International Pooled Analysis of Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Premenopausal Breast Cancer in Women From 19 Cohorts.

PURPOSE: There is strong evidence that leisure-time physical activity is protective against postmenopausal breast cancer risk but the association with premenopausal breast cancer is less clear. The purpose of this study was to examine the association of physical activity with the risk of developing premenopausal breast cancer. METHODS: We pooled individual-level data on self-reported leisure-time physical activity across 19 cohort studies comprising 547,601 premenopausal women, with 10,231 incident cases of breast cancer. Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for associations of leisure-time physical activity with breast cancer incidence. HRs for high versus low levels of activity were based on a comparison of risk at the 90th versus 10th percentiles of activity. We assessed the linearity of the relationship and examined subtype-specific associations and effect modification across strata of breast cancer risk factors, including adiposity. RESULTS: Over a median 11.5 years of follow-up (IQR, 8.0-16.1 years), high versus low levels of leisure-time physical activity were associated with a 6% (HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.89 to 0.99]) and a 10% (HR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.85 to 0.95]) reduction in breast cancer risk, before and after adjustment for BMI, respectively. Tests of nonlinearity suggested an approximately linear relationship (Pnonlinearity = .94). The inverse association was particularly strong for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-enriched breast cancer (HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.84]; Phet = .07). Associations did not vary significantly across strata of breast cancer risk factors, including subgroups of adiposity. CONCLUSION: This large, pooled analysis of cohort studies adds to evidence that engagement in higher levels of leisure-time physical activity may lead to reduced premenopausal breast cancer risk.

Prospective analysis of sleep characteristics, chronotype, and risk of breast cancer in the california teachers study.

PURPOSE: Poor sleep quality and evening chronotype were associated with increased risk of breast cancer in a previous retrospective study in the California Teachers Study (CTS). The present analysis examines these sleep factors prospectively in the same cohort of women. METHODS: From the CTS, we included 1,085 incident breast cancer cases and 38,470 cancer-free participants from 2012 through 2019. We calculated time at risk and used Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and control for risk factors such as age, race, body mass index, family history of breast cancer, and reproductive history. The sleep factors examined were quality, latency, duration, disturbance, and sleep medication use, based on a shortened version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, as well as chronotype (preference for morning or evening activity). This analysis was limited to women who were post-menopausal at the time they answered these sleep-related questions. RESULTS: Measures of sleep quality did not appear to be associated with subsequent breast cancer risk. The HR for evening chronotypes compared to morning chronotypes was somewhat elevated (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.04, 1.36). CONCLUSION: While the measures of sleep quality and duration were not associated with post-menopausal breast cancer risk in this prospective analysis, the modestly elevated risk observed for evening chronotypes was consistent with the prior retrospective analysis.

The Health of Women (HOW) Study®: a web-based survey of breast cancer risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment.

PURPOSE: Although improvements in breast cancer detection and treatment have significantly increased survival, important questions related to breast cancer risk, prognosis, and survivorship remain. This brief report describes the Health of Women (HOW) Study® methodology and characterizes the participants who completed the My Health Overview and My Breast Cancer modules. METHODS: The HOW Study® was a collection of cross-sectional, web-based modules designed to survey a large number of participants with and without breast cancer. RESULTS: A total of 42,540 participants completed the My Health Overview module, of whom 13,285 (31.2%) reported a history of breast cancer. The majority of participants were white (94.3%), female (99.5%), married (74.1%), college educated (73.2%), post-menopausal (91.1%), parous (68.8%), and reported breastfeeding their children (56.0%). A total of 11,670 participants reported a history of breast cancer in the My Breast Cancer module. The majority of survivors reported on their primary breast cancer and were diagnosed over the age of 40 years (83.5%), had either Stage I or Stage II breast cancer (63.1%), and were treated with surgery (98.8%), radiation (64.8%), and/or chemotherapy (62.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The HOW Study® provides an innovative framework for collecting large amounts of epidemiological data in an efficient and minimally invasive way. Data are publicly available to researchers upon request. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The HOW Study® can be leveraged to answer important questions about survivorship, and researchers are encouraged to utilize this new data source.

Genetic epidemiology of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated cancer across Latin America.

The prevalence and contribution of BRCA1/2 (BRCA) pathogenic variants (PVs) to the cancer burden in Latin America are not well understood. This study aims to address this disparity. BRCA analyses were performed on prospectively enrolled Latin American Clinical Cancer Genomics Community Research Network participants via a combination of methods: a Hispanic Mutation Panel (HISPANEL) on MassARRAY; semiconductor sequencing; and copy number variant (CNV) detection. BRCA PV probability was calculated using BRCAPRO. Among 1,627 participants (95.2% with cancer), we detected 236 (14.5%) BRCA PVs; 160 BRCA1 (31% CNVs); 76 BRCA2 PV frequency varied by country: 26% Brazil, 9% Colombia, 13% Peru, and 17% Mexico. Recurrent PVs (seen ≥3 times), some region-specific, represented 42.8% (101/236) of PVs. There was no ClinVar entry for 14% (17/125) of unique PVs, and 57% (111/196) of unique VUS. The area under the ROC curve for BRCAPRO was 0.76. In summary, we implemented a low-cost BRCA testing strategy and documented a significant burden of non-ClinVar reported BRCA PVs among Latin Americans. There are recurrent, population-specific PVs and CNVs, and we note that the BRCAPRO mutation probability model performs adequately. This study helps address the gap in our understanding of BRCA-associated cancer in Latin America.

Chronotype and risk of post-menopausal endometrial cancer in the California Teachers Study.

Working at night causes circadian disruption and it has been classified as a probable carcinogen. An evening chronotype, or preference for late day activity, has been shown to increase risk for several adverse health effects, such as metabolic disorders and recently, breast cancer. To further explore this emerging area of interest, we examined the association between endometrial cancer (EC) risk, another common cancer in women, and chronotype. The women in this study were members of the California Teachers Study cohort, which was established in 1995. Chronotype was reported on a subsequent questionnaire (Q5), administered in 2012-2013. The women included in this analysis were under age 90 years, were post-menopausal at Q5, and had no hysterectomy. The cancer cases, identified through linkages to the California Cancer Registry, were diagnosed between 1996 and 2014. We used unconditional logistic regression models to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the associations between chronotype and EC diagnosis. There were 437 EC cases and 26,753 cancer-free controls included in this analysis. Controls were more likely to classify themselves as current morning chronotypes than were cases (39% and 34%, respectively). Compared to morning types, women who were definite evening types had a statistically significantly elevated OR of 1.44 (95% CI 1.09-1.91). This association was more pronounced among obese women as compared to non-obese women. For evening type compared to morning type, the OR among obese women was 2.01 (95% CI 1.23, 3.29) while the OR for non-obese women was 1.12 (95% CI 0.77, 1.63). To our knowledge, the association between EC risk and evening chronotype has not been previously reported, but is consistent with the small body of literature which suggests increased breast cancer risks among evening chronotypes. Because this study was based on a retrospective analysis in a cohort of mostly white female teachers in California, further analysis of chronotype as a potential EC risk factor should be considered in other cohorts and in prospective analyses in order to further explore this relationship.

Chronotype and postmenopausal breast cancer risk among women in the California Teachers Study.

Chronotype is the behavioral manifestation of an individual's underlying circadian rhythm, generally characterized by one's propensity to sleep at a particular time during the 24 hour cycle. Evening chronotypes ("night owls") generally suffer from worse physical and mental health compared to morning chronotypes ("morning larks") - for reasons that have yet to be explained. One hypothesis is that evening chronotypes may be more susceptible to circadian disruption, a condition where the coordinated timing of biologic processes breaks down. The role of chronotype as an independent or modifying risk factor for cancer has not been widely explored. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the risk of breast cancer associated with chronotype in a case-control study nested within the California Teachers Study (CTS) cohort. The study population consisted of 39686 post-menopausal CTS participants who provided information on chronotype by completing a questionnaire in 2012-2013. 2719 cases of primary invasive breast cancer diagnosed from 1995/1996 through completion of the chronotype questionnaire were identified by linkage of the CTS to the California Cancer Registry. 36967 CTS participants who had remained cancer-free during this same time period served as controls. Chronotype was ascertained by responses to an abbreviated version of the Horne-Ostberg Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) and was characterized into five categories: definite morning, more morning than evening, neither morning or evening, more evening than morning, definite evening. Multivariable unconditional logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for each of the chronotypes, adjusted for established breast cancer risk factors. Compared to definite morning types, definite evening types had an increased risk of breast cancer with elevated ORs that were statistically significant in both the crude (OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.10-1.40) and fully-adjusted models (OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.06-1.35). The risk estimates in the fully-adjusted model for all other chronotypes did not significantly differ from one. These results suggest that evening chronotype may be an independent risk factor for breast cancer among a population of women who are not known to have engaged in any substantial night shift work. Further research in other populations of non-shift workers is warranted.

Metastatic Breast Cancer Collateral Damage Project (MBCCD): Scale development and preliminary results of the Survey of Health, Impact, Needs, and Experiences (SHINE).

PURPOSE: Until recently, people with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) had a very poor prognosis. New treatment approaches have prolonged the time that people with MBC live, but their quality of life has received less attention. Consequently, the needs and concerns across financial, vocational, psychological, social, and physical domains in MBC patients are poorly understood-particularly regarding the collateral damage or longer-term, life-altering impacts of MBC and its treatments. This study's aims were to characterize MBC-related collateral damage, identify groups most likely to experience collateral damage, and examine its associations with psychological health, illness management, and health behaviors. METHODS: Participants (N = 515) with MBC were recruited from Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation's Army of Women® and other advocacy organizations. Participants completed questionnaires of MBC-related collateral damage, depressive symptoms, anxiety, self-efficacy for managing oncologic treatments and physical symptoms, sleep, and physical activity. RESULTS: Eight domains of MBC-related collateral damage, as well as MBC-related benefit finding, were reliably characterized. Concerns about mortality/uncertainty were most prominent. Participants also endorsed high levels of benefit finding. Participants younger than 50 years, with limited financial resources, or with children under 18 at home reported the most collateral damage. Collateral damage was associated significantly with compromised psychological health, lower illness management efficacy, and poorer health behaviors, beyond sociodemographic and medical characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Subgroups of MBC patients report long-term, life-altering consequences of MBC and its treatments, which relate to important health outcomes. Clinical implications and recommendations are discussed.