[Effects of complex trauma disorder on the workplace: a scoping review]. / Auswirkungen der komplexen Traumafolgestörung auf die Arbeitswelt: Ein Scoping-Review.

BACKGROUND: The "International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision" (ICD-11) introduces complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) as a separate diagnosis to account for the effects that persistent or repetitive trauma can have. In CPTSD, disorders of self-organization are added to the core symptoms of PTSD. It can be assumed that those affected are impaired in their professional lives as a result. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the effects of CPTSD on work-related functioning and to present possible consequences for therapeutic and rehabilitative treatment. METHOD: A scoping review with a literature search in the MEDLINE, APA PsycArticles, and APA PsycInfo databases was conducted in February 2024. RESULTS: Of 2378 studies on KPTBS, five studies were included, of which only three dealt more specifically with the impact on the world of work. Those affected appear to have a poorer prognosis for maintaining their ability to work and are therefore to be regarded as a socio-medical risk group with regard to long-term maintenance of participation in working life. DISCUSSION: The current state of research on the effects of the CPTSD symptom complex on the world of work is surprisingly limited. In comparison, the results indicate that CPTSD has a greater negative impact on the ability to function in the world of work than PTSD and other mental disorders. It is still unclear which psychopathological mechanisms mediate the connection. Only basic findings on the psychopathology of CPTSD are available. Treatment approaches that address the disorders of self-organization in addition to PTSD symptoms appear necessary.

[Psychotherapeutic consultation at work: associations between company size and psychosomatic health]. / Psychotherapeutische Sprechstunde am Arbeitsplatz: Zusammenhänge zwischen Unternehmensgröße und psychosomatischer Gesundheit.

BACKGROUND: The utilization of psychotherapeutic consultation at work (PT-A) has so far been investigated in large enterprises (LEs). These differ structurally from small(est) and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Differences in the user profiles of a PT­A with regard to psychosomatic health, work-related self-efficacy, and work ability depending on company size have hardly been investigated. This study also examined differences in the employees' perception of the psychosocial safety climate (PSC) in the company, which represents management's efforts to promote mental health. METHODS: As part of the Early Intervention in the Workplace intervention study called "friaa", employees from LEs and SMEs interested in a PT­A were surveyed throughout Germany from September 2021 to January 2023. Using t­ and χ2-tests, differences between employees in LEs (n = 439) and SMEs (n = 109) were examined with regard to the ICD-10 F diagnostic code ("International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems"; mental and behavioral disorders), depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-2), level of functioning (GAF), somatic symptom burden (SSS-8), health (VR-12), ability to work (WAI), self-efficacy (SOSES), and psychosocial safety climate (PSC-4). The association between these variables and especially the PSC­4 were investigated using correlation analysis. RESULTS: Both groups showed similar levels of stress. From the employees' perspective, psychosocial issues were addressed significantly more frequently in LEs than in SMEs with a medium effect size. The study provided initial indications that in LEs there were positive correlations of the PSC­4 with SOSES and WAI and negative ones with PHQ­9 and SSS­8. DISCUSSION: The comparable psychological strain on employees in LEs and SMEs points to the need for behavioral and structural preventive measures regardless of the company size. Mainly in SMEs, organizational communication of psychosocial health should be given greater priority.

[Anxiety Disorders in Rehabilitation]. / Angsterkrankungen in der Rehabilitation.

Anxiety disorders are among the most common and socio-medically relevant mental illnesses. Correct diagnosis and initiation of appropriate therapy are of the utmost importance for patients' prognosis and for ensuring their social and occupational participation. This article therefore aims to provide an overview of new developments in the field of anxiety disorders relevant to rehabilitation.Within the framework of the changes in ICD-11, anxiety disorders now receive an independent chapter with a focus appropriate to their frequency and relevance. Further innovations concern the revised S3 guideline (2020) with the increasing consideration of digital therapy options, such as virtual reality exposure therapy (VER) as well as Internet-supported therapy methods as part of the therapy recommendations. Systemic therapy is also considered for the first time. However, the evidence for both procedures is significantly lower than for behavioral therapy, psychodynamic therapy, or pharmacotherapy. Online interventions are therefore not recommended as the sole therapy.Important for the practice in rehabilitation is the knowledge of the core symptoms of each of the above mentioned diagnoses as well as the diagnostic possibilities taking into account especially the correlations and interactions with physical diseases.Both psychotherapy and psychopharmacotherapy are available for treatment. In the field of psychotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is the therapy of first choice due to the broadest base of evidence. In consideration of comorbid somatic diseases, attention must be paid to possible contraindications for antidepressants. Psychosomatic rehabilitation is an important resource in the overall treatment spectrum, especially if chronification or a threat to participation is foreseeable, in order to give the affected person confidence and motivation for further successful treatment of the anxiety disorder in an intensified treatment setting, in addition to teaching anxiety management strategies and socio-medical clarification. An important task of somatic rehabilitation is to recognize comorbid anxiety disorders and to provide the affected persons with an appropriate explanatory model of their complaints and to be able to initiate targeted treatment.

Early intervention, treatment and rehabilitation of employees with common mental disorders by using psychotherapeutic consultation at work: study protocol of a randomised controlled multicentre trial (friaa project).

BACKGROUND: Common mental disorders are one of the leading causes for sickness absence and early retirement due to reduced health. Furthermore, a treatment gap for common mental disorders has been described worldwide. Within this study, psychotherapeutic consultation at work defined as a tailored, module-based and work-related psychotherapeutic intervention will be applied to improve mental health care. METHODS: This study comprises a randomised controlled multicentre trial with 1:1 allocation to an intervention and control group. In total, 520 employees with common mental disorders shall be recruited from companies being located around five study centres in Germany. Besides care as usual, the intervention group will receive up to 17 sessions of psychotherapy. The first session will include basics diagnostics and medical indication of treatment and the second session will include work-related diagnostics. Then, participants of the intervention group may receive work-related psychotherapeutic consultation for up to ten sessions. Further psychotherapeutic consultation during return to work for up to five sessions will be offered where appropriate. The control group will receive care as usual and the first intervention session of basic diagnostics and medical indication of treatment. After enrolment to the study, participants will be followed up after nine (first follow-up) and fifteen (second follow-up) months. Self-reported days of sickness absence within the last 6 months at the second follow-up will be used as the primary outcome and self-efficacy at the second follow-up as the secondary outcome. Furthermore, a cost-benefit assessment related to costs of common mental disorders for social insurances and companies will be performed. DISCUSSION: Psychotherapeutic consultation at work represents a low threshold care model aiming to overcome treatment gaps for employees with common mental disorders. If successfully implemented and evaluated, it might serve as a role model to the care of employees with common mental disorders and might be adopted in standard care in cooperation with sickness and pension insurances in Germany. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The friaa project was registered at the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS) at 01.03.2021 (DRKS00023049): https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00023049 .

Differences between chronic and nonchronic depression: Systematic review and implications for treatment.

BACKGROUND: There is still uncertainty if and to what extent chronic depression (CD) presents with specific features especially in contrast to the nonchronic course of major depressive disorder (non-CD). This systematic review aims to summarize the existing literature regarding sociodemographic factors, psychopathology, and course of disease in patients with CD in comparison to patients with non-CD. METHODS: A structured database search (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CENTRAL) was performed. All studies comparing CD with non-CD patients were included. Twenty-eight studies, including cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, and observational studies, were identified in which both subgroups were diagnosed according to DSM-IV or DSM-5, respectively. Primary outcome were group comparisons focused on sociodemographic factors, childhood adversity, onset of the disorder, comorbidities, severity and course of the depressive symptoms, and specific psychopathology. RESULTS: Patients with CD had an earlier onset of depressive symptoms, higher rates of psychiatric comorbidities, and a complicated treatment course (e.g., higher rates of suicidality) compared to non-CD. We also found some evidence for specific features in the psychopathology of CD patients (submissive and hostile interpersonal styles) in contrast to non-CD patients. Results were inconsistent with regard to childhood maltreatment. No differences were found regarding the severity of depressive symptoms and most sociodemographic factors. CONCLUSION: Despite some inconsistencies, the results of this review verified important differences between CD and non-CD. However, future research is needed to characterize especially the specific psychopathology of CD in comparison to non-CD patients to develop more tailored treatment strategies.