Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Public Health ; 1: 5, 2001.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11446904

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study examined condom acquisition by persons in a hospital setting when single versus assorted brand name condoms were provided. METHODS: Condom receptacles were placed in exam rooms of two clinics. During Phase 1, a single brand name was provided; for Phase 2, assorted brand names were added. Number of condoms taken was recorded for each phase. RESULTS: For one clinic there was nearly a two-fold increase in number of condoms taken (Phase 1 to Phase 2); for the second clinic there was negligible difference in number of condoms taken. CONCLUSIONS: The provision of assorted brand name condoms, over a single brand name, can serve to increase condom acquisition. Locations of condoms and target population characteristics are related factors.


Assuntos
Preservativos/provisão & distribuição , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Ambulatório Hospitalar/organização & administração , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Marketing Social , Adolescente , Adulto , Alaska , Preservativos/classificação , Preservativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Medicina Interna , Masculino , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/complicações , Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa/complicações
2.
Vaccine ; 19(28-29): 4081-5, 2001 Jul 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11427285

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Hepatitis B vaccination is recommended for all healthcare workers (HCW) at risk of exposure to infectious body fluids. However, the absolute duration of protection from immunization is unknown. The purpose of this randomized comparison trial was to determine how previously immunized HCW respond to different booster doses of hepatitis B vaccine. METHOD: Adult HCW (n=59) were classified by level of hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), either <10 milli-International Units per milliliter (mIU/ml) or 10-50 mIU/ml. Participants were then randomized to receive a 2.5 or 10 microg dose of hepatitis B vaccine. Evaluation of anti-HBs levels were conducted 10 to 14 days, one month and one year postbooster. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: All participants responded to the booster dose with increased anti-HBs levels. At 14 days, mean anti-HBs levels were significantly higher for those with higher levels at baseline (P=0.004) and those receiving the 10 microg dose (P=0.016). At one month, those with higher anti-HBs levels at baseline and those receiving the 10 microg dose were significantly higher (P<0.01 for both). At one year, the increase for the higher dose was no longer statistically significant when examined by itself (P=0.081); statistical significance (P=0.021) was achieved after adjusting for anti-HBs level at baseline. For all participants, the geometric mean anti-HBs level was 2618 mIU/ml at 14 days, 2175 mIU/ml at one month and 88.9 mIU/ml at one year. At all time points the increase in anti-HBs levels represented an increase over the geometric mean baseline level of anti-HBs (7.4 mIU/ml). Hepatitis B immunized adults responded to a booster dose of hepatitis B vaccine from 3 to 13 yr postvaccination series. Data support current recommendations that immunized HCW do not require periodic antibody testing or vaccine boosters.


Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/administração & dosagem , Hepatite B/imunologia , Hepatite B/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Feminino , Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite B/sangue , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Imunização Secundária , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Tempo
3.
J Occup Med ; 32(6): 508-12, 1990 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2380800

RESUMO

Hospital-based female pharmacists were asked about workplace practices and conditions, use of protective equipment, and formal hospital guidelines governing exposure to antineoplastic agents. Special preparation areas dedicated to antineoplastic agents were absent in 13.4% of the workplaces. Vertical laminar flow hoods were unavailable for 27.7% of the respondents. Although protective gloves were worn by the majority (87.9%), safety glasses and facial masks were used infrequently. More than 40% of the group reported skin contact with cytotoxic drugs at least once a month. Eighty-three percent of all respondents reported that their institution had a formal policy governing the handling of antineoplastic agents. Medical surveillance for exposed employees, however, was available in only 28% of the workplaces.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Farmacêuticos , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/organização & administração , Roupa de Proteção/normas , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Exposição Ambiental , Fatores Epidemiológicos , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Política de Saúde , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...