(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography-computed tomography to diagnose recurrent cancer.

BACKGROUND: Sometimes the diagnosis of recurrent cancer in patients with a previous malignancy can be challenging. This prospective cohort study assessed the clinical utility of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography-computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET-CT) in the diagnosis of clinically suspected recurrence of cancer. METHODS: Patients were eligible if cancer recurrence (non-small-cell lung (NSCL), breast, head and neck, ovarian, oesophageal, Hodgkin's or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma) was suspected clinically, and if conventional imaging was non-diagnostic. Clinicians were asked to indicate their management plan before and after (18)F-FDG PET-CT scanning. The primary outcome was change in planned management after (18)F-FDG PET-CT. RESULTS: Between April 2009 and June 2011, 101 patients (age, median 65 years; 55% female) were enroled from four cancer centres in Ontario, Canada. Distribution by primary tumour type was: NSCL (55%), breast (19%), ovarian (10%), oesophageal (6%), lymphoma (6%), and head and neck (4%). Of the 99 subjects who underwent (18)F-FDG PET-CT, planned management changed after (18)F-FDG PET-CT in 52 subjects (53%, 95% confidence interval (CI), 42-63%); a major change in plan from no treatment to treatment was observed in 38 subjects (38%, 95% CI, 29-49%), and was typically associated with (18)F-FDG PET-CT findings that were positive for recurrent cancer (37 subjects). After 3 months, the stated post-(18)F-FDG PET-CT management plan was actually completed in 88 subjects (89%, 95% CI, 81-94%). CONCLUSION: In patients with suspected cancer recurrence and conventional imaging that is non-diagnostic, (18)F-FDG PET-CT often provides new information that leads to important changes in patient management.

Penetrating trauma to the male external genitalia.

BACKGROUND: We report on 40 patients with penetrating trauma to the external genitalia. Initial evaluation and management, operative findings, and treatment outcomes are reviewed. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients presenting to our facility with penetrating trauma to the external genitalia since 1988. RESULTS: Of the 40 patients reviewed, 22 sustained isolated scrotal trauma, 10 sustained isolated penile trauma, and 8 had both scrotal and penile injuries. Twenty-nine of the 30 men with scrotal injuries underwent surgical exploration, and 21 of these were found to have injuries to the spermatic cord or testes (in 2 patients, bilateral injuries were noted). The testicular salvage rate was 35%. Penile trauma occurred in 18 patients. Eight corporal injuries and four urethral injuries were managed with debridement and primary repair. Erection and normal voiding was present in all men undergoing reconstruction who returned for follow-up. Thirty-eight percent of tested patients were positive for hepatitis B, C, or both. More than 60% of tested patients were legally intoxicated at the time of injury. Injuries separate from genitourinary trauma were identified in 72% of the men. CONCLUSION: Early surgical exploration with conservative debridement and primary repair of injured structures is recommended for most men who sustain penetrating injuries to the external genitalia. Selected patients with superficial injuries can be managed nonoperatively, but delayed wound complications are not uncommon. Although universal precautions are recommended for all patients, the high prevalence of hepatitis B and C in this group reemphasizes their importance. Long-term follow-up in this largely young, mobile, indigent population was poor.