Bone turnover markers as predictive indicators of outcome in patients with breast cancer and bone metastases treated with bisphosphonates: results from a 2-year multicentre observational study (ZOMAR study).

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the evolution and predictive value of bone turnover markers (BTMs) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) with respect to mortality, disease progression (DP) and skeletal-related events (SREs), in patients with bone metastatic breast cancer (BmBCa). The correlation between BTMs and CTCs was also studied. METHODS: In a 2-year observational, multicenter study, the levels of three BTMs (N- and C-terminal telopeptides of collagen I [NTX and αα-CTX], and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase [BSAP]) and CTCs were analyzed every three months. Patients received zoledronic acid (4mg every 28days) from the baseline visit. RESULTS: 234 patients were analyzed. The levels of the BTMs were increased at baseline and significantly decreased after 3months (P<0.05). In the Cox regression univariate analyses significant hazard ratios (HRs) for death were found for pathological BSAP values at baseline (5.03 [95% CI: 1.214-20.839; P=0.0259]) and at 3months (3.41 [95% CI: 1.367-8.498; P=0.0085]). HRs >2 were found for increased baseline and 3-month levels of NTX and CTC (P<0.05). Only increased baseline BSAP levels were associated with DP (HR=2.25 [95% CI: 1.391-3.626; P=0.0009]). No biomarker was associated with SREs. In the multivariate analysis, pathologic levels at 3months of NTX and BSAP were significantly associated with mortality (HRs=3.59 [95% CI: 1.375-9.382; P=0.0091] and 3.25 [95% CI: 1.293-8.189; P=0.0120], respectively). CTC and BSAP were correlated during all study timepoints (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline levels of NTX, BSAP and CTCs, and changes after treatment initiation with bisphosphonates, may be useful for the prognostic assessment of patients with BmBCa. BSAP showed the strongest prognostic value.

New insights into the role of the immune microenvironment in breast carcinoma.

Recently, immune edition has been recognized as a new hallmark of cancer. In this respect, some clinical trials in breast cancer have reported imppressive outcomes related to laboratory immune findings, especially in the neoadjuvant and metastatic setting. Infiltration by tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and their subtypes, tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) and myeloid-derived suppressive cells (MDSC) seem bona fide prognostic and even predictive biomarkers, that will eventually be incorporated into diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms of breast cancer. In addition, the complex interaction of costimulatory and coinhibitory molecules on the immune synapse and the different signals that they may exert represent another exciting field to explore. In this review we try to summarize and elucidate these new concepts and knowledge from a translational perspective focusing on breast cancer, paying special attention to those aspects that might have more significance in clinical practice and could be useful to design successful therapeutic strategies in the future.

Immune microenvironment in colorectal cancer: a new hallmark to change old paradigms.

Impact of immune microenvironment in prognosis of solid tumors has been extensively studied in the last few years. Specifically in colorectal carcinoma, increased knowledge of the immune events around these tumors and their relation with clinical outcomes have led to consider immune microenvironment as one of the most important prognostic factors in this disease. In this review we will summarize and update the current knowledge with respect to this intriguing and complex new hallmark of cancer, paying special attention to infiltration by T-infiltrating lymphocytes and their subtypes in colorectal cancer, as well as its eventual clinical translation in terms of long-term prognosis. Finally, we suggest some possible investigational approaches based on combinatorial strategies to trigger and boost immune reaction against tumor cells.

Metástasis lingual única de leiomiosarcoma uterino / Single lingual metastasis from a uterine leiomyosarcoma

No disponible

Tumor microenvironment and immune effects of antineoplastic therapy in lymphoproliferative syndromes.

Lymphomas represent a wide group of heterogenic diseases with different biological and clinical behavior. The underlying microenvironment-specific composition seems to play an essential role in this scenario, harboring the ability to develop successful immune responses or, on the contrary, leading to immune evasion and even promotion of tumor growth. Depending on surrounding lymphoid infiltrates, lymphomas may have different prognosis. Moreover, recent evidences have emerged that confer a significant impact of main lymphoma's treatment over microenvironment, with clinical consequences. In this review, we summarize these concepts from a pathological and clinical perspective. Also, the state of the art of lymphoma's anti-idiotype vaccine development is revised, highlighting the situations where this strategy has proven to be successful and eventual clues to obtain better results in the future.

Role of transforming growth factor beta in cancer microenvironment.

Transforming growth factor Beta (TGF-Beta) family members are polypeptidic cytokines with pleiotropic physiological properties. In relation to cancer, TGF-Beta exerts a dual tumour-suppressive and oncogenic effect, which is largely dependent on microenvironment stimuli. After activation of TGF-Beta signalling, two pathways can be activated: the canonical one through the mammalian Smad family or the non-canonical one activating, among others, the cellular mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling downstream, which interacts with Smad signalling. During tumorigenesis, cells of many cancer types often lose their response to the tumour-suppressive effects of TGF-Beta, which, in turn, has the opposite effect, acting as an autocrine tumour-promoting factor. In this review, we summarise the current knowledge about this intriguing cytokine, with special emphasis on its immunosuppressive actions.

Role of transforming growth factor beta in cancer microenvironment

Transforming growth factor Beta (TGF-Beta) family members are polypeptidic cytokines with pleiotropic physiological properties. In relation to cancer, TGF-Beta exerts a dual tumour-suppressive and oncogenic effect, which is largely dependent on microenvironment stimuli. After activation of TGF-Beta signalling, two pathways can be activated: the canonical one through the mammalian Smad family or the non-canonical one activating, among others, the cellular mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling downstream, which interacts with Smad signalling. During tumorigenesis, cells of many cancer types often lose their response to the tumour-suppressive effects of TGF-Beta, which, in turn, has the opposite effect, acting as an autocrine tumour-promoting factor. In this review, we summarise the current knowledge about this intriguing cytokine, with special emphasis on its immunosuppressive actions (AU)

No disponible

Cancer and immune response: old and new evidence for future challenges.

Cancer may occur as a result of abnormal host immune system tolerance. Recent studies have confirmed the occurrence of spontaneous and induced antitumor immune responses expressed as the presence of tumor-infiltrating T cells in the tumor microenvironment in some cancer models. This finding has been recognized as a good prognostic factor in several types of tumors. Some chemotherapy agents, such as anthracyclines and gemcitabine, are effective boosters of the immune response through tumor-specific antigen overexpression after apoptotic tumor cell destruction. Other strategies, such as GM-CSF or interleukin-2, are pursued to increase immune cell availability in the tumor vicinity, and thus improve both antigen presentation and T-cell activation and proliferation. In addition, cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4-blocking monoclonal antibodies enhance immune activity by prolonging T-cell activation. Strategies to stimulate the dormant immune system against tumors are varied and warrant further investigation of their applications to cancer therapy in the future.

Oral vinorelbine and cisplatin as induction chemotherapy and concomitant chemo-radiotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: final results of an international phase II trial.

INTRODUCTION: Cisplatin in combination with vinorelbine has reported an optimal activity/tolerance ratio when used in combination with radiotherapy in locally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. The currently available oral formulation of vinorelbine should be easier to use assuming a similar activity profile. An international phase II trial with vinorelbine oral and cisplatin as induction followed by oral vinorelbine and cisplatin with concomitant radiotherapy was implemented to evaluate the efficacy in terms of objective response (OR) following this combination as primary end point and duration or response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety as secondary endpoints. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included patients between 18 and 75 years, with histologically proven untreated locally advanced inoperable stage IIIA/IIIB (supraclavicular lymph nodes and pleural effusion excluded) non-small cell lung cancer, adequate bone marrow, hepatic and renal function, Karnofsky performance status >/=80%. Patients were treated with oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m day 1,8 cycle 1 and 80 mg/m day 1,8 cycle 2 (if no grade 3-4 toxicity) and cisplatin 80 mg/m day 1 every 3 weeks for 2 cycles as induction. Patients without progression received oral vinorelbine 40 mg/m day 1, 8 and cisplatin 80 mg/m day 1 every 3 weeks for 2 more cycles with radiotherapy 66 Gy in 6.5 weeks. RESULTS: Patient and disease characteristics (n = 54) included: median age 57 years; female sex 24%; stage IIIA 48% and IIIB 52%; Squamous carcinoma 59%, Karnofsky performance status 100% (range, 80-100%) 50%, patients >/=5% weight loss at baseline 7%. Relative dose intensities of oral vinorelbine/cisplatin were 86%/93% and 97%/98% at induction and in combination with radiotherapy, respectively. Forty-one patients (76%) increased oral vinorelbine from 60 to 80 mg/m day during induction (reasons for nonescalation: hematological 7 patients, nonhematological 2 patients, error 4 patients). After two cycles of chemotherapy induction, the OR intent-to-treat in the 54 patients was 37%. Toxicities during induction were as follows: Neutropenia G3-4 (28%), Febrile Neutropenia (7%), nausea G3 (11%), vomiting G3-4 (9%), anorexia G3 (4%), diarrhea G4 (2%), constipation G3 (2%). Forty-seven out of 54 (87%) patients received concomitant chemo-radiotherapy.Median radiotherapy delivered dose was 66 Gy. Tolerance: 9% G3 Neutropenia; 4% G3 dysphagia/radiation; 2% G3 radiation dermatitis. Late pulmonary fibrosis was reported in one patient (1.8%). One month after completion of chemo-radiotherapy, the overall OR intent-to-treat in the 54 patients was 54% (95% CI: 40-67%). With a median follow-up of 37 months (95% CI: 34-41) the median progression-free survival and overall survival were: 12.5 (95% CI: 9.6-16.4) and 23.4 (95% CI: 17.6-29.8) months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Oral vinorelbine in combination with cisplatin is an effective combination in stage IIIA/IIIB patients. The excellent tolerance profile allowed to complete concomitant chemo-radiotherapy in 87% of patients. Oral vinorelbine in combination with cisplatin is a new and promising option that facilitates the administration of concomitant chemo-radiotherapy with high rates of treatment completion.