Interhemispheric transfer of semantic information facilitates bilateral word recognition.

Language comprehension is left-lateralized but with variable contributions from the right hemisphere. When both hemispheres are stimulated simultaneously using divided visual field presentation, performance may be enhanced or hindered depending on the complexity of the task, and these effects may relate to independent processing in both hemispheres or to information transfer between hemispheres. Simultaneous stimulation of both hemispheres is thought to suppress interhemispheric interactions, but information transfer may nonetheless occur. Studies with simultaneous bilateral displays have demonstrated that semantic information from the contralateral visual field (and hemisphere) can facilitate relatedness judgments and lexical decisions. The current study extends this line of research by assessing semantic information transfer in a bilateral word identification task. Task manipulations involving directed spatial attention and asymmetric primes (e.g., ATOM → BOMB) were used to isolate automatic priming as opposed to top-down processing. The results revealed 2 main findings: (a) interhemispheric priming in the form of improved word recognition occurred specifically in conditions designed to isolate automatic transfer of semantic information, that is, in the attended visual field for the target word in asymmetric prime pairs, and (b) there is evidence for an asymmetrical transfer of semantic information, in that the subordinate left visual field-right hemisphere benefited more from such transfer. Together, these results demonstrate evidence for automatic interhemispheric transfer of semantic information, even under conditions of simultaneous bilateral display. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Interhemispheric connectivity during lateralized lexical decision.

The well-established right visual field (RVF-lh) advantage in word recognition is commonly attributed to the typical left hemisphere dominance in language; words presented to the LVF-rh are processed less efficiently due to the need for transcallosal transfer from the right to left hemisphere. The exact stage for this hemispheric transfer is currently unsettled. Some studies suggest that transfer occurs at very early stages between primary visual regions, whereas other studies suggest that transfer occurs between the left visual word form area and its right hemisphere homolog. This study explores these conflicting accounts and finds evidence for both. Participants conducted a lateralized lexical decision task with both unilateral and bilateral display conditions. Connectivity analyses were conducted from magnetoencephalography signals that were localized to the left middle occipital gyrus (LMOG), right middle occipital gyrus (RMOG), left visual word form area (LVWFA), and right visual word form area (RVWA). Results from unilateral trials showed asymmetrical interhemispheric connectivity from the RMOG to LMOG and symmetrical interhemispheric connectivity between the LVWFA and RVWFA. Furthermore, bilateral presentations led to reduced interhemispheric connectivity between both homologous region of interest pairs. Together, these results suggest that lateralized word recognition involves multiple stages of interhemispheric interactions and that these interactions are reduced with bilateral displays.

Interhemispheric interactions during sentence comprehension in patients with aphasia.

Right-hemisphere involvement in language processing following left-hemisphere damage may reflect either compensatory processes, or a release from homotopic transcallosal inhibition, resulting in excessive right-to-left suppression that is maladaptive for language performance. Using fMRI, we assessed inter-hemispheric effective connectivity in fifteen patients with post-stroke aphasia, along with age-matched and younger controls during a sentence comprehension task. Dynamic Causal Modeling was used with four bilateral regions including inferior frontal gyri (IFG) and primary auditory cortices (A1). Despite the presence of lesions, satisfactory model fit was obtained in 9/15 patients. In young controls, the only significant homotopic connection (RA1-LA1), was excitatory, while inhibitory connections emanated from LIFG to both left and right A1's. Interestingly, these connections were also correlated with language comprehension scores in patients. The results for homotopic connections show that excitatory connectivity from RA1-to-LA1 and inhibitory connectivity from LA1-to-RA1 are associated with general auditory verbal comprehension. Moreover, negative correlations were found between sentence comprehension and top-down coupling for both heterotopic (LIFG-to-RA1) and intra-hemispheric (LIFG-to-LA1) connections. These results do not show an emergence of a new compensatory right to left excitation in patients nor do they support the existence of left to right transcallosal suppression in controls. Nevertheless, the correlations with performance in patients are consistent with some aspects of both the compensation model, and the transcallosal suppression account for the role of the RH. Altogether our results suggest that changes to both excitatory and inhibitory homotopic and heterotopic connections due to LH damage may be maladaptive, as they disrupt the normal inter-hemispheric coordination and communication.