Effect of immunotherapy-infusion time of day on survival of patients with advanced cancers: a study-level meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard of care for numerous malignancies. Emerging evidence suggests that the time of day (ToD) of ICI administration could impact the outcomes of patients with cancer. The consistency of ToD effects on ICI efficacy awaits initial evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This meta-analysis integrates progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) data from studies with a defined 'cut-off' ToD. Hazard ratios (HRs) [95% confidence interval (CI)] of an earlier progression or death according to 'early' or 'late' ToD of ICIs were collected from each report and pooled. RESULTS: Thirteen studies involved 1663 patients (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, 83%; males/females, 67%/33%) with non-small-cell lung cancer (47%), renal cell carcinoma (24%), melanoma (20%), urothelial cancer (5%), or esophageal carcinoma (4%). Most patients received anti-programmed cell death protein 1 or anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (98%), and a small proportion also received anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (anti-CTLA-4) (18%). ToD cut-offs were 13:00 or 14:00 (i.e. ICI median infusion time), for six studies, and 16:00 or 16:30 (i.e. reported threshold for weaker vaccination responses) for seven studies. Pooled analyses revealed that the early ToD groups had longer OS (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.42-0.58; P < 0.00001) and PFS (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.42-0.61; P < 0.00001) compared with the late ToD groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with selected metastatic cancers seemed to largely benefit from early ToD ICI infusions, which is consistent with circadian mechanisms in immune-cell functions and trafficking. Prospective randomized trials are needed to establish recommendations for optimal circadian timing of ICI-based cancer therapies.

Prognostic value of comorbidities in older patients with cancer: the ELCAPA cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In older patients, comorbidities competed with cancer for mortality risk. We assessed the prognostic value of comorbidities in older patients with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed all patients >70 years of age with colorectal, breast, prostate, or lung cancer included in the prospective ELCAPA cohort. The Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatrics (CIRS-G) score was used to assess comorbidities. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) at 3, 12, and 36 months. The adjusted difference in the restricted mean survival time (RMST) was used to assess the strength of the relationship between comorbidities and survival. RESULTS: Of the 1551 patients included (median age 82 years; interquartile range 78-86 years), 502 (32%), 575 (38%), 283 (18%), and 191 (12%) had colorectal, breast, prostate, and lung cancer, respectively, and 50% had metastatic disease. Hypertension, kidney failure, and cognitive impairment were the most common comorbidities (67%, 38%, and 29% of the patients, respectively). A CIRS-G score >17, two or more severe comorbidities, more than seven comorbidities, heart failure, and cognitive impairment were independently associated with shorter OS. The greatest effect size was observed for CIRS-G >17 (versus CIRS-G <11): at 36 months, the adjusted differences in the RMST (95% confidence interval) were -6.0 months (-9.3 to -2.6 months) for colorectal cancer, -9.1 months (-13.2 to -4.9 months) for breast cancer, -8.3 months (-12.8 to -3.9 months) for prostate cancer, and -5.5 months (-9.9 to -1.1 months) for lung cancer (P < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidities' type, number, and severity were independently associated with shorter OS. A 17-point cut-off over 56 for the total CIRS-G score could be considered in clinical practice.

Immune response to pertussis vaccine in COPD patients.

Exacerbation triggered by respiratory infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Strategies aiming to preventing infection may have significant public health impact. Our previous study demonstrated decreased immunological response to seasonal flu vaccination in COPD patients, questioning the efficiency of other vaccines in this group of patients. We performed a prospective, monocenter, longitudinal study that evaluated the humoral and cellular responses upon pertussis vaccination. We included 13 patients with stable COPD and 8 healthy volunteers. No difference in circulating B and T cell subsets at baseline was noted. Both groups presented similar levels of TFH, plasmablasts and pertussis specific antibodies induction after vaccination. Moreover, monitoring T cell immunity after ex-vivo peptide stimulation revealed equivalent induction of functional and specific CD4+ T cells (IFNγ, TNFα and IL-2-expressing T cells) in both groups. Our results highlight the immunological efficiency of pertussis vaccination in this particularly vulnerable population and challenge the concept that COPD patients are less responsive to all immunization strategies. Healthcare providers should stress the necessity of decennial Tdap booster vaccination in COPD patients.

Real-world effectiveness of ixazomib combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: the REMIX study.

Ixazomib (IXA) is an oral proteasome inhibitor (PI) used in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IXA-Rd) for patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The REMIX study is one of the largest prospective, real-world analysis of the effectiveness of IXA-Rd in the setting of RRMM. Conducted in France between August 2017 and October 2019, the REMIX study, a non-interventional prospective study, included 376 patients receiving IXA-Rd in second line or later and followed for at least 24 months. Primary endpoint was the median progression-free survival (mPFS). Median age was 71 years (Q1-Q3 65.0 - 77.5) with 18.4% of participants older than 80 years. IXA-Rd was initiated in L2, L3 and L4 + for 60.4%, 18.1% and 21.5%, respectively. mPFS was 19.1 months (95% CI [15.9, 21.5]) and overall response rate (ORR) was 73.1%. mPFS was 21.5, 21.9 and 5.8 months in patients receiving IXA-Rd as L2, L3, L4 + respectively. Among patients receiving IXA-Rd in L2 and L3, mPFS was similar for patients previously exposed to lenalidomide (19.5 months) than for those lenalidomide naive (not exposed, 22.6 months, p = 0.29). mPFS was 19.1 months in patients younger than 80 years and 17.4 months in those 80 years or older (p = 0.06) with similar ORR (72.4% and 76.8%) in both subgroups. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 78.2% of patients including 40.7% of treatment-related AE. IXA discontinuation was due to toxicity in 21% of patients. To conclude, the results of the REMIX study are consistent with the results of Tourmaline-MM1 and confirm the benefit of IXA-Rd combination in real life. It shows the interest of IXA-Rd in an older and frailer population, with an acceptable effectiveness and tolerance.

Reduced risk of secondary primary extra pulmonary cancer in advanced/metastatic lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer survivors are at high risk of developing a second primary cancer (SPC). We explored the Unicancer Epidemiology Strategy Medical-Economics for advanced or metastatic lung cancer (AMLC) database to assess the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) on the risk of SPC in patients with advanced/metastatic lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study used data from patients with AMLC, with treatment initiated between January 1st 2015 and December 31st 2018. Patients with lung cancer as the second primary cancer were excluded and a 6-months landmark threshold was applied to exclude patients with synchronous SPC, patients dead without SPC or with a follow-up inferior to 6 months. A propensity score (PS) was calculated on the following baseline covariates: Age at locally advanced or metastatic diagnosis, sex, smoking status, metastatic status, performance status and histological type. The inverse probability of treatment weighting approach was used on the analyses aiming to assess the impact of ICI administered for AMLC, on the risk of occurrence of SPC. RESULTS: Among the 10 796 patients, 148 (1.4%) patients had a diagnosis of SPC in a median interval of 22 (min-max: 7-173) months. All the patients (100%) with locally advanced or metastatic LC received at least one systemic treatment including (chemotherapy regimen (n = 9 851, 91.2%); ICI (n = 4 648, 43.0%); targeted treatment (n = 3 500; 32.4%). 40 (0.9%) SPC were reported in the 4 648 patients with metastatic LC treated with ICI vs 108 (1.7%) out of the 6 148 who did not receive immunotherapy (p < 0.0001). The multivariate analysis identified that treatment with ICI in patients with AMLC is associated with a reduced risk of SPC (HR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.27-0.58). CONCLUSION: Treatment with ICI in AMLC patients was associated with a significantly reduced risk of SPC. Prospective studies are required to confirm these results.

Cancer du poumon à l'ère du COVID-19: Lung cancer in the COVID-19 era.

The Covid-19 epidemic has placed considerable strain on healthcare systems in all countries. The impacts are multiple for patients treated for cancer.The objective of this manuscript is to summarize the epidemiological data available on patients with lung cancer developing a Covid infection, in particular the risk factors for aggravation and mortality, to describe the different strategies to improve the management of these patients and to summarize the existing recommendations in this area.The largest cohort on this subject, Teravolt, which included 1012 patients, found a hospitalization rate of 72 %, an aggravation rate of 56 % and a mortality of 32 %. In multivariate analysis, age ≥65 years (OR 1.53 CI 1.11-2.1), active smoking (OR 2 CI 1.3-3), metastatic status (OR 1.9 CI 1, 3-2.7), an ECOG PS ≥2 (OR 3.7 CI 2.7-5), taking corticosteroids before COVID infection (OR 1.8 CI 1.2-2.7), are associated with a higher risk of mortality but not treatments with chemotherapy or targeted therapies. Interestingly, treatment with immunotherapy appears to decrease the risk of mortality (OR 0.6 CI 0.97)Several screening strategies for asymptomatic forms have been reported in the literature and seem useful for diagnosing asymptomatic forms in patients undergoing systemic treatment or radiotherapy. Finally, national and international recommendations converge on many points, in particular for the need to protect patients and their families from Covid by assessing the benefit / risk of treatment on a case-by-case basis.© 2020 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

[Evolution of the costs and management of lung cancer between 2004 and 2014]. / Évolution des coûts et de la prise en charge du cancer pulmonaire entre 2004 et 2014.

BACKGROUND: Given its morbidity and mortality, lung cancer is a major public health issue. In recent years, it has benefited from several therapeutic innovations. The objective of this study was to compare, over two distinct periods of ten years, the impact on survival and the costs of lung cancer management. METHODS: The monocentric study assessed survival and the direct costs of lung cancer management of patients diagnosed in Brest University hospital in 2004 and in 2014. RESULTS: The analysis included 142 patients in 2004 and 156 in 2014. Most patients were smokers (72%), metastatic at diagnosis (60%) both in 2004 and in 2014. Median survival was not significantly improved between the 2 periods (9.7 versus 10.9 months), but there was a significant increase in the average cost of care per patient (€ 17,063 vs. € 29,264, P=<0.0001) between 2004 and 2014. CONCLUSION: The significant increase in treatment costs did not translate into an improvement in the survival of patients with lung cancer between 2004 and 2014.

Nivolumab-refractory patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionised cancer care especially in lung cancer. New response patterns have been described under ICIs such as pseudo-progression or hyper-progressive disease (HPD). The definition of HPD is yet to be consensual. The aim of this study was to suggest a clinical definition of nivolumab-refractory patients and find factors associated with this entity. METHODS: We performed a multi centric retrospective study including all patients who received nivolumab for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) during the French authorisation for temporary use in 2015. RESULTS: 303 patients were included in the cohort and 292 had details on the number of nivolumab injections received. 57 patients (20%) were nivolumab-refractory. These patients had worse PS at nivolumab initiation (p < 0.0001), shorter duration of treatment before nivolumab (p = 0.028) and had dramatically shorter nivolumab overall survival (p < 0.0001) than patients who did not present with refractory disease. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab-refractory disease can affect up to 20% of patients treated with nivolumab for advanced NSCLC with dramatically shortened survival rates. Further studies are needed to understand the precise mechanisms leading to refractory disease as well as its management.

[Respiratory isolation in suspected tuberculosis with negative direct sputum examination]. / Isolement respiratoire en cas de suspicion de tuberculose avec examen direct négatif.

Airborne isolation is the main confinement measure used to limit human-to-human transmission of tuberculosis. If implemented early, precisely as soon as the patient is clinically diagnosed with tuberculosis, this measure will protect the population, particularly the health workers who are exposed. A patient suspected of being infected with tuberculosis can create a difficult situation if microbiological examination of his respiratory secretions is negative. This is a complex laboratory technique and sensitivity varies from one test to another. Thus, a false negative result is possible; meaning that a patient can have positive results on a microbiological culture performed later. This patient would still have low, but not no, contagiousness as long as a treatment has not been initiated. This situation can extend the period of respiratory isolation while further diagnostic investigations are carried out. This extended isolation can reduce the quality of health care delivered and patients can show signs of depression and anxiety. The use in routine clinical investigation of gene amplification tools should allow a rethinking of respiratory isolation rules. These tools, which are very sensitive and with a short reporting time, could drastically reduce the duration of respiratory isolation for patients suspected of being infected with tuberculosis.

Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring a BRAF mutation: a multicentre study exploring clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes in a real-life setting: EXPLORE GFPC 02-14.

Background: Mutations in BRAF are rare oncogene mutations, found in 2% of non-small-cell lung cancers (nsclcs). Little information is available about the management of patients with BRAF-mutated nsclc, except for those included in clinical trials. We undertook the present study to assess the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of those patients in a real-life setting. Methods: This retrospective multicentre observational study included all patients with BRAF-mutated nsclc diagnosed between January 2012 and December 2014. Results: Patients (n = 59) from 24 centres were included: 57.6% men; mean age: 64.5 ± 14.5 years; 82% with a performance status of 0-1 at diagnosis; smoking status: 40.3% current, 32.6% former; 93% with adenocarcinoma histology; 75% stage iv; 78% with V600E mutations; 2 with EGFR and 2 with ALK co-mutations. Of the stage iv patients, 79% received first-line therapy (14.2% anti-BRAF), and 48% received second-line treatment (23.8% anti-BRAF). Response rate and progression-free survival were, respectively, 51.7% and 8.7 months [95% confidence interval (ci): 6.4 months to 15.2 months] for first-line therapy and 35.3% and 4.1 months (95% ci: 2 months to 10.9 months) for second-line treatments. The 2-year overall survival was 58.5% (95% ci: 45.8% to 74.8%). Outcomes in patients with stage iv nsclc harbouring BRAF V600E mutations (n = 32) did not differ significantly from those of patients with other BRAF mutations. Conclusions: In this real-world analysis, most nsclc patients with a BRAF mutation were men and current or former smokers. Survival appears to be better in these BRAF-mutated patients than in nsclc patients without an oncogenic driver.

[Bevacizumab in combination with first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in clinical practice. Results of the EOLE study]. / Bevacizumab en association à une première ligne de chimiothérapie chez des patients atteints d'un cancer bronchique non à petites cellules, non épidermoïde, à un stade avancé ou en rechute : résultats de l'étude non interventionnelle EOLE.

INTRODUCTION: The EOLE cohort aimed to describe, in routine clinical practice, the characteristics and management of patients receiving bevacizumab in combination with first-line metastatic chemotherapy for advanced metastatic or recurrent non squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC), as well as its efficacy and safety. METHODS: A total of 423 patients were enrolled in this prospective, national, multicenter study. Data were collected every 3 months over an 18-month period. RESULTS: Amongst the 407 patients analyzed (mean age 60±10 years, male 68%, ECOG-PS≤1 88%, smokers or former smokers 87%, cardiovascular comorbidities 40%), all except for 2 patients received bevacizumab (7.5 or 15mg/kg/3 weeks in 99% of patients) in combination with doublet chemotherapy. A total of 160 (60%) patients who completed induction received bevacizumab maintenance therapy. Median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI=[6.0-7.5]). Median overall survival (12.8 months [10.4-14.7]) was longer in patients with ECOG-PS≤1 (14.4 months [12.3-15.9] versus 4.9 months [3.4-8.3] if ECOG-PS=2). A total of 131 (32%) patients experienced at least one serious adverse event (SAE), and 51 (12%) at least one bevacizumab-related SAE. CONCLUSION: EOLE confirms the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in aNSCLC patients, in current medical practice.

[Lung adenocarcinoma with concomitant EGFR mutation and ALK rearrangement]. / Adénocarcinome bronchique avec mutation de l'EGFR et réarrangement ALK concomitants.

INTRODUCTION: Among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, coexistence of EGFR mutation and ALK rearrangement is rare. We describe the clinical features of two patients with this double anomaly. CASE REPORTS: A 62-year-old Caucasian non-smoking woman was diagnosed with cT4N0M0 lung adenocarcinoma. Initial biopsy showed EGFR mutation and ALK rearrangement. She received cisplatin-gemcitabine, followed by 17 months of gemcitabine. Owing to progression, she received erlotinib for 14 months, then paclitaxel for 6 months and finally crizotinib. A partial response was achieved and maintained for 24 months. A 45-year-old Caucasian woman, light smoker, was diagnosed with cT2N3M0 lung adenocarcinoma. Only EGFR mutation was found on initial analysis. She underwent treatment with cisplatin-gemcitabine and thoracic radiotherapy. Progression occurred after 8 months and afatinbib was started. Eight months later, progression was observed with a neoplasic pleural effusion in which tumor cells expressing ALK rearrangement were found. A new FISH analysis was performed on the initial tumor but did not find this rearrangement. Despite a third line of crizotinib, the patient died one month later. DISCUSSION: The literature shows 45 other cases of these two abnormalities, observed either from the start or during follow-up. EGFR's TKI were almost always given before ALK's TKI. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic strategy needs to be clarified in cases of double alteration. With regard to the second patient, appearance of ALK rearrangement may constitute a resistance mechanism to EGFR's TKI.

[Can positron emission tomography assessment of response to treatment help to individualize use of erlotinib in non-small cell lung cancer?] / L'imagerie par émission de positons à la 3'-désoxy-3'-[18F]-fluorothymidine ([18F]FLT) peut-elle avoir un rôle théranostique lors du traitement par erlotinib dans le cancer bronchique non à petites cellules ?

Erlotinib can be prescribed in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small lung cancer cell (NSCLC) after failure of at least one prior chemotherapy regimen on the basis of the BR-21 study. Several publications have recently questioned these results. The metabolic imaging of solid tumours by positron emission tomography is a research field that could help customize the treatment of NSCLC and so complement the treatment approaches allowed by genetic analyses. This strategy is part of an innovative "early metabolic look" approach. The primary objective of this study is to determine if metabolic progression observed between the 7th and 14th day after initiation of treatment with erlotinib by 3'-Deoxy-3'-[18F]-Fluorothymidine PET in patients with EGFR naive NSCLC is predictive for morphological progression after 6 to 8 weeks of treatment. A health economic analysis will be conducted. This study is particularly innovative because it begins the exploration of the era of metabolic evaluation of therapeutic response in NSCLC.

Impact of Continuing First-Line EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy Beyond RECIST Disease Progression in Patients with Advanced EGFR-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Retrospective GFPC 04-13 Study.

UNLABELLED: Retrospective studies suggested a benefit of first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment continuation after response evaluation in solid tumors (RECIST) progression in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The aim of this multicenter observational retrospective study was to assess the frequency of this practice and its impact on overall survival (OS). The analysis included advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients treated with first-line TKI who experienced RECIST progression between June 2010 and July 2012. Among the 123 patients included (67 ± 12.7 years, women: 69 %, non smokers: 68 %, PS 0-1: 87 %), 40.6 % continued TKI therapy after RECIST progression. There was no difference between the patients who did and did not continue TKI therapy with respect to progression-free survival (PFS1: 10.5 versus 9.5 months, p = 0.4). Overall survival (OS) showed a non-significant trend in favor of continuing TKI therapy (33.0 vs. 21.2 months, p = 0.054). Progressions were significantly less symptomatic in the TKI continuation group than in the discontinuation group (18 % vs. 37 %, p < 0.01). Univariate analysis showed a higher risk of death among patients with PS >1 (HR 4.33, 95 %CI: 2.21-8.47, p = 0.001), >1 one metastatic site (HR 1.96, 95 %CI: 1.06-3.61, p = 0.02), brain metastasis (HR 1.75, 95 %CI: 1.08-2.84, p = 0.02) at diagnosis, and a trend towards a higher risk of death in cases of TKI discontinuation after progression (HR 1.62, 95 %CI: 0.98-2.67, p = 0.056 ). In multivariate analysis only PS >1 (HR 6.27, 95 %CI: 2.97-13.25, p = 0.00001) and >1 metastatic site (HR 2.54, 95 %CI: 1.24-5.21, p = 0.02) at diagnosis remained significant. This study suggests that under certain circumstances, first-line TKI treatment continuation after RECIST progression is an acceptable option in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: NCT02293733.

[Validation of an evaluation questionnaire for COPD acute exacerbations (Exascore)]. / Validation d'un questionnaire d'évaluation de l'exacerbation dans la BPCO : l'Exascore.

BACKGROUND: Early identification of acute exacerbations of COPD facilitates better care. This study was designed to validate a short questionnaire (Exascore) developed to help patients, relatives and carers to diagnose acute exacerbations. METHOD: We first addressed content validity that allowed the elaboration of two questionnaires, one assessing the current status and the other stable status (transition). The second step tested their construction validity, reproducibility and concomitant validity among 126 COPD patients aged 64.4±9.9 years. They included 56 presenting with an exacerbation and 70 in stable state, of whom 57 completed the questionnaire a second time after 7 days. The diagnosis of exacerbation and assessment of severity (gold standard) were established by the treating respiratory physician and confirmed by two independent experts. RESULTS: Factorial analyses established a "current status" questionnaire comprising 8 items and 2 dimensions. Cronbach's alpha coefficients were satisfactory, 0.867 for "respiratory impact", 0.886 for "psychosocial impact" and 0.886 for the total score. Concomitant validity and reproducibility were also adequate. The transition questionnaire did not obtain convincing psychometric results. CONCLUSIONS: The "current status" Exascore questionnaire satisfies psychometric quality criteria while being usable in clinical practice. It helps in diagnosing acute exacerbations and assessing their intensity. Further studies will need to test the adequacy of proposed thresholds, the factorial structure of the score in healthcare professionals and patients' relatives, and its predictive power.

Afatinib beyond progression in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer following chemotherapy, erlotinib/gefitinib and afatinib: phase III randomized LUX-Lung 5 trial.

BACKGROUND: Afatinib has demonstrated clinical benefit in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer progressing after treatment with erlotinib/gefitinib. This phase III trial prospectively assessed whether continued irreversible ErbB-family blockade with afatinib plus paclitaxel has superior outcomes versus switching to chemotherapy alone in patients acquiring resistance to erlotinib/gefitinib and afatinib monotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with relapsed/refractory disease following ≥1 line of chemotherapy, and whose tumors had progressed following initial disease control (≥12 weeks) with erlotinib/gefitinib and thereafter afatinib (50 mg/day), were randomized 2:1 to receive afatinib plus paclitaxel (40 mg/day; 80 mg/m(2)/week) or investigator's choice of single-agent chemotherapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Other end points included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), safety and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Two hundred and two patients with progressive disease following clinical benefit from afatinib were randomized to afatinib plus paclitaxel (n = 134) or single-agent chemotherapy (n = 68). PFS (median 5.6 versus 2.8 months, hazard ratio 0.60, P = 0.003) and ORR (32.1% versus 13.2%, P = 0.005) significantly improved with afatinib plus paclitaxel. There was no difference in OS. Global health status/quality of life was maintained with afatinib plus paclitaxel over the entire treatment period. The median treatment duration was 133 and 51 days with afatinib plus paclitaxel and single-agent chemotherapy, respectively; 48.5% of patients receiving afatinib plus paclitaxel and 30.0% of patients receiving single-agent chemotherapy experienced drug-related grade 3/4 adverse events. Treatment-related adverse events were consistent with those previously reported with each agent. CONCLUSION: Afatinib plus paclitaxel improved PFS and ORR compared with single-agent chemotherapy in patients who acquired resistance to erlotinib/gefitinib and progressed on afatinib after initial benefit. LUX-Lung 5 is the first prospective trial to demonstrate the benefit of continued ErbB targeting post-progression, versus switching to single-agent chemotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01085136 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: a French multicenter retrospective study (GFPC 0802 study).

BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare disease with poor prognosis in spite of significant improvement in survival, due to new chemotherapy regimens. We describe here patients' profiles and management in daily practice in France. METHODS: Observational retrospective study. Data were collected from medical files. All patients with histologically proven MPM diagnosed from January 2005 to December 2008 were included in the participating sites. RESULTS: Four hundred and six patients were included in 37 sites: mean age 68.9 ± 9.8 years, male predominance (sex ratio 3.27), latency of the disease 45.7 years, epithelioïd type 83 %. Diagnosis was made using thoracoscopy in 80.8 % of patients. Radical surgery was performed in 6.2 % of cases. Chemotherapy was administered to 74.6 % of patients. First line regimens consisted mainly of platinum + pemetrexed (91 %) or pemetrexed alone (7 %). Objective response rate was 17.2 % and another 41.6 % of patients experienced disease stabilization. Half of these patients underwent second line chemotherapy (platinium + pemetrexed 31.6 %, pemetrexed alone 24.6 %), resulting in a 6 % response rate. Third-line chemotherapy (56 patients) yielded disease control in 5.4 % of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The management of MPM in France is usually in accordance with guidelines. Response rates are somewhat lower than those described in clinical trials.

[Chemotherapy at the end of life for patients with lung cancer. A practice analysis]. / Chimiothérapie et fin de vie dans les cancers broncho-pulmonaires : analyse des pratiques.

RATIONALE: Few studies have analyzed the aggressiveness of the care (continuation of active treatments) at the end of life in patients with lung cancer. The objective of this study was to assess practices in this setting in a university department of respiratory medicine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study has consecutively included all patients who were managed for lung cancer and died over a period of 18 months. The analysis focused on the characteristics of the patients, the modalities of cancer treatment and the delays between the last active treatment and death. RESULTS: The overall median survival of the 94 patients included was 9.6 months; 92% of patients having received at least one active treatment. During the 4 and 2 weeks periods preceding death, respectively 55% and 22% of the patients received active treatments. The median time between the last day of active treatment and death was 27 days. CONCLUSION: These results, in concordance with the published data, showed that end of life active treatment in patients with lung cancer is a complex problem. We need prospective multicentric studies, with testing tools allowing better sharing of the decisions on active treatment between the medical team, the patient and his family.