Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy ; 16(6): 889-899, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30062464

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: US FDA draft guidance includes pathogen reduction (PR) or secondary rapid bacterial testing (RT) in its recommendations for mitigating risk of platelet component (PC) bacterial contamination. An interactive budget impact model was created for hospitals to use when considering these technologies. METHODS: A Microsoft Excel model was built and populated with base-case costs and probabilities identified through literature search and a survey of US hospital transfusion service directors. Annual costs of PC acquisition, testing, wastage, dispensing/transfusion, sepsis, shelf life, and reimbursement for a mid-sized hospital that purchases all of its PCs were compared for four scenarios: 100% conventional PCs (C-PC), 100% RT-PC, 100% PR-PC, and 50% RT-PC/50% PR-PC. RESULTS: Annual total costs were US$3.64, US$3.67, and US$3.96 million when all platelets were C-PC, RT-PC, or PR-PC, respectively, or US$3.81 million in the 50% RT-PC/50% PR-PC scenario. The annual net cost of PR-PC, obtained by subtracting annual reimbursements from annual total costs, is 6.18% above that of RT-PC. Maximum usable shelf lives for C-PC, RT-PC, and PR-PC are 3.0, 5.0, and 3.6 days, respectively; hospitals obtain PR-PC components earliest at 1.37 days. CONCLUSION: The model predicts minimal cost increase for PR-PC versus RT-PC, including cost offsets such as elimination of bacterial detection and irradiation, and reimbursement. Additional safety provided by PR, including risk mitigation of transfusion-transmission of a broad spectrum of viruses, parasites, and emerging pathogens, may justify this increase. Effective PC shelf life may increase with RT, but platelets can be available sooner with PR due to elimination of bacterial detection, depending on blood center logistics.


Assuntos
Plaquetas/microbiologia , Coleta de Amostras Sanguíneas/economia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Transfusão de Plaquetas/economia , Infecções Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecções Bacterianas/economia , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Infecções Bacterianas/transmissão , Remoção de Componentes Sanguíneos/efeitos adversos , Remoção de Componentes Sanguíneos/economia , Remoção de Componentes Sanguíneos/estatística & dados numéricos , Coleta de Amostras Sanguíneas/métodos , Orçamentos , Humanos , Modelos Econométricos , Transfusão de Plaquetas/efeitos adversos , Transfusão de Plaquetas/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
2.
Transfusion ; 55(10): 2312-20, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25989465

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pathogen inactivation (PI) is a new approach to blood safety that may introduce additional costs. This study identifies costs that could be eliminated, thereby mitigating the financial impact. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Cost information was obtained from five institutions on tests and procedures (e.g., irradiation) currently performed, that could be eliminated. The impact of increased platelet (PLT) availability due to fewer testing losses, earlier entry into inventory, and fewer outdates with a 7-day shelf life were also estimated. Additional estimates include costs associated with managing (1) special requests and (2) test results, (3) quality control and proficiency testing, (4) equipment acquisition and maintenance, (5) replacement of units lost to positive tests, (6) seasonal or geographic testing, and (7) health department interactions. RESULTS: All costs are mean values per apheresis PLT unit in USD ($/unit). The estimated test costs that could be eliminated are $71.76/unit and a decrease in transfusion reactions corresponds to $2.70/unit. Avoiding new tests (e.g., Babesia and dengue) amounts to $41.80/unit. Elimination of irradiation saves $8.50/unit, while decreased outdating with 7-day storage can be amortized to $16.89/unit. Total potential costs saved with PI is $141.65/unit. Costs are influenced by a variety of factors specific to institutions such as testing practices and the location in which such costs are incurred and careful analysis should be performed. Additional benefits, not quantified, include retention of some currently deferred donors and scheduling flexibility due to 7-day storage. CONCLUSIONS: While PI implementation will result in additional costs, there are also potential offsetting cost reductions, especially after 7-day storage licensing.


Assuntos
Plaquetas , Preservação de Sangue/economia , Segurança do Sangue/economia , Desinfecção/economia , Plaquetoferese/economia , Preservação de Sangue/métodos , Segurança do Sangue/métodos , Custos e Análise de Custo , Desinfecção/métodos , Humanos , Plaquetoferese/métodos
3.
Transfusion ; 42(1): 87-93, 2002 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11896318

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The effort to eliminate transfusion complications associated with WBCs has led to the widespread use of filters able to reduce WBC concentrations to

Assuntos
Contagem de Leucócitos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Sistemas Computacionais , DNA/sangue , Filtração , Humanos , Cinética , Contagem de Leucócitos/normas , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...