RESUMO
Background: The supraorbital approach is a modification of the traditional pterional approach, and it offers the benefits of a shorter skin incision and a smaller craniotomy than the pterional approach. The purpose of this systemic review study was to compare the two surgical approaches for raptured and unruptured anterior cerebral circulation aneurysms. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, and MEDLINE, up to August 2021, for published studies on the supraorbital vs pterional keyhole approach for anterior cerebral circulation aneurysms, and reviewers performed a brief qualitative descriptive analysis of both approaches. Results: Fourteen eligible studies were included in this systemic review. Results indicated that the supraorbital approach for anterior cerebral circulation aneurysms had fewer ischemic events compared to pterional approach. However, no significant difference between both groups in terms of complications such as intraoperative aneurysm rupture, brain hematoma, and postoperative infections for ruptured aneurysms. Conclusion: The meta-analysis suggests that the supraorbital method for clipping anterior cerebral circulation aneurysms might be a viable alternative to the traditional pterional method as the supraorbital group had decreased ischemic events compared to the pterional group, however, the associated difficulties in utilizing this approach among ruptured aneurysms with cerebral oedema and midline shifts further needs to be understood.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the medical literature to determine the utility of heart rate variability in predicting mortality for moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. METHODS: A search for randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized trials, and prospective and retrospective cohort studies was carried out using PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Reference lists of included studies were also searched to identify potentially eligible studies. RESULTS: Five articles comprising 542 patients met inclusion criteria. Heart rate variability as low-frequency/high-frequency ratio (area under the curve [AUC] receiver operating characteristic [ROC]) for predicting mortality was found to be statistically significant (AUC ROC 0.810, P < 0.001) with high heterogeneity (I2 = 61.98%, P = 0.032). Meta-analysis of low-frequency/high-frequency ratio, High frequency peak, and total power were statistically significant for predicting mortality. Odd's ratio for predicting mortality for LF/HF ratio, HF peak, and TP were 16.17, 19.09, 22.59 respectively. High-frequency peak in predicting mortality showed an AUC ROC of 0.986 (P ≤ 0.001) with a low level of heterogeneity. Total power (TP) showed an AUC ROC of 0.93 (P < 0.001) in predicting mortality with a high level of heterogeneity (I2 = 83.16%, P = 0.002). Funnel plot analysis to assess the presence of publication bias for TP showed a high level of heterogeneity and asymmetry among studies. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis predicted high mortality based on odds ratio for variables low-frequency/high-frequency ratio, high-frequency peak, and TP. However, the statistical analysis was weakened owing to the high level of heterogeneity in the included studies. Further research is needed to generate high-quality recommendations regarding heart rate variability as a predictor of mortality after traumatic brain injury.