Long-term treatment-free remission in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia after second-line nilotinib: ENESTop 5-year update.

The ENESTop study evaluated treatment-free remission (TFR) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase who had received ≥3 years of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy and achieved sustained deep molecular response only after switching from imatinib to nilotinib. After 1-year nilotinib consolidation, 126 patients attempted TFR. At 48 weeks (primary analysis), 57.9% (73/126) were in TFR. In the present analysis at 5 years, 42.9% (54/126) were in TFR. Since the 48-week analysis, among patients who left the TFR phase, 58% (11/19) did not have a loss of molecular response and discontinued for other reasons. Of the 59 patients who reinitiated nilotinib upon loss of major molecular response (MMR) or confirmed loss of MR4, 98.3% regained MMR, 94.9% regained MR4, and 93.2% regained MR4.5. Overall adverse event rates decreased over the 5 years of TFR. In patients reinitiating nilotinib, there was a cumulative increase in cardiovascular events with longer nilotinib exposure. No disease progression or CML-related deaths were reported. Overall, these results confirm the durability and safety of TFR for patients receiving second-line nilotinib. Cardiovascular risk should be carefully managed, particularly when reinitiating treatment after TFR.

Treatment-Free Remission After Second-Line Nilotinib Treatment in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase: Results From a Single-Group, Phase 2, Open-Label Study.

Background: Treatment-free remission (TFR)-that is, stopping tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy without loss of response-is an emerging treatment goal in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Objective: To evaluate TFR after discontinuation of second-line nilotinib therapy. Design: Single-group, phase 2, open-label study. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01698905). Setting: 63 centers in 18 countries. Patients: Adults with CML in chronic phase who received TKI therapy for at least 3 years (>4 weeks with imatinib, then ≥2 years with nilotinib) and achieved MR4.5 (BCR-ABL1 ≤0.0032% on the International Scale [BCR-ABL1IS]) while receiving nilotinib entered a 1-year consolidation phase. Those with sustained MR4.5 during consolidation were eligible to enter TFR. Interventions: Patients received nilotinib during consolidation; those who entered TFR stopped treatment. Patients with loss of major molecular response (MMR) (BCR-ABL1IS ≤0.1%) or confirmed loss of MR4 (BCR-ABL1IS ≤0.01%) during TFR reinitiated nilotinib treatment. Measurements: Proportion of patients without loss of MMR, confirmed loss of MR4, or treatment reinitiation within 48 weeks of stopping treatment (primary end point). Results: 163 patients who had switched from imatinib to nilotinib (for reasons including resistance, intolerance, and physician preference) enrolled in the study and entered the consolidation phase. Of these patients, 126 met the criteria for entering the TFR phase, and 73 (58% [95% CI, 49% to 67%]) and 67 (53% [CI, 44% to 62%]) maintained TFR at 48 weeks (primary end point) and 96 weeks, respectively. Of the 56 patients who reinitiated nilotinib therapy, 55 regained MMR or better and 52 regained MR4.5. None had CML progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis. Musculoskeletal pain was more frequent during the first 48 weeks after nilotinib discontinuation. Limitation: The study included a heterogeneous patient population and was not designed to compare outcomes between patients continuing and those stopping treatment. Conclusion: TFR seems achievable in patients with sustained MR4.5 after switching to nilotinib. Primary Funding Source: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

Deep molecular responses achieved in patients with CML-CP who are switched to nilotinib after long-term imatinib.

Patients in complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) with detectable BCR-ABL1 after ≥2 years on imatinib were randomized to nilotinib (400 mg twice daily, n = 104) or continued imatinib (n = 103) in the Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in clinical Trials-Complete Molecular Response (ENESTcmr) trial. By 1 and 2 years, confirmed undetectable BCR-ABL1 was achieved by 12.5% vs 5.8% (P = .108) and 22.1% vs 8.7% of patients in the nilotinib and imatinib arms, respectively (P = .0087). Among patients without molecular response 4.5 (BCR-ABL1(IS) ≤0.0032%; MR(4.5)) and those without major molecular response at study start, MR(4.5) by 2 years was achieved by 42.9% vs 20.8% and 29.2% vs 3.6% of patients in the nilotinib and imatinib arms, respectively. No patient in the nilotinib arm lost CCyR, vs 3 in the imatinib arm. Adverse events were more common in the nilotinib arm, as expected with the introduction of a new drug vs remaining on a well-tolerated drug. The safety profile of nilotinib was consistent with other reported studies. In summary, switching to nilotinib enabled more patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) to sustain lower levels of disease burden vs remaining on imatinib. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00760877.

Granulocytic sarcoma of the stomach: relapse after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia.

An 18-year-old male underwent an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the first late chronic phase. On day 132, he was readmitted to the hospital with nausea, vomiting and nodular lesions on endoscopy. A diagnosis of granulocytic sarcoma of the stomach was made. Bone marrow cytogenetic analysis for the Philadelphia chromosome and nested polymerase chain reaction for BCR-ABL1 were both negative. Immunosuppression was abruptly discontinued, and by day 180, all gastric lesions had completely disappeared. However, there were histological signs of graft-versus-host disease. The patient developed progressive anorexia and elevated hepatic enzymes, which prompted the reintroduction of cyclosporine. Considering the risk of another relapse, imatinib mesylate (IM) 600 mg/day was started. The patient Is condition improved, and there was no evidence of disease recurrence at 36 months after relapse. Relapse of CML is the commonest cause of treatment failure after allo-HSCT. On rare occasions, a localized extramedullary presentation is seen. Unless properly treated, other extramedullary relapse sites and/or marrow infiltration usually occur. Withdrawal of immunosuppression, along with IM therapy seems to be an acceptable approach in this setting.

De novo acute myeloid leukemia in adults younger than 60 years of age: socioeconomic aspects and treatment results in a Brazilian university center.

We retrospectively studied the outcomes of adults with de novo acute myeloid leukemia treated in a reference center in Brazil and analyzed the association with the human development index (HDI) of the United Nations used as a socioeconomic factor. Among 123 patients, 46 (37%) died during induction, 65 (53%) reached complete remission and 45 (37%) received high-dose cytarabine (Hidac) consolidation. The 5-year overall survival and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were 17 and 26%, respectively, for all patients and 36 and 30%, respectively, for those receiving Hidac. In multivariate analysis, an HDI <0.660 was associated with a lower probability to receive Hidac (P = 0.001), a trend for higher mortality in remission induction (P = 0.062) and a decreased LFS (P < 0.0001). However, it was not associated with outcomes for patients receiving Hidac. In conclusion, survival for patients who received Hidac consolidation is satisfactory; however, socioeconomic factors may have selected patients to receive intensive Hidac consolidation.