An evaluation of the relationship between adult height and health-related quality of life in the general UK population.

OBJECTIVE: Short stature has previously been shown to influence several social factors during childhood and adult life. However, limited data exist to determine the influence of short stature on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) because of underpowered studies and the fact that children find questionnaires very difficult to complete. The objective of this study was to examine the influence of height on HRQoL for the general adult population in the UK. DESIGN: The 2003 Health Survey for England (HSE03), commissioned by the Department of Health, provides a random general population sample for the population living in private households in England. Observations for 14 416 adults (aged > 18 years) were included in the analysis. MEASUREMENTS: The survey involved a questionnaire-based interview and a nurse visit, where measurements and blood samples were taken. HRQoL was measured using the EQ-5D questionnaire. Social class (I-V) was derived according to definitions from UK National Statistics. Height was converted from centimetres to height standard deviation scores (HSDS). RESULTS: Mean EQ-5D scores were lower in subjects with greater height deficit than in taller subjects. Three significantly different subgroups were identified using an analysis of variance (anova). The first subgroup 'HSDS HSDS 0'. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed significant correlations between height and HRQoL, such that an increase in height of 1 HSDS predicts an improvement in EQ-5D score of 6.1% for subjects shorter than -2.0 HSDS. Social class was a significant predictor of HRQoL in taller, but not in shorter, subjects. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that height in adult life is correlated with HRQoL and that short stature in adult life may be associated with a significant reduction in HRQoL.

The cost-effectiveness of bimatoprost 0.03% in the treatment of glaucoma in adult patients--a European perspective.

Glaucoma is a condition affecting one or both eyes with raised intraocular pressure (IOP). IOP should be reduced to prevent progression of visual field loss. This study investigates the cost-effectiveness of bimatoprost compared with latanoprost as first-line monotherapies in the treatment of glaucoma in Austria, Finland and France. On the basis of a single multicentre, randomised, investigator-masked controlled trial, a 6- and 12-month cost-effectiveness model was designed following the treatment recommendations from the European Glaucoma Society. Treatment changes due to insufficient IOP reduction and adverse events were included. The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the need for adjunctive therapy was the major cost driver. On the basis of evidence from the randomised, investigator-masked clinical trial (RCT), the cost-effectiveness analysis found that bimatoprost was a cheaper and a more effective treatment strategy compared with latanoprost. This was true for all three countries and all IOP targets between 13 and 20 mmHg. The cost-effectiveness result may be generalised to a European setting and perspective.

Suriclone and diazepam in the treatment of neurotic anxiety. A double-blind cross-over trial.

Suriclone is a new anxiolytic drug belonging to the family of cyclopyrrolones. Although chemically entirely different from the benzodiazepines, it acts as a benzodiazepine agonist with very high affinity for the benzodiazepine receptors. In the present cross-over study, 33 out-patients with a diagnosis of neurotic anxiety were treated with suriclone (mean dose 2 mg/day) and diazepam (25 mg/day) in two 6-week periods. Both drugs had a significant anxiolytic effect, but diazepam appeared to have a better effect within the first 2 weeks of treatment, while no significant difference was seen after treatment, while no significant difference was seen after treatment for 6 weeks. Suriclone and diazepam had a different side effect profile: suriclone produced mainly dizziness, while diazepam caused sedation. This may reflect the fact that suriclone and benzodiazepines bind to distinct sites or different allosteric conformations of the benzodiazepine receptors.