RESUMO
Polyclonal anti-idiotypic antibodies to human monoclonal anti-HBs antibodies (MoAb1) were raised in rabbits and designated Ab2-H1 and Ab2-H2. These Ab2 were characterized using three assays. A direct binding ELISA evaluated specificity towards a panel of human monoclonal antibodies and gamma globulins. Competition radioimmunoassay (CRIA) revealed Ab2 specificities towards Ab1 antigen binding sites by inhibition of HBsAg/Ab1 binding. Ab2-H1 and Ab2-H2 had comparable reactivities in ELISA and CRIA, whereas, using affinity purified Ab2, a fast (10 min) agglutination test (Spherotest) revealed different Ab1/Ab2 binding properties. Ab2-H1 reacted in this Spherotest with the Ab1 against which it was known to be specific (Ab1-H1), whereas in the same assay Ab2-H2 showed no activity towards the variable regions of the Ab1 used for its production (Ab1-H2). When injected into rabbits Ab2-H1 induced anti-HBs Ab3 antibodies but Ab2-H2 did not, thereby confirming the assay results.
Assuntos
Testes de Aglutinação/métodos , Anticorpos Anti-Idiotípicos/imunologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais/imunologia , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Antígenos de Superfície da Hepatite B/imunologia , Radioimunoensaio/métodos , Animais , Especificidade de Anticorpos/imunologia , Ligação Competitiva/imunologia , Epitopos/imunologia , Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite B/imunologia , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia , CoelhosRESUMO
Human spleen cells from an HIV-seropositive donor were immunized in vitro with the aa583-599 peptide conjugated to an heptalysyl core. This sequence was derived from the putatively HIV-immunosuppressive region of HIV1 gp41. The same conjugated peptide was used to immunize mice. One human and one mouse IgM monoclonal antibody (mAb) directed against the aa583-599 peptide were obtained. The two mAb had distinct patterns of reactivity against a panel of 42 peptides with modified sequences. Neither of the mAb inhibited the immunosuppressive effect of aa583-599 octopus-lys-conjugated peptide on anti-CD3 Ab-induced lymphoproliferation. In addition, both mAb did not neutralize cell-free virus transmission or enhance HIV infection. However, HmAb inhibited formation of syncytia between HIV1-infected (but not HIV2-infected cells) and non-infected target cells at concentrations above 20 micrograms/ml, whereas MmAb did not have any effect. The degree of conservation of the aa583-599 region makes HmAb a candidate for use as a group-specific reagent in future HIV1 passive immunotherapy protocols.