Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 48(7): 915-21, 2013 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23292239

RESUMO

The optimal protocol for mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells in patients with lymphoid malignancies has not been determined so far. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of Ara-C at a dose of 1.6 g/m(2) compared with CY at a dose of 4.0 g/m(2), both combined with filgrastim. Seventy and forty-five patients, respectively, were included, among whom 60% were defined as 'predicted poor mobilizers'. The use of Ara-C was associated with significantly higher peak number of circulating CD34(+) cells compared with CY (P<0.0001). In the Ara-C group, 95% of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) collected at least 5 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg required for tandem transplantation, and 97% of lymphoma patients collected at least 2 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg, needed for a single autologous hematopoietic SCT (autoHSCT), which was achieved with a single leukapheresis in 91% of cases. Results for the CY group were significantly inferior (P<0.0001). No patient mobilized with Ara-C experienced febrile neutropenia, whereas 35% required platelet transfusions. Among patients who proceeded to autoHSCT, the time of both neutrophil and platelet recovery was significantly shorter for those mobilized with Ara-C than CY. We conclude that intermediate-dose Ara-C+filgrastim is a very effective and relatively safe mobilization protocol for patients with lymphoid malignancies.


Assuntos
Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Citarabina/administração & dosagem , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/administração & dosagem , Mobilização de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Linfoma/terapia , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Autoenxertos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neutropenia/etiologia , Neutropenia/terapia , Transfusão de Plaquetas , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Vox Sang ; 104(3): 240-7, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23046417

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The procedure of autologous hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell transplantation requires cryopreservation. Addition of DMSO is necessary to secure the viability of such cells, but this solvent is potentially toxic to stem cells' recipient. 10% DMSO solution is used by the majority of transplant centres. The aim of our study was to test if DMSO concentration might be reduced without negative impact on cell recovery and clonogenicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples were prospectively collected from 20 patients. Small volumes of leukapheresis products were frozen with different cryoprotective mixtures, containing 10%, 7·5%, 5% and 2·5% DMSO, respectively. The quality of cryoprotective mixtures was evaluated based on recovery, viability and clonogenic potential of hematopoietic stem cells after defreezing. RESULTS: Reduction in DMSO concentration to 7·5% or lower was associated with decreased recovery of nucleated cells. In contrast, the number of colonies was highest for 7·5% DMSO with significant differences when compared to 10% DMSO solution. CONCLUSION: Reduction in DMSO concentration from 10% to 7·5% may have favourable impact on hematopoietic recovery after autologous transplantation. The findings require confirmation in a clinical setting.


Assuntos
Criopreservação/métodos , Dimetil Sulfóxido/administração & dosagem , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Células-Tronco/citologia , Adulto , Idoso , Antígenos CD34/metabolismo , Núcleo Celular/metabolismo , Sobrevivência Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Crioprotetores/administração & dosagem , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/administração & dosagem , Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/citologia , Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Leucaférese/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Linfócitos T/citologia
3.
Ukr Biokhim Zh (1999) ; 81(4): 48-58, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20387634

RESUMO

Glutathione S-transferase P1 is a major phase II detoxification enzyme in most cell types. Aberrant expression of GSTP1 is associated with carcinogenesis and development of multidrug resistance. GSTP1 gene transcription is regulated by promoter methylation and by transcription factors. To elucidate the mechanisms responsible for the different levels of GSTP1 expression observed in Hbl-100 and BeWo cells we utilized truncated promoter constructs to compare the functional role of different promoter elements. We also identified transcription factors binding the responsive elements by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. The applied approaches provided the evidence that binding of transcription factors to ARE, CRE and NF-kappaB sites are responsible for the cell specific levels of GSTP1 expression in Hbl-100 and BeWo cells. It was also indicated that partial promoter methylation occurs in BeWo cells.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Coriocarcinoma/genética , Regulação Enzimológica da Expressão Gênica , Glutationa S-Transferase pi/genética , Transcrição Gênica , Neoplasias Uterinas/genética , Western Blotting , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Metilação de DNA , Ensaio de Desvio de Mobilidade Eletroforética , Feminino , Humanos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Gravidez , Regiões Promotoras Genéticas , Ligação Proteica , Fatores de Transcrição/metabolismo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...