Role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of temporal arteritis.

BACKGROUND: Temporal artery (TA) biopsy is the current standard for diagnosing temporal arteritis, but has limited sensitivity. Colour duplex ultrasonography is a newer, non-invasive method of diagnosing temporal arteritis. METHODS: A systematic review was performed of trials comparing TA biopsy with duplex ultrasonography. Duplex results (halo sign, stenosis or vessel occlusion) were compared with either TA biospy findings or the American College of Rheumatology research criteria for diagnosing temporal arteritis. Trials were identified from MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library trials register. The performance of duplex ultrasonography was assessed with weighted independent sensitivity and specificity values, and summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: There were 17 eligible studies containing 998 patients. When the halo sign on duplex imaging was compared with TA biopsy, the sensitivity was 75 (95 per cent confidence interval 67 to 82) per cent and the specificity was 83 (78 to 88) per cent. There was no heterogeneity across the eligible studies. CONCLUSION: Duplex ultrasonography was relatively accurate for diagnosing temporal arteritis. It should become the first-line investigation, with biopsy reserved for patients with a negative scan.

Case series and literature review: popliteal artery injury following total knee replacement.

We present a case series and literature review of injury to the popliteal vessels during total knee replacement (TKR). This is rare but may be limb-threatening with devastating consequences for the patient. An individual surgeon will see few cases. Over a 28-month period 3913 elective TKRs were performed at three hospitals in East Anglia, United Kingdom. We present nine cases (0.23%) of popliteal artery injury following TKR. All required further investigation and intervention. The range of pathology included intra-operative haemorrhage (3 cases), thrombosis (2 cases), pseudo-aneurysm (3 cases) and arteriovenous fistula (1 case). Definitive treatment of the arterial injury was by primary repair (4 cases), interposition graft (2 cases), bypass graft (2 cases), endovascular stenting (1 case) and primary above-knee amputation (AKA; 1 case). There was morbidity in four patients: two AKAs, one case of foot-drop, and one unsightly fasciotomy scar. There was no mortality. Compared to other published studies (totalling 141 cases) complications resulting from direct arterial injury were significantly more common in our series. Incidence remains steady. More careful surgical technique may be the most effective preventative measure. Ongoing awareness is therefore essential for early diagnosis and management of this rare but serious complication.

Anaesthetic specialisation leads to improved early- and medium-term survival following major vascular surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Vascular surgical specialisation is associated with improved outcomes. We aimed to assess the effect of anaesthetic specialisation on outcome following major vascular surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Patients undergoing major vascular surgery (lower limb revascularisation, elective and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, endovascular aneurysm repair and carotid endarterectomy) over a five-year period were identified from a prospective database. The primary outcomes were death within 30 days and death within two years of surgery. Potential risk factors for mortality were assessed using multivariate logistic regression modelling. RESULTS: The analysis cohort comprised 1155 patients followed up for a median of 583 days. Mortality within two years of surgery was 16%. For the overall cohort, care from vascular anaesthetists was independently associated with reduced 30-day (odds ratio 0.22; 95% CI 0.12-0.62) and medium-term mortality (0.31; 95% CI 0.18-0.55). For elective patients (n=851), vascular anaesthesia reduced two-year mortality (odds ratio 0.29; 95% CI 0.15-0.58; P=0.0004) though not 30-day mortality (odds ratio 0.55; 95% CI 0.15-1.95; P=0.35). For emergency patients, care by a vascular anaesthetist influenced neither 30-day mortality (odds ratio 0.33; 95% CI 0.08-1.41; P=0.13) nor medium-term mortality (odds ratio 0.45; 95% CI 0.17-1.21; P=0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Anaesthetic specialisation reduced early- and medium-term mortality rates following major vascular surgery. If replicated by prospective studies, these results suggest that vascular surgery services would benefit from specialised anaesthetic support.