Thrombophilic factors in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTE-PH) is an infrequent cause of pulmonary hypertension that develops in 0.1-0.2% of patients who survive after an acute venous thromboembolic event. According to the largest series so far reported, 15-30% of patients with diagnosis of CTE-PH have an underlying congenital or acquired hypercoagulable state. To determine the prevalence of thrombophilic factors in our population, we analyzed 24 patients admitted to our institution between November 1992 and March 2000 fulfilling criteria for CTE-PH. Eighteen patients disclosed abnormal results in the screening for thrombophilia. The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (lupus anticoagulant and/or anticardiolipin antibodies) was the abnormality most frequently found (12 out of 24 patients). We found hyperhomocysteinaemia in 7/14, true protein S deficiency in 1/10, protein C deficiency in 1/13, activated protein C resistance in 1/22, antithrombin III deficiency in 1/24, and prothrombin gene G20210A mutation in 1/18 patients. Factor V Leiden was normal in all 18 patients studied. Five patients (20.8%) disclosed more than one thrombophilic abnormality. In conclusion, contrary to the largest series of patients with CTE-PH so far reported, we found that 75% of patients with CTE-PH presented at least one thrombophilic risk factor, being antiphospholipid antibodies in 50% of the cases. We recommend a thorough screening for thrombophilia in all patients with diagnosis of CTE-PH.

Lupus anticoagulant, high levels of anticardiolipin, and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies are associated with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of lupus anticoagulant (LAC) and anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), and that of anti-beta2- glycoprotein I (anti-beta2-GPI) and prothrombin antibodies in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). METHODS: Fifty-four consecutive patients with PH were studied: 23 with primary, 20 secondary, and 11 chronic thromboembolic PH. LAC was diagnosed by screening and confirmatory coagulation tests, while aCL, anti-beta2-GPI, and prothrombin antibodies were measured by ELISA. RESULTS: Prevalence of aPL was higher in patients with chronic thromboembolic PH compared to the other 2 groups. The prevalence in chronic thromboembolic PH vs primary and secondary PH was: LAC 63.6 vs 13.0 and 10.0%, p < 0.001; aCL-IgG 54.5 vs 17.4 and 15.0%, p < 0.02; anti-beta2-GPI-IgG 36.4 vs 0 and 0%, p < 0.001; and prothrombin antibodies-IgG 36.4 vs 8.7 and 5.0%, p < 0.05. No differences between groups were found for any antibody of IgM isotype. Antibodies detected in patients with primary and secondary PH were of low titer, so considering only moderate or high titers these differences were greater for aCL-IgG (odds ratio, OR 24.6, confidence interval, CI 3.0-282, p = 0.0004) and IgM (OR 35.0, CI 2.9-1692, p = 0.0007) and remained significant for anti-beta2-GPI-IgG (OR = undefined, p = 0.006). Multivariate analysis showed that only LAC and aCL-IgG at moderate or high levels were independent variables associated with chronic thromboembolic PH. CONCLUSION: The presence of LAC, moderate or high levels of aCL-IgG, or anti-beta2-GPI-IgG was strongly associated with that of chronic thromboembolic PH. These data are in agreement with the close relationship observed among these 3 variables and thromboembolism in patients with aPL.