RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Hypertension control remains poorly achieved worldwide, despite the use of modern diagnostic tools and advanced therapeutic strategies. We aimed to evaluate the preferences expressed by either specialised physicians (SPs) or general practitioners (GPs) for the clinical management of hypertension and high cardiovascular risk in Italy. METHODS AND RESULTS: A predefined questionnaire was anonymously administered to a large community sample of physicians, stratified according to clinical expertise. From a total of 64 questions, 557 physicians (478 male, mean age 54.2 ± 7.1 years, average age of medical activity 28.0 ± 8.1 years), including 261 (46.9%) SPs and 296 (53.1%) GPs, provided 9564 answers to the survey questionnaire. Involved clinicians spent the majority of their time and practice for hypertension management and control. SPs aimed to achieve the recommended BP targets (<140/90 mmHg), whereas GPs tended to achieve more rigorous BP goals (<130/80 mmHg); nonetheless, they both reported a very high rate of BP control (about 70%). Concomitant presence of diabetes, organ damage, as well as comorbidities, was reported to be relatively frequent (26-50%), mostly by SPs. ESH/ESC 2007 risk score stratification was preferred by SPs compared to GPs, who favored a comprehensive clinical evaluation. ACE inhibitors or ARBs were considered the best pharmacological option to start antihypertensive treatment, thus adding diuretics or calcium-channel blockers, if needed. CONCLUSIONS: This predefined analysis of a survey questionnaire showed relatively different opinions with respect to recommended BP targets and distributions of cardiovascular risk profile, and similar diagnostic and therapeutic choices between GPs and SPs.
