A second chance for a new heart? The role of metabolic and bariatric surgery in patients with end-stage heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is an independent risk factor for heart failure (HF). Substantial weight loss has been shown to reverse obesity-related cardiomyopathy. This study aimed to report our institution's experience with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in patients with morbid obesity and end-stage HF. METHODS: Between 2018 and 2022, 26 patients with end-stage HF were referred for LSG. Of 26 patients, 16 underwent an operation, and 10 did not. After institutional review board approval, a retrospective electronic medical record review was performed to evaluate (i) age, (ii) preoperative weight, (iii) decrease in body mass index (BMI) score, (iv) whether the patient underwent heart transplantation, and (v) mortality. Data analysis was performed using Stata/SE (version 17.0; StataCorp). The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare continuous variables between the cohorts, and the Pearson chi-square test was used for binary variables with Bonferroni correction applied. RESULTS: The LSG and non-LSG cohorts had comparable ages (P = .088) and starting BMI score (P = .918), and a proportion of patients had a ventricular assist device (P = .191). Patients who underwent LSG lost significantly more weight than the patients who did not, with an average decrease in BMI score of 8.9 kg/m2 (SD, ±6.13) and 1.1 kg/m2 (SD, ±4.10), respectively (P = .040). Of note, 6 patients (37.5%) who underwent LSG eventually underwent transplantation, compared with 2 patients (20.0%) from the matched cohort (P = .884). Of the 26 patients, there were 6 deaths: 2 (12.5%) in the LSG cohort and 4 (40.0%) in the non-LSG cohort (P = .525). CONCLUSION: LSG may be safe and effective for weight loss in patients with HF. This operation may provide patients affected by obesity with end-stage HF the lifesaving opportunity to achieve transplant candidacy.

Hemodynamic and Clinical Performance of Hearts Donated After Circulatory Death.

BACKGROUND: Donor organ demand continues to outpace supply in heart transplantation. Utilization of donation after circulatory death (DCD) hearts could significantly increase heart donor availability for patients with advanced heart failure. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe hemodynamic and clinical profiles of DCD hearts in comparison to standard of care (SOC) hearts donated after brain death (DBD). METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive heart transplant recipients analyzed right heart catheterization measurements, inotrope scores, echocardiograms, and clinical outcomes between DCD and DBD heart recipients. RESULTS: Between April 2016 and February 2022, 47 DCD and 166 SOC hearts were transplanted. Median time from DCD consent to transplant was significantly shorter compared with SOC waiting list time (17 days [6-28 days] vs 70 days [23-240 days]; P < 0.001). Right heart function was significantly impaired in DCD recipients compared with SOC recipients 1 week post-transplant (higher median right atrial pressure (10 mm Hg [8-13 mm Hg] vs 7 mm Hg [5-11 mm Hg]; P < 0.001), higher right atrial pressure to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ratio (0.64 [0.54-0.82] vs 0.57 [0.43-0.73]; P = 0.016), and lower pulmonary arterial pulsatility index (1.66 [1.27-2.50] vs 2.52 [1.63-3.82]; P < 0.001), but was similar between groups by 3 weeks post-transplant. DCD and SOC recipient mortality was similar at 30 days (DCD 0 vs SOC 2%; P = 0.29) and 1 year post-transplant (DCD 3% vs SOC 8%; P = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: DCD heart utilization is associated with transient post-transplant right heart dysfunction and short-term clinical outcomes otherwise similar to transplantation using DBD hearts.

A Multicenter Study of Left Ventricular Assist Device-Related Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

INTRODUCTION: Continuous left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) offer hemodynamic support in advanced and decompensated heart failure but are often complicated by gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in medically fragile patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 475 consecutive patients who underwent LVAD implantation at the Massachusetts General Hospital and Tufts Medical Center from 2008 to 2019 and identified 128 patients with clinically significant GIB. Clinical characteristics of each bleeding event, including procedures and interventions, were recorded. We examined LVAD patients with overt and occult presentations to determine diagnostic endoscopic yield and analyzed predictors of recurrent GIB. RESULTS: We identified 128 unique patients with LVAD implantation complicated by GIB. No significant difference was observed based on study center, underlying cardiomyopathy, race/ethnicity, serum indices, and medications used. Overt bleeders presented more commonly during LVAD implantation admission ( P = 0.001) than occult bleeders. Occult bleed presentations had only 1 lower and no middle GI bleed source identified, despite similar workups to overt bleeds. Destination therapy (e.g., among nontransplant candidates) LVAD implantation (odds ratio 2.38, 95% confidence interval 1.05-5.58) and a history of GIB (odds ratio 3.85, 95% confidence interval 1.29-12.7) were independently associated with an increased risk of recurrent GIB-related hospitalization. DISCUSSION: Our findings confirm a high rate of GIB, especially in destination LVAD patients, and show a low diagnostic yield for colonoscopy and middle GI bleed assessments in LVAD patients with occult bleeds. Overt bleeding was more common and associated with vascular malformations. Although endoscopic interventions stopped active hemorrhage, GIB often recurred.

NT-proBNP and predictors of event free survival and left ventricular systolic function recovery in peripartum cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine predictors of adverse outcomes in peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM). METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a multi-center cohort study across four centers to identify subjects with PPCM with the following criteria: LVEF <40%, development of heart failure within the last month of pregnancy or within 5 months of delivery and no other identifiable cause of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Outcomes included 1) survival free from major adverse events (need for extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation, ventricular assist device, orthotopic heart transplantation or death) and 2) LVEF recovery ≥ 50%. Using a univariate logistic regression analysis, we identified significant clinical predictors of these outcomes, which were then used to create multivariable models. NT-proBNP at the time of diagnosis was examined both as a continuous variable (log transformed) in logistic regression and as a dichotomous variable (values above and below the median) using the log-rank test. In all, 237 women (1993 to 2017) with 736.4 person-years of follow-up, met criteria for PPCM. Participants had a mean age of 32.4 ± 6.7 years, mean BMI 30.6 ± 7.8 kg/m2; 63% were White. After median follow-up of 3.6 years (IQR 1.1-7.8), 113 (67%) had LVEF recovery, and 222 (94%) had survival free from adverse events. Significant predictors included gestational age, gravidity, systolic blood pressure, smoking, heart rate, initial LVEF, and diuretic use. In a subset of 110 patients with measured NTproBNP levels, we found a higher event free survival for women with NTproBNP <2585 pg/ml (median) as compared to women with NTproBNP ≥2585 pg/ml (log-rank test p-value 0.018). CONCLUSION: Gestational age, gravidity, current or past tobacco use, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, initial LVEF and diuretic requirement at the time of diagnosis were associated with survival free from adverse events and LVEF recovery. Initial NT-proBNP was significantly associated with event free survival.

Effect of Impella 5.5 on Preexisting Functional Mitral Regurgitation in Patients with Heart Failure-Related Cardiogenic Shock.

Background: Heart failure-related cardiogenic shock (HF-CS) is increasingly common. Moderate/severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is commonly seen in patients presenting with decompensated heart failure and is associated with worse outcomes. Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices are increasingly used to provide hemodynamic support for ongoing CS. There is no description of the impact of Impella device on hemodynamic response when used in combination with preexisting FMR. Methods: Retrospective review of patients aged ≥18 years, who underwent Impella 5.5 implant for HF-CS, and who had a transthoracic echocardiogram performed pre- and post-Impella. Results: Of 24 patients, 33% had moderate-to-severe/severe FMR, 38% had mild-moderate/moderate FMR, and 29% had trace/mild FMR on pre-Impella transthoracic echocardiogram. Additional right ventricular assist device was simultaneously inserted in 3 patients, of whom 1 had severe, 1 had moderate, and another had mild FMR pre-Impella. Despite maximally tolerated Impella unloading, 6 patients (25%) had persistent moderate-severe/severe FMR, and 9 (37.5%) patients had persistent moderate FMR. Overall, however, there was a decrease in central venous pressure, pulmonary artery diastolic pressure, serum lactate, and vasoactive-inotrope score at 24 â€‹hours post-Impella, and survival was high at 83%. Conclusions: In a retrospective cohort of patients admitted with HF-CS who underwent Impella 5.5 implant for hemodynamic support, Impella did not seem to acutely ameliorate FMR severity. Despite this, there was a significant improvement in hemodynamic response at 24 â€‹hours post-Impella. In carefully selected patients, especially those with isolated left ventricular failure, Impella 5.5 may provide adequate hemodynamic support even in the presence of higher severity FMR.

Proteomic Signatures During Treatment in Different Stages of Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Proteomics have already provided novel insights into the pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. Previous studies have evaluated cross-sectional protein signatures of HF, but few have characterized proteomic changes following HF with reduced ejection fraction treatment with ARNI (angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor) therapy or left ventricular assist devices. METHODS: In this retrospective omics study, we performed targeted proteomics (N=625) of whole blood sera from patients with American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association stage D (N=29) and stage C (N=12) HF using proximity extension assays. Samples were obtained before and after (median=82 days) left ventricular assist device implantation (stage D; primary analysis) and ARNI therapy initiation (stage C; matched reference). Oblique principal component analysis and point biserial correlations were used for feature extraction and selection; standardized mean differences were used to assess within and between-group differences; and enrichment analysis was used to generate and cluster Gene Ontology terms. RESULTS: Core sets of proteins were identified for stage C (N=9 proteins) and stage D (N=18) HF; additionally, a core set of 5 shared HF proteins (NT-proBNP [N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide], ESM [endothelial cell-specific molecule]-1, cathepsin L1, osteopontin, and MCSF-1) was also identified. For patients with stage D HF, moderate (δ, 0.40-0.60) and moderate-to-large (δ, 0.60-0.80) sized differences were observed in 8 of their 18 core proteins after left ventricular assist devices implantation. Additionally, specific protein groups reached concentration levels equivalent (g<0.10) to stage C HF after initiation on ARNI therapy. CONCLUSIONS: HF with reduced ejection fraction severity associates with distinct proteomic signatures that reflect underlying disease attributes; these core signatures may be useful for monitoring changes in cardiac function following initiation on ARNI or left ventricular assist device implantation.

Pre-emptive pangenotypic direct acting antiviral therapy in donor HCV-positive to recipient HCV-negative heart transplantation: an open-label study.

BACKGROUND: Low donor heart availability underscores the need to identify all potentially transplantable organs. We sought to determine whether pre-emptive administration of pangenotypic direct-acting antiviral therapy can safely prevent the development of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in uninfected recipients of HCV-infected donor hearts. METHODS: Patients were recruited for this an open-label, single-centre, proof-of-concept study from Nov 1, 2017, to Nov 30, 2018. Following enrolment, the recipient's status on the heart transplantation waiting list was updated to reflect a willingness to accept either an HCV-positive or HCV-negative heart donor. Patients who underwent transplantation with a viraemic donor heart, as determined by nucleic acid testing (NAT), received pre-emptive oral glecaprevir-pibrentasvir before transport to the operating room followed by an 8-week course of glecaprevir-pibrentasvir after transplantation. Patients receiving HCV antibody-positive donor hearts without detectable circulating HCV RNA were followed using a reactive approach and started glecaprevir-pibrentasvir only if they developed viraemia. The primary outcome was achievement of sustained virological response 12 weeks after completion of glecaprevir-pibrentasvir therapy (SVR12). Patients were followed from study enrolment to 1 year after transplantation. This is an interim analysis, initiated after all enrolled patients reached the primary outcome. Results reflect data from Nov 1, 2017, to May 30, 2019. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03208244. FINDINGS: 55 patients were assessed for eligibility and 52 consented to enrolment. 25 patients underwent heart transplantation with HCV-positive donor hearts (20 NAT-positive, five NAT-negative), three of whom underwent simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation. All 20 recipients of NAT-positive hearts tolerated glecaprevir-pibrentasvir and showed rapid viral suppression (median time to clearance 3·5 days, IQR 0·0-8·3), with the subsequent achievement of SVR12 by all 20. The five recipients of NAT-negative grafts did not become viraemic. Median pre-transplant waiting time for patients following enrolment in the HCV protocol was 20 days (IQR 8-57). Patient and allograft survival were 100% at a median follow-up of 10·7 months (range 6·5-18·0). INTERPRETATION: Pre-emptive administration of glecaprevir-pibrentasvir therapy results in expedited organ transplantation, rapid HCV suppression, prevention of chronic HCV infection, and excellent early allograft function in patients receiving HCV-infected donor hearts. Long-term outcomes are not yet known. FUNDING: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, National Institutes of Health, and the Massachusetts General Hospital.

Interpreting Neurologic Outcomes in a Changing Trial Design Landscape: An Analysis of HeartWare Left Ventricular Assist Device Using a Hybrid Intention to Treat Population.

Randomized controlled trials can provide optimal clinical evidence to assess the benefits of new devices, and it is these data that often shape device usage in real-world practice. However, individual clinical trial results sometimes appear discordant for the same device, and alternative devices are sometimes not employed in similar patient populations. To make sound evidence-based decisions, clinicians routinely rely on cross-trial comparisons from different trials of similar but not identical patient populations to assess competing technology when head-to-head randomized comparisons are unavailable.

The value of psychosocial factors in patient selection and outcomes after heart transplantation.

Heart transplantation remains the gold standard treatment for advanced heart failure, although its use is limited by donor organ availability. To ensure that the rare resource of a donor heart is allocated appropriately, the evaluation of the heart transplant candidates includes extensive medical and psychosocial assessments. These psychosocial factors are critically important to understand pre-heart transplant because it is known that psychosocial evaluation and psychosocial comorbidities have a strong association with post-heart transplant outcomes. The critical factors to assess are psychological functioning, adherence to medical recommendations, and social support. These factors are likely inter-related and have been shown to have an effect on the health-related quality of life and overall survival. Recently, new tools have been developed to standardize the evaluation process. In this review, we will discuss the tools available to assess psychosocial factors in the transplant candidate and discuss the role these factors have on post-heart transplant outcomes.

Long-term cardiovascular risks associated with an elevated heart rate: the Framingham Heart Study.

BACKGROUND: Higher heart rate has been associated with an adverse prognosis, but most prior studies focused on individuals with known cardiovascular disease or examined a limited number of outcomes. We sought to examine the association of baseline heart rate with both fatal and nonfatal outcomes during 2 decades of follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: Our study included 4058 Framingham Heart Study participants (mean age 55 years, 56% women). Cox models were performed with multivariable adjustment for clinical risk factors and physical activity. A total of 708 participants developed incident cardiovascular disease (303 heart failure, 343 coronary heart disease, and 216 stroke events), 48 received a permanent pacemaker, and 1186 died. Baseline heart rate was associated with incident cardiovascular disease (hazard ratio [HR] 1.15 per 1 SD [11 bpm] increase in heart rate, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.24, P=0.0002), particularly heart failure (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.48, P<0.0001). Higher heart rate was also associated with higher all-cause (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.24, P<0.0001) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.33, P=0.01). Spline analyses did not suggest a lower threshold beyond which the benefit of a lower heart rate abated or increased. In contrast, individuals with a higher heart rate had a lower risk of requiring permanent pacemaker placement (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.79, P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with a higher heart rate are at elevated long-term risk for cardiovascular events, in particular, heart failure, and all-cause death. On the other hand, a higher heart rate is associated with a lower risk of future permanent pacemaker implantation.

Relation between soluble ST2, growth differentiation factor-15, and high-sensitivity troponin I and incident atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: We investigated whether circulating concentrations of soluble ST2, growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), and high-sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI) are associated with incident atrial fibrillation (AF) and whether these biomarkers improve current risk prediction models including AF risk factors, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and C-reactive protein (CRP). METHODS: We studied the relation between soluble ST2, GDF-15, and hsTnI and development of AF in Framingham Heart Study participants without prevalent AF. We used Cox proportional hazard regression analysis to examine the relation of incident AF during a 10-year follow-up period with each biomarker. We adjusted for standard AF clinical risk factors, BNP, and CRP. RESULTS: The mean age of the 3,217 participants was 59 ± 10 years, and 54% were women. During a 10-year follow-up, 242 participants developed AF. In age- and sex-adjusted models, GDF-15 and hsTnI were associated with risk of incident AF; however, after including the AF risk factors and BNP and CRP, only hsTnI was significantly associated with AF (hazard ratio per 1 SD of loge hsTnI, 1.12, 95% CI 1.00-1.26, P = .045). The c statistic of the base model including AF risk factors, BNP, and CRP was 0.803 (95% CI 0.777-0.830) and did not improve by adding individual or all 3 biomarkers. None of the discrimination and reclassification statistics were significant compared with the base model. CONCLUSION: In a community-based cohort, circulating hsTnI concentrations were associated with incident AF. None of the novel biomarkers evaluated improved AF risk discrimination or reclassification beyond standard clinical AF risk factors and biomarkers.

Association of novel biomarkers of cardiovascular stress with left ventricular hypertrophy and dysfunction: implications for screening.

BACKGROUND: Currently available screening tools for left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH) and systolic dysfunction (LVSD) are either expensive (echocardiography) or perform suboptimally (B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP]). It is unknown whether newer biomarkers are associated with LVH and LVSD and can serve as screening tools. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 2460 Framingham Study participants (mean age 58 years, 57% women) with measurements of biomarkers mirroring cardiac biomechanical stress (soluble ST-2 [ST2], growth differentiation factor-15 [GDF-15] and high-sensitivity troponin I [hsTnI]) and BNP. We defined LVH as LV mass/height(2) ≥the sex-specific 80th percentile and LVSD as mild/greater impairment of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) or a fractional shortening <0.29. Adjusting for standard risk factors in logistic models, BNP, GDF-15, and hsTnI were associated with the composite echocardiographic outcome (LVH or LVSD), odds ratios (OR) per SD increment in log-biomarker 1.29, 1.14, and 1.18 (95% CI: 1.15 to 1.44, 1.004 to 1.28, and 1.06 to 1.31), respectively. The C-statistic for the composite outcome increased from 0.765 with risk factors to 0.770 adding BNP, to 0.774 adding novel biomarkers. The continuous Net Reclassification Improvement was 0.212 (95% CI: 0.119 to 0.305, P<0.0001) after adding the novel biomarkers to risk factors plus BNP. BNP was associated with LVH and LVSD in multivariable models, whereas GDF-15 was associated with LVSD (OR 1.41, 95% CI: 1.16 to 1.70), and hsTnI with LVH (OR 1.22, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.36). ST2 was not significantly associated with any outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our community-based investigation suggests that cardiac stress biomarkers are associated with LVH and LVSD but may have limited clinical utility as screening tools.

Common genetic variation at the IL1RL1 locus regulates IL-33/ST2 signaling.

The suppression of tumorigenicity 2/IL-33 (ST2/IL-33) pathway has been implicated in several immune and inflammatory diseases. ST2 is produced as 2 isoforms. The membrane-bound isoform (ST2L) induces an immune response when bound to its ligand, IL-33. The other isoform is a soluble protein (sST2) that is thought to be a decoy receptor for IL-33 signaling. Elevated sST2 levels in serum are associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular disease. We investigated the determinants of sST2 plasma concentrations in 2,991 Framingham Offspring Cohort participants. While clinical and environmental factors explained some variation in sST2 levels, much of the variation in sST2 production was driven by genetic factors. In a genome-wide association study (GWAS), multiple SNPs within IL1RL1 (the gene encoding ST2) demonstrated associations with sST2 concentrations. Five missense variants of IL1RL1 correlated with higher sST2 levels in the GWAS and mapped to the intracellular domain of ST2, which is absent in sST2. In a cell culture model, IL1RL1 missense variants increased sST2 expression by inducing IL-33 expression and enhancing IL-33 responsiveness (via ST2L). Our data suggest that genetic variation in IL1RL1 can result in increased levels of sST2 and alter immune and inflammatory signaling through the ST2/IL-33 pathway.

Distribution and clinical correlates of the interleukin receptor family member soluble ST2 in the Framingham Heart Study.

BACKGROUND: Soluble ST2 (sST2) is a cardiac biomarker whose concentration rises in response to myocardial strain. Increased sST2 concentrations may predict adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure and myocardial infarction. Because sST2 was largely undetectable with first-generation assays in ambulatory individuals, there are few data regarding its distribution and correlates in community-based populations. METHODS: We measured sST2 using a highly sensitive ELISA in 3450 Framingham Heart Study participants who attended a routine examination. We used multivariable linear regression models to identify covariates associated with sST2 in the general sample. We obtained a reference sample (n = 1136) by excluding individuals with prevalent coronary disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, hypertension, obesity, valvular disease, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and pulmonary and renal dysfunction. We used empiric and quantile regression techniques to estimate the 2.5th, 50th, 97.5th, and 99th quantiles. RESULTS: In the general sample (mean age 59 years, 55% women), systolic blood pressure (P = 0.006), antihypertensive medication use (P = 0.03), and diabetes (P < 0.001) were associated with sST2 concentrations. In the reference sample (mean age 55, 59% women), male sex (P < 0.0001) and older age (P = 0.004) were predictive of higher sST2 concentrations. Quantile and empirical methods were used to define the reference intervals. Using the empirical approach, upper 99% percentile values in different age groups ranged from 46.6 to 64.4 µg/L in men and 36.7 to 53.0 µg/L in women. CONCLUSIONS: In a well-characterized, community-based cohort, values for sST2 differ between men and women, increase with age, and are associated with diabetes and hypertension.

Prognostic utility of novel biomarkers of cardiovascular stress: the Framingham Heart Study.

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers for predicting cardiovascular events in community-based populations have not consistently added information to standard risk factors. A limitation of many previously studied biomarkers is their lack of cardiovascular specificity. METHODS AND RESULTS: To determine the prognostic value of 3 novel biomarkers induced by cardiovascular stress, we measured soluble ST2, growth differentiation factor-15, and high-sensitivity troponin I in 3428 participants (mean age, 59 years; 53% women) in the Framingham Heart Study. We performed multivariable-adjusted proportional hazards models to assess the individual and combined ability of the biomarkers to predict adverse outcomes. We also constructed a "multimarker" score composed of the 3 biomarkers in addition to B-type natriuretic peptide and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. During a mean follow-up of 11.3 years, there were 488 deaths, 336 major cardiovascular events, 162 heart failure events, and 142 coronary events. In multivariable-adjusted models, the 3 new biomarkers were associated with each end point (P<0.001) except coronary events. Individuals with multimarker scores in the highest quartile had a 3-fold risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.2-4.7; P<0.001), 6-fold risk of heart failure (6.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-14.8; P<0.001), and 2-fold risk of cardiovascular events (1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-2.7; P=0.001). Addition of the multimarker score to clinical variables led to significant increases in the c statistic (P=0.005 or lower) and net reclassification improvement (P=0.001 or lower). CONCLUSION: Multiple biomarkers of cardiovascular stress are detectable in ambulatory individuals and add prognostic value to standard risk factors for predicting death, overall cardiovascular events, and heart failure.