Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of the Simpliciti Canal-Sparing Shoulder Arthroplasty System: A Prospective Two-Year Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Stemmed humeral components have been used since the 1950s; canal-sparing (also known as stemless) humeral components became commercially available in Europe in 2004. The Simpliciti total shoulder system (Wright Medical, formerly Tornier) is a press-fit, porous-coated, canal-sparing humeral implant that relies on metaphyseal fixation only. This prospective, single-arm, multicenter study was performed to evaluate the two-year clinical and radiographic results of the Simpliciti prosthesis in the U.S. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-seven patients with glenohumeral arthritis were enrolled at fourteen U.S. sites between July 2011 and November 2012 in a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Investigational Device Exemption (IDE)-approved protocol. Their range of motion, strength, pain level, Constant score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score were compared between the preoperative and two-year postoperative evaluations. Statistical analyses were performed with the Student t test with 95% confidence intervals. Radiographic evaluation was performed at two weeks and one and two years postoperatively. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-nine of the 157 patients were followed for a minimum of two years. The mean age and sex-adjusted Constant, SST, and ASES scores improved from 56% preoperatively to 104% at two years (p < 0.0001), from 4 points preoperatively to 11 points at two years (p < 0.0001), and from 38 points preoperatively to 92 points at two years (p < 0.0001), respectively. The mean forward elevation improved from 103° ± 27° to 147° ± 24° (p < 0.0001) and the mean external rotation, from 31° ± 20° to 56° ± 15° (p < 0.0001). The mean strength in elevation, as recorded with a dynamometer, improved from 12.5 to 15.7 lb (5.7 to 7.1 kg) (p < 0.0001), and the mean pain level, as measured with a visual analog scale, decreased from 5.9 to 0.5 (p < 0.0001). There were three postoperative complications that resulted in revision surgery: infection, glenoid component loosening, and failure of a subscapularis repair. There was no evidence of migration, subsidence, osteolysis, or loosening of the humeral components or surviving glenoid components. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated good results at a minimum of two years following use of the Simpliciti canal-sparing humeral component. Clinical results including the range of motion and the Constant, SST, and ASES scores improved significantly, and radiographic analysis showed no signs of loosening, osteolysis, or subsidence of the humeral components or surviving glenoid components. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Natural history of fatty infiltration and atrophy of the supraspinatus muscle in rotator cuff tears.

BACKGROUND: In some patients nonoperative treatment of a rotator cuff tear is sufficient, while in others it is only the first stage of treatment prior to surgery. Fatty infiltration progresses throughout the nonoperative treatment although it is not known at what point fatty infiltration contributes to poor functional outcomes, absence of healing, or increased rerupture rates. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore identified factors related to the appearance of supraspinatus muscle fatty infiltration, determined the speed of appearance and progression of this phenomenon, and correlated fatty infiltration with muscular atrophy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1688 patients with rotator cuff tears and recorded the following: number of tendons torn, etiology of the tear, time between onset of shoulder symptoms and diagnosis of rotator cuff tear. Fatty infiltration of the supraspinatus was graded using either CT or MRI classification. Muscular atrophy was measured indirectly using the tangent sign. RESULTS: Moderate supraspinatus fatty infiltration appeared an average of 3 years after onset of symptoms and severe fatty infiltration at an average of 5 years after the onset of symptoms. A positive tangent sign appeared at an average of 4.5 years after the onset of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that rotator cuff repair should be performed before the appearance of fatty infiltration (Stage 2) and atrophy (positive tangent sign)-especially when the tear involves multiple tendons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The role of arthroscopy in revision of failed open anterior stabilization of the shoulder.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of revision arthroscopic stabilization after failed open anterior shoulder stabilization. METHODS: We studied a retrospective series of 22 consecutive patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability after open surgical stabilization (12 Latarjet procedures, 4 Eden-Hybinette procedures, 3 open Bankart repairs, and 3 capsular shifts). Failure was associated with a traumatic episode in 12 patients, capsular laxity with persistent Bankart lesions in all patients, and a bone block complication in 13 patients. Labral reattachment and capsuloligamentous retensioning with suture anchors were performed in all cases. An additional rotator interval closure was performed in 4 cases and an inferior capsular application in 12. Bone block screws were removed during arthroscopy in 8 patients because of malpositioning or mobility. Nineteen patients were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 43 months. RESULTS: All patients returned to their previous occupations, including 6 cases of work-related injury. Of the patients, 1 (5%) had recurrent subluxation and 2 (11%) had persistent apprehension. The subjective shoulder value was 83% +/- 23%. A good or excellent result was found in 85% of patients according to the Walch-Duplay score and 13 patients (67%) according to the Rowe score. Shoulder pain was found in 6 patients (32%) (4 with light pain and 2 with moderate pain). Of the 5 patients with osteoarthritis before surgery, 3 progressed by 1 stage. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic revision of failed open anterior shoulder stabilization provides satisfactory results in a selected patient population. Some persistent pain and osteoarthritis progression remain concerns. The main advantages of the arthroscopic approach are the avoidance of anterior dissection in front of the subscapularis, which places the axillary nerve at risk, and the ability to address the various soft-tissue pathologies encountered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty after failed rotator cuff surgery.

BACKGROUND: The purpose is to report the results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) after previous failed rotator cuff surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study of 42 RSA in 40 patients (mean age, 71 years) with a mean follow-up of 50 months. Thirty shoulders presented with a pseudoparalytic shoulder and 12 with a painful shoulder with maintained active anterior elevation (AAE >or= 90 degrees). RESULTS: Five complications (12%) occurred and 2 patients (5%) underwent re-operation. In pseudoparalytic shoulders, AAE increased from 56 degrees to 123 degrees and 7% were disappointed or dissatisfied. In painful shoulders, AAE decreased from 146 degrees to 122 degrees and 27% were disappointed or dissatisfied. DISCUSSION: RSA can improve function in patients with cuff deficient shoulders after failure of previous cuff surgery. However, results are inferior to primary RSA. RSA when the patient maintains greater than 90 degrees of preoperative AAE risks loss of AAE and lower patient satisfaction.

Effectiveness of revision following linked versus unlinked total elbow arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to specifically evaluate the implications of unlinked and linked designs on the survivorship of revision surgery. METHODS: Between 1972 and 1990, 352 linked and 151 unlinked prostheses were inserted at our institution. One-hundred and twenty-two elbows (24%) underwent subsequent revision: 55 linked (16%) and 67 unlinked (44%). Survivorship of the initial and revision total elbow replacement was calculated using a Kaplan-Meier analysis. Comparisons were made between revisions done after a failed primary linked or unlinked designs. The unlinked revised to a linked device was more reliable than when revised to another unlinked device: 1 year survival 84% compared to 47%. RESULTS: Initial survival was 56% at 367 months and 84% at 371 months for the unlinked and linked cohorts, respectively (P < .001). A second revision was required in 12 of the 35 elbows (30%) in the linked cohort and 14 of the 50 elbows (28%) in the unlinked. CONCLUSIONS: At our institution, primary linked implants display significantly better long-term survivorship (P < .001) than did the unlinked designs. Unlinked designs are most reliably converted to a linked implant.

Arthroscopic treatment of isolated type II SLAP lesions: biceps tenodesis as an alternative to reinsertion.

BACKGROUND: Overhead athletes report an inconsistent return to their previous level of sport and satisfaction after arthroscopic SLAP lesion repair. HYPOTHESIS: Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis offers a viable alternative to the repair of an isolated type II SLAP lesion. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients operated for an isolated type II SLAP lesion between 2000 and 2004 were evaluated at a mean of 35 months postoperatively (range, 24-69). Patients with associated instability, rotator cuff rupture, posterosuperior impingement, or previous shoulder surgery were excluded. Ten patients (10 men) with an average age of 37 years (range, 19-57) had a SLAP repair performed with suture anchors. Fifteen patients (9 men and 6 women) with an average age of 52 years (range, 28-64) underwent arthroscopic biceps tenodesis performed with an absorbable interference screw. Arthroscopic diagnosis and treatment were performed by a single experienced shoulder surgeon, and all patients were reviewed by an independent examiner. RESULTS: In the repair group, the Constant score improved from 65 to 83 points; however, 60% (6 of 10) of the patients were disappointed because of persistent pain or inability to return to their previous level of sports participation. In the tenodesis group, the Constant score improved from 59 to 89 points, and 93% (14/15) were satisfied or very satisfied. Thirteen patients (87%) were able to return to their previous level of sports participation following biceps tenodesis, compared with only 20% (2 of 10) after SLAP repair (P = .01). Four patients with failed SLAP repairs underwent subsequent biceps tenodesis, resulting in a successful outcome and a full return to their previous level of sports activity. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis can be considered an effective alternative to the repair of a type II SLAP lesion, allowing patients to return to a presurgical level of activity and sports participation. The results of biceps reinsertion are disappointing compared with biceps tenodesis. Furthermore, biceps tenodesis may provide a viable alternative for the salvage of a failed SLAP repair. As the age of the 2 treatment groups differed, these findings should be confirmed by future studies.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty combined with a modified latissimus dorsi and teres major tendon transfer for shoulder pseudoparalysis associated with dropping arm.

Although a reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) can restore active elevation in the cuff deficient shoulder, it cannot restore active external rotation when both the infraspinatus and teres minor muscles are absent or atrophied. We hypothesized that a latissimus dorsi and teres major (LD/TM) transfer with a concomitant RSA would restore shoulder function and activities of daily living (ADLs). We prospectively followed 11 consecutive patients (mean age, 70 years) with a combined loss of active elevation and external rotation (shoulder pseudoparalysis and dropping arm) who underwent this procedure. All had severe cuff tear arthropathy (Hamada Stage 3, 4, or 5) and severe atrophy or fatty infiltration of infraspinatus and teres minor on preoperative MRI or CT-scan. The combined procedure was performed through a single deltopectoral approach in the same session. Postoperatively, mean active elevation increased from 70 degrees to 148 degrees (+78 degrees ) and external rotation from -18 degrees to 18 degrees (+36 degrees ). The Constant score, subjective assessment and ADLs improved. The combination of a RSA and LD/TM transfer restored both active elevation and external rotation in this selected subgroup of patients with a cuff deficient shoulder and absent or atrophied infraspinatus and teres minor.

Modified latissimus dorsi and teres major transfer through a single delto-pectoral approach for external rotation deficit of the shoulder: as an isolated procedure or with a reverse arthroplasty.

Definitive loss of active external rotation of the shoulder impacts an individual's ability to perform ADL's, creating severe disability. To restore active external rotation, we modified the L'Episcopo procedure by transferring both the latissimus dorsi and teres major (LD/TM) through a single delto-pectoral approach. The two tendons were rerouted and reattached laterally on the humerus to the stump of the pectoralis major which was partially transected to the posterior epiphysis. Fifteen consecutive patients who underwent this procedure; (mean age 63.2 years), have been followed for at least one year (range 14-63). The transfer was indicated alone in 7 patients with an isolated loss of active external rotation (ILER) related to an irreparable postero-superior cuff tear. It was associated with a reverse shoulder prosthesis in 8 patients with combined loss of active elevation and external rotation (CLEER): 6 cases of rotator cuff tear arthropathy and 2 of tumor reconstruction. For the series as a whole, the mean increase in active elevation was 34.7 degrees . The gain in active external rotation was +27 degrees for ILER patients and +28 degrees for CLEER patients. Constant score improved to 65.6 (range, 51-79). Subjective shoulder value (SSV) was significantly improved from 34% to 72% (P < .0009). All but one patient was satisfied or very satisfied with the result. The major contributor to their satisfaction was the ability to control the spatial positioning of the arm, eliminating the tendency of the forearm to swing in toward the trunk. One patient had a return of a lag sign after a fall. The modified tendon transfer, performed in the beach chair position through a delto-pectoral approach, is less invasive than the classic two-incisions procedure and provides good functional results in patients with absent or atrophic infraspinatus and teres minor. When the modified LD/TM transfer is associated with a reverse shoulder arthroplasty, it allows to restore both active elevation and external rotation.

Arthroscopic Bristow procedure for anterior instability in shoulders with a stretched or deficient capsule: the "belt-and-suspenders" operative technique and preliminary results.

PURPOSE: We report the results of a new technique consisting of a combined arthroscopic Bankart repair associated with a transfer of the coraco-biceps tendon to reinforce the deficient anterior capsule by lowering the subscapularis. METHODS: The procedure combines 2 parts: an arthroscopic Bankart repair, which recreates the glenoid concavity and retensions the inferior glenohumeral ligament (i.e., "the belt," or intra-articular ligamentoplasty), and an arthroscopic transfer of the conjoined tendon with a coracoid fragment, to reinforce the stretched or torn inferior glenohumeral ligament (i.e., "the suspenders," or extra-articular ligamentoplasty). The coracoid fragment is exteriorized, shaped, and calibrated, and a tenodesis of the coraco-biceps tendon is performed above the subscapularis tendon by fixing the coracoid fragment with a bioabsorbable interference screw in a glenoid socket in the scapular neck. Thirty-six patients were available for clinical and radiographic review with a minimum 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Of the patients, 28 (78%) were very satisfied, 5 (14%) were satisfied, and 3 (8%) were disappointed. In comparison to the contralateral shoulder, postoperative mobility revealed no loss of active anterior elevation, a mean deficit of 9 degrees in external rotation with the arm at the side, a mean deficit of 15 degrees in external rotation in abduction, and no loss of internal rotation. The mean Walch-Duplay score was 87 points. Failures occurred in 3 patients (8%) who presented with recurrent instability. CONCLUSIONS: This new intra- and extra-articular combined technique constitutes an alternative in the treatment of anterior shoulder instability in patients with deficient or stretched anterior capsule. It combines the theoretic advantages of the Bristow bone-block procedure and the arthroscopic Bankart repair while eliminating the potential disadvantages of each. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

The difficult proximal humerus fracture: tips and techniques to avoid complications and improve results.

The indications and techniques for surgical management of fractures of the proximal humerus remain controversial, and the results of treatment are often disappointing, with a relatively high complication rate. Anatomic reduction can be difficult, and loss of fixation because of poor bone quality may lead to fracture displacement and malunion. Hemiarthroplasty has a high rate of shoulder stiffness, tuberosity resorption, and glenohumeral instability. There is a wide variety of surgical techniques and implants to treat these fractures, but there is little guidance in the literature on specific indications for their use. Therefore, it is important for orthopaedic surgeons to be familiar with techniques to avoid complications and improve results when treating proximal humerus fractures.

Isolated arthroscopic biceps tenotomy or tenodesis improves symptoms in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears.

BACKGROUND: Lesions of the long head of the biceps tendon are often associated with massive rotator cuff tears and may be responsible for shoulder pain and dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of isolated arthroscopic biceps tenotomy or tenodesis as treatment for persistent shoulder pain and dysfunction due to an irreparable rotator cuff tear associated with a biceps lesion. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of sixty-eight consecutive patients (mean age [and standard deviation], 68 +/- 6 years) in whom a total of seventy-two irreparable rotator cuff tears had been treated arthroscopically with biceps tenotomy or tenodesis. A simple tenotomy was performed in thirty-nine cases, and a tenodesis was performed in thirty-three. No associated acromioplasty was performed. All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically by an independent observer at a mean of thirty-five months postoperatively. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (78%) were satisfied with the result. The mean Constant score improved from 46.3 +/- 11.9 points preoperatively to 66.5 +/- 16.3 points postoperatively (p < 0.001). A healthy-appearing teres minor on preoperative imaging was associated with significantly increased postoperative external rotation (40.4 degrees +/- 19.8 degrees compared with 18.1 degrees +/- 18.4 degrees ) and a significantly higher Constant score (p < 0.05 for both) compared with the values for the patients with an absent or atrophic teres minor preoperatively. Three patients with pseudoparalysis of the shoulder did not benefit from the procedure and did not regain active elevation above the horizontal level. In contrast, the fifteen patients with painful loss of active elevation recovered active elevation. The acromiohumeral distance decreased 1.1 +/- 1.9 mm on the average, and glenohumeral osteoarthritis developed in only one patient. The results did not differ between the tenotomy and tenodesis groups (mean Constant score, 61.2 +/- 18 points and 72.8 +/- 12 points, respectively). The "Popeye" sign was clinically apparent in twenty-four (62%) of the shoulders that had been treated with a tenotomy; of the sixteen patients who noticed it, none were bothered by it. CONCLUSIONS: Both arthroscopic biceps tenotomy and arthroscopic biceps tenodesis can effectively treat severe pain or dysfunction caused by an irreparable rotator cuff tear associated with a biceps lesion. Shoulder function is significantly inferior if the teres minor is atrophic or absent. Pseudoparalysis of the shoulder and severe rotator cuff arthropathy are contraindications to this procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Proximal humerus fracture sequelae: impact of a new radiographic classification on arthroplasty.

UNLABELLED: Our goal was to analyze the results of unconstrained shoulder replacement in a large series of sequelae of proximal humeral fractures in order to validate a previously described surgical classification. In a multicenter study, we retrospectively evaluated 203 patients with sequelae of proximal humeral fractures who were treated with a nonconstrained modular and adaptable prosthesis. The mean followup was 42 months (range, 24-96 months). We identified 137 impacted fractures with humeral head collapse or necrosis (Type 1 sequelae), 25 unreducible dislocations or fracture-dislocations (Type 2), 22 nonunions of the surgical neck (Type 3), and 19 severe tuberosity malunions (Type 4). Results of nonconstrained shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of Type 1 and Type 2 sequelae were predictably good because no greater tuberosity osteotomy was performed. The distorted anatomy was accepted, and both the prosthesis and technique were modified accordingly. Total shoulder arthroplasty yielded better results than hemiarthroplasty. Patients with Type 3 or Type 4 sequelae had poor functional results with nonconstrained arthroplasty because greater tuberosity osteotomy was needed. This study validates our fracture sequelae classification. We no longer use unconstrained prostheses in Type 3 and Type 4 fracture sequelae and propose peg bone grafting or low-profile fracture prosthesis for patients with Type 3 sequelae and reverse arthroplasty for those with Type 4 sequelae. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, level IV (case series). See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.