COVID-19 in congenital heart disease (COaCHeD) study.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has caused significant worldwide morbidity and mortality. Congenital heart disease (CHD) is likely to increase vulnerability and understanding the predictors of adverse outcomes is key to optimising care. OBJECTIVE: Ascertain the impact of COVID-19 on people with CHD and define risk factors for adverse outcomes. METHODS: Multicentre UK study undertaken 1 March 2020-30 June 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were collected on CHD diagnoses, clinical presentation and outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression with multiple imputation was performed to explore predictors of death and hospitalisation. RESULTS: There were 405 reported cases (127 paediatric/278 adult). In children (age <16 years), there were 5 (3.9%) deaths. Adjusted ORs (AORs) for hospitalisation in children were significantly lower with each ascending year of age (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.96 (p<0.01)). In adults, there were 24 (8.6%) deaths (19 with comorbidities) and 74 (26.6%) hospital admissions. AORs for death in adults were significantly increased with each year of age (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.10 (p<0.01)) and with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH; OR 5.99, 95% CI 1.34 to 26.91 (p=0.02)). AORs for hospitalisation in adults were significantly higher with each additional year of age (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.05 (p=0.04)), additional comorbidities (OR 3.23, 95% CI 1.31 to 7.97 (p=0.01)) and genetic disease (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.04 to 7.94 (p=0.04)). CONCLUSIONS: Children were at low risk of death and hospitalisation secondary to COVID-19 even with severe CHD, but hospital admission rates were higher in younger children, independent of comorbidity. In adults, higher likelihood of death was associated with increasing age and PAH, and of hospitalisation with age, comorbidities and genetic disease. An individualised approach, based on age and comorbidities, should be taken to COVID-19 management in patients with CHD.

Pathophysiology and Management of Arrhythmias Associated with Atrial Septal Defect and Patent Foramen Ovale.

Atrial septal defects (ASDs) are among the most common of congenital heart defects and are frequently associated with atrial arrhythmias. Atrial and ventricular geometrical remodelling secondary to the intracardiac shunt promotes evolution of the electrical substrate, predisposing the patient to atrial fibrillation and other arrhythmias. Closure of an ASD reduces the immediate and long-term prevalence of atrial arrhythmias, but the evidence suggests that patients remain at an increased long-term risk in comparison with the normal population. The closure technique itself and its timing impacts future arrhythmia risk profile while subsequent transseptal access following surgical or device closure is complicated. Newer techniques combined with increased experience will help to alleviate some of the difficulties associated with optimal management of arrhythmias in these patients.

Effects of losartan versus hydrochlorothiazide on indices of endothelial damage/dysfunction, angiogenesis and tissue factor in essential hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Abnormalities in endothelial function, angiogenesis and thrombogenesis are found in essential hypertension. Angiotensin II has been postulated as an agent involved in these processes. We hypothesized that the treatment of essential hypertension with the angiotensin II receptor antagonist, losartan, would affect endothelial damage/dysfunction, angiogenesis and coagulation, when compared to treatment with a diuretic. METHODS: Forty hypertensive patients (28 male, mean age 56 +/- 11.8 years) were randomized to treatment with losartan 50-100 mg o.d. or hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25 mg o.d. over a 12-week period. Patients were assessed at week 0, 4 and 12. Endothelial damage/dysfunction was assessed using plasma levels of von Willebrand factor (vWf) and changes in flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery (FMD). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its soluble receptor Flt-1 (sFlt-1) were measured as indices of angiogenesis, and plasma tissue factor (TF) as an index of coagulation. Baseline results in hypertensives were compared to 20 healthy controls (13 male, mean age 61.1 +/- 10.1 years). RESULTS: Mean patient BP was 161/95 +/- 21/18 mmHg compared to 134/81 +/- 11/7 mmHg in controls (p<0.002). Plasma levels of TF (p=0.023) were significantly higher in patients compared to controls, and FMD was significantly lower (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in baseline blood pressures, plasma indices or FMD between patients randomized to losartan and hydrochlorothiazide. There were no significant changes in levels of plasma indices or FMD over 12 weeks of treatment in either patient group. Significant correlations between levels of VEGF with sFlt-1 (Spearman p<0.001) and TF (p=0.009) and sFlt-1 and TF (p=0.035) were seen in the untreated state, amongst the patient group only. CONCLUSION: We have confirmed previous observations of increased levels of TF and decreased FMD in hypertensive patients compared to healthy controls. Contrary to previous observations in higher-risk hypertensive patient groups, the treatment of essential hypertension with either losartan or hydrochlorothiazide did not affect indices of endothelial damage/dysfunction, angiogenesis or coagulation.