Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Drug Metab Dispos ; 39(3): 551-7, 2011 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21098647

RESUMO

Past publications have highlighted the influence of postdialysis plasma pH on the measured fraction unbound in plasma (fup). There is disparity in the industry as to which of two main methods is more suitable for controlling postdialysis plasma pH: the use of either a stronger buffer or a CO(2) atmosphere for the incubation. In the current study, it has been found that 10% CO(2) could be too high for the buffering capacities of both 100 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.40 decreased to pH 6.90 after a 6-h incubation) and plasma (decreased below pH 7.40 after a 6-h incubation). To provide appropriate control over the postdialysis plasma pH, for a range of species, it is proposed that a standard phosphate buffer strength (100 mM) and pH (7.40) in combination with a 5% CO(2) atmosphere be used for equilibrium dialysis. Furthermore, statistically significant differences in fup values obtained with a pH difference of less than 0.32 pH unit have been demonstrated. An acceptance range for postdialysis plasma pH in routine in vitro fup screening assays of pH 7.40 ± 0.10 is recommended.


Assuntos
Proteínas Sanguíneas/metabolismo , Preparações Farmacêuticas/sangue , Animais , Soluções Tampão , Dióxido de Carbono , Fenômenos Químicos , Diálise , Cães , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos/métodos , Humanos , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Macaca fascicularis , Camundongos , Concentração Osmolar , Preparações Farmacêuticas/química , Preparações Farmacêuticas/metabolismo , Ligação Proteica , Ratos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...