Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am ; 30(1): 83-96, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29153240

RESUMO

Mandibular growth is a complex process that involves the "functional matrix," an interaction of the muscles of mastication, occlusion, and jaw function. Although not a typical growth center, the mandibular condyle has a significant effect on the ultimate size, shape and function of the mandible and secondarily on overall facial form. Acquired temporomandibular joint (TMJ)/condylar abnormalities, such as juvenile idiopathic arthritis, idiopathic condylar resorption, TMJ ankylosis, and condylar hyperplasia, often result in facial deformity and functional deficits. Accurate diagnosis is critical for the clinician to assess potential progression of deformity, predict prognosis, and plan treatment.


Assuntos
Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular/patologia , Articulação Temporomandibular/anormalidades , Articulação Temporomandibular/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Progressão da Doença , Diagnóstico Precoce , Humanos , Lactente , Prognóstico , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular/diagnóstico
2.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 75(11): 2369-2378, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28431236

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Robinson and Martinez established unicystic ameloblastoma (UA) as a distinct pathologic entity in 1977. Using their original description, the aims of this study were to compare the clinical presentation and outcomes of UA treated at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) with outcomes reported in the original article. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of MGH patients treated for UA during a 15-year period. Patients were included if they had a confirmed clinical and histologic diagnosis of UA. The primary predictor variable was the source of the study sample (MGH vs Robinson and Martinez). Secondary variables included age, gender, radiographic appearance, treatment, and histologic subtype. The primary outcome variable was the number of recurrences over time comparing the 2 groups. RESULTS: There were 19 patients (10 female and 9 male patients) in the MGH group and 20 patients (10 female and 10 male patients) in the Robinson and Martinez study. The lesions were predominantly unilocular (13 in MGH group and 19 in Robinson and Martinez group), located in the mandible (18 in MGH group and 20 in Robinson and Martinez group), and tooth associated (12 in MGH group and 14 in Robinson and Martinez group). No statistically significant demographic differences were noted between the 2 groups. In the MGH group, 13 cases (68%) exhibited mural or intramural ameloblastic epithelium, 4 (21%) were luminal or intraluminal, and 2 were unknown. However, histologic configuration was not reported in the Robinson and Martinez group. MGH patients were treated by enucleation (n = 7, 37%) or resection (n = 12, 63%) compared with enucleation in 100% cases in the Robinson and Martinez group. Overall, the disease-free survival rate was higher in the Robinson and Martinez group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .089). Within the MGH group, 100% of recurrences occurred in patients with mural invasion treated by enucleation. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support UA as a distinct entity based on demographic, clinical, and radiographic criteria. Outcomes in the MGH group were influenced by the degree of ameloblastic epithelial invasion and suggest that this variable should be considered when planning treatment.


Assuntos
Ameloblastoma , Neoplasias Maxilomandibulares , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ameloblastoma/patologia , Ameloblastoma/cirurgia , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Hospitais Gerais , Humanos , Neoplasias Maxilomandibulares/patologia , Neoplasias Maxilomandibulares/cirurgia , Masculino , Massachusetts , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Can Dent Assoc ; 82: g24, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28240582

RESUMO

Although radiation therapy is a common treatment for head and neck cancer, osteoradionecrosis (ORN) represents a major complication during or after treatment. Hyperbaric oxygen is often mentioned as a prophylactic and therapeutic treatment for ORN. In this article, we review the literature on hyperbaric oxygen therapy in head and neck irradiated patients. The widespread use of such therapy for the prevention and treatment of ORN appears to be based mainly on personal beliefs and experience, as no consensus exists in the scientific literature about its efficacy. Randomized controlled trials are, thus, needed to assess the real impact of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in head and neck irradiated patients. More fundamental research is also needed to clarify the pathophysiology of ORN, which in turn would help identify appropriate treatments.


Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Humanos , Osteorradionecrose , Extração Dentária
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...