Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of different processes during a target identification task assessing perceptual learning.

This study aimed to test whether a target identification task involving same and different judgments to assess the ability to differentiate between similar pre-exposed stimuli-i.e., perceptual learning-could actually be assessing two different cognitive processes. Specifically, the hypothesis was that while "different" trials might be truly assessing the ability to differentiate between the pre-exposed stimuli, "same" trials might be assessing the ability to recognize one of these stimuli as the target. To test this hypothesis, accuracy on judgments as well as reaction times and event-related potentials for same/different trials were recorded after concurrent pre-exposure to similar stimuli. If same/different trials were assessing cognitive processes with different time courses, distinct outcomes for such trials would be expected at the behavioral and neural level. Results showed that participants were very accurate both in same and different judgments, indicating that they were perfectly able to differentiate between the stimuli after their concurrent presentations. However, larger P3 latencies and slower reaction times for different trials than for same trials were found. These results seem to support the idea that cognitive processes activated in same and different trials are different due to their distinct time courses. The importance of these findings for the theoretical approaches to perceptual learning is discussed.

Visuospatial attention revamps cortical processing of sound amid audiovisual uncertainty.

Selective attentional biases arising from one sensory modality manifest in others. The effects of visuospatial attention, important in visual object perception, are unclear in the auditory domain during audiovisual (AV) scene processing. We investigate temporal and spatial factors that underlie such transfer neurally. Auditory encoding of random tone pips in AV scenes was addressed via a temporal response function model (TRF) of participants' electroencephalogram (N = 30). The spatially uninformative pips were associated with spatially distributed visual contrast reversals ("flips"), through asynchronous probabilistic AV temporal onset distributions. Participants deployed visuospatial selection on these AV stimuli to perform a task. A late (~300 ms) cross-modal influence over the neural representation of pips was found in the original and a replication study (N = 21). Transfer depended on selected visual input being (i) presented during or shortly after a related sound, in relatively limited temporal distributions (<165 ms); (ii) positioned across limited (1:4) visual foreground to background ratios. Neural encoding of auditory input, as a function of visual input, was largest at visual foreground quadrant sectors and lowest at locations opposite to the target. The results indicate that ongoing neural representations of sounds incorporate visuospatial attributes for auditory stream segregation, as cross-modal transfer conveys information that specifies the identity of multisensory signals. A potential mechanism is by enhancing or recalibrating the tuning properties of the auditory populations that represent them as objects. The results account for the dynamic evolution under visual attention of multisensory integration, specifying critical latencies at which relevant cortical networks operate.

Fast unconscious processing of emotional stimuli in early stages of the visual cortex.

Several cortical and subcortical brain areas have been reported to be sensitive to the emotional content of subliminal stimuli. However, the timing of these activations remains unclear. Our scope was to detect the earliest cortical traces of emotional unconscious processing of visual stimuli by recording event-related potentials (ERPs) from 43 participants. Subliminal spiders (emotional) and wheels (neutral), sharing similar low-level visual parameters, were presented at two different locations (fixation and periphery). The differential (peak-to-peak) amplitude from CP1 (77 ms from stimulus onset) to C2 (100 ms), two early visual ERP components originated in V1/V2 according to source localization analyses, was analyzed via Bayesian and traditional frequentist analyses. Spiders elicited greater CP1-C2 amplitudes than wheels when presented at fixation. This fast effect of subliminal stimulation-not reported previously to the best of our knowledge-has implications in several debates: 1) The amygdala cannot be mediating these effects, 2) latency of other evaluative structures recently proposed, such as the visual thalamus, is compatible with these results, 3) the absence of peripheral stimuli effects points to a relevant role of the parvocellular visual system in unconscious processing.