Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 57
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Med Res ; 29(1): 133, 2024 Feb 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38368424

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies in many populations have reported associations between circulating cytokine levels and various physiological or pathological conditions. However, the reliability of cytokine measurements in population studies, which measure cytokines in multiple assays over a prolonged period, has not been adequately examined; nor has stability during sample storage or intra-individual variation been assessed. METHODS: We assessed (1) analytical reliability in short- and long-term repeated measurements; (2) stability and analytical reliability during long-term sample storage, and (3) variability within individuals over seasons, of four cytokines-osteopontin (OPN), osteoprotegerin (OPG), vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), and interleukin-17A (IL-17A). Measurements in plasma or serum samples were made with commercial kits according to standard procedures. Estimation was performed by fitting a random or mixed effects linear model on the log scale. RESULTS: In repeated assays over a short period, OPN, OPG, and VEGF-A had acceptable reliability, with intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CV) less than 0.11. Reliability of IL-17A was poor, with inter- and intra-assay CV 0.85 and 0.43, respectively. During long-term storage, OPG significantly decayed (- 33% per year; 95% confidence interval [- 54, - 3.7]), but not OPN or VEGF-A (- 0.3% or - 6.3% per year, respectively). Intra- and inter-assay CV over a long period were comparable to that in a short period except for a slight increase in inter-assay CV of VEGF-A. Within-individual variation was small for OPN and VEGF-A, with intra-class correlations (ICC) 0.68 and 0.83, respectively, but large for OPG (ICC 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that OPN and VEGF-A can be reliably measured in a large population, that IL-17A is suitable only for small experiments, and that OPG should be assessed with caution due to degradation during storage and intra-individual variation. The overall results of our study illustrate the need for validation under relevant conditions when measuring circulating cytokines in population studies.


Assuntos
Osteopontina , Osteoprotegerina , Humanos , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular , Biomarcadores , Interleucina-17 , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Citocinas
2.
Int J Radiat Biol ; 99(12): 1853-1864, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37549410

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Development of an integrated time and dose model to explore the dynamics of gene expression alterations and identify biomarkers for biodosimetry following low- and high-dose irradiations at high dose rate. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We utilized multiple transcriptome datasets (GSE8917, GSE43151, and GSE23515) from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) for identifying candidate biological dosimeters. A linear mixed-effects model with random intercept was used to explore the dose-time dynamics of transcriptional responses and to functionally characterize the time- and dose-dependent changes in gene expression. RESULTS: We identified genes that are correlated with dose and time and discovered two clusters of genes that are either positively or negatively correlated with both dose and time based on the parameters of the model. Genes in these two clusters may have persistent transcriptional alterations. Twelve potential transcriptional markers for dosimetry-ARHGEF3, BAX, BBC3, CCDC109B, DCP1B, DDB2, F11R, GADD45A, GSS, PLK3, TNFRSF10B, and XPC were identified. Of these genes, BAX, GSS, and TNFRSF10B are positively associated with both dose and time course, have a persistent transcriptional response, and might be better biological dosimeters. CONCLUSIONS: With the proposed approach, we may identify candidate biomarkers that change monotonically in relation to dose, have a persistent transcriptional response, and are reliable over a wide dose range.


Assuntos
Regulação da Expressão Gênica , Radiação Ionizante , Proteína X Associada a bcl-2 , Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação , Biomarcadores
3.
J Radiat Res ; 64(1): 99-104, 2023 Jan 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36420765

RESUMO

Although mammalian fetuses have been suggested to be sensitive to radiation, an increased frequency of translocations was not observed in blood lymphocytes from atomic bomb (A-bomb) survivors who were exposed to the bomb in utero and examined as adults. Since experiments using hematopoietic cells of mice and rats confirmed this finding, it was hypothesized that either irradiated fetal hematopoietic stem cells (f-HSCs) cannot generate exchange-type chromosomal aberrations or cells bearing induced aberrations are eliminated before the animals reach adulthood. In the present study, pregnant mice (12.5-15.5 days post coitum [dpc]) were irradiated with 2 Gy of X-rays and long-term HSCs (LT-HSCs) were isolated 24 h later. Multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (mFISH) analysis of LT-HSC clones proliferated in vitro showed that nine out of 43 (21%) clones from fetuses and 21 out of 41 (51%) clones from mothers bore translocations. These results indicate that cells with translocations can arise in mouse f-HSCs but exist at a lower frequency than in the mothers 24 h after X-ray exposure. Thus, it seems likely that translocation-bearing f-HSCs are generated but subsequently disappear, so that the frequency of lymphocyte translocations may decrease and reach the control level by the time the animals reach adulthood.


Assuntos
Aberrações Cromossômicas , Translocação Genética , Gravidez , Feminino , Ratos , Animais , Hibridização in Situ Fluorescente , Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Feto/efeitos da radiação , Mamíferos
4.
Int J Radiat Biol ; : 1-11, 2022 May 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35394411

RESUMO

One of the principal uncertainties when estimating population risk of late effects from epidemiological data is that few radiation-exposed cohorts have been followed up to extinction. Therefore, the relative risk model has often been used to estimate radiation-associated risk and to extrapolate risk to the end of life. Epidemiological studies provide evidence that children are generally at higher risk of cancer induction than adults for a given radiation dose. However, the strength of evidence varies by cancer site and questions remain about site-specific age at exposure patterns. For solid cancers, there is a large body of evidence that excess relative risk (ERR) diminishes with increasing age at exposure. This pattern of risk is observed in the Life Span Study (LSS) as well as in other radiation-exposed populations for overall solid cancer incidence and mortality and for most site-specific solid cancers. However, there are some disparities by endpoint in the degree of variation of ERR with exposure age, with some sites (e.g., colon, lung) in the LSS incidence data showing no variation, or even increasing ERR with increasing age at exposure. The pattern of variation of excess absolute risk (EAR) with age at exposure is often similar, with EAR for solid cancers or solid cancer mortality decreasing with increasing age at exposure in the LSS. We shall review the human data from the Japanese LSS cohort, and a variety of other epidemiological data sets, including a review of types of medical diagnostic exposures, also some radiobiological animal data, all bearing on the issue of variations of radiation late-effects risk with age at exposure and with attained age. The paper includes a summary of several oral presentations given in a Symposium on "Age effects on radiation response" as part of the 67th Annual Meeting of the Radiation Research Society, held virtually on 3-6 October 2021.

5.
Radiat Environ Biophys ; 61(1): 59-72, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35175360

RESUMO

A previous study of peripheral blood lymphocyte translocations around age 40 among atomic-bomb survivors exposed in utero revealed no overall association with radiation dose-despite a clear association between translocations and dose among their mothers-but the data suggested an increase at doses below 100 mGy with a definite peak. That analysis of the in utero-exposed survivors did not adjust for their subsequent smoking behavior, an established cause of chromosomal aberrations, or their subsequent exposures to medical irradiation, a potential mediator. In addition, atomic-bomb survivor radiation dose estimates have subsequently been updated and refined. We therefore re-estimated the dose response using the latest DS02R1 dose estimates and adjusting for smoking as well as for city and proximal-distal location at the time of exposure to the atomic bomb. Sex of the survivor, mother's age around the time of conception, and approximate trimester of gestation at the time of exposure were also considered as explanatory variables and modifiers. Precision of the estimated dose response was slightly lower due to greater variability near zero in the updated dose estimates, but there was little change in evidence of a low-dose increase and still no suggestion of an overall increase across the entire dose range. Adjustment for smoking behavior led to a decline in background number of translocations (the dose-response intercept), but smoking did not interact with dose overall (across the entire dose range). Adjustment for medical irradiation did not alter the association between dose and translocation frequency. Sex, mother's age, and trimester were not associated with number of translocations, nor did they interact with dose overall. Interactions with dose in the low-dose range could not be evaluated because of numerical instability.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação , Guerra Nuclear , Adulto , Aberrações Cromossômicas , Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação , Humanos , Japão , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/etiologia , Doses de Radiação , Fumar , Sobreviventes
6.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 36(4): 401-414, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33742296

RESUMO

Past reports indicated that total-body irradiation at low to moderate doses could be responsible for cardiovascular disease risks, but the mechanism remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between radiation exposure and atherosclerosis, an underlying pathology of cardiovascular diseases, in the Japanese atomic bomb survivors. We performed a cross-sectional study measuring 14 clinical-physiological atherosclerosis indicators during clinical exams from 2010 to 2014 in 3274 participants of the Adult Health Study cohort. Multivariable analyses were performed by using a structural equation model with latent factors representing underlying atherosclerotic pathologies: (1) arterial stiffness, (2) calcification, and (3) plaque as measured with indicators chosen a priori on the basis of clinical-physiological knowledge. Radiation was linearly associated with calcification (standardized coefficient per Gy 0.15, 95 % confidence interval: CI [0.070, 0.23]) and plaque (0.11, 95 % CI [0.029, 0.20]), small associations that were comparable to about 2 years of aging per Gy of radiation exposure, but not with arterial stiffness (0.036, 95 % CI [- 0.025, 0.095]). The model fitted better and had narrower confidence intervals than separate ordinary regression models explaining individual indicators independently. The associations were less evident when the dose range was restricted to a maximum of 2 or 1 Gy. By combining individual clinical-physiological indicators that are correlated because of common, underlying atherosclerotic pathologies, we found a small, but significant association of radiation with atherosclerosis.


Assuntos
Aterosclerose/etiologia , Sobreviventes de Bombas Atômicas , Efeitos da Radiação , Exposição à Radiação/efeitos adversos , Lesões por Radiação/complicações , Adulto , Idoso , Índice Tornozelo-Braço , Espessura Intima-Media Carotídea , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Japão , Análise de Classes Latentes , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Armas Nucleares , Análise de Onda de Pulso
7.
Radiat Res ; 195(1): 60-65, 2021 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33181839

RESUMO

There is limited evidence concerning the association between radiation exposure and ovarian cancer. We evaluated radiation risk of ovarian cancer between 1958 and 2009 among 62,534 female atomic bomb survivors in the Life Span Study cohort, adding 11 years of follow-up from the previously reported study. Poisson regression methods were used to estimate excess relative risk per Gy (ERR/Gy) for total ovarian cancer and according to tumor type. We assessed the modifying effect of follow-up period and other factors on the radiation risk. We ascertained 288 first primary ovarian cancers including 77 type 1 epithelial cancers, 75 type 2 epithelial cancers, 66 epithelial cancers of undetermined type and 70 other cancers. Radiation dose was positively, although not significantly, associated with risk of total ovarian cancer [ERR/Gy = 0.30, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.22 to 1.11]. There was a suggestion of heterogeneity in radiation effects (P = 0.08) for type 1 (ERR/Gy = -0.32, 95% CI: <-0.32 to 0.88) and type 2 cancers (ERR/Gy = 1.24, 95% CI: -0.08 to 4.16). There were no significant trends in the ERR with time since exposure or age at exposure. Further follow-up will help characterize more accurately the patterns of radiation risk for total ovarian cancer and its types.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/epidemiologia , Exposição à Radiação/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Sobreviventes de Bombas Atômicas , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Japão/epidemiologia , Longevidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/patologia , Armas Nucleares , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
9.
Biom J ; 62(8): 1939-1959, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32608110

RESUMO

The paper proposes an approach to causal mediation analysis in nested case-control study designs, often incorporated with countermatching schemes using conditional likelihood, and we compare the method's performance to that of mediation analysis using the Cox model for the full cohort with a continuous or dichotomous mediator. Simulation studies are conducted to assess our proposed method and investigate the efficiency relative to the cohort. We illustrate the method using actual data from two studies of potential mediation of radiation risk conducted within the Adult Health Study cohort of atomic-bomb survivors. The performance becomes comparable to that based on the full cohort, illustrating the potential for valid mediation analysis based on the reduced data obtained through the nested case-control design.

10.
Int J Cancer ; 147(5): 1294-1299, 2020 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31985032

RESUMO

Primary liver cancer is difficult to diagnose accurately at death, due to metastases from nearby organs and to concomitant diseases, such as chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis. Trends in diagnostic accuracy could affect radiation risk estimates for incident liver cancer by altering background rates or by impacting risk modification by sex and age. We quantified the potential impact of death-certificate inaccuracies on radiation risk estimates for liver cancer in the Life Span Study of atomic bomb survivors. True-positive and false-negative rates were obtained from a previous study that compared death-certificate causes of death with those based on pathological review, from 1958 to 1987. We assumed various scenarios for misclassification rates after 1987. We obtained estimated true positives and estimated false negatives by stratified sampling from binomial distributions with probabilities given by the true-positive and false-negative rates, respectively. Poisson regression methods were applied to highly stratified person-year tables of corrected case counts and accrued person years. During the study period (1958-2009), there were 1,885 cases of liver cancer, which included 383 death-certificate-only (DCO) cases; 1,283 cases with chronic liver disease as the underlying cause of death; and 150 DCO cases of pancreatic cancer among 105,444 study participants. Across the range of scenarios considered, radiation risk estimates based on corrected case counts were attenuated, on average, by 13-30%. Our results indicated that radiation risk estimates for liver cancer were potentially sensitive to death-certificate inaccuracies. Additional data are needed to inform misclassification rates in recent years.


Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Bombas Atômicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/mortalidade , Causas de Morte , Humanos , Incidência , Japão/epidemiologia , Expectativa de Vida , Hepatopatias/diagnóstico , Hepatopatias/mortalidade , Hepatopatias/patologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/patologia
11.
Radiat Res ; 192(4): 388-398, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31355713

RESUMO

A recent analysis of solid cancer incidence in the Life Span Study of atomic bomb survivors (Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan) found evidence of a nonlinear, upwardly curving radiation dose response among males but not among females. Further analysis of this new and unexpected finding was necessary. We used two approaches to investigate this finding. In one approach, we excluded individual cancer sites or groups of sites from all solid cancers. In the other approach, we used joint analysis to allow for heterogeneity in background-rate parameters across groups of cancers with dissimilar trends in background rates. Exclusion of a few sites led to the disappearance of curvature among males in the remaining collection of solid cancers; some of these influential sites have unique features in their background age-specific incidence that are not captured by a background-rate model fit to all solid cancers combined. Exclusion of a few sites also led to an appearance of curvature among females. Misspecification of background rates can cause bias in inference about the shape of the dose response, so heterogeneity of background rates might explain at least part of the all solid cancer dose-response difference in curvature between males and females. We conclude that analysis based on all solid cancers as a single outcome is not the optimal method to assess radiation risk for solid cancer in the Life Span Study; joint analysis with suitable choices of cancer groups might be preferable by allowing for background-rate heterogeneity across sites while providing greater power to assess radiation risk than analyses of individual sites.


Assuntos
Radiação de Fundo/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/etiologia , Armas Nucleares , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Estatísticos , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/epidemiologia , Medição de Risco , Sobreviventes
12.
JAMA Netw Open ; 2(3): e190731, 2019 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30874785

RESUMO

Importance: Weight cycling is associated with the risk of mortality from heart disease, but many studies have not distinguished between simple nonlinear (monotone) weight changes and more complex changes that reflect fluctuations. Objective: To assess whether extreme body weight variation is associated with mortality after controlling for nonlinear weight changes. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prospective clinical cohort study, 4796 Japanese atomic bomb survivors were examined in the clinic as part of a biennial health examination and research program. The study consisted of a 20-year longitudinal baseline period (July 1, 1958, to June 30, 1978) and subsequent mortality follow-up of 27 years (July 1, 1978, to June 30, 2005) Participants were initially between the ages of 20 and 49 years during the baseline period and, throughout the baseline period, had no diagnoses of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or cancer and attended at least 7 of 10 scheduled examinations. Data analysis was performed from October 16, 2015, to May 13, 2016. Exposures: Residual variability in body mass index (BMI) during the baseline period. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes were mortality from ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, other CVDs combined, other causes (except cancer), and cancer. Root mean squared error was calculated to capture individual residual variation in BMI after adjustment for baseline BMI trends, and the association of magnitude of residual variation with mortality was calculated as relative risk. Results: In total, 4796 persons (mean [SD] age, 35.0 [7.3] years at first baseline examination; 3252 [67.8%] female; mean [SD] BMI, 21.2 [2.8] at first baseline visit [20.6 (2.4) among men and 21.5 (2.9) among women]) participated in the study. During follow-up, 1550 participants died: 82 (5.3% of all deaths) of ischemic heart disease, 181 (11.7%) of cerebrovascular disease, 186 (12.0%) of other CVDs, 615 (39.7%) of cancer, and 486 (31.3%) of other causes. Magnitude of residual variation in weight was associated with all-cause mortality (relative risk, 1.25 for 1 U of additional variation; 95% CI, 1.06-1.47) and ischemic heart disease mortality (relative risk, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.41-4.38). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that an association exists between weight variation and heart disease mortality and that weight loss interventions, if deemed to be necessary, should be considered carefully.


Assuntos
Peso Corporal/fisiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Doenças Cardiovasculares/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Japão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Neoplasias/fisiopatologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
13.
J Epidemiol ; 29(3): 116-122, 2019 Mar 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30101814

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The effects, in terms of bias and precision, of omitting non-confounding predictive covariates from generalized linear models have been well studied, and it is known that such omission results in attenuation bias but increased precision with logistic regression. However, many epidemiologic risk analyses utilize alternative models that are not based on a linear predictor, and the effect of omitting non-confounding predictive covariates from such models has not been characterized. METHODS: We employed simulation to study the effects on risk estimation of omitting non-confounding predictive covariates from an excess relative risk (ERR) model and a general additive-multiplicative relative-risk mixture model for binary outcome data in a case-control setting. We also compared the results to the effects with ordinary logistic regression. RESULTS: For these commonly employed alternative relative-risk models, the bias was similar to that with logistic regression when the risk was small. More generally, the bias and standard error of the risk-parameter estimates demonstrated patterns that are similar to those with logistic regression, but with greater magnitude depending on the true value of the risk. The magnitude of bias and standard error had little relation to study size or underlying disease prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: Prior conclusions regarding omitted covariates in logistic regression models can be qualitatively applied to the ERR and the general additive-multiplicative relative-risk mixture model without substantial change. Quantitatively, however, these alternative models may have slightly greater omitted-covariate bias, depending on the magnitude of the true risk being estimated.


Assuntos
Viés , Modelos Estatísticos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Simulação por Computador , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Modelos Logísticos , Prevalência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Risco
14.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 7(23): e008921, 2018 12 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30486720

RESUMO

Background Past reports suggested that total-body irradiation at 0.5 to 1.0 Gy could be responsible for atherosclerosis. Peripheral artery disease ( PAD ) is a manifestation of systematic atherosclerosis. Whether the consequences of a low-to-moderate dose of radiation include increased risk of PAD remains to be determined. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between radiation exposure and prevalence of PAD among Japanese atomic bomb survivors. Methods and Results Radiation exposure from the atomic bombing was assessed in 3476 participants (41.1% men, mean age 74.8 years with SD 6.4 years) with a cross-sectional survey in 2010 to 2014. Left- and right-side ankle-brachial indexes and upstroke time ( UT ) were obtained using oscillometric VP -2000. PAD was defined as an ankle-brachial index of 1.0 or less or a prior history related to revascularization. UT was considered a sensitive marker of early-stage PAD . Association between radiation exposure and PAD or UT was assessed using multivariable regression analyses with adjustment for potential confounding factors. Of 3476 participants, 79 (2.3%) were identified as having prevalent PAD . Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that radiation dose was unrelated to PAD prevalence (odds ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [0.57-1.21]). UT appeared to increase with radiation dose, but the increase was not statistically significant (1.09 ms/Gy; 95% confidence interval [-0.17 to 2.36]). Conclusions We found no clear association of radiation dose with PAD , but it remains to be determined whether UT is associated with radiation dose.


Assuntos
Armas Nucleares , Doença Arterial Periférica/etiologia , Exposição à Radiação/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Índice Tornozelo-Braço , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/epidemiologia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Japão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Doença Arterial Periférica/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Sobreviventes/estatística & dados numéricos
15.
BMC Genomics ; 19(1): 524, 2018 Jul 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29986644

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Common variants have explained less than the amount of heritability expected for complex diseases, which has led to interest in less-common variants and more powerful approaches to the analysis of whole-genome scans. Because of low frequency (low statistical power), less-common variants are best analyzed using SNP-set methods such as gene-set or pathway-based analyses. However, there is as yet no clear consensus regarding how to focus in on potential risk variants following set-based analyses. We used a stepwise, telescoping approach to analyze common- and rare-variant data from the Illumina Metabochip array to assess genomic association with colorectal cancer (CRC) in the Japanese sub-population of the Multiethnic Cohort (676 cases, 7180 controls). We started with pathway analysis of SNPs that are in genes and pathways having known mechanistic roles in colorectal cancer, then focused on genes within the pathways that evidenced association with CRC, and finally assessed individual SNPs within the genes that evidenced association. Pathway SNPs downloaded from the dbSNP database were cross-matched with Metabochip SNPs and analyzed using the logistic kernel machine regression approach (logistic SNP-set kernel-machine association test, or sequence kernel association test; SKAT) and related methods. RESULTS: The TGF-ß and WNT pathways were associated with all CRC, and the WNT pathway was associated with colon cancer. Individual genes demonstrating the strongest associations were TGFBR2 in the TGF-ß pathway and SMAD7 (which is involved in both the TGF-ß and WNT pathways). As partial validation of our approach, a known CRC risk variant in SMAD7 (in both the TGF-ß and WNT pathways: rs11874392) was associated with CRC risk in our data. We also detected two novel candidate CRC risk variants (rs13075948 and rs17025857) in TGFBR2, a gene known to be associated with CRC risk. CONCLUSIONS: A stepwise, telescoping approach identified some potentially novel risk variants associated with colorectal cancer, so it may be a useful method for following up on results of set-based SNP analyses. Further work is required to assess the statistical characteristics of the approach, and additional applications should aid in better clarifying its utility.


Assuntos
Asiático/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Estudos de Coortes , Neoplasias Colorretais/etnologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla , Genótipo , Humanos , Japão , Receptor do Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta Tipo II/genética , Receptor do Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta Tipo II/metabolismo , Risco , Transdução de Sinais/genética , Proteína Smad7/genética , Proteína Smad7/metabolismo , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta/genética , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta/metabolismo
16.
Am J Epidemiol ; 187(8): 1623-1629, 2018 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29617935

RESUMO

In the Life Span Study cohort of atomic bomb survivors, differences in urbanicity between high-dose and low-dose survivors could confound the association between radiation dose and adverse outcomes. We obtained data on the population distribution in Hiroshima and Nagasaki before the 1945 bombings and quantified the impact of adjustment for population density on radiation risk estimates for mortality (1950-2003) and incident solid cancer (1958-2009). Population density ranged from 4,671 to 14,378 people/km2 in the urban region of Hiroshima and 5,748 to 19,149 people/km2 in the urban region of Nagasaki. Radiation risk estimates for solid cancer mortality were attenuated by 5.1% after adjustment for population density, but those for all-cause mortality and incident solid cancer were unchanged. There was no overall association between population density and adverse outcomes, but there was evidence that the association between density and mortality differed according to age at exposure. Among survivors who were 10-14 years of age in 1945, there was a positive association between population density and risk of all-cause mortality (per 5,000-people/km2 increase, relative risk = 1.053, 95% confidence interval: 1.027, 1.079) and solid cancer mortality (per 5,000-people/km2 increase, relative risk = 1.069, 95% confidence interval: 1.025, 1.115). Our results suggest that radiation risk estimates from the Life Span Study are not sensitive to unmeasured confounding by urban-rural differences.


Assuntos
Mortalidade , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/epidemiologia , Densidade Demográfica , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Japão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/etiologia , Medição de Risco , Adulto Jovem
17.
Int J Radiat Biol ; 94(2): 97-105, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29307255

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Ionizing radiation and high levels of circulating estradiol are known breast cancer carcinogens. We investigated the risk of first primary postmenopausal breast cancer in relation to the combined effects of whole-body ionizing radiation exposure and prediagnostic levels of postmenopausal sex hormones, particularly bioavailable estradiol (bE2). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A nested case-control study of 57 incident breast cancer cases matched with 110 controls among atomic bomb survivors. Joint effects of breast radiation dose and circulating levels of sex hormones were assessed using binary regression and path analysis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Radiation exposure, higher levels of bE2, testosterone and progesterone, and established reproductive risk factors were positively associated with postmenopausal breast cancer risk. A test for mediation of the effect of radiation via bE2 level suggested a small (14%) but significant mediation (p = 0.004). The estimated interaction between radiation and bE2 was large but not significant (interaction = 3.86; p = 0.32). There is accumulating evidence that ionizing radiation not only damages DNA but also alters other organ systems. While caution is needed, some portion of the radiation risk of postmenopausal breast cancer appeared to be mediated through bE2 levels, which may be evidence for cancer risks due to both direct and indirect effects of radiation.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/sangue , Neoplasias da Mama/etiologia , Estradiol/sangue , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/sangue , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Disponibilidade Biológica , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Dano ao DNA , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pós-Menopausa , Progesterona/sangue , Radiação Ionizante , Radiometria , Fatores de Risco , Testosterona/sangue
18.
JNCI Cancer Spectr ; 2(4): pky081, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31249993

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ionizing radiation is known to be capable of causing cancer of many organs, but its relationship with uterine cancer has not been well characterized. METHODS: We studied incidence of uterine cancer during 1958-2009 among 62 534 female atomic bomb survivors. Using Poisson regression analysis, we fitted excess relative risk (ERR) models to uterine cancer rates adjusted for several lifestyle and reproductive factors. Person-years at risk were also adjusted for the probability of prior hysterectomy, because it could affect the subsequent risk of uterine cancer. We assessed the modifying effect of age and other factors on the radiation risk. For analysis of the modifying effect of age at radiation exposure around menarche, we compared the radiation risk for several exposure-age categories as well as using parametric models. RESULTS: There were 224 uterine corpus cancers and 982 cervical cancers. We found a significant association between radiation dose and risk of corpus cancer (ERR per Gray [ERR/Gy] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.03 to 1.87) but not for cervical cancer (ERR/Gy = 0.00, 95% CI = -0.22 to 0.31). For corpus cancer, we found statistically significant heterogeneity in ERR/Gy by age (P heterogeneity = .001) with elevated risk for women exposed to radiation between ages 11 and 15 years (ERR/Gy = 4.10, 95% CI = 1.47 to 8.42) and no indication of a radiation effect for exposures before or after this exposure-age range. CONCLUSIONS: The current data suggest that uterine corpus is especially sensitive to the carcinogenic effect of radiation exposure occurring during the mid-pubertal period preceding menarche. There is little evidence for a radiation effect on cervical cancer risk.

19.
Radiat Environ Biophys ; 57(1): 83-88, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29164324

RESUMO

It was recently suggested that earlier reports on solid-cancer mortality and incidence in the Life Span Study of atomic-bomb survivors contain still-useful information about low-dose risk that should not be ignored, because longer follow-up may lead to attenuated estimates of low-dose risk due to longer time since exposure. Here it is demonstrated, through the use of all follow-up data and risk models stratified on period of follow-up (as opposed to sub-setting the data by follow-up period), that the appearance of risk attenuation over time may be the result of less-precise risk estimation-in particular, imprecise estimation of effect-modification parameters-in the earlier periods. Longer follow-up, in addition to allowing more-precise estimation of risk due to larger numbers of radiation-related cases, provides more-precise adjustment for background mortality or incidence and more-accurate assessment of risk modification by age at exposure and attained age. It is concluded that the latest follow-up data are most appropriate for inferring low-dose risk. Furthermore, if researchers are interested in effects of time since exposure, the most-recent follow-up data should be considered rather than the results of earlier reports.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/epidemiologia , Armas Nucleares , Sobreviventes/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/mortalidade , Adulto Jovem
20.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 32(12): 1055-1063, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29204903

RESUMO

In cohort studies, unbiased estimation of exposure-outcome associations requires selection of an appropriate reference group of unexposed individuals. We illustrate strategies for analyzing cohort data with multiple potential reference groups. We analyzed the association between radiation exposure and incidence of first primary solid cancer among 105,444 participants of the Life Span Study (Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan, 1958-2009). Potential reference groups included zero-dose survivors at different ground distances from the hypocenter (internal) and city residents who were not in either city at the time of the bombings (external). DS02R1 weighted absorbed colon doses were estimated by the DS02 dosimetry system. Piecewise constant hazard models estimated excess relative risks of first primary solid cancer. We focused on sex-averaged excess relative risks and the shape of the dose-response curve. A model with internal standardization provided a sex-averaged excess relative risk of 0.510, 95% confidence interval: (0.414, 0.612) per gray of weighted absorbed colon dose, as well as strong evidence of a curvilinear dose response among males (P = 0.008). Selection of not-in-city residents as the reference group resulted in a larger excess relative risk of 0.560, 95% confidence interval: (0.467, 0.657) per gray, and reduced evidence of a curvilinear dose response among males (P = 0.042). These differences were particularly apparent at weighted absorbed colon doses < 1 gray. In cohort studies, selection of an appropriate reference group requires understanding of the nature of unmeasured confounding to which the results could be sensitive.


Assuntos
Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/epidemiologia , Armas Nucleares/estatística & dados numéricos , Exposição à Radiação/efeitos adversos , Lesões por Radiação , Sobreviventes/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Japão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Exposição à Radiação/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Distribuição por Sexo , Análise de Sobrevida , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA