Age at any full-term pregnancy and breast cancer risk.

The authors analyzed data from two multistate, population-based case-control studies to investigate the association between age at any full-term pregnancy (FP) and breast cancer risk. Study subjects included breast cancer cases aged 20-79 years identified from four statewide cancer registries and randomly selected controls interviewed from 1988 to 1996. Complete information on a comprehensive set of risk factors for breast cancer was available for 9,891 cases and 12,271 controls. The large number of subjects enabled simultaneous adjustment of the covariates and efficient application of various modeling approaches. Overall, each 5-year increase in age at first FP was associated with an odds ratio of 1.07 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01, 1.13) for breast cancer. The corresponding estimates were odds ratio = 1.02 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.05) for age at second through ninth FPs. For age at last FP, the effect estimate (odds ratio = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.06) was indistinguishable from that for other FPs after the first. In this analysis, a modest and transient increase in breast cancer risk after childbirth was also observed. The relatively greater effect of age at first FP is consistent with the existence of a long-term effect of early first FP on the differentiation of mammary cells, causing them to become less susceptible to carcinogenesis.

Leukemia in petroleum refinery workers: a review of recent studies.

A previous review of the published epidemiologic literature on cancer risk in workers in the petrochemical industry indicated excess risks of leukemia and several other cancers. Here we update this review, focusing on the risk of hematologic cancers (for example, leukemia and lymphoma) reported in studies of oil refinery workers published in the last ten years. Limitations of recent studies are discussed, including the dilution of highly exposed groups of workers with workers with little or no exposure. We consider the evidence for a "safe level" or threshold of benzene exposure in the light of its ability to cause several types of damage, including damage to stem cells which may cause a variety of malignancies. We conclude that there is evidence of a slight increase in mortality from leukemia among oil refinery workers, particularly among those employed before 1950. And continuing exposures to benzene and other carcinogens occurring in this industry should be controlled.

The decline in U.S. cancer mortality from 1991 to 1995: what's behind the numbers?

In 1996, a series of articles and news stories about cancer mortality in the United States proclaimed a "turning point in the 25-year war on cancer." While these articles and stories pointed to a recent decline in overall cancer mortality, they missed some important points about increases in specific types. They also ignored the politics behind the emphasis on smoking and diet as the main contributors to the cancer rates and the racial disparities in the U.S. data. In addition, recent articles on the decline in cancer mortality fail to note the much sharper decline in heart disease mortality. Continued efforts to reduce carcinogenic exposures at work and in the environment are needed to truly reduce the cancer burden.

Physical activity in usual occupation and risk of breast cancer (United States).

We have used data from a large population-based case-control study in the United States to evaluate the effect of occupational physical activity on breast cancer risk. Women diagnosed with breast cancer identified from four state cancer registries, and controls randomly selected from lists of licensed drivers or Medicare beneficiaries, were interviewed by telephone for information on usual occupation and other factors. We classified usual occupation into one of four categories of physical activity. After excluding subjects for whom a strength rating could not be assigned, we had a final sample size of 4,863 cases and 6,783 controls. Using conditional logistic regression models, we calculated adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95 percent confidence intervals (CI) for occupations having light, medium, and heavy activity compared with sedentary ones. Women with heavy-activity occupations had a lower risk of breast cancer than women with sedentary jobs (OR = 0.82, CI = 0.63-1.08), as did women with jobs with medium activity (OR = 0.86, CI = 0.77-0.97) or light activity (OR = 0.92, CI = 0.84-1.01). There was a significant decreasing trend in the ORs from sedentary to heavy work (P = 0.007). Although limited by exposure misclassification, these data are consistent with the hypothesis that physical activity reduces the risk of breast cancer.

Variation in female breast cancer risk by occupation.

Data from a population-based case control study were used to estimate occupation-specific relative risks for female breast cancer, adjusted for established breast cancer risk factors. Breast cancer cases under age 75 were identified from tumor registries in four states. Controls were randomly selected from driver's license and Medicare beneficiary lists. Information on usual occupation and risk factors was obtained by telephone interview. Odds ratios from logistic regression adjusted for age, state, body mass index, benign breast disease, family history of breast cancer, menopausal status, age at menarche, parity, age of first birth, lactation history, education, and alcohol consumption were calculated for each of 26 occupational groups. Complete occupational information was obtained for 6,835 cases and 9,453 controls. Of 26 occupational groups, only "administrative support occupations" had a statistically significantly increased risk of breast cancer (OR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.06-1.24). In these data, no specific occupational group had an unusual risk of breast cancer. Increased risks reported elsewhere for nurses and teachers were not corroborated.

Occupational exposure to 60-hertz magnetic fields and risk of breast cancer in women.

We used data from a large population-based case-control study to test the hypothesis that women whose "usual occupation" entailed exposure to higher than background 60-Hz magnetic fields had a higher risk of breast cancer than women without such exposure. Breast cancer cases were identified from four statewide tumor registries, and controls were randomly selected from lists of licensed drivers and Medicare beneficiaries. Information on usual occupation and breast cancer risk factors was obtained by telephone interview. We calculated adjusted odds ratios from logistic regression models for women holding occupations with potential for low, medium, or high magnetic field exposure, compared with background exposure. There was a modest increase in risk for women with potential for high exposure [odds ratio (OR) = 1.43; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.99-2.09], and no increase for women with potential for medium (OR = 1.09; 95% CI = 0.83-1.42) or low (OR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.91-1.15) exposure The risk among premenopausal women in the highest-exposure category was higher (OR = 1.98; 95% CI = 1.04-3.78) than for postmenopausal women (OR = 1.33; 95% CI = 0.82-2.17).

Recent oral contraceptive use and risk of breast cancer (United States)

We examined the association between recent oral contraceptive (OC) use and the risk of breast cancer in data from a large population-based case-control study in the United States. Cases (n = 6,751) were women less than 75 years old who had breast cancer identified from statewide tumor registries in Wisconsin, Massachusetts, Maine, and New Hampshire. Controls (n = 9,311) were selected randomly from lists of licensed drivers (if aged under 65 years) and from lists of Medicare beneficiaries (if aged 65 through 74 years). Information on OC use, reproductive experiences, and family and medical history was obtained by telephone interview. After adjustment for parity, age at first delivery, and other risk factors, women who had ever used OCs were at similar risk of breast cancer as never-users (relative risk [RR] = 1.1, 95 percent confidence interval [CI] = 1.0-1.2). Total duration of use also was not related to risk. There was a suggestion that more recent use was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer; use less than two years ago was associated with an RR of 1.3 (CI = 0.9-1.9). However, only among women aged 35 to 45 years at diagnosis was the increase in risk among recent users statistically significantly elevated (RR = 2.0, CI = 1.1-3.9). Use prior to the first pregnancy or among nulliparous women was not associated with increased risk. Among recent users of OCs, the risk associated with use was greatest among non-obese women, e.g., among women with body mass index (kg/m2) less than 20.4, RR = 1.7, CI = 1.1-2.8. While these results suggest that, in general, breast cancer risk is not increased substantially among women who have used OCs, they also are consistent with a slight increased risk among subgroups of recent users.

Cigarette smoking and breast cancer.

A priori hypotheses suggest that cigarette smoking could either increase or decrease breast cancer incidence. To clarify these competing hypotheses, we used data from a very large population-based breast cancer case-control study to investigate the impact of smoking on breast cancer risk. Breast cancer patients less than 75 years old were identified from statewide tumor registries in Wisconsin, Massachusetts, Maine, and New Hampshire; controls were randomly selected from driver's license lists (age less than 65) or lists of Medicare beneficiaries (age 65-74). Information on reproductive history, medical history, and personal habits including cigarette smoking was obtained by telephone interview. A total of 6,888 cases and 9,529 controls were interviewed. There was virtually no relationship between current smoking and breast cancer risk (multivariate odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.09), and former smokers had a barely increased risk (odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.19). Similar results were observed among both premenopausal and postmenopausal women. There was no suggestion that heavy or long-term smoking increased or decreased risk, nor were there indications that women who began smoking at an early age were at increased risk, as has been hypothesized. The results of this large population-based study indicate that smoking does not influence the risk of breast cancer, even among heavy smokers who began smoking at an early age.

Cutaneous melanoma mortality among the socioeconomically disadvantaged in Massachusetts.

OBJECTIVES: To identify groups for melanoma prevention and early detection programs, this study explored the hypothesis that survival with cutaneous melanoma is disproportionately lower for persons of lower socioeconomic status. METHODS: Massachusetts Cancer Registry and Registry of Vital Records and Statistics data (1982 through 1987) on 3288 incident cases and 1023 deaths from cutaneous melanoma were analyzed. Mortality/incidence ratios were calculated and compared, predictors of late stage disease were examined with logistic regression analysis, and a proportional hazards regression analysis that used death registration as the outcome measure for incident cases was performed. RESULTS: Lower socioeconomic status was associated with a higher mortality/incidence ratio after adjustment for age and sex. For education, the mortality/incidence ratio was 0.37 in the lower group vs 0.25 in the higher group (rate ratio = 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08, 2.03). Late stage disease was independently associated with lower income (rate ratio for lowest vs highest tertile = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.20, 2.25), and melanoma mortality among case patients was associated with lower education (rate ratio = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.09, 213). CONCLUSIONS: Melanoma patients of lower socioeconomic status may be more likely to die from their melanoma than patients of higher socioeconomic status. Low- SES communities may be appropriate intervention targets.

Long-term hormone replacement therapy and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

Despite extensive study, concerns remain about a possible association between long-term postmenopausal hormone treatment--particularly use of combination preparations--and risk of breast cancer. The authors evaluated the use of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy in relation to breast cancer risk in a large multicenter, population-based case-control study. Women with a new diagnosis of breast cancer were identified through statewide tumor registries in Wisconsin, Massachusetts, Maine, and New Hampshire. Controls were randomly selected from population lists in each state. For this analysis of postmenopausal women, data were available from 3,130 breast cancer cases and 3,698 controls interviewed between 1989 and 1991. Replacement hormone use was not associated with breast cancer risk in women who had ever undergone this treatment (relative risk (RR) = 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-1.18). Among women who had used replacement hormones for 15 years or more, there was no clear increase in risk, although the small sample size did not preclude the possibility of a modest association (RR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.87-1.43). Risk among women using progestins in combination with estrogens was similar to that in women using estrogens alone. Risk did not vary according to type of menopause, family history of breast cancer, history of benign breast disease, or alcohol intake. These results are consistent with the majority of reports which find no overall increased risk associated with the use of replacement hormones. However, in contrast to several other studies, this study did not find long-term use to be associated with increased risk. These results also do not support a hypothesized effect of combined progestin and estrogen use on the risk of breast cancer.

Strenuous physical activity in young adulthood and risk of breast cancer (United States).

The epidemiologic data on the relation between strenuous physical activity and breast cancer are limited and inconsistent. Because risk of breast cancer may be influenced by ovarian function which, in turn is modulated by physical activity, the hypothesis that exercise may be associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer merits further investigation. We, therefore, conducted a large case-control study in 1988-1991, and interviewed 6,888 women (17 to 74 years of age) with breast cancer in Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Wisconsin (United States). Interviewed controls (9,539 women, 18 to 74 years of age) were selected randomly from lists of licensed drivers (for younger women) or from a roster of Medicare enrollees (for older women). We used multivariate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95 percent confidence intervals (CI) from logistic regression models to estimate relative risks between self-reported physical activity when 14 to 22 years of age and breast cancer. When compared with sedentary controls, women who reported any strenuous physical during ages 14 to 22 years had a modest reduction in the risk of breast cancer (OR = 0.95, CI = 0.93-0.97). However, those who exercised vigorously at least once a day had a 50 percent reduction in risk of breast cancer (OR = 0.5, CI = 0.4-0.7). These data support the hypothesis that women who are physically active have a reduced risk of breast cancer.

Risk of breast cancer in relation to lifetime alcohol consumption.

BACKGROUND: Although an association between alcohol consumption and risk of breast cancer has been observed in many studies, questions of major importance remain, including the nature of the dose-response relationship and the effects of drinking at various periods in life. PURPOSE: Our goal was to address the issues listed above with a large case-control study. METHODS: We conducted a population-based case-control study in Maine, Massachusetts (excluding the four counties that include metropolitan Boston), New Hampshire, and Wisconsin. Case patients were eligible if their diagnosis of invasive breast cancer was first reported to one of the four statewide cancer registries during the period of 1988 through 1991. During the accrual period, 11,879 potentially eligible case patients and 16,217 control subjects were identified. After excluding ineligible women from the study, telephone interviews were obtained from 6888 case patients and 9424 control subjects. Complete data for recent alcohol consumption, and thus final eligibility for study participation, were determined for 6662 case patients and 9163 control subjects. The average age at time of interview was 58.7 years. The questions on alcohol use addressed average consumption during five periods of the subjects' lives: ages 16-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-59, and 60-74 years. Similar responses from 211 control subjects upon reinterview 6-12 months later were taken to be indicative of the reliability of the questionnaire used in this study. RESULTS: Lifetime average alcohol consumption (measured as the average grams per day consumed from age 16 to the recent past) and recent alcohol consumption (average grams per day consumed in the previous age interval) were associated with risk of developing breast cancer. The multivariate relative risk of breast cancer, in those who drink compared with abstainers, associated with average lifetime consumption of 12-18 g/day of alcohol (about one drink) was 1.39 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16-1.67), of 19-32 g/day (about two drinks) was 1.69 (95% CI = 1.36-2.10), of 33-45 g/day (about three drinks) was 2.30 (95% CI = 1.51-3.51), and of greater than or equal to 46 g/day (four or more drinks) was 1.75 (95% CI = 1.16-2.64) (P for trend < .0001). The multivariate relative risk per 13 g/day (about one drink) of alcohol consumed before 30 years of age was 1.09 (95% CI = 0.95-1.24), whereas the relative risk associated with recent consumption of 13 g/day was 1.21 (95% CI = 1.09-1.34). CONCLUSIONS: In these data, alcohol consumption was clearly related to breast cancer risk. Risk appeared to increase even at moderate levels of consumption. For women of all ages combined, consumption before 30 years of age was not an important determinant of risk.

Lactation and a reduced risk of premenopausal breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The evidence of an association of lactation with a reduction in the risk of breast cancer among women has been limited and inconsistent. The effect of lactation appears to be confined to premenopausal women with a history of long lactation, but most studies of this relation have been limited in statistical power. We conducted a multicenter, population-based, case-control study with a sample large enough for us to describe more precisely the association between lactation and the risk of breast cancer. METHODS: Patients less than 75 years old who had breast cancer were identified from statewide tumor registries in Wisconsin, Massachusetts, Maine, and New Hampshire. Controls were randomly selected from lists of licensed drivers if the case subjects were less than 65 years old, and from lists of Medicare beneficiaries if they were 65 through 74 years old. Information on lactation, reproductive history, and family and medical history was obtained by means of telephone interviews. After the exclusion of nulliparous women, 5878 case subjects and 8216 controls remained for analysis. RESULTS: After adjustment for parity, age at first delivery, and other risk factors for breast cancer, lactation was associated with a slight reduction in the risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women, as compared with the risk among women who were parous but had never lactated (relative risk, 0.78; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.66 to 0.91); the relative risk of breast cancer among postmenopausal women who had lactated, as compared with those who had not, was 1.04 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.95 to 1.14). With an increasing cumulative duration of lactation, there was a decreasing risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women (P for trend < 0.001) but not among postmenopausal, parous women (P for trend = 0.51). A younger age at first lactation was significantly associated with a reduction in the risk of premenopausal breast cancer (P for trend = 0.003). As compared with parous women who did not lactate, the relative risk of breast cancer among women who first lactated at less than 20 years of age and breast-fed their infants for a total of six months was 0.54 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: There is a reduction in the risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women who have lactated. No reduction in the risk of breast cancer occurred among postmenopausal women with a history of lactation.

The reliability of self-reported alcohol consumption in the remote past.

We examined the reliability of self-reported alcohol consumption in past age periods of women's lives. As part of a case-control study of breast cancer conducted in Massachusetts and Wisconsin in 1988-1991, the same questionnaire was administered for a second time to 211 controls (mean age = 54 years) after an interval of 6-12 months. The Spearman correlation coefficients between the average number of grams of alcohol consumed daily reported in the two interviews, by age period of consumption, were: 16-19 years, r = 0.81; 20-29 years, r = 0.84; 30-39 years, r = 0.75; and for recent consumption, r = 0.77. Self-reported alcohol consumption throughout adult life was reported with precision sufficient to make the ranking of subjects' intake consistent between interviews.