Cannabidiol-drug interaction in cancer patients: A retrospective study in a real-life setting.

Cannabidiol (CBD) consumption in cancer patients is growing and there is a need to investigate how to detect cannabidiol-drug interactions (CDIs). However, CDIs and the clinical relevance between CBD, anticancer treatment, supportive care and conventional drugs is poorly studied especially in real-life settings. In 1 oncology day-hospital, a cross-sectional study in 363 cancer patients treated with chemotherapy revealed 20 patients (5.5%) who consumed CBD. In this study we aimed to explore the prevalence and clinical relevance of CDIs among these 20 patients. CDI detection used the Food and Drug Administration Drugs.com database and clinical relevance was assessed accordingly. Ninety CDIs with 34 medicines were detected (4.6 CDI/patient). The main clinical risks were central nervous system depression and hepatoxicity. The main CDIs were assessed as moderate and anticancer treatment do not seem to add to the risk. CBD discontinuation appears to be the most consistent management. Future studies should explore the clinical relevance of drug interactions with CBD in cancer patients.

Using national data to describe characteristics and determine acceptance factors of pharmacists' interventions: a six-year longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND: In France, hospital pharmacists perform medication order reviews during patients' hospital stays. This activity can be centralized in the pharmacy or carried out directly in the ward, in collaboration with the healthcare team. During this review, pharmacists can make recommendations to optimize therapeutics. Since 2006, they can document their interventions, via the national Act-IP© observatory. AIM: To determine the characteristics of pharmacists' interventions and their acceptance by physicians in French hospitals. METHOD: A 6-year observational study of pharmacists' interventions documented on the Act-IP© French observatory between 2009 and 2014 was performed. Multiple logistic regression was undertaken to determine the predictors of physicians' acceptance of interventions. RESULTS: A total of 194,684 pharmacists' interventions were documented and concerned mainly "dosage adjustment" (25.6%). These interventions were mostly related to drugs from the central nervous system (23.7%). Seventy percent of pharmacists' interventions were accepted by physicians. Acceptance rate was higher when conducted by a pharmacist regularly practicing in the ward (ORa = 1.60, CI 95 [1.57-1.64]). Physicians' acceptance was significantly associated with (1) ward specialty: emergency (ORa = 1.24, CI 95 [1.14-1.35]); (2) type of intervention: "drug discontinuation", "drug switch" (ORa = 1.15, CI 95 [1.12-1.19]) and "addition of a new drug" (ORa = 1.15, CI 95 [1.12-1.19]); (3) drug group: antineoplastic and immunomodulators (ORa = 3.67, CI 95 [3.44-3.92]). CONCLUSION: This 6-year longitudinal study highlights the role of clinical pharmacists, and particularly the impact of those integrated into wards. This was found to improve intervention acceptance, potentially through collaboration with physicians in pursuit of patient care and drug safety.

Clinical Relevance of Pharmacist Intervention: Development of a Named Entity Recognition Model on Unstructured Comments.

We developed a clinical named entity recognition model to predict clinical relevance of pharmacist interventions (PIs) by identifying and labelling expressions from unstructured comments of PIs. Three labels, drug, kidney and dosage, had a great inter-annotator agreement (>60%) and could be used as reference labelization. These labels also showed a high precision (>70%) and a variable recall (50-90 %).

Clinical and Organizational Impacts of Medical Ordering Settings on Patient Pathway and Community Pharmacy Dispensing Process: The Prospective ORDHOSPIVILLE Study.

During the dispensing process of medical orders (MOs), community pharmacists (CPs) can manage drug-related problems (DRPs) by performing pharmacist interventions (PIs). There is little evidence that the PI rate is higher with MOs from hospitals (MOHs) than ambulatory (MOAs) settings, and their impact on the patient and community pharmacy is unknown. The primary objective of this study was to compare the MOH and MOA PI rates. The secondary objective was to describe PIs and their clinical and organizational impacts on patient and community pharmacy workflow. A total of 120 CPs participated in a prospective study. Each CP included 10 MOH and 10 MOA between January and June 2020. DRP and PI description and clinical and organizational impacts between MOH and MOA were assessed and compared. We analyzed 2325 MOs. PIs were significantly more frequent in MOH than in MOA (9.7% versus 4.7%; p < 0.001). The most reported PI was the difficulty of contacting hospital prescribers (n = 45; 52.2%). MOHs were associated with a longer dispensing process time and a greater impact on patient pathway and community pharmacy workflow than MOAs. Lack of communication between hospital and primary care settings partly explains the results. Implementation of clinical pharmacy activities at patient discharge could alleviate these impacts.

Nightmares and hallucinations with aprepitant and opium powder: a suspected drug-drug interaction.

Polypharmacy of elderly oncology patients and fragmented medication management are well-known risk factors for drug-drug interactions (DDIs). These interactions can occur among antineoplastic, ongoing chronic treatment(s) and chemotherapy-associated treatments, like antiemetics. Clinically relevant interactions based on enzyme- or transporter-inhibition phenomena of active drugs can increase the frequency of their DDIs. We describe a strongly suspected elderly cancer patient's DDI between aprepitant and opium powder in the context of an irinotecan-based regimen manifested by nightmares and visual hallucinations. We discuss this DDI's hypothetical pharmacological mechanisms and management.