Which reference equation should we use for interpreting spirometry values for First Nations Australians? A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the suitability of the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI)-2012 other/mixed and GLI-2022 global reference equations for evaluating the respiratory capacity of First Nations Australians. DESIGN, SETTING: Cross-sectional study; analysis of spirometry data collected by three prospective studies in Queensland, the Northern Territory, and Western Australia between March 2015 and December 2022. PARTICIPANTS: Opportunistically recruited First Nations participants in the Indigenous Respiratory Reference Values study (Queensland, Northern Territory; age, 3-25 years; 18 March 2015 - 24 November 2017), the Healthy Indigenous Lung Function Testing in Adults study (Queensland, Northern Territory; 18 years or older; 14 August 2019 - 15 December 2022) and the Many Healthy Lungs study (Western Australia; five years or older; 10 October 2018 - 7 November 2021). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Goodness of fit to spirometry data for each GLI reference equation, based on mean Z-score and its standard deviation, and proportions of participants with respiratory parameter values within 1.64 Z-scores of the mean value. RESULTS: Acceptable and repeatable forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) values were available for 2700 First Nations participants in the three trials; 1467 were classified as healthy and included in our analysis (1062 children, 405 adults). Their median age was 12 years (interquartile range, 9-19 years; range, 3-91 years), 768 (52%) were female, and 1013 were tested in rural or remote areas (69%). Acceptable and repeatable forced vital capacity (FVC) values were available for 1294 of the healthy participants (88%). The GLI-2012 other/mixed and GLI-2022 global equations provided good fits to the spirometry data; the race-neutral GLI-2022 global equation better accounted for the influence of ageing on FEV1 and FVC, and of height on FVC. Using the GLI-2012 other/mixed reference equation and after adjusting for age, sex, and height, mean FEV1 (estimated difference, -0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.46 to -0.22) and FVC Z-scores (estimated difference, -0.45; 95% CI, -0.59 to -0.32) were lower for rural or remote than for urban participants, but their mean FEV1/FVC Z-score was higher (estimated difference, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03-0.25). CONCLUSION: The normal spirometry values of healthy First Nations Australians may be substantially higher than previously reported. Until more spirometry data are available for people in urban areas, the race-neutral GLI-2022 global or the GLI-2012 other/mixed reference equations can be used when assessing the respiratory function of First Nations Australians.

Developing Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide Predicted and Upper Limit of Normal Values for a Disadvantaged Population.

BACKGROUND: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (Feno), used as a biomarker, is influenced by several factors including ethnicity. Normative data are essential for interpretation, and currently single cutoff values are used in children and adults. RESEARCH QUESTION: Accounting for factors that influence Feno, (1) what are appropriate predicted and upper limit of normal (ULN) Feno values in an underserved population (First Nations Australians), (2) how do these values compare with age-based interpretive guidelines, and (3) what factors influence Feno and what is the size of the effect? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Feno data of First Nations Australians (age < 16 years, n = 862; age ≥ 16 years, n = 348) were obtained. Medical history using participant questionnaires and medical records were used to define healthy participants. Flexible regression using spline functions, as used by the Global Lung Function Initiative, were used to generate predicted and ULN values. RESULTS: Look-up tables for predicted and ULN values using age (4-76 years) and height (100-200 cm) were generated and are supplied with a calculator for clinician use. In healthy First Nations children (age < 18 years), ULN values ranged between 25 and 60 parts per billion (ppb) when considering only biologically plausible age and height combinations. For healthy adults, ULN values ranged between 39 and 88 ppb. Neither the current Feno interpretation guidelines, nor the currently recommended cutoff of 50 ppb for First Nations children 16 years of age or younger were appropriate for use in this cohort. Our modelling revealed that predicted and ULN values of healthy participants varied nonlinearly with age and height. INTERPRETATION: Because single pediatric, adult, or all-age Feno cutoff values used by current interpretive guidelines to define abnormality fail to account for factors that modify Feno values, we propose predicted and ULN values for First Nations Australians 4 to 76 years of age. Creating age- and height-adjusted predicted and ULN values could be considered for other ethnicities.