Clinic Study Completion Rate in Orthopedic Surgery.

Purpose: The primary aim of this study is to determine the rate of completion of clinic-based study orders. Secondarily, we attempt to determine factors associated with study incompletion. Methods: This retrospective study included 591 clinic-based studies that were ordered for 510 patients at the time of clinical evaluation at a single medical center between April 8, 2018 and August 22, 2019. Inclusion criteria were studies ordered in a hand clinic for consecutive adult patients to be completed after the visit. Exclusion criteria included pediatric patients and routine radiographs obtained prior to the visit. Invasive studies were defined as studies with a significant procedural component, such as aspirations, injections and electromyography/nerve conduction (electrodiagnostic) studies (EDS). Blood tests and imaging were considered noninvasive. Patient demographics and study completion rates were collected through chart reviews. Univariate and bivariate analyses were performed, and P <.05 was considered significant. Results: The overall clinic-based study completion rate was 94.2%, with the highest incompletion rates seen in invasive studies (8.3%, n = 34) compared to noninvasive studies (3.3%, n = 10). Within the invasive study category, EDS had the highest rate of incompletion (11.4%) and contributed to the majority of incompletions in the invasive cohort (20/24). The median time to study completion was 7 days (interquartile range [IQR] 2-21). Race, gender, English as primary language, marriage status, insurance type, and distance from facility were similar between completed and noncompleted studies. Conclusion: Study completion rates were similar between all patients regardless of race, gender, and other social economic variables. Invasive studies, particularly EDS, had higher rates of incompletion and can be barriers to patients receiving additional care. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic III.

Risk Factors for Failure of Nonsurgical Management of Ulnar Shaft Fractures.

PURPOSE: Isolated ulnar shaft fractures are frequently managed nonsurgically. However, rates of nonsurgical treatment failure remain substantial, and risk factors for the failure of nonsurgical management are not well described. This study investigated radiographic and patient-specific risk factors for the failure of nonsurgical management of isolated ulnar shaft fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with ulnar shaft fractures initially treated nonsurgically was performed at two tertiary referral centers over a 19-year period from 2001 to 2020. Patient- and injury-related variables, surgical interventions, and plain radiographic measurements were recorded. The outcome of interest was failure of nonsurgical management, defined as failure to achieve fracture union nonsurgically within 3 months of injury. RESULTS: One hundred fifty four patients initially treated nonsurgically for isolated ulnar shaft fractures were included. Twenty six patients (17%) experienced failure of nonsurgical management; these included five nonunions, 16 delayed unions, and 10 conversions to surgical management. Patients who experienced failure of nonsurgical management had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, a higher employment rate, and fractures with higher initial median posteroanterior and lateral translations, fracture gap, and angulation; 83% of the patients with an initial fracture gap of ≥4 mm and 41% of the patients with an initial fracture angulation of >10° failed nonsurgical management. CONCLUSIONS: Although most ulnar shaft fractures heal successfully with nonsurgical management, a substantial percentage of these fractures do not. Patients who are currently working, have diabetes mellitus, or have fractures with an initial fracture gap of ≥4 mm or an initial fracture angulation of > 10° may be more likely to fail nonsurgical treatment, although additional studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these associations. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Patient Perception and Preferences for Virtual Telemedicine Visits for Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery.

Introduction: Telemedicine in upper extremity surgery is an evolving modality that provides a viable alternative to the traditional in-person visit for achieving convenient, safe, and cost-effective health care. Our study aimed to identify patient preferences for virtual visits for hand and upper extremity surgery. Methods: An institutional review board approved survey was prospectively administered to all patients >18 years of age, presenting for any complaint to an orthopedic hand and upper extremity clinic at a Level I academic trauma center from September to December 2019. This survey included questions about access and literacy of technology as well as patient preferences regarding virtual visits. The medical record was reviewed to collect demographics, insurance type, and reasons for their visit. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed according to survey responses. Results: Two hundred consecutive patients (n) completed surveys. Surveys revealed that >88% of patients own a computer or smartphone, have WiFi access at home, and own a device capable of video chat. In total, 75% of patients reported that they would be moderately or highly comfortable in their ability to use a device for a virtual visit. In bivariate and multivariate analyses, technological literacy and access to a private space to conduct a visit were associated with high interest in virtual visits. Discussion: Telemedicine is a viable alternative to in-person patient visits. Our study demonstrates that most patients are willing and able to participate in a virtual visit for a hand or upper extremity issue.

Pronator Quadratus Repair Does Not Affect Reoperation Rates Following Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of pronator quadratus (PQ) repair on reoperation rates after distal radius open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) using a volar locking plate. METHODS: A retrospective study of all patients undergoing distal radius ORIF with a volar locking plate between January 2012 and December 2016 at 2 urban, academic level I trauma centers was performed. Patient demographics, fracture and procedure characteristics, surgeon subspecialty, PQ repair, and reoperations were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to determine whether patient-related or injury-related characteristics were associated with PQ repair. Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses were used to assess the effect of PQ repair on subsequent reoperations. RESULTS: In total, 509 patients were included, including 31 patients with bilateral injuries. The average follow-up time was 3.7 ± 2.8 years. Patients undergoing PQ repair were younger (57 ± 17 years vs 61 ± 17 years) and were more likely to have a lower Soong grade (53% vs 44% with Soong grade 0) than patients without PQ repair. Pronator quadratus repair was not found to have a significant impact on hardware removal, reoperations for flexor tendon pathology, or overall reoperations. CONCLUSIONS: Pronator quadratus repair was more commonly performed in younger patients and in patients with a lower Soong grade. Hand-subspecialized surgeons are more likely to pursue PQ repair than trauma-subspecialized surgeons. This study did not detect statistically significant differences in hardware removal, flexor tendon pathology, or overall reoperations between groups.

The Impact of the Soong Index on Hardware Removal and Overall Reoperation Rates After Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures.

PURPOSE: This study sought to determine the impact of volar plate prominence on reoperation rates after open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fractures with volar locking plates and to identify other factors associated with removal of hardware (ROH) or a reoperation. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients who underwent distal radius open reduction and internal fixation between 2012 and 2016 at 2 level I trauma centers was conducted. Plate prominence was evaluated using the Soong index at the first postoperative visit. The details of patient demographics, fracture and plate characteristics, complications, and reoperations were recorded. Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with increased rates of ROH and overall reoperation. RESULTS: A total of 732 (70.2%) of 1,042 patients completed follow-up at an average of 38.2 months, including 34 patients with bilateral operations, yielding 766 distal radius fractures. One hundred sixteen (15.1%) patients underwent reoperation at an average of 12.1 ± 13.6 months after the index surgery. Removal of hardware was the most commonly performed reoperation (77 patients, 10%). The multivariable regression analysis revealed significantly higher rates of ROH in Soong grade 1 or 2 patients (odds ratio 16, 95% CI 5.8-47; odds ratio 44, 95% CI 14-140, respectively) than in Soong grade 0 patients. Plate type, younger age, bilateral injuries, and concomitant procedures at the time of the index operation were all associated with increased risk of ROH. There were significant differences between individual surgeons the in rates of ROH (range 2.1%-22%) and overall reoperation (range 5.2%-36%). Compared with other hand surgeons, fellowship-trained hand surgeons had lower rates of ROH (8% vs 14%, respectively) and overall reoperation (12% vs 22%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The rates of ROH and overall reoperation increase with increasing Soong grade. Plate type is independently predictive of future ROH. Older patients and those undergoing open reduction and internal fixation experience lower rates of subsequent reoperation. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Accuracy of Provocative Tests for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Purpose: Prior literature on the diagnostic accuracy of commonly used provocative tests for suspected carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is affected by research biases. The objectives of our study were to measure and compare the diagnostic accuracy of 4 commonly used provocative tests for CTS using electrodiagnostic study as the reference standard. Methods: We prospectively evaluated 85 hands in 55 patients with suspected CTS. Tinel sign, Phalen's test, Durkan's test, and Phdurkan test (a combination of wrist flexion and carpal compression) and subsequent electrodiagnostic testing were performed on all patients. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using electrodiagnostic findings as the reference standard. McNemar test was used to compare differences in paired outcomes between provocative tests. Results: Tinel sign had a sensitivity of 0.47 and specificity of 0.56. Phalen's test had a sensitivity of 0.50 and specificity of 0.33. Durkan's test had a sensitivity of 0.71 and specificity of 0.22. Phdurkan test had a sensitivity of 0.84 and specificity of 0.11. Median time to a positive Phdurkan test result was 3 seconds. McNemar tests showed significant differences (P < .05) in the proportions of positive results among all CTS provocative tests except between Tinel sign and Phalen's test. Conclusions: Commonly performed provocative tests for suspected CTS differ in sensitivity and specificity. As the examination maneuver becomes more provocative, the test becomes more sensitive and less specific for CTS. Type of study/level of evidence: Diagnostic III.

Patient Satisfaction and Opioid Use With a Postoperative Opioid Protocol After Common Hand Procedures.

Purpose: Given the state of the opioid crisis and national pressure to minimize prescriptions, pain management after common hand procedures can pose a challenge for patients and providers. Despite the volume of recent literature on prescribing protocols and over-the-counter (OTC) medications, patient satisfaction has not been adequately assessed. The purposes of this study were (1) to investigate patient satisfaction with pain management using an opioid prescribing protocol after common hand procedures, and (2) to evaluate medication use in the postoperative period using this opioid prescribing protocol. Methods: A prospective survey was administered to 100 consecutive patients undergoing common soft tissue hand procedures at a Level I academic institution over a 5-month period. The medical record was reviewed for demographics and the number or dosage of opioid pills prescribed. The survey was conducted at 2 time points within 2 weeks after the procedure and assessed the number of opioid pills taken, use of OTC medications, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, and satisfaction with pain management and surgery. Results: Mean number of opioid pills consumed at 2 weeks after the procedure was 1.5; 19 patients consumed all of their prescribed opioid pills. Acetaminophen was the most commonly used OTC medication and 84 patients reported using OTC medication in the postoperative period. The average VAS score at the end of the study period was 1.7. Nearly all patients were satisfied with the pain management and surgery; no patients received a second opioid prescription. Conclusions: We found that patients consumed far fewer opioid pills than were prescribed to them. We also found that patients who took more opioid pills had higher VAS pain scores, with lower satisfaction in both categories. The cohort demonstrated effective control of pain with high satisfaction, indicating that an opioid protocol is a successful and patient-accepted tool for managing postoperative pain. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.