The Decline of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Splenectomies: A Single Center Experience.

Background: Splenectomy has been performed for various indications from haematological diseases to benign cysts and tumours, and for splenic traumatic injuries. However, there has been a steady decline in splenectomies in the last 20 years. The aim of this study is to establish the reasons behind this decline in splenectomy and to analyse them based on indication, type of splenectomy, and manner of approach (open, laparoscopic or robotic). Material and Methods: This is a retrospective study of a single centre experience of all the splenectomies, both total and partial, performed in the Department of General Surgery of Fundeni Clinical Institute (Bucharest) between 2002 and 2023. Only surgeries for primary splenic diseases were selected, splenic resections as part of other major operations were not included. Results: Between 2002 and 2023, 876 splenectomies were performed in the Department of General Surgery of Fundeni Clinical Institute (Bucharest). Most splenectomies (n=245) were performed for immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), followed by benign tumours and cysts (n=136), lymphoma (n=119), hypersplenism due to cirrhosis (n=107) and microspherocytosis (n=95). Other indications included myelodysplastic syndrome (n=39), trauma (n=35), thalassemia (n=22), leukaemia (n=18) and also there were 60 splenectomies that were performed for hypersplenism of unknown cause. There were 795 total splenectomies (TS) and 81 partial splenectomies (PS). There was a decline in the number of splenectomies both TS and PS for all these indications, most notably in the case of ITP, microspherocytosis and hypersplenism due to cirrhosis with no splenectomies performed for these indications since 2020. Conclusion: With the development of new lines of treatment, advances in interventional radiology and in surgery with the spleen parenchyma sparing options, the need for total splenectomy has been greatly reduced which is reflected in the decline in the number of splenectomies performed in the last 20 years in our clinic.

HLA-haploidentical stem cell transplantation in children with inherited bone marrow failure syndromes: A retrospective analysis on behalf of EBMT severe aplastic Anemia and pediatric diseases working parties.

Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) represents the main alternative for children with inherited bone marrow failure syndrome (I-BMF) lacking a matched donor. This retrospective study, conducted on behalf of the EBMT SAAWP and PDWP, aims to report the current outcomes of haplo-SCT in I-BMFs, comparing the different in vivo and ex vivo T-cell depletion approaches. One hundred and sixty-two I-BMF patients who underwent haplo-SCT (median age 7.4 years) have been registered. Fanconi Anemia was the most represented diagnosis (70.1%). Based on different T-cell depletion (TCD) approaches, four categories were identified: (1) TCRαß+/CD19+-depletion (43.8%); (2) T-repleted with post-transplant Cyclophosphamide (PTCy, 34.0%); (3) In-vivo T-depletion with ATG/alemtuzumab (14.8%); (4) CD34+ positive selection (7.4%). The cumulative incidences (CI) of neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 84% and 76% respectively, while that of primary and secondary graft failure was 10% and 8% respectively. The 100-day CI of acute GvHD grade III-IV(95% CI) was 13%, while the 24-month CI of extensive chronic GvHD was 4%. After a median follow-up of 43.4 months, the 2-year overall survival(OS) and GvHD/Rejection-free Survival (GRFS) probabilities are 67% and 53%, respectively. The TCR CD3+αß+/CD19+ depletion group showed a significantly lower incidence of both acute and chronic GvHD and higher OS (79%; p0.013) and GRFS (71%; p < .001), while no significant differences in outcomes have been observed by different diagnosis and conditioning regimens. This large retrospective study supports the safety and feasibility of haplo-SCT in I-BMF patients. TCRαß+/CD19+ depletion offers higher chances of patients' survival, with a significantly lower risk of severe a- and c-GvHD in I-BMFs compared to other platforms.