by suspected or confirmed familial micro-angiopathy (35.8%). Compared to the first years of activity, we are now facing the need of augmenting the number of visits due to increasing request and to better implement the multidisciplinarity of the team. Efforts are currently directed towards the definition of management protocols in pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies. CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of a VAS-COG clinic represents an important step for the appreciation of the patient clinical needs and for the implementation of screening, diagnostic, and treatment options in the field of the neuropsychiatric consequences of cerebrovascular diseases.

Predictive value of MoCA in the acute phase of stroke on the diagnosis of mid-term cognitive impairment.

Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) includes all forms of cognitive decline that develop after stroke, even if not severe enough to fit the criteria of dementia. Our aims were to investigate the predictive value of a brief bedside examination (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA) in the acute phase of stroke on the diagnosis of mid-term PSCI, taking into account other clinical, cognitive, functional, and neuroimaging predictors. Consecutive patients admitted to a stroke unit were evaluated with MoCA between 5 and 9 days after stroke. At baseline, clinical, functional, and neuroimaging data were collected. Patients were reassessed between 6 and 9 months after stroke by means of an extensive neuropsychological and functional evaluation. Out of 137 enrolled stroke patients, 80 (58.4%) were followed up (mean age 68.2 ± 14.6 years, males 66%, mean NIHSS score 3.6 ± 4.8). PSCI was diagnosed in 47 patients (59%; 35 mild cognitive impairment, 12 dementia). Controlling for age, education, functional and cognitive pre-morbid status, stroke severity, and pre-existing lacunar infarcts, MoCA baseline score [OR (95% CI) = 1.4(1.1-1.8)] for each point] and leukoaraiosis severity [OR (95% CI) = 0.4(0.2-0.9)] for each point of the van Swieten scale] were independently associated with PSCI. Using a ROC analysis, a cut-off of 21 predicted the diagnosis of PSCI with 91.4 % sensitivity, 75.8 % specificity, 80 % positive predictive value, and 89.3 % negative predictive value. In a sample of mild stroke patients, MoCA seems to be a good predictor of mid-term PSCI, making it a possible candidate for a brief cognitive screening in the acute stroke setting.