Effectiveness of the static progressive Joint Active System splint in improving upper extremity joint stiffness.

PURPOSE: Injuries to the upper extremity often result in stiffness. The joint capsule may lose its elastic properties, limiting motion. Most modalities for increasing motion are based on capsule stretching, and usually involve physical or occupational therapy. We tested the hypothesis that the Joint Active System static-progressive splint is helpful in increasing range of motion in stiff joints after failure of other treatments. METHODS: Candidates for the Joint Active System splint were mostly patients with upper extremity trauma that required surgery, if they plateaued after therapy but still had stiffness. A retrospective review was performed of all patients from 2015 to 2019 that met our inclusion criteria. Etiologies of stiffness and patient demographics were documented. Range of motion was recorded before and after treatment and, when available, functional scores were calculated. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were treated with the Joint Active System splint; 5 were excluded, leaving 39 for analysis: 15 elbow, 14 wrist and 10 proximal interphalangeal joints. All patients had received therapy before using the Joint Active System and 11 had tried a dynamic splint in addition to therapy. All joints showed significant improvement in motion after treatment: from 66.5° to 95.7° in the elbow, 63.5° to 81.1° in the wrist and 33.2° to 51.8° in the proximal interphalangeal joint. When functional scores were available before and after treatment, there was significant improvement for both elbow and wrist. Even when the Joint Active System was started many months after injury, it was effective. CONCLUSIONS: Despite reaching a plateau with therapy, the Joint Active System static-progressive splint is effective in improving range of motion in elbow, wrist and finger joints with stiffness following injury or surgery. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective case series. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level IV.

Advances in multi-modality imaging for constrictive pericarditis and pericardial inflammation: role of imaging-guided therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Constrictive pericarditis (CP) can result from uncontrolled inflammation of the pericardium. This can be due to various etiologies. CP can lead to both left- and right-sided heart failure with associated poor quality of life, so early recognition is key. The evolving role of multimodality cardiac imaging allows for earlier diagnosis and facilitates management to help mitigate this adverse outcome. AREAS COVERED: This review discusses the pathophysiology of constrictive pericarditis, chronic inflammation and autoimmune etiologies, clinical presentation of CP, and advances in multimodality cardiac imaging for diagnosis and management. Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging remain cornerstone modalities to evaluate this condition, whereas additional imaging modalities such as computed tomography and FDG-positron emission tomography can provide complementary information. EXPERT OPINION: Advances in multimodality imaging allow for a more precision diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis. There has been a paradigm shift in pericardial disease management with advances in multimodality imaging, especially CMR, to detect subacute and chronic inflammation. This has enabled imaging-guided therapy (IGT) to both help prevent and potentially reverse established constrictive pericarditis.

Retrospective Cohort Study of the Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury with Vancomycin Area under the Curve-Based Dosing with Concomitant Piperacillin-Tazobactam Compared to Meropenem or Cefepime.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a complication associated with vancomycin. Previous studies demonstrated that the combination of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam increases the risk of AKI compared to vancomycin with meropenem or cefepime. These studies did not utilize area under the curve (AUC)-based dosing, which reduces vancomycin exposure and may decrease nephrotoxicity compared with trough-based dosing. This study evaluated the incidence of AKI in patients receiving AUC-dosed vancomycin with either concomitant piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) or meropenem or cefepime (VMC). This retrospective cohort study included patients admitted to Sentara Norfolk General Hospital between October 2019 and September 2020 who received AUC-dosed vancomycin and concomitant piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, or cefepime for at least 48 h. The primary outcome was the incidence of AKI during treatment or within 24 h of discontinuation. A total of 435 patients (VPT, n = 331; VMC, n = 104) who received a median duration of 4 days of treatment were included. The incidence of AKI was significantly higher with VPT than with VMC (13.6% versus 4.8% [P = 0.014]). Multivariable analysis showed VPT to be an independent risk factor for the development of AKI (odds ratio [OR], 3.00 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.15 to 7.76]). VPT was associated with more frequent AKI than VMC, even with the relatively short courses of antimicrobial therapy administered in this population. In comparison with the precedent in the literature for trough-based vancomycin dosing, our results suggest that the use of AUC-based vancomycin dosing in combination with piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, or cefepime may result in a lower overall incidence of AKI.

The Intersection of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure.

Background Type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) is common and associated with high cardiovascular event rates. However, the relationship between T2MI and heart failure (HF) is uncertain. Methods and Results We identified patients with T2MI at a large tertiary hospital between October 2017 and May 2018. Patient characteristics, causes of T2MI, and subsequent HF hospitalizations were determined by physician chart review. We identified 359 patients with T2MI over the study period; 184 patients had a history of HF. Among patients with ejection fraction (EF) assessment (N=180), the majority had preserved EF (N=107; 59.4%), followed by reduced EF (N=54; 30.0%), and mid-range EF (N=19; 10.6%). Acute HF was the most common cause of T2MI (20.9%). Of those whose T2MI was precipitated by HF (N=75), the mean EF was 53.0±16.8% and 16 (21.3%) were de novo diagnoses of HF. Among patients with T2MI who were discharged alive with available follow-up (N=289), 5.5% were hospitalized with acute HF within 30 days, 17.3% within 180 days, and 22.1% within 1 year. In subgroup analyses, among patients with T2MI with prevalent or new HF (N=161), the rate of HF hospitalization at 1 year was 34.2%, considerably higher than those with T2MI and no HF diagnosis at discharge (7.0%; N=9/128). Conclusions Index presentations of HF or worsening chronic HF represent the most common causes of T2MI. ≈1 in 5 patients with T2MI will be readmitted for HF within 1 year of their event. Strategies to prevent HF events after a T2MI are needed.

Post-Myocardial Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture Bridged to Heartmate 3 with an Impella 5.5.

Optimal timing of surgical repair for patients diagnosed with a post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture is controversial. Urgent surgical intervention to prevent hemodynamic decompensation must be balanced against delayed repair to allow for tissue stabilization and increased likelihood of a successful outcome. We report the use of an axillary Impella 5.5 (Abiomed Inc, Danvers, MA) temporary left ventricular assist device to aid in hemodynamic stabilization, shunt fraction reduction, and tissue maturation with eventual definitive surgical repair in a patient who presented with a post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture and cardiogenic shock.

Home-Time After Discharge Among Patients With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction.

Background Home-time, defined as the time spent alive outside of a healthcare institution, has emerged as a patient-centered health outcome. The discharge locations and distribution of home-time after a type 2 myocardial infarction are unknown. Methods and Results Patients with a type 2 myocardial infarction between October 2017 and May 2018 at Massachusetts General Hospital were included. Patients discharged to hospice or without follow-up data were excluded. Our primary outcome was home-time defined as the number of days lived outside of a hospital, long-term acute care facility, skilled nursing facility, or rehabilitation facility. We identified 359 patients with type 2 myocardial infarction over the study period. Of those discharged alive (N=321), 62.9% were discharged home, and the remainder went to a facility or hospice. Among those with available follow-up data (N=289), the median home-time was 30 (interquartile range [IQR], 16-30) days at 30 days, 171 (IQR, 133-180) days at 180 days, and 347 (IQR, 203-362) days at 365 days. At 1 year, 29 patients (10%) with type 2 myocardial infarction had spent no time at home and only 57 patients (19.7%) spent the entire year alive and at home. At 1 year, postdischarge all-cause mortality was 23.2%, all-cause readmission was 69.2%, and major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, or stroke) was 34.9%. Home-time through 1 year correlated strongly with time-to-event all-cause mortality (τ=0.54, P<0.001) and major adverse cardiovascular events (τ=0.52, P<0.001) and modestly with a composite of all-cause mortality or readmission (τ=0.44, P<0.001). Conclusions Home-time is low after a hospitalization for type 2 myocardial infarction and correlates strongly with mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events.

WATCHMAN implantation in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation and intracranial hemorrhage.

PURPOSE: Use of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients with a history of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is often considered high risk as OAC-related ICH is associated with high mortality rates. Left atrial appendage closure with a WATCHMAN device is an alternative management strategy to OAC to decrease thrombotic risk in atrial fibrillation patients; however use of OAC followed by dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) or DAPT therapy alone is required for 6 months post-procedurally. In this study, we examined the safety of WATCHMAN implantation followed by 6 months of anti-thrombotic therapy in patients with a history of ICH. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 63 patients with a history of ICH prior to WATCHMAN implantation (Group I) and 95 patients without a history of ICH who underwent WATCHMAN placement (Group II). The primary outcome was death, stroke, or major bleeding within 6 months of WATCHMAN placement. RESULTS: The average CHA2DS2-VASc of Group I was 4.9 ± 1.7 vs 4.7 ± 1.4 for Group II (p = 0.34). The most common type of ICH in Group I was an intracerebral hemorrhage (57%). The median time between ICH and WATCHMAN implantation in Group I patients was 212 days. A total of 19% of Group I patients were managed with DAPT alone post-procedurally vs. 3% in Group II (p < 0.001). Similar to 89% of Group II (p = 0.19), 95% of Group I patients were free of the primary outcome at 6 months. No Group I patients had recurrent ICH within 6 months after WATCHMAN implantation. CONCLUSION: In a retrospective, multicenter series of patients with a history of ICH prior to WATCHMAN implantation, WATCHMAN placement was performed safely with 6-month outcomes that were similar to patients without a history of ICH, encompassing the time during which a patient with a history of ICH would need antithrombotic therapy to facilitate WATCHMAN placement.

A comparison of postprocedural anticoagulation in high-risk patients undergoing WATCHMAN device implantation.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an alternative to long-term anticoagulation for thromboembolic protection in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and high bleeding risk. Short-term Warfarin use following LAAC is well-studied, while data pertaining to novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) use in this setting is less robust. Specifically, data regarding the safety and efficacy of postprocedural NOAC use in high-risk patients is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of Warfarin and NOAC use in a high-risk patient population undergoing LAAC with the WATCHMAN device. METHODS: From November 2015 to October 2017, 97 patients underwent LAAC with the WATCHMAN device. All patients were discussed at a multidisciplinary meeting prior to device implantation. Longitudinal data were collected and analyzed for a composite endpoint of stroke and death at 8 months, and major bleeding at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: Among the 90 patients included in the safety and efficacy analysis, 43 were prescribed Warfarin and 47 were prescribed NOACs. Baseline characteristics were comparable between study groups. There were no procedural complications and no significant differences in the incidence of death and stroke at 8 months or major bleeding at 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSION: For patients with AF at high risk of both thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events, NOACs as compared to Warfarin, seem to be safe and effective for short-term anticoagulation following LAAC with the WATCHMAN device. Further validation in large randomized controlled trials is required.

Misclassification of Myocardial Injury as Myocardial Infarction: Implications for Assessing Outcomes in Value-Based Programs.

Importance: Similar to other patients with acute myocardial infarction, patients with type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) are included in several value-based programs, including the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program and the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program. To our knowledge, whether nonischemic myocardial injury is being misclassified as T2MI is unknown and may have implications for these programs. Objective: To determine whether patients with nonischemic myocardial injury are being miscoded as having T2MI and if this has implications for 30-day readmission and mortality rates. Design, Settings, and Participants: Using the new International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision code, we identified patients who were coded as having T2MI between October 2017 and May 2018 at Massachusetts General Hospital. Strict adjudication using the fourth universal definition of MI was then applied. Main outcome and Measures: Clinical adjudication of T2MI and 30-day readmission and mortality rates as a function of T2MI or nonischemic myocardial injury. Results: Of 633 patients, 369 (58.3%) were men and 514 (81.2%) were white. After strict adjudication, 359 (56.7%) had T2MI, 265 (41.9%) had myocardial injury, 6 (0.9%) had type 1 MI, and 3 (0.5%) had unstable angina. Patients with T2MI had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities than those with myocardial injury. Patients with T2MI and myocardial injury had high in-hospital mortality rates (10.6% and 8.7%, respectively; P = .50). Of those discharged alive (563 [88.9%]), 30-day readmission rates (22.7% vs 21.1%; P = .68) and mortality rates (4.4% vs 7.4%; P = .14) were comparable among patients with T2MI and myocardial injury. Conclusions and Relevance: A substantial percentage of patients coded as having T2MI actually have myocardial injury. Both conditions have high 30-day readmission and mortality rates. Including patients with high-risk myocardial injury may have substantial implications for value-based programs.

Transient and persistent conduction abnormalities following transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the Edwards-Sapien prosthesis: a comparison between antegrade vs. retrograde approaches.

BACKGROUND: Electrocardiographic conduction abnormalities following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the Edwards-Sapien valve (ESV) are not uncommon and may be transient. We sought to examine the clinical time-course of conduction abnormalities after TAVR with ESV and determine risk factors for persistent abnormalities. METHODS: In this single-center prospective study, 116 consecutive patients underwent implantation of the ESV after approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Demographic, clinical, and intra-procedural variables were collected in a registry, including ECGs before, immediately after, and at discharge from hospital. Conduction abnormalities were analyzed including PR interval lengthening, QRS widening, left bundle branch block (LBBB), and high-grade AV block. RESULTS: There were 92 patients included in the analysis. A total of 41 new conduction abnormalities were observed in 31 (34 %) patients: 7 new PR prolongation, 14 QRS widening, 14 new LBBB, and 5 high-grade AV block requiring permanent pacemaker. Of the 41 new CAs, 11 (27 %) were transient; of the transient abnormalities, 9 (82 %) resolved within 24 h of the index procedure. Chronic kidney disease was a risk factor for the development of a persistent abnormality and for need for PPM. Antegrade approach was associated with the development of persistent LBBB and persistent QRS widening. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of conduction abnormalities after ESV implantation improved prior to discharge from the hospital, usually within 24 h. CKD is associated with persistence of abnormalities and with need for PPM. Antegrade approach increases risk for new intraventricular conduction delays, including LBBB.

Adjunctive Therapies for Catheter Ablation of Non-Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.

The success rate of pulmonary vein antral isolation (PVAI) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been realized for persistent or long-standing AF, collectively termed nonparoxysmal AF. Many investigators have described adjunctive ablation strategies to improve outcomes for catheter ablation in patients with non-paroxysmal AF. In this focused review we aim to describe these therapies and current evidence pertaining to their utilization. At present, left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) ablation, non-pulmonary vein (non-PV) trigger ablation and rotor ablation appear to improve outcomes for patients with non-paroxysmal AF when performed in conjunction with PVAI. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to further elucidate such claims.

Clinical Outcomes of Patients with HIV Undergoing Lead Extraction for Infectious and Noninfectious Indications.

BACKGROUND: With the increasing prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus positive (HIV+) patients in the United States, and the association between HIV and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, the use of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) in patients with HIV has become more common. With the increasing incidence of device-related complications, lead extraction is becoming a topic of importance in this population. As the use of implantable devices increases in the HIV+ population, complications are to be expected; therefore, lead extraction in the HIV population must be addressed. METHODS: From January 2004 to May 2013, 1,018 patients requiring lead extraction were referred to a single, high-volume tertiary cardiovascular center. Within this group of patients, 10 were HIV+. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of this cohort and reported clinical variables of interest. RESULTS: Infection was the most common indication for lead extraction and device removal. Four patients were in advanced heart failure, and the overall average ejection fraction of the sample population was 32.7 ± 16.3%. In addition, the majority of patients had one or more medical comorbidities. Devices removed, in order of frequency, were implantable cardioverter defibrillators, permanent pacemakers, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices. On average, 35.6 ± 41.6 months elapsed from implantation of the oldest lead to the date of extraction. There were no major or minor complications and all procedures were clinically successful. CONCLUSIONS: Laser lead extraction is both safe and effective in patients with HIV. This study sets a level of clinical precedent regarding the management of CIED infection or malfunction in patients with HIV.