Impact of enhancement filters of a CMOS system on halo artifact expression at the bone-to-implant interface.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of enhancement filters on the formation of halo artifacts in radiographs of dental implants obtained with a complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) system. METHODS: Digital radiographs of dental implants placed in dry human mandibles were processed with the Noise Reduction smoothing filter, as well as the Sharpen 1, Sharpen 4, and Sharpen UM high-pass filters available in the CLINIVIEW™ software (Instrumentarium Dental, Tuusula, Finland). Subjective analysis involved evaluating the left, right, and apical surfaces of each implant for the presence of much, few, or no halo. The objective analysis involved measurement of the halo area using the Trainable Weka Segmentation plugin (ImageJ, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Data were analyzed using Friedman's test (subjective analysis) and ANOVA (objective analysis) (α = 5%). RESULTS: In the subjective evaluation, the Sharpen 4 filter produced more radiographs with much halo present, and in the objective evaluation, a bigger halo area when compared to the original images and the Noise Reduction filter for all surfaces (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: When evaluating dental implants, priority should be given to original images and those enhanced with smoothing filters since they exhibit fewer halo artifacts. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Post-processing tools, such as enhancement filters, may improve the image quality and assist some diagnostic tasks. However, little is known regarding the impact of enhancement filters in halo formation on CMOS systems, which have been increasingly used in dental offices.

High-density objects in exomass affect the volume of high-density objects inside the field of view.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of the presence and the number of high-density objects in the exomass on the volume of a high-density object in cone-beam CT (CBCT). METHODS: Cylinders of cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr), titanium (Ti), and zirconium (Zi) were inserted into a polymethylmethacrylate phantom in five different combinations of number and position: 1-no cylinder; 2-one cylinder in a posterior region; 3-one cylinder in an anterior region; 4-two cylinders in posterior regions; and 5-three cylinders in anterior and posterior regions. The phantom underwent CBCT scanning using OP300 and X800 systems, with the afore mentioned cylinders of the same composition placed in the exomass and an additional high-density cylinder placed in the centre of the field of view (FOV), corresponding to the left-anterior region. The tomographic volume of the cylinder inside the FOV was measured using semi-automatic segmentation. The volumetric alteration (VA) between the segmented and physical volumes, in percentage, was compared among the experimental groups using repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc (α = 5%). RESULTS: The factors material, combination, and their interaction affected the volume or both CBCT systems. In OP300, more cylinders in the exomass reduced the VA, mainly for Co-Cr. In X800, more cylinders in the exomass tended to increase the VA inside the FOV, except for Zi. CONCLUSIONS: In general, the presence of high-density objects in the exomass influences the VA of the object inside the FOV, although this oscillates according to object composition, number and position in the exomass, and CBCT system.

The effect of voxel and field of view size on the volumetric alteration artifact of high-density materials with 2 cone beam computed tomography devices.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the influence of voxel and field of view (FOV) sizes on expression of the volumetric alteration artifact (VAA) of 5 high-density materials in 2 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices. STUDY DESIGN: Cylinders of amalgam, cobalt-chromium, gutta-percha, titanium, and zirconium were individually positioned in a polymethyl methacrylate phantom. OP300 Maxio and ProMax 3D Classic CBCT devices were used to acquire images with varying voxel and FOV sizes, totaling 585 scans. Two evaluators segmented the high-density cylinder images to obtain the tomographic volumes. The difference between the tomographic and physical volume of each cylinder (i.e., volumetric alteration) was calculated. Statistical analysis was conducted with multiway ANOVA and the Tukey post hoc test (α = 5%). Evaluator reliability was measured with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: All studied parameters and nearly all interactions influenced the VAA (P < .05). The post hoc test demonstrated less volumetric alteration for the smallest voxel sizes, 61 × 78 mm FOV, and gutta-percha for OP300, and for the smallest voxel sizes, 80 × 80 mm FOV, and gutta-percha and titanium for ProMax 3D (P < .05). The ICC demonstrated perfect reliability (1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Voxel and FOV sizes influenced VAA expression. Using smaller voxel sizes, the 61 × 78 mm FOV for OP300 and the 80 × 80 mm FOV for ProMax 3D, and materials with lower density and lower atomic number reduced VAA expression.

Does cone-beam CT convex triangular field of view influence the image shape distortion of high-density materials?

OBJECTIVES: To assess the distortion of high-density materials using two CBCT devices presenting convex triangular and cylindrical fields of view (FOVs). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four high-density cylinders were individually placed in a polymethylmethacrylate phantom. 192 CBCT scans were acquired using the convex triangular and cylindrical FOVs of Veraviewepocs® R100 (R100) and Veraview® X800 (X800) devices. Using HorosTM's software, two oral radiologists determined the cylinders' horizontal and vertical dimensional alterations. Nine oral radiologists subjectively identified each cylinder's axial shape distortion. Statistical analysis comprised Multiway ANOVA (α = 5%), and the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: The distortion in the axial plane was greater in the convex triangular FOVs for both devices in almost all the materials (p < 0.05). The evaluators subjectively identified a shape distortion in both FOVs for R100 device (p < 0.001), while no distortion was identified for X800 device (p = 0.620). A vertical magnification of all materials was observed in both FOVs for both devices (p < 0.05). No differences among vertical regions (p = 0.988) nor FOVs (p = 0.544) were found for the R100 device, while all materials showed higher magnification in all regions in the cylindrical FOV (p < 0.001) of the X800 device. CONCLUSIONS: The convex triangular FOV influenced the axial distortion of the high-density materials in both devices. A vertical magnification was observed in both FOVs of both devices, but it was greater in the cylindrical FOV of the X800 device.

Comparison of the expression of the volumetric alteration artifact in cylindrical and triangular fields of view in two cone-beam computed tomography devices.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the expression of the volumetric alteration (VA) artifact between cylindrical and convex triangular fields of view (FOVs) using high-density materials in different positions in two cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cylinders of five high-density materials (amalgam, chromium-cobalt, gutta-percha, titanium, and zirconium) with known physical volume were individually submitted to CBCT acquisition in four positions inside a polymethylmethacrylate phantom using two different FOV shapes (convex triangular and cylindrical) on the Veraviewepocs® R100 (R100) and Veraview® X800 (X800) devices. Two oral radiologists obtained the tomographic volumes by segmenting each cylinder. The difference between the tomographic and physical volumes corresponded to the VA. These values were analyzed by intraclass correlation coefficient and analysis of variance for repeated measures with Tukey post hoc test (α = 5%). RESULTS: The FOV influenced the VA only in the X800 device (p = 0.014): the VA in the triangular FOV was greater than in the cylindrical FOV. The VA in the triangular FOV of the X800 device was greater than the R100 device (p < 0.0001). The material influenced the expression of the VA only in the R100 device (p < 0.0001); gutta-percha presented the highest VA, being underestimated, and differing from the other materials (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The triangular FOV increased the VA of high-density materials in the X800 device. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: It is important to know if there is an influence on the volumetric alteration artifact of dental materials due to the different image formation geometry in the convex triangular FOV.

Influence of Voxel Size and Filter Application in Detecting Second Mesiobuccal Canals in Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Images.

INTRODUCTION: This study assessed the influence of voxel size and filter application in detecting second mesiobuccal (MB2) canals in cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) images. METHODS: Using the OP300 CBCT system (Instrumentarium, Tuusula, Finland) and 3 voxel size protocols (80 µm, 125 µm, and 200 µm), we scanned 40 first molars: 20 with an MB2 canal and 20 without. All molars received silver palladium pins on the palatal root, whereas the non-MB2 molars were also filled with gutta-percha. Five oral radiologists assessed the presence of an MB2 canal under 3 filter application conditions: without filter, with sharpen 1 × filter, and with sharpen 2 × filter. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility was evaluated using the weighted kappa index. We compared the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves with SPSS Statistics v.20.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) using 2-way analysis of variance and the Tukey post hoc test with 5% significance level. RESULTS: Our analysis found median intra- and interobserver agreement values of 0.70 and 0.56, respectively. The 80-µm voxel with sharpen 1 × filter image group had the highest sensitivity, accuracy, and negative predictive values. As for specificity and positive predictive, the 80-µm voxel group without filter application presented the highest values. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were higher in the 80-µm groups than in the 125-µm and 200-µm voxel size groups (P < .05). We found no differences among the filters used (P = .22) or for the filter-voxel size interactions (P = .88). CONCLUSIONS: A smaller voxel size increased the accuracy in detecting MB2 canals, whereas the enhancement filters did not.

Distortion or magnification? An in vitro cone-beam CT study of dimensional changes of objects with different compositions.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether dimensional changes occur as shape distortion (unevenly), contraction or magnification (evenly) in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) considering materials, anatomical regions and metal artefact reduction algorithms. METHODS: Four cylinders of amalgam (Am), cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr), gutta-percha (Gu), titanium (Ti) and zirconium (Zi) were inserted inside a polymethylmethacrylate phantom in anterior and posterior regions for acquisitions in Picasso Trio and OP300 with MAR enabled and disabled. Two observers measured the dimensions of each cylinder in three axes: Y (height), Z (antero posterior diameter) and X (latero-lateral diameter). Repeated measures ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test compared the data (α = 5%). RESULTS: Shape distortion occurred for all materials in anterior region of Picasso Trio without MAR (p < 0.05). With MAR enabled, Gu and Ti contracted (p ≥ 0.05), while the others showed distortion (p < 0.05). In posterior region, all materials distorted in both MAR conditions (p < 0.05), except Gu, which magnified without MAR (p ≥ 0.05) and contracted unevenly with MAR (p < 0.05). In anterior region of OP300, all materials magnified without MAR, (p ≥ 0.05) and had shape distortion with MAR (p < 0.05). In posterior region, only Am showed magnification without MAR (p ≥ 0.05), while all materials presented shape distortion with MAR (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Dimensional changes of high-density materials in CBCT can be either a magnification, a contraction or a distortion; the last condition is the most prevalent. Furthermore, changes differ considering material, anatomical region and MAR condition.

Influence of windowing and metal artefact reduction algorithms on the volumetric dimensions of five different high-density materials: a cone-beam CT study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of windowing and metal artefact reduction (MAR) algorithms on the volumetric dimensions of high-density materials using two CBCT systems. METHODS: Four cylinders of amalgam, cobalt-chromium, gutta-percha, titanium and zirconium, were manufactured and their physical volumes (PV) were measured. A polymethyl methacrylate phantom containing the cylinders was submitted to CBCT acquisitions with Picasso Trio and OP300 units with their MAR enabled and disabled. The tomographic volume (TV) of all the cylinders was obtained by semi-automatic segmentation using two windowing adjustments: W1-large window width and upper window level; W2-narrow window width and low window level. Volumetric distortion was expressed as the difference between TV and PV. Statistics comprised intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures with Tukey post hoc test (α = 5%). RESULTS: The ICC values ​​indicated excellent reproducibility of TV. Gutta-percha and titanium resulted in the smallest volumetric distortion. Using W1 provided less volumetric distortion for almost all experimental conditions (p < 0.05). Activating MAR algorithm of Picasso Trio underestimated gutta-percha and titanium TV (p < 0.05) and was inefficient in significantly reducing the volumetric distortion of the other materials (p > 0.05). Disabling MAR algorithm of OP300 resulted in smaller volumetric distortion for almost all experimental conditions (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The TV of gutta-percha and titanium were closer to the PV. In general, the MAR algorithms of both systems were inefficient in significantly reducing the volumetric distortion of high-density materials. We encourage the use of large window width and upper window level to evaluate high-density materials.