RESUMO
Purpose: During the COVID-19 pandemic, teaching has required online-learning modalities to facilitate easily accessible yet high-quality education. However, since the nature of anatomy requires hands-on experience in laboratories with cadavers, teaching anatomy in an online setting has proven especially difficult. This matter may be resolved with the Anatomage Table, an advanced anatomy visualization tool, which several studies have suggested can augment learning experiences for students in anatomy courses. Our objective was to provide accessible online modules, through utilization of the Anatomage Table, for medical students to facilitate their learning and enhance online learning experience. Materials and Methods: Ten modules were designed, consisting of a presentation, a pre- and post-self-assessment, as well as anatomical images and radiographs taken from Anatomage Table. The modules were based on a single organ system, and a clinical case pertaining to that organ system was presented. Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar (WCM-Q) second-year medical students contributed 102 responses in total throughout the 10 modules. Using a paired t-test, the study compared the students' pre- and post-assessment scores to determine how beneficial the modules were. Results: A significant difference in scores on the pre- and post-assessments was found for all 10 modules using a paired t-test. At the end of the modules, the students completed a feedback survey to assess the quality and convenience. Most of the students agreed or strongly agreed that the modules were beneficial to their online anatomy learning and wanted to see similar anatomical modules in the future. Conclusion: The Anatomage Table is an innovative virtual resource that can significantly contribute to a more engaging and productive experience for medical students.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia (IH) is a commonly encountered problem even in the era of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Numerous studies on IH are available in English literature, but there are lack of data from the Eastern part of the world. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors as well as incidence of IH by analyzing a large cohort collected from a single tertiary center in Korea. METHODS: Among a total number of 4276 colorectal cancer patients who underwent a surgical resection from 2006 to 2019 in Korea University Anam Hospital, 2704 patients (2200 laparoscopic and 504 robotic) who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. IH was confirmed by each patient's diagnosis code registered in the hospital databank based on physical examination and/or computed tomography findings. Clinical data including specimen extraction incision (transverse or vertical midline) were compared between IH group and no IH group. Risk factors of developing IH were assessed by utilizing univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: During the median follow-up of 41 months, 73 patients (2.7%) developed IH. Midline incision group (n = 1472) had a higher incidence of IH than that of transverse incision group (n = 1232) (3.5% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.003). The univariable analysis revealed that the risk factors of developing IH were old age, female gender, obesity, co-morbid cardiovascular disease, transverse incision for specimen extraction, and perioperative bleeding requiring transfusion. However, on multivariable analysis, specimen extraction site was not significant in developing IH and transfusion requirement was the strongest risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: IH development after MIS is uncommon in Korean patients. Multivariable analysis suggests that specimen extraction site can be flexibly chosen between midline and transverse incisions, with little concern about risk of developing IH. Careful efforts are required to minimize operative bleeding because blood transfusion is a strong risk factor for developing IH.