Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 61
Filtrar
1.
JAMA ; 330(1): 80-82, 2023 07 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37395777

RESUMO

This study uses National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data to examine lipid control among adults in the US with coronary artery disease from January 2015 to March 2020.


Assuntos
LDL-Colesterol , Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Adulto , Humanos , HDL-Colesterol , LDL-Colesterol/sangue , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/sangue , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 12205, 2023 07 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37500708

RESUMO

This study examined the latent structure of the broad range of complex neuropsychiatric morbidities occurring 1 year after COVID-19 infection. As part of the CU-COVID19 study, 248 (response rate=39.3%) of 631 adults hospitalized for COVID-19 infection in Hong Kong completed an online survey between March-2021 and January-2022. Disorder prevalence was compared against a random non-infected household sample (n=1834). 248 surveys were received on average 321 days post-infection (Mean age: 48.9, 54% female, moderate/severe/critical infection: 58.2%). 32.4% were screened to have at least one mental disorder, 78.7% of whom had concurrent fatigue/subjective cognitive impairment (SCI). Only PTSD (19.1%) was significantly more common than control (14%, p=0.047). Latent profile analysis classified individuals into P1 (12·4%)-no current neuropsychiatric morbidities, P2 (23.1%)-SCI/fatigue, P3 (45.2%)-anxiety/PTSD, P4 (19.3%)-depression. SCI and fatigue pervaded in all profiles (P2-4) with neuropsychiatric morbidities one-year post-infection. PTSD, anxiety and depressive symptoms were most important in differentiating P2-4. Past mental health and P4 independently predicted functional impairment. Neuropsychiatric morbidity was associated with past mental health, reduced resilience, financial problems, but not COVID-19 severity. Their confluence with depressive and anxiety symptoms predicted impairment and are associated with psychological and environmental factors.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/complicações , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/epidemiologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/diagnóstico , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Transtornos de Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Transtornos de Ansiedade/etiologia , Fadiga/etiologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/etiologia
3.
Cell Rep ; 42(5): 112432, 2023 05 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37120812

RESUMO

We recently discovered that some bacteriophages establish a nucleus-like replication compartment (phage nucleus), but the core genes that define nucleus-based phage replication and their phylogenetic distribution were still to be determined. Here, we show that phages encoding the major phage nucleus protein chimallin share 72 conserved genes encoded within seven gene blocks. Of these, 21 core genes are unique to nucleus-forming phage, and all but one of these genes encode proteins of unknown function. We propose that these phages comprise a novel viral family we term Chimalliviridae. Fluorescence microscopy and cryoelectron tomography studies of Erwinia phage vB_EamM_RAY confirm that many of the key steps of nucleus-based replication are conserved among diverse chimalliviruses and reveal variations on this replication mechanism. This work expands our understanding of phage nucleus and PhuZ spindle diversity and function, providing a roadmap for identifying key mechanisms underlying nucleus-based phage replication.


Assuntos
Bacteriófagos , Erwinia , Bacteriófagos/genética , Bacteriófagos/metabolismo , Erwinia/genética , Erwinia/metabolismo , Filogenia , Genoma Viral , DNA Viral/genética , DNA Viral/metabolismo
4.
bioRxiv ; 2023 Feb 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36865095

RESUMO

We recently discovered that some bacteriophages establish a nucleus-like replication compartment (phage nucleus), but the core genes that define nucleus-based phage replication and their phylogenetic distribution were unknown. By studying phages that encode the major phage nucleus protein chimallin, including previously sequenced yet uncharacterized phages, we discovered that chimallin-encoding phages share a set of 72 highly conserved genes encoded within seven distinct gene blocks. Of these, 21 core genes are unique to this group, and all but one of these unique genes encode proteins of unknown function. We propose that phages with this core genome comprise a novel viral family we term Chimalliviridae. Fluorescence microscopy and cryo-electron tomography studies of Erwinia phage vB_EamM_RAY confirm that many of the key steps of nucleus-based replication encoded in the core genome are conserved among diverse chimalliviruses, and reveal that non-core components can confer intriguing variations on this replication mechanism. For instance, unlike previously studied nucleus-forming phages, RAY doesn't degrade the host genome, and its PhuZ homolog appears to form a five-stranded filament with a lumen. This work expands our understanding of phage nucleus and PhuZ spindle diversity and function, providing a roadmap for identifying key mechanisms underlying nucleus-based phage replication.

5.
Hypertension ; 80(3): 553-562, 2023 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36111537

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hypertension control has worsened nationally, and treatment intensification is important for control. National trends for appropriate blood pressure intensification for older adults are unknown. We determine the proportion of ambulatory visits where older adults with hypertension were appropriately intensified on antihypertensives from 2008 to 2018. METHODS: Data from National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey were used. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey is a nationally representative sample of ambulatory visits. Adults 60 years or older were included. Appropriate antihypertensive intensification was defined as addition of an antihypertensive for a blood pressure reading above target. We examined appropriate intensification by blood pressure targets set by the American College of Cardiology-American Heart Association, the European Society of Cardiology, and the American College of Physicians-American Academy of Family Physicians guidelines for older adults. Further, we defined an additional all-inclusive criterion meeting all 3 guidelines. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2018, appropriate intensification by American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association occurred at 11.1% (95% CI, 9.8%-12.5%) of visits, decreasing from 13.6% (95% CI, 15.6%-28.7%) of visits in 2008 to 2009 to 10.4% (95% CI, 10.9%-26.4%) in 2015 to 2018. Appropriate intensification by European Society of Cardiology occurred at 14.2% (12.1%-16.6%) of visits over 2008 to 2018, decreasing from 16.9% (95% CI, 13.5%-21.0%) in 2008 to 2009 to 12.5% (95% CI, 7.4%-20.3%) from 2015 to 2018. Appropriate intensification by American Academy of Family Physicians/American College of Physicians occurred at 18.9% (16.2%-22.0%) of visits over 2008 to 2018, decreasing from 24.7% (95% CI, 20.2%-29.0%) in 2008 to 2009 to 14.9% (95% CI, 9.0%-23.7%) from 2015 to 2018. By all-inclusive criteria, intensification trended toward worsening with time: odds ratio: 0.93 ([95% CI, 0.87-1.00]; P=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate treatment intensification for older adults with hypertension in the United States was suboptimal over the past decade.


Assuntos
Cardiologia , Hipertensão , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Idoso , Pressão Sanguínea , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Hipertensivos/farmacologia , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , American Heart Association
7.
JAMA Health Forum ; 3(7): e221956, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35977225

RESUMO

Importance: Safety-net hospitals, which have limited financial resources and care for disadvantaged populations, have lower performance on measures of patient experience than non-safety-net hospitals. In 2011, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) program began tying hospital payments to patient-reported experience scores, but whether implementation of this program narrowed differences in scores between safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals is unknown. Objective: To evaluate whether the VBP program's implementation was associated with changes in measures of patient-reported experience at safety-net hospitals compared with non-safety-net hospitals between 2008 and 2019. Design Setting and Participants: This cohort study evaluated 2266 US hospitals that participated in the VBP program between 2008 and 2019. Safety-net hospitals were defined as those in the highest quartile of the disproportionate share hospital index. Data were analyzed from December 2021 to February 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems global measures of patient-reported experience and satisfaction, including a patient's overall rating of a hospital and willingness to recommend a hospital. Secondary outcomes included the 7 other Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems measures encompassing communication ratings, clinical processes ratings, and hospital environment ratings. Piecewise linear mixed regression models were used to assess annual trends in performance on each patient experience measure by hospital safety-net status before (July 1, 2007-June 30, 2011) and after (July 1, 2011-June 30, 2019) implementation of the VBP program. Results: Of 2266 US hospitals, 549 (24.2%) were safety-net hospitals. Safety-net hospitals were more likely than non-safety-net hospitals to be nonteaching (67.6% [371 of 549] vs 53.1% [912 of 1717]; P < .001) and urban (82.5% [453 of 549] vs 77.4% [1329 of 1717]; P = .01). Safety-net hospitals consistently had lower patient experience scores than non-safety-net hospitals across all measures from 2008 to 2019. The percentage of patients rating safety-net hospitals as a 9 or 10 out of 10 increased during the pre-VBP program period (annual percentage change, 1.84%; 95% CI, 1.73%-1.96%) and at a slower rate after VBP program implementation (annual percentage change, 0.49%; 95% CI, 0.45%-0.53%) at safety-net hospitals. Similar patterns were observed at non-safety-net hospitals (pre-VBP program annual percentage change, 1.84% [95% CI, 1.77%-1.90%] and post-VBP program annual percentage change, 0.42% [95% CI, 0.41%-0.45%]). There was no differential change in performance between these sites after the VBP program implementation (adjusted differential change, 0.07% [95% CI, -0.08% to 0.23%]; P = .36). These patterns were similar for the global measure that assessed whether patients would definitely recommend a hospital. There was also no differential change in performance between safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals under the VBP program across measures of communication, including doctor (adjusted differential change, -0.09% [95% CI, -0.19% to 0.01%]; P = .08) and nurse (adjusted differential change, -0.01% [95% CI, -0.12% to 0.10%]; P = .86) communication as well as clinical process measures (staff responsiveness adjusted differential change, 0.13% [95% CI, -0.03% to 0.29%]; P = .11; and discharge instructions adjusted differential change, -0.02% [95% CI, -0.12% to 0.07%]; P = .62). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study of 2266 US hospitals found that the VBP program was not associated with improved patient experience at safety-net hospitals vs non-safety-net hospitals during an 8-year period. Policy makers may need to explore other strategies to address ongoing differences in patient experience and satisfaction, including additional support for safety-net hospitals.


Assuntos
Medicare , Aquisição Baseada em Valor , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Hospitais , Humanos , Assistência ao Paciente , Estados Unidos
8.
Hypertension ; 79(11): 2388-2396, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35924561

RESUMO

Orthostatic hypotension affects roughly 10% of individuals with hypertension and is associated with several adverse health outcomes, including dementia, cardiovascular disease, stroke, and death. Among adults with hypertension, orthostatic hypotension has also been shown to predict patterns of blood pressure dysregulation that may not be appreciated in the office setting, including nocturnal nondipping. Individuals with uncontrolled hypertension are at particular risk of orthostatic hypotension and may meet diagnostic criteria for the condition with a smaller relative reduction in blood pressure compared with normotensive individuals. Antihypertensive medications are commonly de-prescribed to address orthostatic hypotension; however, this approach may worsen supine or seated hypertension, which may be an important driver of adverse events in this population. There is significant variability between guidelines for the diagnosis of orthostatic hypotension with regards to timing and position of blood pressure measurements. Clinically relevant orthostatic hypotension may be missed when standing measurements are delayed or when taken after a seated rather than supine position. The treatment of orthostatic hypotension in patients with hypertension poses a significant management challenge for clinicians; however, recent evidence suggests that intensive blood pressure control may reduce the risk of orthostatic hypotension. A detailed characterization of blood pressure variability is essential to tailoring a treatment plan and can be accomplished using both in-office and out-of-office monitoring.


Assuntos
Distinções e Prêmios , Hipertensão , Hipotensão Ortostática , Humanos , Hipotensão Ortostática/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/complicações , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Pressão Sanguínea , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico
11.
Ann Intern Med ; 175(6): 765-773, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35533384

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Racial/ethnic minority populations in the United States have increased rates of diabetes compared with White populations. The 2021 guidelines from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommend diabetes screening for adults aged 35 to 70 years with a body mass index (BMI) of 25 kg/m2 or greater. OBJECTIVE: To determine the BMI threshold for diabetes screening in major racial/ethnic minority populations with benefits and harms equivalent to those of the current diabetes screening threshold in White adults. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey), 2011 to 2018. PARTICIPANTS: Nonpregnant U.S. adults aged 18 to 70 years (n = 19 335). MEASUREMENTS: A logistic regression model was used to estimate diabetes prevalence at various BMIs for White, Asian, Black, and Hispanic Americans. For each racial/ethnic minority group, the equivalent BMI threshold was defined as the BMI at which the prevalence of diabetes in 35-year-old persons in that group is equal to that in 35-year-old White adults at a BMI of 25 kg/m2. Ranges were estimated to account for the uncertainty in prevalence estimates for White and racial/ethnic minority populations. RESULTS: Among adults aged 35 years with a BMI of 25 kg/m2, the prevalence of diabetes in Asian Americans (3.8% [95% CI, 2.8% to 5.1%]), Black Americans (3.5% [CI, 2.7% to 4.7%]), and Hispanic Americans (3.0% [CI, 2.1% to 4.2%]) was significantly higher than that in White Americans (1.4% [CI, 1.0% to 2.0%]). Compared with a BMI threshold of 25 kg/m2 in White Americans, the equivalent BMI thresholds for diabetes prevalence were 20 kg/m2 (range, <18.5 to 23 kg/m2) for Asian Americans, less than 18.5 kg/m2 (range, <18.5 to 23 kg/m2) for Black Americans, and 18.5 kg/m2 (range, <18.5 to 24 kg/m2) for Hispanic Americans. LIMITATION: Sample size limitations precluded assessment of heterogeneity within racial/ethnic groups. CONCLUSION: Among U.S. adults aged 35 years or older, offering diabetes screening to Black Americans and Hispanic Americans with a BMI of 18.5 kg/m2 or greater and Asian Americans with a BMI of 20 kg/m2 or greater would be equivalent to screening White adults with a BMI of 25 kg/m2 or greater. Using screening thresholds specific to race/ethnicity has the potential to reduce disparities in diabetes diagnosis. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Etnicidade , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Humanos , Grupos Minoritários , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
12.
Am J Cardiol ; 174: 89-95, 2022 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35504747

RESUMO

Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is a primary cause of older adults presenting to the emergency department with acute dyspnea. Point-of-care lung ultrasound (LUS) has shown comparable or superior diagnostic accuracy in comparison with a chest x-ray (CXR) in patients presenting with symptoms of ADHF. The systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to elucidate the sensitivity and specificity of LUS in comparison with CXR for diagnosing ADHF and summarize the rapidly growing body of evidence in this domain. A total of 5 databases were searched through February 18, 2021, to identify observational studies that reported on the use of LUS compared with CXR in diagnosing ADHF in patients presenting with shortness of breath. Meta-analysis was conducted on the sensitivities and specificities of each diagnostic method. A total of 8 studies reporting on 2,787 patients were included in this meta-analysis. For patients presenting with signs and symptoms of ADHF, LUS was found to be more sensitive than CXR (91.8% vs 76.5%) and more specific than CXR (92.3% vs 87.0%) for the detection of cardiogenic pulmonary edema. In conclusion, LUS is more sensitive and specific than CXR in detecting pulmonary edema. This highlights the importance of sonographic B-lines, along with the accurate interpretation of clinical data, in the diagnosis of ADHF. In addition to its convenience, reduced costs, and reduced radiation exposure, LUS should be considered an effective alternative to CXR for evaluating patients with dyspnea in the setting of ADHF.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Edema Pulmonar , Idoso , Dispneia/diagnóstico , Dispneia/etiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Edema Pulmonar/complicações , Edema Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Radiografia , Radiografia Torácica/efeitos adversos , Radiografia Torácica/métodos , Ultrassonografia/métodos
15.
PLoS One ; 16(12): e0261358, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34962939

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Colchicine may inhibit inflammasome signaling and reduce proinflammatory cytokines, a purported mechanism of COVID-19 pneumonia. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to report on the state of the current literature on the use of colchicine in COVID-19 and to investigate the reported clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients by colchicine usage. METHODS: The literature was searched from January 2019 through January 28, 2021. References were screened to identify studies that reported the effect of colchicine usage on COVID-19 outcomes including mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, or mechanical ventilation. Studies were meta-analyzed for mortality by the subgroup of trial design (RCT vs observational) and ICU status. Studies reporting an risk ratio (RR), odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) were analyzed separately. RESULTS: Eight studies, reporting on 16,248 patients, were included in this review. The Recovery trial reported equivalent mortality between colchicine and non-colchicine users. Across the other studies, patients who received colchicine had a lower risk of mortality-HR of 0.25 (95% CI: 0.09, 0.66) and OR of 0.22 (95% CI: 0.09, 0.57). There was no statistical difference in risk of ICU admissions between patients with COVID-19 who received colchicine and those who did not-OR of 0.26 (95% CI: 0.06, 1.09). CONCLUSION: Colchicine may reduce the risk of mortality in individuals with COVID-19. Further prospective investigation may further determine the efficacy of colchicine as treatment in COVID-19 patients in various care settings of the disease, including post-hospitalization and long-term care.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Colchicina/uso terapêutico , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Respiração Artificial , Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
PLoS One ; 16(11): e0259514, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34735523

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Famotidine is a competitive histamine H2-receptor antagonist most commonly used for gastric acid suppression but thought to have potential efficacy in treating patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis are to summarize the current literature and report clinical outcomes on the use of famotidine for treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. METHODS: Five databases were searched through February 12, 2021 to identify observational studies that reported on associations of famotidine use with outcomes in COVID-19. Meta-analysis was conducted for composite primary clinical outcome (e.g. rate of death, intubation, or intensive care unit admissions) and death separately, where either aggregate odds ratio (OR) or hazard ratio (HR) was calculated. RESULTS: Four studies, reporting on 46,435 total patients and 3,110 patients treated with famotidine, were included in this meta-analysis. There was no significant association between famotidine use and composite outcomes in patients with COVID-19: HR 0.63 (95% CI: 0.35, 1.16). Across the three studies that reported mortality separated from other endpoints, there was no association between famotidine use during hospitalization and risk of death-HR 0.67 (95% CI: 0.26, 1.73) and OR 0.79 (95% CI: 0.19, 3.34). Heterogeneity ranged from 83.69% to 88.07%. CONCLUSION: Based on the existing observational studies, famotidine use is not associated with a reduced risk of mortality or combined outcome of mortality, intubation, and/or intensive care services in hospitalized individuals with COVID-19, though heterogeneity was high, and point estimates suggested a possible protective effect for the composite outcome that may not have been observed due to lack of power. Further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) may help determine the efficacy and safety of famotidine as a treatment for COVID-19 patients in various care settings of the disease.


Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Famotidina/uso terapêutico , Hospitalização , Adulto , Idoso , Gerenciamento de Dados , Feminino , Antagonistas dos Receptores H2 da Histamina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Razão de Chances , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Risco , SARS-CoV-2
17.
Am J Cardiol ; 159: 30-35, 2021 11 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34503823

RESUMO

Cardiovascular mortality is substantially higher in rural communities compared with urban communities. Understanding if disparities in inpatient percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) persist in the United States will help inform initiatives to improve cardiovascular health. Of the more than 7 million hospitalizations in the National Inpatient Sample (2016), we identified 80,793 unweighted hospitalizations for PCI using ICD-10 procedure codes. Using survey weights, these hospitalizations projected 371,040 US admissions for inpatient PCI. For the primary analysis, we determined the association between hospital urban-rural designation and in-hospital mortality after inpatient PCI. In the secondary analysis, we evaluated the association between teaching status and this outcome. Multivariable logistic regression models, adjusted for multiple risk factors and patient characteristics, were used. Of the 371,430 hospitalizations for inpatient PCI, there were 108.9 (±2.2) admissions per 100,000 US population from urban hospitals and 152.9 (±6.3) from rural hospitals. Of the urban hospitals, there were 77.7 (±1.9) admissions per 100,000 US population at teaching hospitals (71.7%) and 30.7 (±1.0) at urban nonteaching hospitals (28.3%). In-hospital mortality did not differ between urban and rural hospitals (1.8% urban vs 1.9% rural, adjusted odds ratio for rural compared with urban: 1.15 [95% confidence interval 0.98, 1.34], p = 0.08). In urban hospitals, however, in-hospital mortality was higher in nonteaching hospitals than in teaching hospitals (2.0% nonteaching vs 1.7% teaching, adjusted odds ratio for teaching compared with nonteaching: 1.17 [95% confidence interval 1.01, 1.36], p = 0.04). In conclusion, in-hospital mortality rates after inpatient PCI were similar between urban and rural hospitals in the United States. However, among urban hospitals, nonteaching hospitals had higher rates of in-hospital mortality after PCI. In conclusion, solutions to address disparities for inpatient PCI outcomes between teaching and nonteaching hospitals are needed.


Assuntos
Mortalidade Hospitalar , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/mortalidade , Feminino , Hospitais Rurais , Hospitais de Ensino , Hospitais Urbanos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos
18.
Hypertens Res ; 44(11): 1471-1482, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34518648

RESUMO

Resistant hypertension (RH) has been poorly studied due to the difficulty in distinguishing it from nonadherence-the exclusion of which is necessary to accurately diagnose RH. Therefore, little is known about the prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of true RH. We evaluated 1838 patients from the standard blood pressure (BP) arm of the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Trial. We classified patients into three groups: "true RH", "pseudo-RH" (i.e., patients with BP levels that would classify them as RH but who were non-adherent), and "other" (i.e., those who could not be classified as having "true RH" or "pseudo-RH"). We examined predictors of true and pseudo-RH and the relationship between true RH and the composite outcome of nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. Among 1838 participants with complete information, 489 (26.6%) met the definition of true RH, and 94 (16.1%) RH patients had "pseudo-RH" on ≥1 visit over the first 12 months. Predictors of RH included: baseline SBP ≥ 160 mmHg (OR = 8.79; 95% CI: 5.70-13.68) and baseline SBP between 140-159 (OR = 2.91; 95% CI: 2.13-4.00) compared to SBP < 140, additional baseline BP medication (OR = 3.40; 95% CI: 2.83-4.11), macroalbuminuria (OR = 2.35; 95% CI: 1.50-3.67), CKD (OR = 1.53; 95% CI: 0.99-2.33), history of stroke (OR = 1.73; 95% CI: 1.04-2.82), and black race (OR = 1.39; 95% CI: 1.02-1.88); the cross-validated C-statistic was 0.80. "True RH" patients had a 65% increased hazard in composite outcome (HR = 1.65; 95% CI: 1.13-2.42). In conclusion, the majority of patients classified as having RH had "true RH," which was more common among those who are black, have macroalbuminuria, CKD, stroke, higher baseline SBP, and are taking more baseline antihypertensives. These patients are at increased risk for cardiovascular and mortality events.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus , Hipertensão , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Pressão Sanguínea , Doenças Cardiovasculares/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Coortes , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco de Doenças Cardíacas , Humanos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...