Outcomes of Abbreviated MRI (Ab-MRI) for Women of any Breast Cancer Risk and Breast Density in a Community Academic Setting.

BACKGROUND: Abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (Ab-MRI) has been evaluated for elevated breast cancer risk or dense breasts but has not been evaluated across all risk profiles. METHODS: Patients selected underwent Ab-MRI from February 2020 to September 2021. Women were older than aged 30 years, up to date with screening mammography, and paid $299 cash. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients were identified with a mean age of 52 years; 92.5% were Caucasian, 0% black, and 97.9% were from high socioeconomic status. Mean Gail score was 14.2, and 83.3% had a lifetime risk of breast cancer <20%. Reasons for Ab-MRI: dense breasts (36.6%); family history (24.7%); palpable mass (12.9%). Providers ordering: OBGYN (49.5%); breast surgeon (39.1%); primary care (6.6%). Thirteen biopsies (14%) detected one breast cancer. 31.1% had a change in follow-up screening: 58.6% 6-month MRI, 20.7% 6-month mammogram, and 10.3% 6-month ultrasound. Negative predictive value was 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 95-100%, p < 0.0001). Sensitivity was 100% (95% CI: 2.5-100%, p < 0.0001), and specificity was 87% (95% CI: 78.3-93.1%, p < 0.0001) compared with 77.6% and 98.8% for mammography. Only one cancer was detected: cost of $27,807 plus cost of 13 MRI or ultrasound (US)-guided biopsies and additional follow-up imaging. Historically 20% of abnormalities detected on full MRI are malignant; however, 7.7% of ab-MRI abnormalities were malignant CONCLUSIONS: One third of women were recommended a change in follow-up, which predominantly included a 6-month MRI. Ab-MRI may introduce average risk women to unnecessary follow-up and increased biopsies with a lower cancer detection rate. Ab-MRI should be evaluated closely before implementation.

The use of neoadjuvant therapy increases the rate of breast conservation in men with locally advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Male breast cancer (MBC) is often diagnosed at a later stage and with a more unfavorable tumor-to-breast ratio compared to women, prompting lower rates of breast conservation (BCT). We sought to assess the practice patterns of neoadjuvant therapy (NT) in MBC patients and the impact on BCT. METHODS: Men with nonmetastatic, invasive breast cancer were identified from the National Cancer Database. Patients were categorized as having small (cT1/2) or locally advanced (cT3/4) tumors and by whether they received NT (which included endocrine or chemotherapy). Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to assess patterns of NT use and rates BCT. RESULTS: Of 15,151 male patients, 4.8% received NT and 21.6% underwent BCT. NT was more common among males with cT3/4 tumors than those with cT1/2 tumors (8.2 vs. 2.1%, P < .001). Overall, unadjusted rates of BCT were higher for patients receiving NT in the cT3/4 subgroup (19.0 vs. 12.5%, P < .001), a difference which persisted on multivariable analysis. For all patients analyzed, overall survival (OS) did not differ between males who underwent NT and those who did not (110 vs. 122 months, P = .67), but NT was associated with poorer OS in both univariate and multivariate analyses for patients with cT3/4 tumors (both P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Men with invasive breast cancer have an expected low rate of BCT, but NT appears to reduce the use of mastectomy in patients with locally advanced cancers. More work is needed to understand the impacts of BCT on locoregional recurrence and disease-free and overall survival for MBC.

Racial and socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer diagnosis and mortality in Pennsylvania.

PURPOSE: Many studies have demonstrated disparities in breast cancer (BC) incidence and mortality among Black women. We hypothesized that in Pennsylvania (PA), a large economically diverse state, BC diagnosis and mortality would be similar among races when stratified by a municipality's median income. METHODS: We collected the frequencies of BC diagnosis and mortality for years 2011-2015 from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry and demographics from the 2010 US Census. We analyzed BC diagnoses and mortalities after stratifying by median income, municipality size, and race with univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: In this cohort, of 5,353,875 women there were 54,038 BC diagnoses (1.01% diagnosis rate) and 9,828 BC mortalities (0.18% mortality rate). Unadjusted diagnosis rate was highest among white women (1.06%) but Black women had a higher age-adjusted diagnosis rate (1.06%) than white women (1.02%). Race, age and income were all significantly associated with BC diagnosis, but there were no differences in BC diagnosis between white and Black women across all levels of income in the multivariable model. BC mortality was highest in Black women, a difference which persisted when adjusted for age. Black women 35 years and older had a higher mortality rate in all income quartiles. CONCLUSION: We found that in PA, age, race and income are all associated with BC diagnosis and mortality with noteworthy disparities for Black women. Continued surveillance of differences in both breast cancer diagnosis and mortality, and targeted interventions related to education, screening and treatment may help to eliminate these socioeconomic and racial disparities.

Institutions Treating Breast Cancer Patients of a Low Socioeconomic Status Achieve Multidisciplinary Quality Standards at Lower Rates.

BACKGROUND: The National Accreditation Program of Breast Centers (NAPBC) certifies institutions that provide quality breast care. Whereas low socioeconomic status (SES) has a negative impact on patient outcomes, it is unknown whether an institution's patient SES mix is associated with meeting NAPBC standards. METHODS: All institutions submitting at least 100 breast cancer patients to the National Cancer Database (2006-2017) were ranked based on the patients' insurance status, income, and education. The 10% treating the largest proportion of low-SES patients were termed low-SES institutions (LSES). Patient cohorts were created based on the 2018 NAPBC standards. Uni- and multivariate comparisons of patient, tumor, and treatment factors were made to calculate adjusted odds of meeting each standard between low- and non-low-SES institutions. RESULTS: The analysis included 1319 institutions. Both the LSES and non-LSES reached the benchmark rate of 50% lumpectomies (61.2 vs 62.9%; p < 0.001), but the unadjusted and adjusted rates of lumpectomy were lower in LSES. The rate for sentinel lymphadenectomy was lower for LSES (49.2 vs 53.7%; p < 0.001). Similarly, the unadjusted and adjusted rates of adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy were lower at LSES. Although the unadjusted rate of adjuvant radiation was higher at LSES, adjusted odds demonstrated that patients treated at LSES were less likely to undergo adjuvant radiation when appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: Small but significant differences in achieving multidisciplinary standards for quality breast cancer care exist between LSES and non-LSES and may exacerbate disparities already faced by patients of low SES.

Breast Cancer Risk, Screening, and Prevalence Among Sexual Minority Women: An Analysis of the National Health Interview Survey.

Purpose: Sexual minority women (SMW) may have a different distribution of breast cancer risk factors than their heterosexual peers. Epidemiologic studies of breast cancer in SMW have been limited, and many use only proxy variables to identify SMW in data sets, introducing selection bias. We utilized National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data to compare breast cancer risk factors, screening, and prevalence between SMW and non-SMW. Methods: We identified female respondents to the NHIS from 2013 to 2017, selected women ≥40 years old and stratified by sexual orientation. We compared demographics and health maintenance variables and prevalence of breast cancer diagnosis between groups and performed a multivariable analysis of breast cancer risk. Results: Of 58,378 women ≥40 years old, 1162 (2.0%) were identified as SMW. SMW were younger and more likely to use tobacco and alcohol, be younger at menarche, and be nulliparous. SMW also reported less preventive care, and despite reporting equivalent rates of mammography, were more likely to obtain mammograms due to an identifiable problem and not simply for screening purposes. Prevalence of breast cancer was similar between SMW and non-SMW (4.7% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.67), and SMW status was not associated with breast cancer diagnosis on univariate and multivariable logistic regression (p = 0.14 and p = 0.07, respectively). Conclusion: Despite finding no difference in breast cancer prevalence between SMW and non-SMW, there was evidence for differences in the utilization of breast care. Further studies of breast cancer incidence, characteristics (including subtype and stage), treatment, and survival for SMW are needed.

Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of breast MRI for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients is uncertain. This study characterizes those receiving MRI versus those who did not, and reports on their short-term surgical outcomes, including time to operation, margin status, and mastectomy rate. STUDY DESIGN: All patients seen in a multidisciplinary breast cancer clinic from July 2004 to December 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were evaluated by a radiologist, a pathologist, and surgical, radiation, and medical oncologists. RESULTS: Among 577 patients, 130 had pretreatment MRIs. MRI use increased from 2004 (referent, 13%) versus 2005 (24%, p=0.014) and 2006 (27%, p=0.002). Patients having MRIs were younger (52.5 versus 59.0 years, p < 0.001), but its use was not associated with preoperative chemotherapy, family history of breast or ovarian cancer, presentation, or tumor features. MRI was associated with a 22.4-day delay in pretreatment evaluation (p=0.011). Breast conserving therapy (BCT) was attempted in 320 of 419 patients with complete surgical data. The odds ratio for mastectomy, controlling for T size and stage, was 1.80 after MRI versus no MRI (p=0.024). Patients having MRIs did not have fewer positive margins at lumpectomy (21.6% MRI versus 13.8% no MRI, p=0.20), or conversions from BCT to mastectomy (9.8% MRI versus 5.9% no MRI, p=0.35). CONCLUSIONS: Breast MRI use was not confined to any particular patient group. MRI use was not associated with improved margin status or BCT attempts, but was associated with a treatment delay and increased mastectomy rate. Without evidence of improved oncologic outcomes as a result, our study does not support the routine use of MRI to select patients or facilitate the performance of BCT.

The significance of GATA3 expression in breast cancer: a 10-year follow-up study.

GATA3 is a transcription factor closely associated with estrogen receptor alpha in breast carcinoma, with a potential prognostic utility. This study investigated the immunohistochemical expression of GATA3 in estrogen receptor alpha-positive and estrogen receptor alpha-negative breast carcinomas. One hundred sixty-six cases of invasive breast carcinomas with 10-year follow-up information were analyzed. Positive GATA3 and estrogen receptor alpha cases were defined as greater than 20% of cells staining. Time to cancer recurrence and time to death were analyzed with survival methods. Of 166 patients, 40 were estrogen receptor alpha negative and 121 estrogen receptor alpha positive. Thirty-eight (23%) recurrences and 51 (31%) deaths were observed. In final multivariable analyses, GATA3-positive tumors had about two thirds the recurrence risk of GATA3-negative tumors (hazard ratio = 0.65, P = .395) and comparable mortality risk (hazard ratio = 0.86, P = .730). In prespecified subgroup analyses, the protective effect of GATA3 expression was most pronounced among estrogen receptor alpha-positive patients who received tamoxifen (hazard ratio = 0.57 for recurrence and 0.68 for death). We found no statistically significant differences in recurrence or survival rates between GATA3-positive and GATA3-negative tumors. However, there was a suggestion of a modest-to-strong protective effect of GATA3 expression among estrogen receptor alpha-positive patients receiving hormone therapy.

A prospective feasibility trial to determine the significance of the sentinel node gradient in breast cancer: a predictor of nodal metastasis location.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy is standard for breast cancer staging, but SN dye gradients and their significance have never been characterized. If predictive of SN metastasis location, their use for focused pathology examination might improve intraoperative imprint cytology sensitivity. METHODS: This prospective trial enrolled clinically lymph node-negative patients with invasive breast cancer not undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Surgeons marked SN gradients at their bluest end. Nodal halves were examined separately by imprint cytology, and the marked SN half was correlated to metastasis location. Demographic, pathologic, and prognostic features were recorded. RESULTS: Mean patient age and tumor size for the 102 patients was 59.6 years and 2.2 cm, respectively. Of 169 SNs, 159 (94.1%) had dye gradients, which varied by tumor quadrant, but not by histology, diagnosis method, grade, or stage. Among 41 marked SNs with metastases, 92.7% were present in the halves marked by the surgeon. Fourteen were confined to 1 nodal half, with 11 on the marked side and 3 on the unmarked side (P = .029). Metastases were smaller when confined to 1 versus both SN halves (0.14 vs 0.75 cm; P = .005), and smaller (0.87 vs 0.13 cm; P < .0001) when missed intraoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Dye gradients occur in most SNs and predict metastasis location. The smallest metastases are hardest to detect intraoperatively and are usually confined to the marked SN half. This suggests that marking an SN's bluest half warrants further study to explore whether its correlation to metastasis location may be exploited to focus pathologic examination and decrease the reoperative axillary dissection rate.

Presence of lobular carcinoma in situ does not increase local recurrence in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy.

BACKGROUND: Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is known to be a risk factor for the development of invasive breast cancer. Debate continues as to whether LCIS is also a precursor lesion. We hypothesized that, if LCIS were a precursor, its presence in the lumpectomy specimen, particularly at the margin, could increase local recurrence (LR) after breast-conserving therapy (BCT). METHODS: 2894 patients treated with BCT for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), stage I or II breast cancer between 1/80 and 5/07 were identified. Patients with DCIS or invasive cancer at the margins or those receiving neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. Group A had 290 patients with LCIS in the lumpectomy; 84 had LCIS at the final margin. Group B included 2604 patients with no evidence of LCIS. RESULTS: Median patient age in group A and B was 57 and 58 years, respectively (P = 0.05); 12% and 13%, respectively, of patients in group A and B had margins <2 mm (P = NS). The histologic distribution of tumor types in group A was lobular in 47.2%, ductal in 34.5%, DCIS in 11.4%, and other invasive histologies in 6.9%, compared with 4.1%, 76.3%,13.6%, and 6.0% for group B, respectively (P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between the groups in tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage. The crude rate of LR was 4.5% in group A and 3.8% in group B (P = NS). Five- and 10-year actuarial LR rates for LCIS at the margin were 6% and 6%, 1% and 15% for LCIS present but not at the margin, and 2% and 6% for no LCIS (P = NS), for group A and B, respectively. In multivariate analysis, menopausal status and adjuvant therapy use were significant predictors of LR. LCIS, either in the specimen or at the margin, was not significantly associated with LR. CONCLUSION: Presence of LCIS, even at the margin, in BCT specimens does not have an impact on LR. Re-excision is not indicated if LCIS is present or close to margin surfaces. These findings do not support consideration of LCIS as a precursor to the development of invasive lesions.