Extended Sanitation Intervals for Cage Components and Automated Watering Valves: Validation and Cost Analysis.

Although the Guide suggests changing rodent cage components every 2 wk, it states that "decreased sanitation frequency may be justified if the microenvironment in the cages, under the condition of use ..., is not compromised." The purpose of this study was to evaluate extended sanitation intervals of cage components (automated watering valve, wire bar lid, and filter top) of mouse individually ventilated caging (IVCs) at our institution. We hypothesized that there would be no significant difference in relative light units measured by ATP luminometry of these cage components at the control time point of 14 d as compared with each extended time interval: 28, 56, and 84 d. In addition, for automated watering valves, the study was extended to 168 d. We also hypothesized that time-and-motion studies performed by moving to a sanitation interval of 84 d for all components would result in substantial time and cost savings. The components of a total of 24 cages containing 4 or 5 mice each were swabbed, and an ATP luminometer was used to detect organic matter. We found no significant differences in organic matter load between 14 d and all other time points for all cage components. Our time- and cost-savings analysis found that extending the sanitation interval of cage components from every 2 wk (14 d) to every 3 mo (84 d) for every 10,000 cages would save about 3,000 technician hours annually, for a total annual labor cost savings of about $100,000. This study is the first to validate the extended sanitation interval of automated watering valves and confirms the findings of previous studies that validated the extended sanitation frequency of wire bar lids and filter tops of rodent IVCs. Overall, extending the sanitation frequency of cage components reduces workload of animal care staff without compromising the cage microenvironment.

Identification and Control of an Ornithonyssus Bacoti Infestation in a Rodent Vivarium by Using Molecular Diagnostic Techniques.

Ornithonyssus bacoti, commonly known as the tropical rat mite, is a zoonotic ectoparasite that occasionally infests research rodent colonies. Most infestations have been attributed to wild rodents that harbor the mite and spread it to research animals, often during building construction or other activity that disrupts wild rodent populations. Although infestation may be clinically silent, severe outbreaks have been reported to cause pruritis, dermatitis, decreased reproductive performance, and anemia in rodents. In mid-2020, our institution experienced increased activity of wild mice, which were found to be infested with O. bacoti, diagnosed by microscopic exam and confirmed by fur swab PCR analysis. We elected to add O. bacoti to our quarterly health monitoring exhaust air dust (EAD) testing PCR panel, increase wild mouse control measures, and treat the environment with a sustained-release synthetic pyrethroid spray in an attempt to prevent colony animal infestation. Initial quarterly EAD health monitoring results in September of 2020 were negative for O. bacoti. However, in early 2021, multiple IVC racks tested positive for O. bacoti at quarterly testing. Treatment consisted of providing permethrin-soaked nesting material and surface spray treatment of the room and hallway with a sustained-release synthetic pyrethroid. Historically in the literature, O. bacoti outbreaks of research mice were not identified until mite burden was high enough to cause dermatitis on animal care workers. Due to modern molecular diagnostics and proactive PCR-based health monitoring surveillance, we were able to identify the outbreak earlier than would have otherwise been possible. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to successfully identify O. bacoti using environmental health monitoring PCR techniques. This outbreak demonstrates the importance of screening for O. bacoti in facilities with the potential for wild rodent infestation and highlights unique considerations when managing O. bacoti infestations. In addition, a novel permethrin-soaked enrichment item was developed for cage-level treatment.

Characterization of a Jumping Stereotypy in Gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) and Assessment of Opaque Tubing Enrichment on Stereotypies and Breeding.

Mongolian gerbils can develop stereotypic behaviors, including corner digging. At our institution, gerbils also engage in repetitive corner jumping, which we sought to characterize as a potentially novel stereotypy in gerbils. We then attempted to mitigate this behavior by mimicking the natural habitat by adding intracage environmental complexity. Seventeen gerbil breeding pairs were video recorded in their home cages during the light cycle. Repetitive corner jumping and digging were compared between different times of day to assess when the behaviors occurred and whether they were temporally associated. To determine whether we could reduce the incidence of stereotypic behaviors, we tested a straight tube or 1 of 3 angled opaque tubes in different orientations, which were fitted to the gerbils' preexisting opaque nesting box. Behavior was assessed at baseline and at 1, 4, 8, and 12 wk to evaluate opaque tube placement as an intervention. In addition, breeding efficiency, valuated as the number of gerbil pups born and weaned per breeder pair, was compared with pre- and poststudy data. The number of corner jumps was highest at the end of the light cycle and the majority were associated with corner digging. After placement of the enrichment tubes, an initial increase in corner digging behavior was observed and persisted throughout the study period. The opaque tubes were not associated with significant changes in corner jumping. After adjusting for age, the addition of opaque tubing to gerbil breeding cages was not associated with significant changes in breeding efficiency. The addition of opaque tubing did not effectively address concerns about stereotypic behaviors and was associated with a chronic increase in stereotypic corner digging among breeding gerbil pairs.

Cholinergic and dopaminergic interactions alter attention and response inhibition in Long-Evans rats performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task.

Acetylcholine (ACh) neurotransmission is important for attention, while dopamine (DA) signaling modulates impulsive behavior. Prior studies have established an existing relationship between ACh and DA that mediates dopamine release in the prefrontal cortex of the brain in rats performing the 5-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT). This study is aimed to identify cholinergic and dopaminergic interactions that govern attention and impulsive behavior, using adult Long-Evans rats of both sexes and a 5-CSRTT, with variable short and long cue delays. In Experiment 1, the effects of single cholinergic and dopaminergic drugs were evaluated on 5-CSRTT performance. Drugs like nicotinic ACh receptor (nAChR) agonist nicotine, amphetamine, and GBR12909 that increase the synaptic levels of ACh and DA respectively all increased impulsive behavior. In addition, amphetamine and GBR 12909 decreased attention while nicotine had no effect on attention. The antagonists mecamylamine, a general nAChR antagonist, flupenthixol a DA 1/2 receptor antagonist, and SCH 23390 a DA 1 receptor antagonist, all decreased impulsive behavior, with mixed effects on attention. In contrast, dihydro-ß-erythroidine hydrobromide (DHBE), an α4ß2 subunit-specific nAChR antagonist, had no significant effects on attention or impulsivity across doses administered. Eticlopride, a DA 2 receptor antagonist, decreased attention at the shortest cue delay but did not affect impulsivity. The acetylcholinesterase inhibitor donepezil decreased both attention and impulsive behavior. Subsequently in Experiment 2, effects of nicotine and amphetamine were determined after pretreatment with SCH 23390 or eticlopride. SCH 23390 attenuated the effects of nicotine and amphetamine to increase impulsivity, while eticlopride only attenuated the effect of nicotine on impulsivity. Minimal effects were seen on attention in the combination trials. This study confirms that dopamine D1 receptor plays an essential role in modulation of impulsive behavior, as measured by the 5-CSRTT. More importantly, it establishes that impulsive behavior is altered by interactions between cholinergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission.