An Institutional Analysis of Early Postoperative Free Tissue Transfer Takeback Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative free tissue transfer reexploration procedures are relatively infrequent but associated with increased overall failure rates. This study examines the differences between flaps requiring takeback versus no takeback, as well as trends in reexploration techniques that may increase the odds of successful salvage. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on all free tissue transfers performed at our institution from 2011 to 2022. Patients who underwent flap reexploration within 30 days of the original procedure were compared with a randomly selected control group who underwent free flap procedures without reexploration (1:2 cases to controls). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: From 1,213 free tissue transfers performed in the study period, 187 patients were included in the analysis. Of the total flaps performed, 62 (0.05%) required takeback, and 125 were randomly selected as a control group. Free flap indication, flap type, reconstruction location, and number of venous anastomoses differed significantly between the two groups. Among the reexplored flaps, 8 (4.3% of the total) had a subsequent failure while 54 (87.10%) were salvaged, with significant differences in cause of initial flap failure, affected vessel type, and salvage technique. CONCLUSION: Free tissue transfers least prone to reexploration involved breast reconstruction in patients without predisposition to hypercoagulability or reconstruction history. When takeback operations were required, salvage was more likely in those without microvascular compromise or with an isolated venous injury who required a single exploratory operation.

Impact and Implementation of Plastic Surgery Interest Groups: National Survey of Plastic Surgery Interest Group Leadership.

Background: Plastic surgery interest groups (PSIGs) provide an invaluable opportunity to enhance medical students' exposure to and knowledge of plastic surgery. Despite this, there have been no studies that provide information on the formation of these groups as well as the aspects that make for a productive PSIG. Methods: An anonymous survey was distributed by email via RedCAP to US medical students who hold leadership positions within their medical school's PSIG. Participants were asked baseline medical school information, the structure of their interest group, and perspectives on the most impactful and challenging components of their interest group. Results: Sixteen members (27.6%) of PSIG leadership completed the survey. Eighty percent reported having a membership of greater than 20 students. Fifty percent of the PSIGs were led by advisors who were medical school or hospital-affiliated faculty. Sixty-nine percent of groups were allocated a predetermined amount of money to fund activities and events throughout the academic year. Based on member feedback, groups reported that interactions with plastic surgery faculty, mentorship opportunities, and research opportunities were the most impactful and beneficial components of their PSIG. Forty-four percent reported that the biggest challenge faced by their PSIG was having a small active member group, followed by a lack of funding. Conclusion: Our study provides an in-depth look at the current structure and impact of PSIGs in the United States. It also provides a framework for medical schools that wish to start a PSIG and suggestions for established groups who wish to revitalize their PSIG structure.

Contexte: Les groupes d'intérêt en chirurgie plastique (GICP) offrent la possibilité inestimable d'améliorer l'exposition et les connaissances des étudiants envers la chirurgie plastique. Malgré cela, il n'y a pas eu d'études apportant d'information sur la formation de ces groupes ainsi que sur les éléments qui font qu'un GICP soit productif. Methodes: Une enquête anonyme a été distribuée par courriel via RedCAP aux étudiants en médecine des États-Unis qui ont un rôle de leadership au sein du GICP de leur école de médecine. Les questions posées aux participants incluaient des demandes d'information basique sur l'école de médecine, la structure de leur groupe d'intérêt et des points de vue sur les éléments de leur groupe d'intérêt les plus stimulants et ceux ayant le plus d'impact. Résultats: Seize membres (27.6%) du leadership de GICP ont répondu à l'enquête. Quatre-vingts pour cent ont déclaré avoir plus de 20 étudiants adhérents. Cinquante pour cent des GICP étaient menés par des conseillers qui étaient des enseignants de l'école de médecine ou affiliés à un hôpital. Soixante-neuf pour cent des groupes recevaient des sommes prédéterminées pour financer leurs activités et événements tout au long de l'année universitaire. En fonction du retour d'informations des membres, les groupes ont déclaré que les interactions avec les enseignants en chirurgie plastique, des occasions de mentorat et des possibilités de recherchez étaient les éléments les plus bénéfiques et ayant le plus d'impact de leur CGIP. Quarante-quatre pour cent que le plus grand défi de leur CGIP était d'abord d'avoir un petit groupe de membres actifs, et ensuite de manquer de financement. Conclusion: Notre étude procure un regard approfondi sur la structure actuelle et l'impact des CGIP aux États-Unis. Elle fournit aussi un cadre pour les facultés de médecine qui souhaitent lancer un CGIP et des suggestions pour les groupes établis qui souhaitent revitaliser la structure de leur CGIP.

In the Age of Social Media, How Does the Public Choose a Plastic Surgeon? A Crowdsourcing Analysis of Major Deciding Factors.

BACKGROUND: Patients consider many factors when selecting a plastic surgeon. Previous studies have demonstrated the importance of board certification and reputation in this decision. Despite this, there is a paucity of knowledge on the role that cost of procedure, social media, and surgeon training have on the decision-making process. METHODS: The authors' study used a population-based survey administered by Amazon Mechanical Turk. Adults 18 years and older and residing in the United States were asked to rank the importance of 36 factors from 0 (least important) to 10 (most important) when selecting a plastic surgeon. RESULTS: A total of 369 responses were analyzed. The mean age of respondents was 36.9 years (SD, 10.9 years), and 174 participants (47.2%) were female. Of those surveyed, 216 (55.0%) had previously undergone plastic surgery, and all respondents were considering plastic surgery either at the time of survey or in the future. The most common first step for respondents in identifying a plastic surgeon was a web-based search (32.2%). The top three most important factors in selecting a plastic surgeon were surgeon's experience with the desired procedure (7.48), surgeon's board certification (7.38), and surgeon's years in practice (7.36). The three least important factors were the surgeon's race (5.43), number of social media posts (5.62), and television appearances (5.64). CONCLUSIONS: The authors' survey provides insight into the role that different elements play in the decision of selecting a plastic surgeon in the United States. Understanding how patients select a plastic surgeon can help surgeons optimize these elements in their practices.

Having Social Media among Integrated Plastic Surgery Applicants: Is It Needed to Match?

Background: Little information exists on the perceptions of integrated plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) residency applicants on the need for having social media (SoMe) during the application process. Methods: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted during the 2022 match cycle to assess integrated PRS residency applicants' perceptions on the role of SoMe during the match. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on variables of interest. Qualitative analysis was conducted on free-form responses. Results: Seventy-nine surveys were completed (response rate: 24%). The majority of respondents were educated in the United States (92%). Instagram was the most commonly used SoMe platform (92%). Of those surveyed, 18% thought that SoMe was beneficial to the application process. Twenty-nine percent of respondents agreed that a SoMe presence increases one's chances of matching into PRS residency (41% disagreed and 30% responded neutrally). Forty-four percent endorsed stress about maintaining a SoMe presence in PRS. Having mentors who recommended maintaining a SoMe presence was associated with the belief that SoMe increases one's chances of matching [odds ratio (OR) 8.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-40.4, P = 0.011] and stress about maintaining a SoMe presence (OR 6.3, 95% CI 1.2-33.3, P = 0.030). Applicants who did research years had lower odds of experiencing stress (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04-0.70, P = 0.015). Conclusions: The growing role of SoMe in the residency selection process may be exacerbating applicants' stress and anxiety. PRS programs may consider establishing clear policies for how SoMe will be used in evaluating candidates.

Workplace Bias Affecting Applicants to Independent Plastic Surgery Residencies.

Background: This study explores factors that encourage residents to apply to independent plastic surgery residencies to gain insight into whether they faced bias as a result of this decision. Methods: Resident applicants who applied to two academic independent plastic surgery residencies in 2021 and 2022 were emailed a survey consisting of 25 questions. Responses were collected anonymously and analyzed. Descriptive statistics were performed, and subgroup analyses were conducted with Fisher exact and Pearson χ2 testing. Results: Thirty-nine complete responses were included for analysis (response rate 22.7%). Participants were asked what encouraged them to go into plastic surgery during residency. The most common reasons were scrubbing in on plastic surgery cases and interactions with plastic surgery faculty/residents, with each reason cited by 30 respondents (76.8%). Further, 20.5% of residents agreed or strongly agreed that they felt unsupported by their program director in their decision to apply into plastic surgery. Likewise, 64.1% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed to having experienced demeaning comments or jokes by faculty about their choice of plastic surgery. Consequently, 17.9% agreed or strongly agreed that they developed stress or anxiety due to how co-residents and/or faculty treated them regarding their decision to pursue plastic surgery. Conclusions: General surgery residents planning to apply to independent plastic surgery residency may experience workplace biases related to their career decision. An important opportunity exists to support independent applicants and to provide mentorship.

Republication of "Open Repair of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: Is the Incidence of Clinically Significant Wound Complications Overestimated?"

Background: Conflicting evidence exists regarding the optimal management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Operative repair is thought to afford patients a lower risk of rerupture, albeit at a higher overall risk of wound complications. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 369 consecutive patients undergoing open repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures performed by a single foot and ankle fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeon was undertaken. Healing was classified as no complications, complications without prolonging treatment, complications requiring prolonged local treatment, and complications requiring operative intervention. A statistical analysis comparing the rates of complications in this cohort to that reported in the literature was conducted. Results: There were a total of 33 (8.94%) wound complications. Compared to the rates reported in the literature, no significant difference was detected (P = .3943; CI 6.24-12.33). However, when the complications not requiring additional treatment or prolonged care were excluded, only 9 wound complications (2.44%) were identified-a significantly lower complication rate than that reported in the literature (P < .0001; CI 1.12-4.58). There were only 2 (0.54%) major complications requiring operative intervention, also a significantly lower rate than in the literature (P < .0001; CI 0.067-1.94). Conclusion: In the past, wound-healing complications have been cited as a concern when treating patients operatively. We found that when solely looking at healing complications prolonging the patients' overall recovery, a significantly lower rate of complications existed compared to that reported in the literature. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Acute Diplopia Following Rhinoplasty: Clearing the Air.

Diplopia after rhinoplasty is a rare complication that requires immediate medical attention. Workup should include a complete history and physical examination, appropriate imaging, and consultation with ophthalmology. Diagnosis may be challenging due to the wide differential ranging from dry eyes to orbital emphysema to an acute stroke. Patient evaluation should be expedient, though thorough to facilitate time-sensitive therapeutic interventions. Here, we present a case of transient binocular diplopia presenting 2 days after closed septorhinoplasty. The visual symptoms were attributed to either intra-orbital emphysema or a decompensated exophoria. This is the second documented case of orbital emphysema after rhinoplasty presenting with diplopia. It is the only case with a delayed presentation as well as the only case that resolved after positional maneuvers.

La diplopie après la rhinoplastie est une complication rare qui exige des soins médicaux. Le bilan inclut une histoire complète et un examen physique, une imagerie appropriée et une consultation en ophtalmologie. Le diagnostic peut être difficile à poser en raison du vaste diagnostic différentiel, qui va de la sécheresse oculaire à l'emphysème orbitaire, en passant par l'accident vasculaire cérébral aigu. L'évaluation des patients doit être rapide, mais approfondie, pour favoriser des interventions opportunes. Les auteurs présentent un cas de diplopie binoculaire transitoire s'étant manifestée deux jours après une septorhinoplastie fermée. Les symptômes visuels étaient attribués à un emphysème intraorbitaire ou une exophorie décompensée. Il s'agit du deuxième cas répertorié d'emphysème orbitaire après une rhinoplastie démontrée par une diplopie. C'est le seul cas aux manifestations tardives, de même que le seul à s'être résorbé après des manœuvres positionnelles.

The Upcoming Pass/Fail USMLE Step 1 Score Reporting: An Impact Assessment From Medical School Deans.

Background: The US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 change to pass/fail has been met with mixed reviews, and the impact on medical student education and residency match is unknown. We surveyed medical school student affairs deans regarding their thoughts on the upcoming transition of Step 1 to pass/fail. Methods: A questionnaire was emailed to medical school deans. Deans were asked to rank the importance of the following after the Step 1 reporting change: Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (Step 2 CK), clerkship grades, letters of recommendation, personal statement, medical school reputation, class rank, Medical Student Performance Evaluation, and research. They were asked how the score change will affect curriculum, learning, diversity, and student mental health. Deans were asked to select 5 specialties they thought would be most affected. Results: Regarding perceived importance of residency applications following the scoring change, the most frequent number 1 choice was Step 2 CK. The majority of deans (93.5%, n = 43) felt that the change to pass/fail would benefit medical student education/learning environment; however, most (68.2%, n = 30) did not believe their school curriculum would change. Students applying to dermatology, neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, ENT, and plastic surgery were felt to be most affected by the scoring change; 58.7% (n = 27) felt it would not adequately address future diversity. Conclusion: The majority of deans feel the USMLE Step 1 change to pass/fail would benefit medical student education. Deans feel that students applying to traditionally more competitive specialties (ie, programs with fewer overall residency positions available) will be most affected.

Contexte : Le changement de l'épreuve 1 de l'USMLE pour un résultat de type réussite/échec a été accueilli par des opinions variées et son impact sur la formation des étudiants en médecine et l'adéquation des résidences est inconnu. Nous avons mené une enquête auprès des doyens des affaires étudiantes des facultés de médecine pour connaître leur opinion sur la transition prochaine de l'épreuve 1 à un score réussite/échec. Méthodes : Un questionnaire a été envoyé par courriel aux doyens des facultés de médecine. Il leur a été demandé de classer l'importance des éléments suivants après la modification de déclaration des résultats de l'Épreuve 1: Épreuve 2 CK, notes d'externat, lettres de recommandation, déclaration personnelle, réputation de l'école de médecine, classement, évaluation des performances des étudiants en médecins (MSPE) et recherche. Il leur a été demandé comment le changement de notation allait affecter les programmes, l'apprentissage, la diversité et la santé mentale des étudiants. Les doyens devaient sélectionner les 5 spécialités qui, à leur avis, allaient être les plus touchées. Résultats : Pour ce qui concerne l'importance perçue des demandes de résidence après le changement de notation, le choix numéro 1 le plus fréquent a été l'épreuve 2 CK. La majorité des doyens (93,5%, n = 43) a eu le sentiment que le changement en Réussite/Échec serait bénéfique pour la formation des étudiants en médecine et leur environnement pédagogique; toutefois, la plupart d'entre eux (68,2%, n = 30) ne croyaient pas que les programmes d'études changeraient. Les étudiants faisant des demandes en dermatologie, neurochirurgie, chirurgie orthopédique, ORL, et chirurgie plastique étaient perçus comme les plus touchés par le changement de notation. Par ailleurs 58,7% des répondants (n = 27) ont estimé que cela n'aborderait pas de manière adéquate la diversité future. Conclusion : La majorité des doyens a le sentiment que le passage à une notation Réussite/Échec de l'Épreuve 1 de l'USMLE serait bénéfique à la formation des étudiants en médecine. Les doyens estiment que les étudiants faisant des demandes pour des spécialités où règne traditionnellement une plus grande concurrence (c.-à-d. les programmes avec un moins grand nombre global de postes de résidents) seront les plus touchés.

Trends of Autologous Free-Flap Breast Reconstruction and Safety during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Autologous free-flap breast reconstruction (ABR) is a valuable surgical option for patients following mastectomy. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a myriad of factors that have affected access to care, hospital logistics, and postoperative outcomes. This study aims to identify differences in patient selection, hospital course and severity, and postoperative outcomes for patients who underwent ABR during and prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Patients undergoing ABR from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2019 to 2020 database were analyzed to compare sociodemographics, hospital course, and outcomes over the first postoperative month. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors predictive of complications based on the operative year. RESULTS: In total, 3,770 breast free flaps were stratified into two groups based on the timing of reconstruction (prepandemic and pandemic groups). Patients with a diagnosis of disseminated cancer were significantly less likely to undergo ABR during the COVID-19 pandemic. On univariate analysis, there were no significant differences in postoperative complications between the two groups. When controlling for potentially confounding sociodemographic and clinical risk factors, the COVID-19 group was significantly more likely to undergo reoperation compared with the prepandemic group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: When comparing outcomes for patients who underwent ABR prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic, we found a significant increase in the odds of reoperation for those who had ABR during the pandemic. Debridement procedures and exploration for postoperative hemorrhage, thrombosis, or infection increased in the prepandemic group compared to the COVID-19 group. Notably, operative times decreased.

Perspectives on the Plastic Surgery Common Application (PSCA): A Survey of 2021-2022 Integrated Plastic Surgery Applicants.

The Plastic Surgery Common Application (PSCA) was introduced as a free and specialty-specific application for plastic surgery applicants in the 2020-2021 cycle. Now in its second year, the PSCA is being piloted by all integrated residency programs with future plans to replace Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) in the 2022-2023 cycle. This study aimed to explore applicant perspectives related to the PSCA and ERAS applications. Methods: An anonymous survey was distributed to integrated plastic surgery residency applicants from the 2021-2022 application cycle. Participants were asked to provide basic demographic information, their perspectives of the PSCA, and overall application preference. Results: One hundred forty (43.1%) applicants completed the survey. Nearly, 63% of applicants responded "slightly well" or "not well at all" regarding their ability to highlight at least one aspect of their application. Forty-one percent of applicants believed ERAS best highlighted the strengths of their application compared with 27% who believed their strengths were better highlighted by the PSCA. Seventy-nine percent reported the cost savings associated with the PSCA were "very" or "extremely important." Overall, 63% of respondents reported a preference to apply with the PSCA alone. Conclusions: This is the first study to provide insight on applicants' perspectives of the PSCA. Although the majority preferred applying with the PSCA, there may be challenges with transitioning to this application solely. Future iterations of the PSCA may aim to ameliorate functionality concerns, optimize application content, and incorporate plastic surgery-specific information that may be important to selection committees.

Outpatient Prosthetic-Based Reconstruction during COVID-19 Pandemic Possible in Selected Patients without Increased Complications.

BACKGROUND: Following the reopening of elective surgery, the authors' division transitioned from inpatient admission to same-day discharge for immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction in an effort to decrease the hospital's clinical burden and minimize potential coronavirus disease of 2019 exposure. This study aims to compare complication rates following this acute transition for patients who had inpatient and outpatient mastectomy with immediate alloplastic reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent mastectomy with immediate prosthetic reconstruction. The outcome of interest was 30-day morbidity. Descriptive statistics were compared for patients with outpatient and inpatient operations. Odds ratios were calculated to determine whether any preoperative factors increased odds of 30-day complications. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients were included in this study. Twenty-six patients had outpatient surgery and 89 stayed inpatient postoperatively. Same-day discharge did not significantly impact the odds of having one or more 30-day complications (OR, 0.275; 95% CI, 0.047 to 1.618; P = 0.153). Patients with complications had significantly longer median operating times [5.0 hours (interquartile range, 4.0 to 6.0 hours) versus 4.0 hours (interquartile range, 3.0 to 5.0 hours; P = 0.05), and there was a statistically significant association between length of surgery and odds of complication (OR, 1.596; 95% CI, 1.039 to 2.451; P = 0.033). Age was independently associated with increased risk of 30-day complication (OR, 1.062; 95% CI, 1.010 to 1.117; P = 0.020). CONCLUSION: The authors' findings support a continuation of same-day discharge strategy, which could decrease costs for patients and hospitals without increasing complications. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Rodent Model for Orthotopic Implantation of Engineered Liver Devices.

This study presents a novel surgical model developed to provide hematological support for implanted cellularized devices augmenting or replacing liver tissue function. Advances in bioengineering provide tools and materials to create living tissue replacements designed to restore that lost to disease, trauma, or congenital deformity. Such substitutes are often assembled and matured in vitro and need an immediate blood supply upon implantation, necessitating the development of supporting protocols. Animal translational models are required for continued development of engineered structures before clinical implementation, with rodent models often playing an essential early role. Our long-term goal has been generation of living tissue to provide liver function, utilizing advances in additive manufacturing technology to create 3D structures with intrinsic micron to millimeter scale channels modeled on natural vasculature. The surgical protocol developed enables testing various design iterations in vivo by anastomosis to the host rat vasculature. Lobation of rodent liver facilitates partial hepatectomy and repurposing the remaining vasculature to support implanted engineered tissue. Removal of the left lateral lobe exposes the underlying hepatic vasculature and can create space for a device. A shunt is created from the left portal vein to the left hepatic vein by cannulating each with separate silicone tubing. The device is then integrated into the shunt by connecting its inflow and outflow ports to the tubing and reestablishing blood flow. Sustained anticoagulation is maintained with an implanted osmotic pump. In our studies, animals were freely mobile after implantation; devices remained patent while maintaining blood flow through their millifluidic channels. This vascular anastomosis model has been greatly refined during the process of performing over 200 implantation procedures. We anticipate that the model described herein will find utility in developing preclinical translational protocols for evaluation of engineered liver tissue. Impact statement Tissue and organ transplantation are often the best clinically effective treatments for a variety of human ailments. However, the availability of suitable donor organs remains a critical problem. Advances in biotechnology hold potential in alleviating shortages, yet further work is required to surgically integrate large engineered tissues to host vasculature. Improved animal models such as the one described are valuable tools to support continued development and evaluation of novel therapies.

Public Confidence for Undergoing Elective Plastic Surgery Procedures during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: The COVID-19 vaccine rollout has since been followed by a gradual resumption of elective surgery. Many individuals remain cautious about visiting a hospital or clinic to undergo surgery. As plastic surgeons are starting to resume elective surgery at this time, it is important to understand the perspectives of potential patients and the concerns they may have. Methods: A survey was distributed to participants in the United States through Amazon's Mechanical Turk (mTurk) during March of 2021. Participants were surveyed regarding their views on the severity of COVID-19, vaccination status, and how much COVID-19 has affected their interest in undergoing surgery. Results: Thirty-nine percent of respondents were either no longer willing or less willing to undergo elective plastic surgery. Seventy-three percent of respondents felt comfortable going to an office for a consultation. With regards to feeling comfortable visiting a hospital, 43.4% reported they would feel safe, 36% felt they would feel safe only if they could be discharged on the same day, and 30.6% reported not feeling safe. Fifty-two percent of respondents reported feeling comfortable undergoing surgery now or within the next year. Respondents who do not think COVID-19 is still a major health issue were more likely to still want plastic surgery. Conclusion: The results of this study highlight that the majority of patients, regardless of vaccination status, currently feel comfortable undergoing elective plastic surgery, particularly in an office setting. Plastic surgeons may expect to see a return in demand for elective procedures in the coming months.

Regenerative medicine: postnatal approaches.

Paper 2 of the paediatric regenerative medicine Series focuses on recent advances in postnatal approaches. New gene, cell, and niche-based technologies and their combinations allow structural and functional reconstitution and simulation of complex postnatal cell, tissue, and organ hierarchies. Organoid and tissue engineering advances provide human disease models and novel treatments for both rare paediatric diseases and common diseases affecting all ages, such as COVID-19. Preclinical studies for gastrointestinal disorders are directed towards oesophageal replacement, short bowel syndrome, enteric neuropathy, biliary atresia, and chronic end-stage liver failure. For respiratory diseases, beside the first human tracheal replacement, more complex tissue engineering represents a promising solution to generate transplantable lungs. Genitourinary tissue replacement and expansion usually involve application of biocompatible scaffolds seeded with patient-derived cells. Gene and cell therapy approaches seem appropriate for rare paediatric diseases of the musculoskeletal system such as spinal muscular dystrophy, whereas congenital diseases of complex organs, such as the heart, continue to challenge new frontiers of regenerative medicine.

Neurotization in Innervated Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Techniques and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Significant improvements in sensory recovery after innervated breast reconstruction have been reported. However, surgical approaches and sensory testing methods have been widely variable. This systematic review aimed to synthesize neurotization techniques and outcomes in breast reconstruction surgery. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of the MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was conducted to identify all studies reporting outcomes of neurotization in innervated breast reconstruction. Data extracted from each study included neurotization techniques, operative times, sensory methods and outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1,350 articles were identified, and 23 articles were included for analysis. Nerve coaptation was performed in 536 breasts and 419 patients, with techniques consisting of direct coaptation (65.1% of flaps), coaptation with nerve conduit (26.3%), and coaptation with nerve allograft (8.6%). The neural component of operating time ranged from 8 to 38 min, and the pooled neurotization success rate among nine studies that reported this outcome was 90.6% (95% CI: 83.6%-96.0%). Overall, innervated breasts achieved earlier and superior sensory recovery that was more uniformly distributed throughout the flap compared to non-innervated breasts. Despite high heterogeneity between studies, all included studies supported neurotized breast reconstruction to improve the rate, quality, and magnitude of sensory recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Neurotization during breast reconstruction may be worth the investment of additional operating time to increase the prospect of high-quality sensory recovery. Further investigation with standardized sensory testing methods and patient-reported outcome tools is needed to definitively support neurotization as a standard of care in breast reconstruction surgery.

Reflections on a Career in Plastic Surgery: A National Survey of Retired Surgeons.

Introduction: Retired plastic surgeons can provide valuable insights for the greater plastic surgery community. The purpose of this study was to gather demographics, personal reflections, and advice for a career in plastic surgery from retired American plastic surgeons. Methods: An email survey was distributed to 825 members of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons during September 2021. The survey distribution was designed to engage members of the plastic surgery community, who were retired from surgical practice in the United States. The form consisted of 29 questions, five of which were free response. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed. Results: A total of 214 completed surveys were received, with a response rate of 25.9%. The average age at retirement was 67.6 years. The majority of respondents were men (87.6%) and White (93.3%); 46.9% of surgeons practiced at individual private practice. Ninety percent of surgeons indicated that they would choose to practice as a plastic surgeon again. Free responses provided positive career reflections and advice for young plastic surgeons regarding navigating the changing landscape of healthcare. Conclusions: Retired plastic surgeons are interested in engaging with the plastic surgery community and demonstrate continued interest in the future of the field. Efforts can be made to avail the field of their expertise and experience.

A national analysis of outpatient mastectomy and breast reconstruction trends from 2013 through 2019.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, patients with breast reconstruction (BR) were hospitalized at least one day postoperatively. However, new trends suggest that outpatient surgery is a viable and safe alternative. This study aims to assess trends among patients with breast cancer who underwent outpatient mastectomy alone, with immediate BR (IBR) or delayed BR (DBR). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the 2013-2019 ACS NSQIP® database was conducted. All women who underwent outpatient mastectomy were included in this study. The cohort was divided as follows: (1) mastectomy without BR, (2) IBR, and (3) DBR. A Cochran-Armitage test and adjusted multivariable logistic regression models were performed to evaluate linear trends over time within groups, and overall and pairwise comparisons between groups across the years, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 84,954 women were included in this study. Overall, 54.9%, 16.2%, and 28.9% underwent mastectomy without BR, IBR, and DBR, respectively. From the BR groups, the majority had implant placement. A significant difference in incidence trends between the three groups was evidenced over time (p<0.001). The greatest increase was evidenced in the IBR group and the lowest in the mastectomy without BR group. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of patients, a significant difference in linear trends was evidenced over time within and between the three groups. Our results suggest that outpatient IBR procedures are increasing in a greater proportion compared to other surgical approaches. Further studies are required to better characterize this population and comprehend the decision-making process toward a surgical procedure within each of the three groups.

Applications of Ultrasound in the Postoperative Period: A Review.

BACKGROUND: Recent advances in ultrasound technology have further increased its potential for routine use by plastic and reconstructive surgeons. METHODS: An extensive literature review was performed to determine the most common applications of ultrasound in the postoperative care of plastic and reconstructive surgery patients. RESULTS: In contrast with other available imaging modalities, ultrasound is cost-effective, rapid to obtain, eliminates the need for ionizing radiation or intravenous contrast, and has virtually no contraindications. In addition to its diagnostic capabilities, ultrasound can also be used to facilitate treatment of common postoperative concerns conveniently at the bedside or in an office setting. CONCLUSION: This article presents a review of the current applications of ultrasound imaging in the postoperative care of plastic and reconstructive surgery patients, including free flap monitoring following microsurgery, diagnosis and treatment of hematoma and seroma, including those associated with BIA-ALCL, and breast implant surveillance.