Buserelin Acetate Added to Boar Semen Enhances Litter Size in Gilts in Tropical Environments.

The use of exogenous hormones has long been of interest for improving reproductive performance in swine production. Enhancing litter size directly impacts the economic efficiency of pig production. Various strategies, including nutritional, genetic, and hormonal approaches, have been explored with varying degrees of success. Administering a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, such as buserelin, at the onset of estrus can induce ovulation and reduce the variation in ovulation timing among sows. This study assessed the impact of GnRH agonist supplementation in boar semen doses on the litter size of inseminated gilts. The research was conducted on a commercial swine herd in northern Thailand. A total of 231 Landrace × Yorkshire crossbred gilts, aged 224.5 ± 16.2 days at the onset of estrus synchronization, participated in the experiment. The gilts' estrus was synchronized with oral altrenogest supplementation at a dosage of 20 mg/day for 18 days. After exhibiting standing estrus, the gilts were randomly divided into three groups. Control group: gilts were inseminated at 0 and 12 h post standing estrus onset with a conventional semen dose (n = 94). Treatment 1: similar to the control group, but with an added 5 µg (1.25 mL) of buserelin acetate to the boar semen dose during the first insemination (n = 71). Treatment 2: similar to the control group, but with 10 µg (2.5 mL) of buserelin acetate added to the boar semen dose during the first insemination (n = 66). All gilts were inseminated twice during their standing estrus using the intrauterine artificial insemination method. Each semen dose contained 3.0 × 109 motile sperm in 80 mL. The farrowing rate averaged 78.8% and did not significantly differ between the groups (p = 0.141). The total number of piglets born per litter in the treatment 2 group was greater than in the control group (14.0 ± 0.3 vs. 13.2 ± 0.3, respectively, p = 0.049), but was not significantly different from the treatment 1 group (13.3 ± 0.3, p = 0.154). Similarly, the number of live-born piglets in the treatment 2 group was greater than in the control and treatment 1 groups (13.2 ± 0.4 vs. 12.3 ± 0.3 and 12.0 ± 0.4, respectively, p < 0.05). Moreover, the live-born piglets' litter birth weight in the treatment 2 group was greater than in the control group (17.0 ± 0.4 vs. 15.6 ± 0.3 kg, respectively, p = 0.008) and the treatment 1 group (15.7 ± 0.4 kg, p = 0.025). In conclusion, adding a GnRH agonist to boar semen appears to enhance the litter size of gilts. Further research should focus on understanding the underlying mechanisms and determining the optimal dose and timing for GnRH agonist supplementation.

Optimizing internal biosecurity on pig farms by assessing movements of farm staff.

For internal biosecurity, it is important to separate different age groups in a pig farm and to stick to specific working lines when visiting the barns. Currently, there is no research on the movements of farm staff on pig farms. The objectives of this observational study were to assess movements of farm staff on pig farms, to assess risky movements and to investigate whether movements differ according to time (week of the batch farrowing system (BFS) and weekday vs. weekend) and unit (farrowing, gestation/insemination, nursery, and fattening unit). Five commercial sow farms participated and on each farm, an internal movement monitoring system was installed. Detection points were installed throughout the farm and workers had to wear a personal beacon. Movement data were collected from 1 December 2019 until 30 November 2020. The following sequence of movements was considered as safe: (1) dressing room, (2) farrowing, (3) gestation/insemination, (4) nursery, (5) fattening, (6) quarantine, and (7) cadaver storage. Movements in the opposite direction were considered as risk, unless a dressing room was visited in between. The total number of movements differed according to week of the BFS, and was highest in insemination and farrowing week. The percentage of risky movements was influenced by week of the BFS for two farms, and was highest around weaning. The percentage of risky movements varied between farms and ranged from 9 to 38%. There were more movements on a weekday compared to a weekend day. There were more movements towards the farrowing and gestation/insemination unit in insemination and farrowing week compared to other weeks of the BFS, but week of the BFS had no impact on movements towards nursery and fattening unit. This study showed that there were a lot of (risky) movements on pig farms and that these movements varied according to week of the BFS, day of the week, and unit. This study creates awareness, which could be a first step in optimizing working lines. Future research should focus on why certain risky movements occur and how these can be avoided to achieve better biosecurity and higher health status on farms.

Reproductive performance of weaned sows after single fixed-time artificial insemination under a tropical climate: Influences of season and insemination technique.

We evaluated the reproductive performance of sows after single fixed-time AI under a tropical climate and investigated the influences of season and insemination technique on the efficacy of single fixed-time AI. After weaning, the sows were divided into CONTROL (n = 212) and FIXED-TIME (n = 212) groups. Sows in the CONTROL group were inseminated at 12 and 36 h after the onset of oestrus, while sows in the FIXED-TIME group were administered 10 µg of GnRH at 72 h after weaning and were inseminated 32 h later. Reproductive performance parameters, including total born, born alive, mummified foetuses and stillborn piglets per litter, piglet birth weight, variation of piglet birth weight within litter, regular return-to-oestrus and farrowing rate, were compared between the two groups. Season was classified into two groups: cool (n = 170) and hot (n = 254), and insemination technique was classified into two groups: conventional AI (n = 171) and intra-uterine insemination (IUI) with a reduced number of spermatozoa (n = 253). On average, regular return-to-oestrus (3.3 vs. 5.6%, P > 0.05) and farrowing rates (92.8 vs. 88.1%, P > 0.05) did not differ between CONTROL and FIXED-TIME groups. However, the total born and born alive piglets per litter in the FIXED-TIME were lower than in the CONTROL group (12.0 vs. 12.8 piglets/litter; P = 0.030 and 11.3 vs. 12.2 piglets/litter, P = 0.007). Interestingly, the number of total born piglets in the FIXED-TIME group was lower than in the CONTROL group only in the sows inseminated in the hot season (11.7 ±â€¯0.32 and 12.9 ±â€¯0.31, respectively, P = 0.005). Piglet birth weight, variation of piglet birth weight within litter, number of piglets at weaning and body weight of piglets at weaning did not differ between groups, irrespective of the season (P > 0.05). The total number of piglets born per litter in the FIXED-TIME group was lower than that in the CONTROL group in sows inseminated via IUI (11.7 ±â€¯0.32 and 12.9 ±â€¯0.32, respectively, P = 0.013), but not in sows inseminated using conventional AI (12.7 ±â€¯0.42 and 12.5 ±â€¯0.41, respectively, P = 0.772). Single fixed-time AI could be successfully performed in sows under a tropical climate, with a promising reproductive performance. However, a decreased litter size at birth after single fixed-time AI was observed when insemination was performed in the hot season. Moreover, single fixed-time AI using IUI with a reduced number of spermatozoa also decreased litter size at birth.