Academic Medical Centers Experienced Higher Rates of Post-Operative Health-Care-Associated Infections during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Post Hoc Analysis of an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multicenter Trial.

Background: We sought to examine health-care-associated infections (HAIs) among patients undergoing an appendectomy at academic medical centers (AMCs) and non-AMCs during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) peri-pandemic. We hypothesized that AMCs would have higher rates of post-operative HAIs during the first wave of the pandemic. Patients and Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of a prospective, observational, multi-center study of patients aged >18 years who underwent an appendectomy for acute appendicitis before (pre-CoV), during (CoV), and after pandemic restrictions were lifted (post-CoV). Patients were grouped according to hospital type (AMC vs. non-AMC). Our primary outcome was the incidence of post-operative HAIs. Results: There were 1,003 patients; 69.5% (n = 697) were treated at AMCs and 30.5% (n = 306) at non-AMCs. Patients at AMCs had greater rates of concomitant COVID-19 infections (5.5% vs. 0.7%; p < 0.0001) and worse operative appendicitis severity (p = 0.01). Greater rates of HAIs were seen at AMCs compared with non-AMCs (4.9% vs. 2%; p = 0.03). Surgical site infections were the most common HAI and occurred more often at AMCs (4.3% vs. 1.6%; p = 0.04). Only during CoV were there more HAIs at AMCs (5.1% vs. 0.3%; p = 0.02). Undergoing surgery at an AMC during CoV was a risk factor for HAIs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 8.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-71.03; p = 0.04). Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, appendectomies performed at AMCs were an independent risk factor for post-operative HAIs. Our findings stress the importance of adherence to standard infection prevention efforts during future healthcare crises.

Outcomes of Patients with Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections: A Propensity-Matched Analysis Using the National Inpatient Sample.

Background: Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are severe, rapidly spreading infections with high morbidity and mortality. Attempts to identify risk factors for mortality and morbidity have produced variable results. We hope to determine which factors across the NSTI population impact mortality, morbidities, and discharge disposition. Patients and Methods: Retrospective data from the National Inpatient Sample from 2012-2018 of patients with primary diagnosis of NSTI (gas gangrene, necrotizing faciitis, cutaneous gangrene, or Fournier gangrene) were identified for analysis. A 1:4 greedy match was performed and risk factors for in-hospital mortality and discharge disposition were examined. Continuous variables were assessed using t-tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Categorical variables were assessed using χ2 and Fisher exact tests. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Results: A total of 6,608 patients were identified. Weighted, this represents 33,040 patients; 32,390 are in the no-mortality cohort and 650 in the mortality cohort. Advanced age group was a risk factor for both in-hospital mortality and morbidity, but not for discharge to a skilled nursing or rehabilitation facility. Having two or more comorbidities was a risk factor for mortality, morbidity, and discharge to skilled nursing or rehabilitation facility. Cancer, liver disease, and kidney disease were predictors of in-hospital mortality. Diabetes mellitus and kidney disease were predictors of experiencing an in-hospital complication. Diabetes mellitus, heart disease, and kidney disease were predictors for discharge to skilled nursing or rehabilitation facility. Conclusions: Necrotizing soft tissue infections are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Identifying patients at higher risk for mortality, morbidity, and higher level of care at discharge can help providers properly allocate resources to improve patient outcomes and reduce the financial burden on patients and healthcare facilities. Special attention should be paid to those with existing or acute kidney dysfunction because this was the only comorbidity associated with increased risk mortality, morbidity, and discharge to higher level of care.

Appendicitis Grade, Operative Duration, and Hospital Cost.

BACKGROUND: The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) established a grading system for appendicitis to allow prediction of risk and outcomes, to assist in quality improvement and resource management, and to provide a framework for research. Grading is determined in clinical, imaging, operative, and pathologic categories, but has not been completely validated. Our aim was to validate appendicitis grade with respect to duration of symptoms, operative duration, and hospital costs. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective medical record review, working backward until at least 40 of each grade of appendicitis were reviewed. Patients 8 years old and younger and those treated nonoperatively were excluded. Appendicitis severity was determined using the AAST grading scale (I to V), with V being the most severe. Statistical comparisons were made between increased grade and duration of symptoms, operative duration, hospital costs, and revenue. Data were analyzed using ANOVA or chi-square tests as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 1,099 appendectomies performed between August 2013 and December 2016 were analyzed. Most were low grade. Median age was 18 years old, and 44.4% were female. Patients with increasing AAST grade had a longer symptom duration (p < 0.001), longer operative duration (p < 0.001), increased direct costs (p < 0.001) in every category measured (operating room, pharmacy, imaging, lab), and contribution margin (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The AAST appendicitis grade is a valid predictor of disease severity as defined by operative duration, hospital cost, and revenue. Duration of symptoms predicts severity. Appendicitis grade can be used in clinical care, residency training, and resource allocation.

Time is money: quantifying savings in outpatient appendectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy can be performed on a fast-track, short-stay, or outpatient basis with high success rates, low morbidity, low readmission rates, and shorter length of hospital stay. Cost savings from outpatient appendectomy have not been well described. We hypothesize that outpatient laparoscopic appendectomy is associated with cost savings. METHODS: We performed an original retrospective cohort analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy between June 2013 and April 2017 at our academic medical center before and after implementation of an outpatient protocol which began on January 1, 2016. We assessed appendicitis grade, length of stay (LOS), cost, net revenue, and profit margin. RESULTS: After protocol implementation, the percentage of patients discharged from the the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) increased from 3.7% to 29.7% (χ2 p<0.001). The proportion of inpatient admissions and admissions to observation decreased by 5.7% and 20.3%, respectively. On average, PACU-to-home patients had a total hospital cost of $4734 compared with $5781 in patients admitted to observation, for an estimated savings of $1047 per patient (p<0.001). Comparing the time periods, the mean LOS decreased for all groups (p<0.001). Appendicitis grade was higher in those who required inpatient admission, but could not distinguish which patients required an observation bed. DISCUSSION: Outpatient appendectomy saves approximately $1000 per patient. Adoption of an outpatient appendectomy pathway is likely to be gradual, but will result in incremental improvement in resource utilization immediately. Grade does not predict which patients should be observed. Considering established safety, our data support widespread implementation of this protocol. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.