Association Between Vancomycin AUC and Clinical Failure in Patients with Streptococcal Bacteremia.

Background: Monitoring of vancomycin using the area under the curve (AUC) to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio is now preferred for serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Vancomycin AUC/MIC monitoring is being investigated but is not yet well elucidated with other bacterial pathogens. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted assessing patients with streptococcal bacteremia treated with vancomycin definitive therapy. AUC was calculated using a Bayesian approach, and classification and regression tree analysis was used to identify a vancomycin AUC threshold predictive of clinical failure. Results: Eleven patients had a vancomycin AUC < 329 of which 8 (73%) experienced clinical failure, while 35 patients had a vancomycin AUC ≥ 329 of which 12 (34%) experienced clinical failure (P = .04). Hospital length of stay was longer in the AUC ≥ 329 group (15 vs 8 days, P = .05), whereas time to bacteremia clearance (29 [22-45] vs 25 [20-29] hours, P = .15) and toxicity incidence (13% vs 4%, P = 1) were similar between groups. Conclusions: This study identified a VAN AUC threshold of <329 to be predictive of clinical failure in patients with streptococcal bacteremia which should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. Studies evaluating VAN AUC-based monitoring for streptococcal bloodstream infections along with other infection types are needed before implementation into clinical practice can be recommended.

Impact of concomitant fluconazole on direct oral anticoagulant bleeding risk.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on bleeding risk when fluconazole is administered concomitantly with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study including hospitalized adult patients prescribed a DOAC with or without fluconazole. SETTING: The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, a tertiary care academic medical center with more than 1800 beds. PATIENTS: Hospitalized patients ages 18-89 years who received apixaban or rivaroxaban with or without fluconazole from October 1, 2016, to September 30, 2021, were included. The minimum duration of DOAC or DOAC with fluconazole therapy was 48 h. Patients were excluded if they received fluconazole <400 mg daily or a DOAC at doses outside those recommended for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism treatment or prophylaxis. Patients were matched based on DOAC received. INTERVENTION: Patients who received a DOAC with fluconazole were compared with those receiving a DOAC alone. The primary outcome was a composite of major, clinically relevant nonmajor, and minor bleeding events at 30 days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 216 patients included, 108 in the DOAC with fluconazole group and 108 in the DOAC alone group. More patients in the DOAC with fluconazole group experienced bleeding at 30 days compared with the DOAC alone group [35/108 (32%) vs. 21/108 (19%), respectively; p = 0.03]; however, after adjusting for proven confounding variables (hemoglobin and concomitant carvedilol) this was found not to be statistically significant [adjusted odds ratio 1.71, 95% confidence interval 0.85-3.40]. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving a DOAC with fluconazole were not at significantly increased risk for bleeding at 30 days compared with those receiving a DOAC alone after controlling for confounding variables. As an increasing number of patients are prescribed DOACs, the results of this study may inform clinical decision-making on the safety of concomitant DOAC and fluconazole use.

Clinical Outcomes with Ertapenem for Pneumonia in Obese versus Nonobese Patients.

The objective of this study was to compare the rate of pneumonia resolution in obese (body mass index [BMI], ≥30 kg/m2) and nonobese (BMI, <30 kg/m2) patients treated with 1 gram ertapenem daily. In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated patients treated at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center between 1 January 2015 and 31 August 2020. Patients were included if they were between 18 and 89 years old and received ertapenem for at least 48 hours for pneumonia treatment. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant, were incarcerated, had renal impairment, received antibiotics with Gram-negative activity for a significant period prior to or in addition to ertapenem, and had other concomitant deep-seated infections. The primary outcome of clinical resolution was defined as meeting any of the following three criteria in order of evaluations: discontinuation of antibiotics by day 8 of therapy, afebrile while on ertapenem in addition to a decrease in white blood cell count, or improvement on chest radiograph at day 7 of therapy. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the association between obesity and clinical resolution, while adjusting for proven confounders. There were 76 nonobese and 65 obese patients included. The median patient BMI was 23.7 kg/m2 (21.0 to 26.9) and 35.0 kg/m2 (32.8 to 39.8) for the nonobese and obese cohorts, respectively. Clinical resolution was achieved in 78% (59/76) of nonobese and 75% (49/65) of obese patients (P = 0.75) without an observed difference in the regression model. Outcomes were similar in obese and nonobese patients treated with 1 gram of ertapenem daily for pneumonia.

Predictors of respiratory bacterial co-infection in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

The primary objectives were to determine the prevalence of and identify variables associated with respiratory bacterial co-infection in COVID-19 inpatients. Secondary outcomes included length of stay and in-hospital mortality. Eighty-two (11.2%) of 735 COVID-19 inpatients had respiratory bacterial co-infection. Fifty-seven patients met inclusion criteria and were matched to three patients lacking co-infection (N = 228 patients). Patients with co-infection were more likely to receive antibiotics [57 (100%) vs 130 (76%), P < 0.0001] and for a longer duration [19 (13-33) vs 8 (4-13) days, P < 0.0001]. The multi-variable logistic regression model revealed risk factors of respiratory bacterial co-infection to be admission from SNF/LTAC/NH (AOR 6.8, 95% CI 2.6-18.2), severe COVID-19 (AOR 3.03, 95% CI 0.78-11.9), and leukocytosis (AOR 3.03, 95% CI 0.99-1.16). Although respiratory bacterial co-infection is rare in COVID-19 inpatients, antibiotic use is common. Early recognition of respiratory bacterial coinfection predictors in COVID-19 inpatients may improve empiric antibiotic prescribing.

Clinical Outcomes With Definitive Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia With Retained Daptomycin and Ceftaroline Combination Therapy vs De-escalation to Monotherapy With Vancomycin, Daptomycin, or Ceftaroline.

BACKGROUND: Lower mortality has been observed with combination therapy compared to monotherapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia; however, there is a lack of evidence for continued combination therapy over de-escalation to monotherapy following bacteremia clearance. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study evaluating patients with MRSA bacteremia hospitalized from November 1, 2011, through July 31, 2019. Patients who received three to ten days of combination therapy followed by de-escalation to monotherapy were directly compared to patients retained on combination therapy. The primary composite outcome included inpatient infection-related mortality, 60-day readmission, and 60-day bacteremia recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 286 patients with MRSA bacteremia were identified, with 146 patients omitted based on exclusion criteria. The study population included 66 in the combination therapy group and 74 in the monotherapy group. Study population was 51% female (n = 71) and 78% white (n = 109) with median age of 46 years (IQR 34.5-61). No significant difference was observed in the primary composite outcome (21% combination therapy group vs 24% monotherapy group; P =.66), with retained observations after controlling for confounders. Within this outcome, there was no significant difference in 60-day readmission (20% combination therapy group vs 18% monotherapy group; P =.75), bacteremia recurrence (3% combination therapy group vs 7% monotherapy group; P =.45), or inpatient infection-related mortality (2% combination therapy group vs 5% monotherapy group; P = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: No difference was found in the composite outcome of 60-day bacteremia recurrence, readmission, or inpatient infection-related mortality for patients with MRSA bacteremia retained on combination therapy versus those de-escalated to monotherapy.

Clinical outcomes of combination versus monotherapy for gram negative non-HACEK infective endocarditis.

The objective of this single-center, retrospective cohort study was to identify whether combination therapy is associated with a lower rate of adverse outcomes for the treatment of Gram negative non-HACEK IE. The primary endpoint was a composite of 60-day all-cause mortality, readmission, or recurrence of bacteremia. Of the 60 patients included, 56.7% met the primary composite outcome, with 20% overall mortality at 60 days. There was no difference in the primary composite outcome of 60-day readmission, infection recurrence or mortality between groups, with 62% of patients in the monotherapy group and 50% of patients in the combination therapy group experiencing the composite outcome (P = 0.36). Despite the high mortality and complicated nature of non-HACEK Gram negative IE, this study showed no difference in 60-day bacteremia recurrence, readmission or mortality among patients treated with combination therapy or monotherapy, suggesting that monotherapy may lead to similar clinical outcomes.

Clinical Impact of an Antibiotic Time Out Initiative at an Academic Medical Center.

Background: Various strategies aimed at limiting inappropriate antimicrobial use including antibiotic time out (ATO) have been proposed to combat the development of antimicrobial resistance, yet there are limited studies that have assessed the impact of ATO on clinical outcomes. Methods: This single-center retrospective study reviewed the effect of a passive ATO strategy by comparing 100 adult patients with an ATO matched by infection type to 100 antibiotic-treated adult patients lacking an ATO note. Results: No difference in clinical outcomes was observed, however, ATO did result in improved optimization of antibiotic selection and duration, and reduction of piperacillin/tazobactam and vancomycin use. Conclusion: Further studies are warranted to evaluate the impact of ATO on clinical outcomes of a larger homogenous population with specified infectious diagnoses and clinical characteristics.

Clinical Outcomes of Daptomycin Versus Anti-Staphylococcal Beta-Lactams in Definitive Treatment of Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections.

OBJECTIVES: Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is the leading cause of bacteraemia and infective endocarditis worldwide. The preferred management of patients with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) bacteraemia includes definitive therapy with intravenous anti-staphylococcal beta-lactam (ASBL) antibiotics. Daptomycin (DAP) has been targeted as a viable substitute for beta-lactam allergic or intolerant patients. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study assessed clinical outcomes of DAP compared with ASBL antibiotics [nafcillin (NAF) or cefazolin (CFZ)] for the treatment of MSSA bacteraemia in patients hospitalised from 01 November 2011 to 31 October 2018. The primary outcome was a composite of the following: clinical failure, MSSA recurrence and MSSA persistence or inpatient infection-related mortality. Secondary outcomes included duration of MSSA bacteraemia, infection-related length of stay, infection-related 90-day readmission, 30-day all-cause mortality, and adverse events necessitating a change in therapy. RESULTS: Of 89 patients with MSSA bacteraemia who were included: 29 received DAP, 30 received NAF and 30 received CFZ. There was no difference in the composite primary outcome in patients treated with DAP compared with ASBL (10% vs. 5%, P = 0.39). The DAP cohort had a longer hospital length of stay compared with the ASBL group (20 days vs. 11.5 days, P = 0.0007). No differences were detected between other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that DAP may serve as a comparable alternative to ASBLs for treatment of MSSA bacteraemia, as no differences in clinical outcomes were identified. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Oral fluoroquinolones for definitive treatment of gram-negative bacteremia in cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Bloodstream infections (BSI) are significant causes of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. These patients often receive 10 to 14 days of intravenous (IV) antibiotics. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of cancer patients transitioned from IV to oral (PO) therapy compared to continuation of IV treatment. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of hospitalized adult cancer patients with gram-negative bacteremia. Patients transitioned to a PO fluoroquinolone (FQ) within 5 days were allocated to the IV-to-PO group, while the remaining patients comprised the IV group. The primary outcome was the composite of treatment failure, defined as infection-related readmission, infection recurrence, or inpatient mortality. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to account for confounding variables. Secondary outcomes assessed included infection-related length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and adverse events, such as Clostridioides difficile infection and catheter-related complications. RESULTS: The IV-to-PO group included 78 patients, while the remaining 133 patients were allocated to the IV group. Differences at baseline included more hematologic malignancy, neutropenia, ICU admissions, and higher Pitt bacteremia scores in the IV group. The rate of treatment failure was significantly higher in the IV group (24% vs 9%; p < 0.01), which persisted in the logistic regression (aOR 3.5, 95% CI 1.3-9.1). The IV-to-PO group had decreased infection-related and hospital length of stay, as well as fewer catheter-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PO FQ may be considered for the definitive treatment of uncomplicated Enterobacterales BSI in cancer patients.

Effectiveness of fidaxomicin versus oral vancomycin in the treatment of recurrent clostridioides difficile.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The 2017 IDSA/SHEA Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) recommend treating recurrent episodes with fidaxomicin or oral vancomycin, but there is little evidence to support one strategy over another, particularly beyond the first recurrence. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent CDI treated with vancomycin vs. fidaxomicin. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated inpatients with recurrent CDI treated with vancomycin or fidaxomicin between 1 January 2013 and 1 May 2019. The primary outcome was CDI recurrence. Secondary outcomes included re-infection, treatment failure, infection-related length of stay (IRLOS) and in-hospital all-cause mortality (IHACM). The Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was utilized, as appropriate. A multivariable logistic regression (MLR) model was used to estimate the adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence interval assessing recurrence while adjusting for confounding variables. A survival analysis was also conducted. RESULTS: 135 patients met the inclusion criteria (35 fidaxomicin vs. 100 vancomycin). There was no difference in CDI recurrence [7 (20%) fidaxomicin vs. 11 (11%) vancomycin, p = 0.18]; this persisted in the MLR model (OR: 0.85 [95% CI 0.27-2.7]) and survival analysis (p = 0.1954). Additionally, there was no difference in re-infection rate (p = 0.73), treatment failure (p = 0.13), IRLOS (p = 0.19) or IHACM (p = 0.65). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: This represents the first analysis of CDI recurrence that included patients with >2 prior episodes of CDI. The study found no difference in additional recurrences when patients were treated with oral vancomycin vs fidaxomicin for recurrent CDI. However, the current study is limited by the small sample size available for inclusion. Prospective randomized studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm this study's conclusions.

Effectiveness of short vs long-course perioperative antibiotics in lung transplant recipients with donor positive respiratory cultures.

Lung transplant recipients are at increased risk for infection in the early postoperative phase, thus perioperative antibiotics are employed. This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of short- vs long-course perioperative antibiotics in lung transplant patients. Lung transplant patients with donor positive cultures between August 2013 and September 2019 were evaluated, excluding those with cystic fibrosis, death within 14 days and re-transplants. The primary outcome was 30-day freedom from donor-derived respiratory infection. A total of 147 patients were included (57 short vs 90 long-course). Median perioperative antibiotic duration was 6 days in the short-course vs 14 days in the long-course group (P < .0001). Thirty-day freedom from donor-derived respiratory infection was present in 56 (98%) patients in the short-course vs 85 (94%) patients in the long-course group (P = .41). There was no difference in development of Clostridioides difficile infections (P = .41), while cumulative ventilator time and time to post-op extubation were longer in the long-course group (P = .001 and .004, respectively). Among lung transplant recipients with positive donor respiratory cultures, short-course perioperative antibiotics were as effective as long-course antibiotics in preventing donor-derived bacterial respiratory infections.

Evaluation of Cycle Threshold, Toxin Concentration, and Clinical Characteristics of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients with Discordant Diagnostic Test Results.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most common health care-associated infections that can cause significant morbidity and mortality. CDI diagnosis involves laboratory testing in conjunction with clinical assessment. The objective of this study was to assess the performance of various C. difficile tests and to compare clinical characteristics, Xpert C. difficile/Epi (PCR) cycle threshold (CT ), and Singulex Clarity C. diff toxins A/B (Clarity) concentrations between groups with discordant test results. Unformed stool specimens from 200 hospitalized adults (100 PCR positive and 100 negative) were tested by cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA), C. diff Quik Chek Complete (Quik Chek), Premier Toxins A and B, and Clarity. Clinical data, including CDI severity and CDI risk factors, were compared between discordant test results. Compared to CCNA, PCR had the highest sensitivity at 100% and Quik Chek had the highest specificity at 100%. Among clinical and laboratory data studied, prevalences of leukocytosis, prior antibiotic use, and hospitalizations were consistently higher across all subgroups in comparisons of toxin-positive to toxin-negative patients. Among PCR-positive samples, the median CT was lower in toxin-positive samples than in toxin-negative samples; however, CT ranges overlapped. Among Clarity-positive samples, the quantitative toxin concentration was significantly higher in toxin-positive samples than in toxin-negative samples as determined by CCNA and Quik Chek Toxin A and B. Laboratory tests for CDI vary in sensitivity and specificity. The quantitative toxin concentration may offer value in guiding CDI diagnosis and treatment. The presence of leukocytosis, prior antibiotic use, and previous hospitalizations may assist with CDI diagnosis, while other clinical parameters may not be consistently reliable.

Clinical outcomes following treatment of Enterobacter species pneumonia with piperacillin/tazobactam compared to cefepime or ertapenem.

BACKGROUND: Enterobacter spp. are a common cause of nosocomial pneumonia and treatment can be complicated by AmpC resistance. Carbapenems are the treatment of choice; however, alternatives are needed. Cefepime has been shown to be non-inferior to carbapenems. There are limited data to support the use of piperacillin/tazobactam. The objective of this study was to determine if piperacillin/tazobactam is non-inferior to cefepime or ertapenem for Enterobacter pneumonia treatment. OBJECTIVES: To compare the rate of clinical cure in patients with Enterobacter pneumonia receiving definitive treatment with piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime, or ertapenem. Secondary outcomes included hospital mortality, infection-related length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, recurrent pneumonia, and resistance. METHODS: Retrospective, single-center study. RESULTS: Of 114 patients included, 59 received definitive treatment with piperacillin/tazobactam and 55 received cefepime or ertapenem. There was no difference in the proportion of patients who achieved clinical cure in the piperacillin/tazobactam group compared to the cefepime or ertapenem group (76.3% vs. 87.3%, P = 0.13). Treatment group was not associated with clinical cure when controlling for confounders in multivariable logistic regression (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-2.37). The rate of recurrent pneumonia was 11.4% in the piperacillin/tazobactam group and 6.7% in the cefepime or ertapenem group (P = 0.48). Other secondary outcomes did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study of patients with Enterobacter pneumonia, clinical cure with piperacillin/tazobactam was comparable to that with cefepime or ertapenem; however, a prospective trial with a larger population is needed to determine if definitive treatment with piperacillin/tazobactam is non-inferior to definitive treatment with cefepime or ertapenem.

Efficacy of combination therapy versus monotherapy in the treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is intrinsically resistant to several antibiotics, making it potentially challenging to treat. Studies have demonstrated treatment failures and resistance development with monotherapy (MT); however, clinical data are limited with combination therapy (CT). OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical outcomes with CT versus MT for S. maltophilia pneumonia. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted between November 2011 and October 2017 with S. maltophilia pneumonia who received at least 48 h of effective therapy. The primary outcome was clinical response after 7 days of effective therapy with CT versus MT. Secondary outcomes included development of a non-susceptible isolate, 30 day microbiological cure, infection recurrence, infection-related mortality and all-cause mortality. The Wilcoxon rank sum test, the Pearson χ2 test and Fisher's exact test were utilized for univariate analyses. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess clinical response while adjusting for confounding variables. RESULTS: Of 252 patients with S. maltophilia pneumonia included, 38 received CT and 214 received MT. There was no difference in 7 day clinical response with CT versus MT (47.4% versus 39.7%, P = 0.38), even after controlling for immune status, APACHE II score and polymicrobial pneumonia (adjusted OR 1.51, 95% CI 0.63-3.65). Thirty day microbiological cure (P = 0.44), recurrence (P = 0.53), infection-related mortality (P = 0.19) and isolation of a non-susceptible isolate during or after therapy (P = 1.00 each) were also similar between both groups; however, 30 day all-cause mortality was greater with CT (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: CT had similar rates of clinical efficacy and resistance development compared with MT for S. maltophilia pneumonia.

Clinical Outcomes with Penicillin Versus Alternative ß-Lactams in the Treatment of Penicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the impact of penicillin versus alternative ß-lactams on clinical outcomes in patients with penicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (PSSA) bacteremia. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adult patients with PSSA bacteremia treated with a ß-lactam as definitive therapy. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was a composite end point of 30-day clinical failure (change in PSSA therapy due to persistent or worsening signs and symptoms, PSSA bacteremia recurrence or persistence, and/or infection-related mortality) in patients treated with penicillin versus alternative ß-lactams. Secondary outcomes included infection-related and hospital length of stay (LOS), 90-day recurrence, 90-day infection-related readmission, 30-day all-cause mortality, adverse drug events (ADEs), and 30-day change in PSSA therapy due to ADEs. A subgroup analysis comparing penicillin, nafcillin, and cefazolin was also conducted. MAIN RESULTS: For the 122 patients who were included, the most common definitive therapies were nafcillin (37%), cefazolin (29%), and penicillin (21%). No difference was found in 30-day clinical failure (4% vs 11%, p=0.46), infection-related LOS (12 days vs 11 days, p=0.39), hospital LOS (12.5 days vs 12 days, p=0.69), 90-day recurrence (p=1.00), 90-day infection-related readmission (p=1.00), or 30-day all-cause mortality (p=0.45) between penicillin and other ß-lactams. The prevalence of ADEs was different among penicillin, nafcillin, and cefazolin (p=0.049), with nafcillin requiring more changes in therapy (p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Definitive therapy with penicillin had similar efficacy compared with alternative ß-lactams for the treatment of PSSA bacteremia. However, nafcillin was associated with more ADEs requiring a change in therapy.