Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 176: 111836, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38154416

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We sought to study adenoidectomy rates in children with adenoid hypertrophy (AH) who were either treated with medical therapy or not during a 2-year follow-up period in a longitudinal population-based study. METHODS: We retrospectively identified healthy children aged 1-18 years between 2014 and 2020 with AH diagnosis from the Clalit Health Services database, the largest healthcare maintenance organization in Israel. The main outcome was adenoidectomy alone or in combination with other procedures performed within 2 years after diagnosis. The treatment group consisted of children who received medical therapy, defined as a pharmacy purchase of montelukast, nasal steroid sprays and/or antihistamines (medical therapy aimed to reduce AH) for ≥2 consecutive months, while the control group consisted of untreated children. RESULTS: We identified 68,356 unique children with AH, of them 56 % were boys, with a mean age of 4.9 ± 3.3 years. Of them, 5310 (7.7 %) received medical therapy. Overall, 6633 (9.7 %) underwent adenoidectomy within 2 years following diagnosis. There was no significant difference in surgery referral rates between the treatment and the control groups, 10 % vs. 9.7 %, respectively (p = 0.3). When adjusted for age and sex, the likelihood of undergoing adenoidectomy was similar in both groups (HR = 0.98, 95 % CI = 0.90-1.07, p = 0.6). Among operated children, the average time from diagnosis to surgery was statistically significantly longer in the treatment group than in the control group, 346 ± 180 vs 311 ± 175 days (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Prescribing montelukast, nasal steroids and/or oral antihistamines was not associated with a reduction in adenoidectomy rates and was associated with an average surgery delay of 35 days.


Assuntos
Tonsila Faríngea , Criança , Masculino , Humanos , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Tonsila Faríngea/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sulfetos , Adenoidectomia , Sprays Nasais , Hipertrofia/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertrofia/cirurgia , Hipertrofia/complicações
3.
Otol Neurotol ; 44(2): e68-e72, 2023 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36624589

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) incidence rates over the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak and the COVID-19 vaccination campaign periods to pre-COVID-19 periods. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Secondary hospital. PATIENTS: Patients >12 years with auditory-confirmed SSNHL were enrolled. COVID-19 status and BNT162 inoculation records ≤28 days before SSNHL diagnosis were retrieved. Patients were categorized according to their date of presentation over four equal periods: 1) July 2018-April 2019 (first prepandemic period), 2) May 2019-February 2020 (second prepandemic period), 3) March 2020-December 2020 (COVID-19 outbreak), and 4) January 2021-October 2021 (BNT162b2 vaccinations campaign). INTERVENTIONS: Pre- and post-COVID-19 emergence; BNT162b2 vaccine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated to compare SSNHL cases during the COVID-19 and vaccination periods with pre-COVID-19 periods. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients with SSNHL over the four periods, 1 had COVID-19 and 8 were vaccinated. The annual SSNHL incidence was 12.87, 12.28, 13.45, and 19.89 per 100,000 over periods 1 to 4, respectively. SSNHL incidence over the third period was not significantly different than the first/second periods (IRR = 1.045, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.629-1.85, ρ = 0.788, and IRR = 1.095, 95% CI = 0.651-1.936, ρ = 0.683, respectively), whereas SSNHL incidence rate over the fourth period was higher (IRR = 1.545, 95% CI = 0.967-2.607, ρ = 0.068, and IRR = 1.619, 95% CI = 1-2.73, ρ = 0.05, respectively). SSNHL incidence in vaccine recipients was lower than prepandemic unvaccinated patients (IRR = 0.584, 95% CI =0.464-1.67, ρ = 0.984, and IRR = 0.612, 95% CI =0.48-1.744, ρ = 0.92, respectively). CONCLUSION: There were fewer SSNHL cases during the first COVID-19 months. Although the SSNHL rate over the COVID-19 vaccination campaign increased, it was not higher for patients who received the BNT162b2 vaccine.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial , Perda Auditiva Súbita , Humanos , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/epidemiologia , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/etiologia , Perda Auditiva Súbita/epidemiologia , Perda Auditiva Súbita/etiologia , Incidência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vacinas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...