Hypobaria during long-range flight resulted in significantly increased histopathological evidence of lung and brain damage in a swine model.

BACKGROUND: Aeromedical evacuation to definitive care is standard in current military conflicts. However, there is minimal knowledge on the effects of hypobaria (HYPO) on either the flight crew or patients. The effects of HYPO were investigated using healthy swine. METHODS: Anesthetized Yorkshire swine underwent a simulated 4 h "transport" to an altitude of 2,441 m (8,000 feet.; HYPO, N = 6) or at normobaric conditions (NORMO, N = 6). Physiologic and biochemical data were collected. Organ damage was assessed for hemorrhage, inflammation, edema, necrosis, and for lungs only, microatelectasis. RESULTS: All parameters were similar prior to and after "transport" with no significant effects of HYPO on hemodynamic, neurologic, or oxygen transport parameters, nor on blood gas, chemistry, or complete blood count data. However, the overall Lung Injury Score was significantly worse in the HYPO than the NORMO group (10.78 ± 1.22 vs. 2.31 ± 0.71, respectively) with more edema/fibrin/hemorrhage in the subpleural, interlobular and alveolar space, more congestion in alveolar septa, and evidence of microatelectasis (vs. no microatelectasis in the NORMO group). There was also increased severity of pulmonary neutrophilic (1.69 ± 0.20 vs. 0.19 ± 0.13) and histiocytic inflammation (1.83 ± 0.23 vs. 0.47 ± 0.17) for HYPO versus NORMO, respectively. On the other hand, there was increased renal inflammation in NORMO compared with HYPO (1.00 ± 0.13 vs. 0.33 ± 0.17, respectively). There were no histopathological differences in brain (whole or individual regions), liver, pancreas, or adrenals. CONCLUSION: Hypobaria, itself, may have an adverse effect on the respiratory system, even in healthy individuals, and this may be superimposed on combat casualties where there may be preexisting lung injury. The additional effects of anesthesia and controlled ventilation on these results are unknown, and further studies are indicated using awake models to better characterize the mechanisms for this pathology and the factors that influence its severity.

Brain hypoxia is exacerbated in hypobaria during aeromedical evacuation in swine with traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: There is inadequate information on the physiologic effects of aeromedical evacuation on wounded war fighters with traumatic brain injury (TBI). At altitudes of 8,000 ft, the inspired oxygen is lower than standard sea level values. In troops experiencing TBI, this reduced oxygen may worsen or cause secondary brain injury. We tested the hypothesis that the effects of prolonged aeromedical evacuation on critical neurophysiologic parameters (i.e., brain oxygenation [PbtO2]) of swine with a fluid percussion injury/TBI would be detrimental compared with ground (normobaric) transport. METHODS: Yorkshire swine underwent fluid percussion injury/TBI with pretransport stabilization before being randomized to a 4-hour aeromedical transport at simulated flight altitude of 8,000 ft (HYPO, n = 8) or normobaric ground transport (NORMO, n = 8). Physiologic measurements (i.e., PbtO2, cerebral perfusion pressure, intracranial pressure, regional cerebral blood flow, mean arterial blood pressure, and oxygen transport variables) were analyzed. RESULTS: Survival was equivalent between groups. Measurements were similar in both groups at all phases up to and including onset of flight. During the flight, PbtO2, cerebral perfusion pressure, and mean arterial blood pressure were significantly lower in the HYPO than in the NORMO group. At the end of flight, regional cerebral blood flow was lower in the HYPO than in the NORMO group. Other parameters such as intracranial pressure, cardiac output, and mean pulmonary artery pressure were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: A 4-hour aeromedical evacuation at a simulated flight altitude of 8,000 ft caused a notable reduction in neurophysiologic parameters compared with normobaric conditions in this TBI swine model. Results suggest that hypobaric conditions exacerbate cerebral hypoxia and may worsen TBI in casualties already in critical condition.

Arterial input functions for dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: requirements and signal options.

Cerebral perfusion imaging using dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) has been the subject of considerable research and shows promise for basic science and clinical use. In DSC, the MRI signals in brain tissue and feeding arteries are monitored dynamically in response to a bolus injection of paramagnetic agents, such as gadolinium (Gd) chelates. DSC has the potential to allow quantitative imaging of parameters such as cerebral blood flow (CBF) with a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in a short scan time; however, quantitation depends critically on accurate and precise measurement of the arterial input function (AIF). We discuss many requirements and factors that make it difficult to measure the AIF. The AIF signal should be linear with respect to Gd concentration, convertible to the same concentration scale as the tissue signal, and independent of hematocrit. Complicated relationships between signal and concentration can violate these requirements. The additional requirements of a high SNR and high spatial/temporal resolution are technically challenging. AIF measurements can also be affected by signal saturation and aliasing, as well as dispersion/delay between the AIF sampling site and the tissue. We present new in vivo preliminary results for magnitude-based (DeltaR2*) and phase-based (Deltaphi) AIF measurements that show a linearity advantage of phase, and a disparity in the scaling of Deltaphi AIFs, DeltaR2* AIFs, and DeltaR2* tissue curves. Finally, we discuss issues related to the choice of AIF signal for quantitative perfusion imaging.