RESUMO
Ulnar styloid fractures (USFs) are often associated with distal radial fractures (DRFs). When unstable DRFs are treated surgically, any associated USF is most commonly left untreated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a concomitant USF on outcome after surgical stabilization of a DRF. Methods: Data from 2 randomized controlled trials on the treatment of unstable DRFs were pooled. The effect of a USF on the QuickDASH, EQ-5D, pain, and range of motion at 2 years was evaluated. Results: Two hundred and eighty-one patients were included; 177 (63%) had an associated, untreated USF. An unadjusted analysis demonstrated no significant difference in functional or patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at 2 years between patients with or without a concomitant USF. When controlling for confounding factors, the presence of a USF did not predict change in any of the PROMs from baseline to 2 years. A concomitant USF also did not predict change in grip strength or range of motion, except for a small effect on extension (-4.1°; 95% confidence interval, -7.5° to -0.8°; p = 0.02), which probably does not have clinical relevance. Conclusions: A USF in combination with a DRF does not affect PROMs, range of motion, or grip strength. We recommend that concomitant USFs be left untreated when treating a DRF with surgical fixation. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
RESUMO
Volar locking plates have permitted early mobilization, omitting the need for prolonged cast immobilization, after distal radial fractures (DRFs). However, the type of rehabilitation following plate fixation of DRFs remains an unresolved issue. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of physiotherapy after volar plate fixation of DRFs. At a 2-year follow-up, we compared the results of immediate physiotherapy (early mobilization) with those of home exercises following 2 weeks in a dorsal plaster splint (late mobilization). METHODS: Patients with an extra-articular DRF scheduled for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with a volar locking plate were evaluated for eligibility for enrollment in the study. The patients were randomized into 2 groups: (1) early mobilization and physiotherapy and (1) late mobilization and home exercise. In the early mobilization group, the plaster splint was removed after 2 to 3 days. During the first 3 months, the patients met with the institution's physiotherapist every other week. The late mobilization group wore the dorsal splint for 2 weeks and only met with our physiotherapist once, when the splint was removed. This group was provided with a home physiotherapy program and instructed to perform home exercises on their own. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen patients were included in the study. The 2 groups had similar demographics with respect to age, sex, and baseline values. Seven patients were lost to follow-up. No clinically relevant difference in scores on the shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire was found between the 2 groups at any of the follow-up evaluations. The largest difference in the QuickDASH score was found at 6 weeks, when the early mobilization group had a mean score of 30 compared with a mean of 37 in the late mobilization group (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Early mobilization and multiple physiotherapy visits did not improve wrist function compared with standard treatment of 2 weeks in a dorsal plaster splint, a single physiotherapy visit, and home exercises. Early mobilization following ORIF of an extra-articular DRF is safe. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
