Nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate, gastric cancer and tooth agenesis.

BACKGROUND: To determine the frequency of nonsyndromic cleft lip and/or palate (NSCL/P) in first-degree relatives and to analyze the prevalence of tooth agenesis in patients with gastric cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional, observational, case-control study included 798 patients attended at hospital Santa Casa in Montes Claros, Minas Gerais and Alfa Institute of Gastroenterology of the Federal University of the Minas Gerais. Information on basic demographic data and tooth agenesis of both groups and their family history of NSCL/P in first-degree relatives were evaluated. The collected information was stored in a database and analyzed using statistical program SPSS version 21.0 and the values with p<0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of the 798 patients, 113 (14.16%) consisted of the case group and 685 of the control group (85.84%). Non-Caucasian males were the most affected, although no differences among the groups were detected. Of all participants (n=798), 66 (8.27%) presented tooth agenesis and 25 (3.13%) presented oral cleft in first degree relative. CONCLUSIONS: Our results no found increase in the frequency of tooth agenesis in patients with gastric cancer and in the frequency of NSCL/P in the first-degree relatives of patients with gastric cancer.

Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue gastric lymphoma regression in a renal transplant patient after conversion of the immunosuppression to sirolimus: a case report.

The treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, the most common posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder, is not well defined. Herein we have reported a case of gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma with rapid, persistent, and complete remission after conversion of the immunosuppression from cyclosporine (CsA) to sirolimus (SRL). A 42-year-old woman underwent renal transplantation in 1992 with no major abnormalities until 2006 when a gastroscopy performed to investigate dyspeptic symptoms showed a mixed MALT gastric lymphoma (with low- and high-grade components) associated with the presence of Helicobacter pylori infection. Two therapeutic interventions in a 1-week interval were performed: treatment of the H. pylori infection (omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin for 14 days) and modification of the immunosuppression by substitution of CsA and azathioprine (AZA) with SRL. Control endoscopy performed 1 month later showed persistence of H. pylori infection and absence of the gastric tumor. New endoscopies performed at 2 and 7 months after therapy confirmed the absence of neoplasia and H. pylori eradication. Currently, the patient has no complaints, displaying a creatinine value of 1.8 mg/dL and a hemoglobin of 9.4 mg/dL using SRL and ibersatan. SRL has been studied extensively as an anticancer drug, acting as a mammalian target for rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor. Accumulating data support the role of mTOR in lymphomagenesis. In conclusion, our case of gastric MALT lymphoma in a renal transplant patient displayed a complete remission after alteration of the immunosuppressive scheme with the introduction of SRL.

New once-daily, highly effective rescue triple therapy after multiple Helicobacter pylori treatment failures: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori treatment failure is a growing problem in daily practice. AIM: To determine the efficacy of the combination of rabeprazole, levofloxacin and furazolidone as a rescue therapy. METHODS: Duodenal ulcer patients previously submitted, without success, to at least two H. pylori treatment regimens were included. Gastroscopy (urease test, histological examination and culture) and (13)C-urea breath test were performed. All patients received a combination of rabeprazole 20 mg, levofloxacin 500 mg and furazolidone 200 mg (two tablets) administered in a single dose in the morning for 10 days. Clinical examination and a new (13)C-urea breath test were performed 90 days after therapy. RESULTS: Twelve patients (eight females and four males), mean age 43 (30-58) years were included. Two patients failed to complete the treatment because of nausea and vomiting. Ten patients completed the study and took all the medications as advised. Culture was obtained in six patients: 100 and 83% of the samples were sensitive to furazolidone and levofloxacin, respectively. Per-protocol and intention-to-treat eradication rates were 100 and 83% (P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: the combination of rabeprazole, levofloxacin and furazolidone in a single daily dose for 10 days constitutes a highly-effective and low-cost alternative as a third-line therapy in patients infected with H. pylori.

Once-daily, low-cost, highly effective Helicobacter pylori treatment to family members of gastric cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori eradication in family members of gastric cancer patients is now widely accepted, although problems related to costs and compliance persist. AIM: To compare the efficacy, tolerability and long-term re-infection rates of two once-daily regimens for the eradication of H. pylori in family members of gastric cancer patients. METHODS: 106 first-degree family members of gastric cancer patients were recruited and submitted to the 13C-urea breath test (UBT) to detect H. pylori. If positive, they were randomly allocated to receive a combination of lanzoprazole 30 mg, clarithromycin OD (extended-release formulation) 500 mg and furazolidone 400 mg, once daily, in the morning, for 7 days (Group A) or the same regimen with only 200 mg furazolidone (Group B). Eradication was confirmed by urea breath test performed 6 weeks after treatment. 13C-urea breath test was repeated at 944 (784-1258) days after treatment in successfully treated participants to look for re-infection. RESULTS: Twenty-five participants were H. pylori negative and two H. pylori-positive individuals refused to sign the informed consent and were excluded. Therefore, 79 participants were studied. Forty participants were allocated to Group A and 39 to Group B. All participants completed treatment. Adverse effects, mostly mild, were observed in 18% of Group A and 18% of Group B (N.S.). The intention-to-treat eradication rate was 87.5% in Group A and 61.5% in Group B (P = 0.006). The mean annual re-infection rate was 3%. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of lanzoprazole 30 mg, one tablet of clarithromycin OD (extended release formulation) 500 mg and furazolidone 400 mg, once daily for 7 days, constitutes an inexpensive, safe and effective alternative for anti-H. pylori therapy in family members of gastric cancer patients.

One-week triple therapy with omeprazole plus azithromycin and secnidazole is ineffective in eradicating "helicobacter pylori"

Background: There is not yet consensus on the most effective treatment for the helicobacter pylori infection, particularly in most developing countries. Azithromycin is a new macrolide and relatively novel agent for H. pylori eradication with an in vitro MIC90 lower than 1 mg/ml.Secnidazole, a nitromidazole that causes fewer side effects than metronidazole, was recenty reported to be used, for the firt time, in the treatment of H. pylori infection. Aim: To evaluate, in a prospective, randomized, single-center study, the association of twodifferent doses of omeprazole, azithromycin and secnidazole in H. pylori eradication. Patients and methods: After informed consent, 55 patients (36m,19F) with duodenal ulcer associated with H. pylori infection were randomized to receive omeprazole 20mg uid (Group A) or 20mg bid (Group B) for sevem days plus azithromycin 500mg uid for six days and secnidazole 2,000mg uid in the first, fourth and seventh day. The H. pylori status was assessed before and 60-90 days posttreatment using urease test, histology and 13C-urea breath test. Statistical analysis was performed by X² test. Results: The two groups had similar demographic characteristics. Fifty-five patients (36M, 19F) were enrolled. Six patients did not show-up for the second visit posttreatment. So, of the 49 evaluable patients, 25por cento (6/24) in Group A and 44por cento(11/25) in Group B wereeradicated, in a per protocol (PP) analysis. Intetion-to-treat (ITT) eradication rates were 21,4por cento (6/28) in Group A and 40.7por cento (11/27) im Group B. The differences betweem ITT and PP analysis from the two groups were not statistically significant. Conclusions: This study shows a very low eradication rate with the two regimens comprising of omeprazole, azithromycin and secnidazole and therefore, should not be recommended for thetreatment of H. pylori infection

Application of isotope-selective non-dispersive infrared spectrometry for the evaluation of the 13C-urea breath test: comparison with three concordant methods

The aim of this work was to compare the performance of isotope-selective non-dispersive infrared spectrometry (IRIS) for the 13C-urea breath test with the combination of the 14C-urea breath test (14C-UBT), urease test and histologic examination for the diagnosis of H. pylori (HP) infection. Fifty-three duodenal ulcer patients were studied. All patients were submitted to gastroscopy to detect HP by the urease test, histologic examination and 14C-UBT. To be included in the study the results of the 3 tests had to be concordant. Within one month after admission to the study the patients were submitted to IRIS with breath samples collected before and 30 min after the ingestion of 75 mg 13C-urea dissolved in 200 ml of orange juice. The samples were mailed and analyzed 11.5 (4-21) days after collection. Data were analyzed statistically by the chi-square and Mann-Whitney test and by the Spearman correlation coefficient. Twenty-six patients were HP positive and 27 negative. There was 100 per cent agreement between the IRIS results and the HP status determined by the other three methods. Using a cutoff value of delta-over-baseline (DOB) above 4.0 the IRIS showed a mean value of 19.38 (minimum = 4.2, maximum = 41.3, SD = 10.9) for HP-positive patients and a mean value of 0.88 (minimum = 0.10, maximum = 2.5, SD = 0.71) for negative patients. Using a cutoff value corresponding to 0.800 per cent CO2/weight (kg), the 14C-UBT showed a mean value of 2.78 (minimum = 0.89, maximum = 5.22, SD = 1.18) in HP-positive patients. HP-negative patients showed a mean value of 0.37 (minimum = 0.13, maximum = 0.77, SD = 0.17). IRIS is a low-cost, easy to manage, highly sensitive and specific test for H. pylori detection. Storing and mailing the samples did not interfere with the performance of the test.

Antiácido de alta potência versus cimetidina no tratamento da úlcera duodenal: comodidade posológica / High potency antacid versus cometidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer: commodus psosology

Foram estudados 98 pacientes com úlcera péptica duodenal distribuídos de forma randômica em dois grupos. Um grupo recebeu antiácido liquido de alta potência (282,4mEq/dia) dividido em 4 tomadas durante 4 semanas e outro recebeu cimetidina (800 mg/dia) dividida em 2 tomadas por igual período. A potência antiácida da associaçäo líquida utilizada é de 7,06 mEq/ml. Todos os pacientes foram avaliados clinicamente no pré-tratamento e duas e quatro semanas após, com exames endoscópicos realizados na admissäo e após quatro semanas. A eficácia, considerada como cicatrizaçäo da úlcera duodenal associada a melhora da sintomatologia foi equivalente para ambos os tratamentos, näo havendo diferença estatisticamente significante. A tolerabilidade de ambas as drogas foi considerada boa

Comparison of the urease test and of direct smear examination in the control of treatment of Helicobacter pylori-induced infection

The sensitivity and specificity of the preformed urease test and of carbolfuchsin-stained smears for the diagnosis of the presence of Helicobacter pylori in gastric mucosa were evaluated before and after antimicrobial treatment. The results obtained by culture were used as the reference point. We studied 41 patients with endoscopically diagnosed duodenal ulcer. Twenty-five of these were treated with furazolidone (100 mg t.i.d.), amoxicillin (500 mg t.i.d.) and metronidazole (250 mg t.i.d.) for 5 days and then with only furazolidone (100 mg t.i.d.) for an additional 25 days. The 16 control patients were treated with cimetidine (800 mg, 4 times a day). The sensitivity of the urease test and of direct smear examination was 100 per cent before treatment and 84.6 per cent and 92.3 per cent , respectively, after treatment. We conclude that the urease test and carbolfuchsin-stained smears, which are highly sensitive for H. pylori diagnosis, present reduced sensitivity when they are employed for the follow-up of patients treated with antimicrobials

Relationship between Sakita endoscopic stage and duration of treatment for duodenal ulcer healing

Endoscopic staging of peptic ulcer lesions according to Sakita will be a methodological improvement in therapeutic trials provided that the correlation between stages and the time spent in treatments is proved valid. We describe a double-blind controlled randomized trial carried out to determine the efficacy of cimentidine in patients with duodenal ulcer in the H stage of Sakita endoscopic staging. Fifty-two patients with duodenal ulcer (H stage) were randomly allocated to receive either 400 mg cimetidine twice daily (N = 26), or placebo (N = 26) for two weeks; patients with unhealed ulcers continued the same treatment for an additional week. Of the cimetidine-treated patients, 19 (73%) were healed after two weeks and 23 (88.5%) after three weeks of treatment, and of the placebo-treated patients, 8 (31%) were healed after two and 13 (50%) after three weeks. These differences indicate a natural tendency of the H stage lesions to heal faster than reported for the active (stage A) lesions and still faster if treated with cimetidine. These findings, by establishing a relationship between the ulcer stage and the time spent in treatment, may help the physician to treat duodenal ulcer patients and will enable the adoption of an important, uniform criterion for selection of duodenal ulcer patients for therapeutic trials, especially in multicenter trials