Composite event-free-survival as an endpoint in oncology drug evaluation: Review and guidance perspectives from the Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS).

BACKGROUND: The use of right-censored composite endpoints, such as progression-free survival, has been questioned in haemato-oncology trials due to potential bias in estimated treatment effect. This may impact the accuracy of health technology evaluations. We hypothesized that there is heterogeneity and potential sources of bias in the reporting of composite endpoints to health technology assessment (HTA) bodies. METHODS: We reviewed the submissions for reimbursement of oncology drugs in 2021 and 2022 that used a composite endpoint in the pivotal trial, after appraisal by the French HTA body. The retrieved information included the clinical study report, protocol, and statistical analysis plan submitted by the industry. All events of the composite endpoint and all causes of censored observations were measured. The design characteristics and treatment effect estimates were recorded. FINDINGS: Seventy-six submissions were selected, including seven without a right-censored endpoint and four evaluating associations, resulting in 65 analysed records: 17 for haematological and 48 for solid tumours. Out these 65 submissions, 47 (72·3%) used a randomized controlled design, and 18 (27·7%) a non-comparative design. The most frequently used composite endpoint was progression-free survival, used in 54 (83·1%) of the submissions. Censoring was possibly informative in 51 (92·7%) cases, mostly due to the onset of new treatment (44/51, 86·3%) and/or discontinuation of follow-up (33/51, 64·7%). In contrast, 38 (58·5%) trials reported a quantification of censored observations, with only 12/51 (23·5%) quantifying the informative ones. The estimated treatment effect on the composite outcome increased with the amount of censoring, suggesting a higher benefit of the drug, but remained below that on survival with poor evidence of surrogacy (R-squared=0·23). INTERPRETATION: Clinical study reports should be improved in terms of reporting censoring, while stakeholders should be aware of this potential source of bias. At a minimum, sensitivity analysis that ignores intercurrent events should be requested.

Determinants of Kidney Failure in Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1: Findings of the European Hyperoxaluria Consortium.

Introduction: Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) has a highly heterogeneous disease course. Apart from the c.508G>A (p.Gly170Arg) AGXT variant, which imparts a relatively favorable outcome, little is known about determinants of kidney failure. Identifying these is crucial for disease management, especially in this era of new therapies. Methods: In this retrospective study of 932 patients with PH1 included in the OxalEurope registry, we analyzed genotype-phenotype correlations as well as the impact of nephrocalcinosis, urolithiasis, and urinary oxalate and glycolate excretion on the development of kidney failure, using survival and mixed model analyses. Results: The risk of developing kidney failure was the highest for 175 vitamin-B6 unresponsive ("null") homozygotes and lowest for 155 patients with c.508G>A and c.454T>A (p.Phe152Ile) variants, with a median age of onset of kidney failure of 7.8 and 31.8 years, respectively. Fifty patients with c.731T>C (p.Ile244Thr) homozygote variants had better kidney survival than null homozygotes (P = 0.003). Poor outcomes were found in patients with other potentially vitamin B6-responsive variants. Nephrocalcinosis increased the risk of kidney failure significantly (hazard ratio [HR] 3.17 [2.03-4.94], P < 0.001). Urinary oxalate and glycolate measurements were available in 620 and 579 twenty-four-hour urine collections from 117 and 87 patients, respectively. Urinary oxalate excretion, unlike glycolate, was higher in patients who subsequently developed kidney failure (P = 0.034). However, the 41% intraindividual variation of urinary oxalate resulted in wide confidence intervals. Conclusion: In conclusion, homozygosity for AGXT null variants and nephrocalcinosis were the strongest determinants for kidney failure in PH1.

Clinical and molecular characterization of a large primary hyperoxaluria cohort from Saudi Arabia: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Primary hyperoxalurias (PHs) constitute rare disorders resulting in abnormal glyoxalate metabolism. PH-associated phenotypes range from progressive nephrocalcinosis and/or recurrent urolithiasis to early kidney failure. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted for patients with confirmed PH diagnoses from three tertiary centers in Saudi Arabia. Detailed clinical molecular diagnosis was performed for 25 affected individuals. Whole exome sequencing (WES)-based molecular diagnosis was performed for all affected individuals. RESULTS: The male:female ratio was 52% male (n = 13) and 48% female (n = 12), and consanguinity was present in 88%. Nephrolithiasis and/or nephrocalcinosis were present in all patients. Kidney stones were present in 72%, nephrocalcinosis in 60%, hematuria in 32%, proteinuria in 16%, abdominal pain in 36%, developmental delay in 8%, and chronic kidney disease stage 5 (CKD stage 5) was observed in 28% of the patients. The most common PH disorder was type I caused by variants in the AGXT gene, accounting for 56%. The GRHPR gene variants were identified in 4 patients, 16% of the total cases. Seven patients did not reveal any associated variants. Missense variants were the most commonly observed variants (48%), followed by frame-shift duplication variants (28%). CONCLUSIONS: Characterization of the genetic and clinical aspects of PH in this unique population provides direction for improved patient management and further research. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

PHYOX2: a pivotal randomized study of nedosiran in primary hyperoxaluria type 1 or 2.

Nedosiran is an investigational RNA interference agent designed to inhibit expression of hepatic lactate dehydrogenase, the enzyme thought responsible for the terminal step of oxalate synthesis. Oxalate overproduction is the hallmark of all genetic subtypes of primary hyperoxaluria (PH). In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we randomly assigned (2:1) 35 participants with PH1 (n = 29) or PH2 (n = 6) with eGFR ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2 to subcutaneous nedosiran or placebo once monthly for 6 months. The area under the curve (AUC) of percent reduction from baseline in 24-hour urinary oxalate (Uox) excretion (primary endpoint), between day 90-180, was significantly greater with nedosiran vs placebo (least squares mean [SE], +3507 [788] vs -1664 [1190], respectively; difference, 5172; 95% CI 2929-7414; P < 0.001). A greater proportion of participants receiving nedosiran vs placebo achieved normal or near-normal (<0.60 mmol/24 hours; <1.3 × ULN) Uox excretion on ≥2 consecutive visits starting at day 90 (50% vs 0; P = 0.002); this effect was mirrored in the nedosiran-treated PH1 subgroup (64.7% vs 0; P < 0.001). The PH1 subgroup maintained a sustained Uox reduction while on nedosiran, whereas no consistent effect was seen in the PH2 subgroup. Nedosiran-treated participants with PH1 also showed a significant reduction in plasma oxalate versus placebo (P = 0.017). Nedosiran was generally safe and well tolerated. In the nedosiran arm, the incidence of injection-site reactions was 9% (all mild and self-limiting). In conclusion, participants with PH1 receiving nedosiran had clinically meaningful reductions in Uox, the mediator of kidney damage in PH.

Improved Outcome of Infantile Oxalosis Over Time in Europe: Data From the OxalEurope Registry.

Introduction: Infantile oxalosis is the most severe form of primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1), with onset of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) during infancy. We aimed to analyze the outcome of these patients as our current understanding is limited owing to a paucity of reports. Methods: A retrospective registry study was conducted using data from the OxalEurope registry. All PH1 patients with ESKD onset at age <1 year were analyzed. Results: We identified 95 patients born between 1980 and 2018 with infantile oxalosis. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) age at ESKD was 0.4 (0.3-0.5) year. There were 4 patients diagnosed by family screening who developed ESKD despite early diagnosis. There were 11 patients who had biallelic missense mutations associated with vitamin B6 responsiveness. Of 89 patients, 27 (30%) died at a median age of 1.4 (0.6-2.0) years (5-year patient survival of 69%). Systemic oxalosis was described in 54 of 56 screened patients (96%). First transplantation was performed at a median age of 1.7 (1.3-2.9) years. In 42 cases, this procedure was a combined liver-kidney transplantation (LKTx), and in 23 cases, liver transplantations (LTx) was part of a sequential procedure. Survival rates of both strategies were similar. Patient survival was significantly higher in patients born after 2000. Intrafamilial phenotypic variability was present in 14 families of patients with infantile oxalosis. Conclusion: Nearly all screened patients with infantile oxalosis developed systemic disease. Mortality is still high but has significantly improved over time and might further improve under new therapies. The intrafamilial phenotypic variability warrants further investigation.

Long-Term Transplantation Outcomes in Patients With Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1 Included in the European Hyperoxaluria Consortium (OxalEurope) Registry.

INTRODUCTION: In primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1), oxalate overproduction frequently causes kidney stones, nephrocalcinosis, and kidney failure. As PH1 is caused by a congenital liver enzyme defect, combined liver-kidney transplantation (CLKT) has been recommended in patients with kidney failure. Nevertheless, systematic analyses on long-term transplantation outcomes are scarce. The merits of a sequential over combined procedure regarding kidney graft survival remain unclear as is the place of isolated kidney transplantation (KT) for patients with vitamin B6-responsive genotypes. METHODS: We used the OxalEurope registry for retrospective analyses of patients with PH1 who underwent transplantation. Analyses of crude Kaplan-Meier survival curves and adjusted relative hazards from the Cox proportional hazards model were performed. RESULTS: A total of 267 patients with PH1 underwent transplantation between 1978 and 2019. Data of 244 patients (159 CLKTs, 48 isolated KTs, 37 sequential liver-KTs [SLKTs]) were eligible for comparative analyses. Comparing CLKTs with isolated KTs, adjusted mortality was similar in patients with B6-unresponsive genotypes but lower after isolated KT in patients with B6-responsive genotypes (adjusted hazard ratio 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01-0.75, P = 0.028). CLKT yielded higher adjusted event-free survival and death-censored kidney graft survival in patients with B6-unresponsive genotypes (P = 0.025, P < 0.001) but not in patients with B6-responsive genotypes (P = 0.145, P = 0.421). Outcomes for 159 combined procedures versus 37 sequential procedures were comparable. There were 12 patients who underwent pre-emptive liver transplantation (PLT) with poor outcomes. CONCLUSION: The CLKT or SLKT remains the preferred transplantation modality in patients with PH1 with B6-unresponsive genotypes, but isolated KT could be an alternative approach in patients with B6-responsive genotypes.

Safety, pharmacodynamics, and exposure-response modeling results from a first-in-human phase 1 study of nedosiran (PHYOX1) in primary hyperoxaluria.

Primary hyperoxaluria (PH) is a family of ultra-rare autosomal recessive inherited disorders of hepatic glyoxylate metabolism characterized by oxalate overproduction. Nedosiran is an RNA interference agent that inhibits hepatic lactate dehydrogenase, the enzyme responsible for the common, final step of oxalate production in all three genetic subtypes of PH. Here, we assessed in a two-part, randomized, single-ascending-dose, phase 1 study (PHYOX1) the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and exposure-response of subcutaneous nedosiran in 25 healthy participants (Group A) and 18 patients with PH1 or PH2 (Group B). Group A received nedosiran (0.3, 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, then 12.0 mg/kg) or placebo, and Group B received open-label nedosiran (1.5, 3.0, or 6.0 mg/kg). No significant safety concerns were identified. Injection site reactions (four or more hours post dose) occurred in 13.3% of participants in Group A and 27.8% of participants in Group B. Mean maximum reduction in 24-hour urinary oxalate excretion from baseline to day 57 (end of study) across Group B dose cohorts was 55% (range: 22%-100%) after single-dose nedosiran, with 33% participants reaching normal 24-hour urinary oxalate excretion. Based on the available modeling and simulation data, a fixed monthly dose of nedosiran 160 mg (free acid; equivalent to 170 mg sodium salt) in adults was associated with the highest proportion of simulated individuals achieving normal or near-normal 24-hour urinary oxalate excretion and fewest fluctuations in urinary oxalate response. Thus, single-dose nedosiran demonstrated acceptable safety and evidence of a pharmacodynamic effect in both PH1 and PH2 subpopulations consistent with its mechanism of action.

A stone in the bone.

Primary hyperoxaluria (PH) is a group of diseases due to mutations in genes coding for enzymes involved in oxalate metabolism. Three types of PH are identified depending on the gene mutated. Type 1 is the most frequent with 80% of the cases, while PH2 and PH3 are rarer. The severity of renal involvement varies between the three types. Indeed, between 60% and 80% of PH1 but only 20% of PH2 patients will reach end-stage kidney disease. In PH3 patients, dialysis is uncommon. Because oxalate clearance is impaired in CKD patients, oxalate can precipitate in various organs leading to systemic oxalosis. We report an uncommon presentation of bone oxalosis associated with hypercalcemia in a dialyzed patient. This report emphasizes the difficulties to diagnose primary hyperoxaluria and the challenge of treating dialyzed patients.

Basket clinical trial design for targeted therapies for cancer: a French National Authority for Health statement for health technology assessment.

During the past decade, health technology assessment bodies have faced new challenges in establishing the benefits of new drugs for individuals and health-care systems. A topic of increasing importance to the field of oncology is the so-called agnostic regulatory approval of targeted therapies for cancer (independent of tumour location and histology) granted on the basis of basket trials. Basket trials in oncology offer the advantage of simultaneously evaluating treatments for multiple tumours, even rare cancers, in a single clinical trial. To address the novel challenges introduced by these trials, an interdisciplinary panel was convened on behalf of the Transparency Committee of the French National Authority for Health to clarify an approach designed to guarantee a transparent, reproducible, and fair assessment of histology-agnostic treatments for reimbursement by the French National Health Insurance Fund. The requirements of this approach include the need for randomisation, clinically relevant endpoints, appropriate correction for multiple significance testing, characterisation of subgroup heterogeneity, and validation of underlying biomarker assays. A prospectively designated external control is encouraged when the implementation of a direct comparison is deemed infeasible. We also underline the importance of recording outcomes from basket trials in a registry for use as future external controls.

Phase 1/2 Study of Lumasiran for Treatment of Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1: A Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the rare disease primary hyperoxaluria type 1, overproduction of oxalate by the liver causes kidney stones, nephrocalcinosis, kidney failure, and systemic oxalosis. Lumasiran, an RNA interference therapeutic, suppresses glycolate oxidase, reducing hepatic oxalate production. The objective of this first-in-human, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic profiles of lumasiran in healthy participants and patients with primary hyperoxaluria type 1. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This phase 1/2 study was conducted in two parts. In part A, healthy adults randomized 3:1 received a single subcutaneous dose of lumasiran or placebo in ascending dose groups (0.3-6 mg/kg). In part B, patients with primary hyperoxaluria type 1 randomized 3:1 received up to three doses of lumasiran or placebo in cohorts of 1 or 3 mg/kg monthly or 3 mg/kg quarterly. Patients initially assigned to placebo crossed over to lumasiran on day 85. The primary outcome was incidence of adverse events. Secondary outcomes included pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters, including measures of oxalate in patients with primary hyperoxaluria type 1. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Thirty-two healthy participants and 20 adult and pediatric patients with primary hyperoxaluria type 1 were enrolled. Lumasiran had an acceptable safety profile, with no serious adverse events or study discontinuations attributed to treatment. In part A, increases in mean plasma glycolate concentration, a measure of target engagement, were observed in healthy participants. In part B, patients with primary hyperoxaluria type 1 had a mean maximal reduction from baseline of 75% across dosing cohorts in 24-hour urinary oxalate excretion. All patients achieved urinary oxalate levels ≤1.5 times the upper limit of normal. CONCLUSIONS: Lumasiran had an acceptable safety profile and reduced urinary oxalate excretion in all patients with primary hyperoxaluria type 1 to near-normal levels. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: Study of Lumasiran in Healthy Adults and Patients with Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1, NCT02706886.

[Interferent RNA treatment: Example of primary hyperoxaluria]. / Traitement par ARN interférent : exemple de l'hyperoxalurie primitive.

Primary hyperoxalurias are rare disease with autosomal recessive inheritance; they often lead to kidney failure and can lead to life-threatening conditions, especially in early onset forms. There are three types, responding to distinct enzyme deficits. Type 1 represents 85% of cases and results from an enzyme deficiency (alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase) in the peroxisomes of the liver, causing hyperoxaluria leading to urolithiasis with or without nephrocalcinosis. As glomerular filtration decreases, a systemic overload appears and spares no organ. Treatment has hitherto been based on combined liver and kidney transplantation, with significant mortality and morbidity. The recent introduction of interfering RNA treatments opens up new perspectives. By blocking an enzymatic synthesis (glycolate oxidase or lacticodehydrogenase a) upstream of the deficit that causes the disease, oxaluria normalizes and the tolerance of the drug (administered by injection every 1 to 3 months) is good. This strategy will help prevent kidney failure in patients treated early and avoid liver transplantation in those who are diagnosed at an advanced stage of kidney failure.

Lumasiran, an RNAi Therapeutic for Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1.

BACKGROUND: Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) is a rare genetic disease caused by hepatic overproduction of oxalate that leads to kidney stones, nephrocalcinosis, kidney failure, and systemic oxalosis. Lumasiran, an investigational RNA interference (RNAi) therapeutic agent, reduces hepatic oxalate production by targeting glycolate oxidase. METHODS: In this double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) patients with PH1 who were 6 years of age or older to receive subcutaneous lumasiran or placebo for 6 months (with doses given at baseline and at months 1, 2, 3, and 6). The primary end point was the percent change in 24-hour urinary oxalate excretion from baseline to month 6 (mean percent change across months 3 through 6). Secondary end points included the percent change in the plasma oxalate level from baseline to month 6 (mean percent change across months 3 through 6) and the percentage of patients with 24-hour urinary oxalate excretion no higher than 1.5 times the upper limit of the normal range at month 6. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients underwent randomization; 26 were assigned to the lumasiran group and 13 to the placebo group. The least-squares mean difference in the change in 24-hour urinary oxalate excretion (lumasiran minus placebo) was -53.5 percentage points (P<0.001), with a reduction in the lumasiran group of 65.4% and an effect seen as early as month 1. The between-group differences for all hierarchically tested secondary end points were significant. The difference in the percent change in the plasma oxalate level (lumasiran minus placebo) was -39.5 percentage points (P<0.001). In the lumasiran group, 84% of patients had 24-hour urinary oxalate excretion no higher than 1.5 times the upper limit of the normal range at month 6, as compared with 0% in the placebo group (P<0.001). Mild, transient injection-site reactions were reported in 38% of lumasiran-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Lumasiran reduced urinary oxalate excretion, the cause of progressive kidney failure in PH1. The majority of patients who received lumasiran had normal or near-normal levels after 6 months of treatment. (Funded by Alnylam Pharmaceuticals; ILLUMINATE-A ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03681184.).

Plasma oxalate and eGFR are correlated in primary hyperoxaluria patients with maintained kidney function-data from three placebo-controlled studies.

BACKGROUND: In patients with primary hyperoxaluria (PH), endogenous oxalate overproduction increases urinary oxalate excretion, leading to compromised kidney function and often kidney failure. Highly elevated plasma oxalate (Pox) is associated with systemic oxalate deposition in patients with PH and severe chronic kidney disease (CKD). The relationship between Pox and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with preserved kidney function, however, is not well established. Our analysis aimed to investigate a potential correlation between these parameters in PH patients from three randomized, placebo-controlled trials (studies OC3-DB-01, OC3-DB-02, and OC5-DB-01). METHODS: Baseline data from patients with a PH diagnosis (type 1, 2, or 3) and eGFR > 40 mL/min/1.73 m2 were analyzed for a correlation between eGFR and Pox using Spearman's rank and Pearson's correlation coefficients. Data were analyzed by individual study and additionally were pooled for Studies OC3-DB-02 and OC5-DB-01 in which the same Pox assay was used. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients were analyzed. A statistically significant inverse Spearman's correlation between eGFR and Pox was observed across all analyses; correlation coefficients were - 0.44 in study OC3-DB-01, - 0.55 in study OC3-DB-02, - 0.51 in study OC5-DB-01, and - 0.49 in the pooled studies (p < 0.0064). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline evaluations showed a moderate and statistically significant inverse correlation between eGFR and Pox in patients with PH already at early stages of CKD (stages 1-3b), demonstrating that a correlation is present before substantial loss in kidney function occurs.